Triggered!
Tags: sjw
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
189 comments displayed.
#2
-
platinumaltaria (11/13/2015) [-] >be privileged white sjw
>not killing yourself to allow room for more poc's
>not killing yourself to allow room for more poc's
#95 to #76
-
enlightednatzie (11/14/2015) [-] I support this proposal to 100%. platinumaltaria, as i can confidentally say that i represent the whole FJ community, i would gladly see your tits.
#256 to #142
-
naroemcgarson ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-] why would you want tits when you can have boobies
Click to show spoiler
#118 to #115
-
enlightednatzie (11/14/2015) [-] I'll never know if i dont try. Determination is what sent us to space and the moon.
#125 to #118
-
platinumaltaria (11/14/2015) [-] No, applied critical thought and rocket fuel is what sent us to space.
#132 to #125
-
enlightednatzie (11/14/2015) [-] If they simply had gone with your example of giving up instead they would have never succeed with that. I will apply critical thought and rocket fuel (lol) if you show me your titties.
#196 to #138
-
enlightednatzie (11/14/2015) [-] Oh, please ignore my last comment to this comment. I thought you said you had ONE tit in **** , but it appeared that you didnt since i re-read your comment.
*tips fedora*
*tips fedora*
#211 to #210
-
niggastolemyname (11/14/2015) [-] make pictures of your bosoms
unless you have kebab
kek
unless you have kebab
kek
#126 to #120
-
platinumaltaria (11/14/2015) [-] You know I'm yet to see evidence that you have a brain.
#219 to #156
-
arreatface (11/14/2015) [-] what is this why is everyone asking platinum for picture of her tits
is this some new kind of bandwagon I have not heard of ?
is this some new kind of bandwagon I have not heard of ?
#263 to #219
-
twiceasfun (11/14/2015) [-] No, it's not a bandwagon. Mostly It's just that tarabostes and enlightednatzie are retarded. It's not just platinumaltaria, they ask me for pictures of my tits all the time too
#305 to #263
-
enlightednatzie (11/14/2015) [-] Could m'lady please share pictures of her tits to a nice bloke like myself?
#380 to #379
-
twiceasfun (11/14/2015) [-] Nobody on fj gets laid, so if course you masturbate too much
#56 to #2
-
chaosraptor (11/14/2015) [-] for every big fat waste of space SJW that dies, theres space and food enough to provide for 3 decent human beings
#15 to #5
-
historybuff (11/14/2015) [-] Ben Garrison has always been conservative, it's just they made his stuff anti-semitic and pol too
#12
-
zanekin (11/14/2015) [-] I'm just sitting here about to graduate college and watching "7 Deadly Sins" on Netflix. My peers really aren't too bad. Just the squeaky wheel getting the attention as usual.
#51 to #33
-
tehfalconguy (11/14/2015) [-] Don't say anything bad about it though, this site starts looking awfully like said cartoon if you even suggest the notion that not many people are actually like this.
#74
-
letting 
(11/14/2015) [-] On behalf of all of the reasonable liberals out there, I would like to apologize for psychotic people like this. Most of us on the "progressive" side of politics do not behave this way, and most condemn this oversensitive, ridiculous social-justice push by ********* who think they're special.
Social justice warriors and feminazis are to liberals what the Westboro Baptist Church are to conservatives. Under the same roof, but extremists that most don't agree with.
Social justice warriors and feminazis are to liberals what the Westboro Baptist Church are to conservatives. Under the same roof, but extremists that most don't agree with.
#290 to #74
-
kibbleking (11/14/2015) [-] Holy **** , who let you be a mod? You're like twelve, dude.
#82 to #74
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Nah, not really, you all support the same things 99% of the time
Don't believe me?
Affirmative action=both support
Wage gap myth=sjws and mass majority of liberals support
LGBT acceptance and promotion=both support
Pro immigration=both support
Socialism/romanticism of socialism=both support
PC language and behavior=sjws and mass majority of liberals support
Really I can't think of any issue that sjws support that liberals dont support besides maybe fat shaming, but thats such a small part of what is horrible about sjws that it doesn't even matter.
Really sjws are the next evolution of liberalism in america, I wouldn't call them the final form yet because I've learned never to underestimate the stupidity of the left, but it's definitely the next step to perdition.
The Blue dogs are all gone, unless you're some factory worker in michigan carrying on the family tradition of thuggery chances are you're inclined to agree with the mass majority of what sjws support.
Don't believe me?
Affirmative action=both support
Wage gap myth=sjws and mass majority of liberals support
LGBT acceptance and promotion=both support
Pro immigration=both support
Socialism/romanticism of socialism=both support
PC language and behavior=sjws and mass majority of liberals support
Really I can't think of any issue that sjws support that liberals dont support besides maybe fat shaming, but thats such a small part of what is horrible about sjws that it doesn't even matter.
Really sjws are the next evolution of liberalism in america, I wouldn't call them the final form yet because I've learned never to underestimate the stupidity of the left, but it's definitely the next step to perdition.
The Blue dogs are all gone, unless you're some factory worker in michigan carrying on the family tradition of thuggery chances are you're inclined to agree with the mass majority of what sjws support.
#92 to #90
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] oh, there are exceptions to the rule, my argument is shattered
if I call myself a member of the kkk, and I say I approve of interracial marriage, does that mean that the kkk isn't associated with racism?
come back to me when you got meat scrub
if I call myself a member of the kkk, and I say I approve of interracial marriage, does that mean that the kkk isn't associated with racism?
come back to me when you got meat scrub
#97 to #92
-
xxbutthurtxx (11/14/2015) [-] Except "conservatism" and "liberalism" are not an organisation nor institution you ******* moron.
#104 to #97
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] It is an ideology though.
Let me pretend you're not a massive mongoloid for a second.
If I was a marxist, and I said that capitalism is great, does that mean that all marxists think capitalism is great?
Try to find two brain cells to rub together and get back to me when you have the insight of at least a retarded goat.
Let me pretend you're not a massive mongoloid for a second.
If I was a marxist, and I said that capitalism is great, does that mean that all marxists think capitalism is great?
Try to find two brain cells to rub together and get back to me when you have the insight of at least a retarded goat.
#108 to #104
-
xxbutthurtxx (11/14/2015) [-] So you admit it is an ideology, great now google the difference between ideology and organisation.
#111 to #108
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Why? If your whole point was that the kkk is an organization you're stupider than I thought buddy.
#200 to #198
-
xxbutthurtxx (11/14/2015) [-] Try again. What is the difference between an organisation and an ideology?
#203 to #200
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] So your whole point is that an organization isn't an ideology.
Great.
Now what does that have to do with anything, be specific.
Great.
Now what does that have to do with anything, be specific.
#215 to #203
-
meganinja (11/14/2015) [-] Because you seem to be too stupid to get it yourself I'll explain.
Ideology: Something that people believe. Since this is on an individual basis rather than an organized basis, people with similar ideologies will still disagree on certain points.
Organization: A group that people with likeminded ideologies can take membership of. The organization is, well, organized, and as such will have core tenants and ideas. Since it's generally well known what those ideas and tenants are, it's generally safe to assume that anybody in the organization agrees with the majority of them, or they would not have joined.
Being liberal is an ideology, the KKK is an organization. Not everybody who's liberal feels the same way on stances, while most people in the KKK will agree on most things, or they simply wouldn't have joined the group.
Ideology: Something that people believe. Since this is on an individual basis rather than an organized basis, people with similar ideologies will still disagree on certain points.
Organization: A group that people with likeminded ideologies can take membership of. The organization is, well, organized, and as such will have core tenants and ideas. Since it's generally well known what those ideas and tenants are, it's generally safe to assume that anybody in the organization agrees with the majority of them, or they would not have joined.
Being liberal is an ideology, the KKK is an organization. Not everybody who's liberal feels the same way on stances, while most people in the KKK will agree on most things, or they simply wouldn't have joined the group.
#217 to #215
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Wow, I honestly can't believe there are people this stupid on earth sometimes.
I was mocking the implication that because not all liberals support one thing its impossible to assign any characteristic ideology to the word liberal.
The kkk is known as being racist, so my first example was about a hypothetical clan member who describes himself as non racist and that being justification for the kkk as a whole being non racist. The retard above was so stupid that he couldn't see what I was talking about and played a game of semantics over the words organization and ideology.
To compensate I immediately used another example after that since you idiots couldn't look into the deeper meaning of my words.
"If I was a marxist, and I said that capitalism is great, does that mean that all marxists think capitalism is great"
Marxism is an ideology. Most marxists obviously dislike capitalism. But if someone who called themselves a marxist said that capitalism is great, does that mean that I cant say that marxists hate capitalism?
You mongoloids are saying that because some people who describe themselves as liberals may not agree with everything the mass majority of liberals support that I can't apply any characteristics to a liberal.
That being said you're both extremely ******* stupid to continue with this organization vs ideology crap as if it has any basis on this discussion. I mean really, It just goes to show how feeble your minds are. That idiot completely ignored comment 104 where I said it was an ideology and continued with the argument, but for whatever reason hes stuck on this stupidity, I'm guessing because he's a mongo looking for a gotcha moment that isn't there.
You're the same. Hey, how about this, you can't say fascists are nationalist anymore because I know a fascist who isn't a nationalist.
Pants on head,mindbogglingly retarded.
I was mocking the implication that because not all liberals support one thing its impossible to assign any characteristic ideology to the word liberal.
The kkk is known as being racist, so my first example was about a hypothetical clan member who describes himself as non racist and that being justification for the kkk as a whole being non racist. The retard above was so stupid that he couldn't see what I was talking about and played a game of semantics over the words organization and ideology.
To compensate I immediately used another example after that since you idiots couldn't look into the deeper meaning of my words.
"If I was a marxist, and I said that capitalism is great, does that mean that all marxists think capitalism is great"
Marxism is an ideology. Most marxists obviously dislike capitalism. But if someone who called themselves a marxist said that capitalism is great, does that mean that I cant say that marxists hate capitalism?
You mongoloids are saying that because some people who describe themselves as liberals may not agree with everything the mass majority of liberals support that I can't apply any characteristics to a liberal.
That being said you're both extremely ******* stupid to continue with this organization vs ideology crap as if it has any basis on this discussion. I mean really, It just goes to show how feeble your minds are. That idiot completely ignored comment 104 where I said it was an ideology and continued with the argument, but for whatever reason hes stuck on this stupidity, I'm guessing because he's a mongo looking for a gotcha moment that isn't there.
You're the same. Hey, how about this, you can't say fascists are nationalist anymore because I know a fascist who isn't a nationalist.
Pants on head,mindbogglingly retarded.
#223 to #217
-
meganinja (11/14/2015) [-] There's things called 'central beliefs' and then there are 'non central beliefs'.
If you're liberal you're going to think that there needs to be more social freedoms, or that the economy as a whole will benefit more from taxing the working class less and the upper class more. Those are central beliefs. The idea that white men are at fault for the hardships of the minorities and must atone for their sins is NOT a central belief of being liberal, and it's a stance that only a unfortunately growing :/ minority of liberals or "SJWs" support. By your logic all conservatives are racists because some of them are, and since they're of the same ideology, they must all think the same.
I realize that arguing with you is pointless though, since you have the arguing skills of a 12 year old. Try to lay off the ad hominem if you want anybody to take you seriously.
If you're liberal you're going to think that there needs to be more social freedoms, or that the economy as a whole will benefit more from taxing the working class less and the upper class more. Those are central beliefs. The idea that white men are at fault for the hardships of the minorities and must atone for their sins is NOT a central belief of being liberal, and it's a stance that only a unfortunately growing :/ minority of liberals or "SJWs" support. By your logic all conservatives are racists because some of them are, and since they're of the same ideology, they must all think the same.
I realize that arguing with you is pointless though, since you have the arguing skills of a 12 year old. Try to lay off the ad hominem if you want anybody to take you seriously.
#231 to #223
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Sorry, you can't whine about me using ad hom when you start off our convo by calling me stupid. Sensitive people are horrible, but sensitive hypocrites are even worse.
How convenient that you get to decide what "central beliefs" are then. So the liberal commanders have issued a decree on what is a liberal and isn't then? Didn't you just get finished ranting about ideologies aren't concrete or some such ******** ? If you're gonna pick a ****** point you should stick with it.
The truth is this "central belief" crap is just ******** that you pulled out of your ass. You know who decides the "central belief"? The majority. And the majority of liberals support all those points that I put up.
You know whats funny though, out of all the liberals I made buttdamaged on this thread not one, ONE, has been able to giive me a list on the major ideological differences between a liberal and an sjw.
And your conservatism example might have been apt if most conservatives supported objectively racist policies. Google the word objective before you come back.
How convenient that you get to decide what "central beliefs" are then. So the liberal commanders have issued a decree on what is a liberal and isn't then? Didn't you just get finished ranting about ideologies aren't concrete or some such ******** ? If you're gonna pick a ****** point you should stick with it.
The truth is this "central belief" crap is just ******** that you pulled out of your ass. You know who decides the "central belief"? The majority. And the majority of liberals support all those points that I put up.
You know whats funny though, out of all the liberals I made buttdamaged on this thread not one, ONE, has been able to giive me a list on the major ideological differences between a liberal and an sjw.
And your conservatism example might have been apt if most conservatives supported objectively racist policies. Google the word objective before you come back.
#247 to #231
-
meganinja (11/14/2015) [-] I called you stupid, sure, but I didn't dismiss your argument based on that.
It's been explained to you several times what the differences between a liberal and an SJW are, you just choose to ignore what they say, just like you're going to ignore what I'm saying, put up a strawman, beat the strawman, and strut around like you won the argument. I choose to not play the game, I've argued with enough idiots for one week.
It's been explained to you several times what the differences between a liberal and an SJW are, you just choose to ignore what they say, just like you're going to ignore what I'm saying, put up a strawman, beat the strawman, and strut around like you won the argument. I choose to not play the game, I've argued with enough idiots for one week.
#248 to #247
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] And I didn't dismiss your argument either, I just called you retarded. I can call you stupid on top of addressing your argument, one doesn't inhibit the other ******* .
Actually not one person has provided me a difference between them. You must be suffering from typical leftist delusion, stick your fingers in your ears and close your eyes until everything you dont like fades way, huh.
And why am I not surprised you don't know what a strawman is.
You think you have it rough? With all the 12 year old liberal sjw mongos here, including you, I've had my hands full. I guess its true what they say, idiots travel in packs, heh.
Actually not one person has provided me a difference between them. You must be suffering from typical leftist delusion, stick your fingers in your ears and close your eyes until everything you dont like fades way, huh.
And why am I not surprised you don't know what a strawman is.
You think you have it rough? With all the 12 year old liberal sjw mongos here, including you, I've had my hands full. I guess its true what they say, idiots travel in packs, heh.
#249 to #248
-
meganinja (11/14/2015) [-] You've been told over and over that SJWs embody the extreme radicals of liberalism by that one guy you were arguing with until you hit the reply limit. I know anything I say is pointless because you simply ignored what he said, so why would you listen to what I have to say? As I said I'm done with this argument, go be misinformed somewhere else.
#252 to #249
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] And just like him you're unable to tell me anything specific they disagree on.
All you have is some vague reference to radicals and moderates, but none of you can give me anything concrete that separates you from them on an issue by issue basis.
It must be tiring to argue a point you know you can't prove, but as a liberal I know you can't accept reality.
Thats the third time you implied you were gonna leave, the next time you come back bring some substance, your fellow sjws are severely lacking it.
All you have is some vague reference to radicals and moderates, but none of you can give me anything concrete that separates you from them on an issue by issue basis.
It must be tiring to argue a point you know you can't prove, but as a liberal I know you can't accept reality.
Thats the third time you implied you were gonna leave, the next time you come back bring some substance, your fellow sjws are severely lacking it.
#255 to #252
-
meganinja (11/14/2015) [-] "Liberalism doesn't require a revolution per say, especially the groups the right brands as liberals. Social Justice Warrior brand politics does require a complete rework of the existing system. There will have to be a strong figurehead at the top, whereas a liberal movement in the USA for example could function with the legislative branch and only that.
Thirdly, and perhaps the greatest difference, is the application of fascism. The opposition of human nature and ultimate denial of free expression required in a SJW paradise is frowned upon by the modern "liberal" parties as nazi-ish and authoritarian in nature, and would never be supported.
:3
Dude, I dunno who you think liberals are, but if you think they're fans of what SJW's do you're completely incorrect. They take liberal values to extremes that Liberals would never want them to go. Ultimately Liberals seek a society that is more free in social matters (though in some cases less free in terms of personal agency). What SJW's seek is the illogical end of that train of thought. A society where all social norms are completely abolished and personal liberty is completely stripped away.
Equating the two is pretty silly just cause their values stem from the same root. "
Now leave me alone
Thirdly, and perhaps the greatest difference, is the application of fascism. The opposition of human nature and ultimate denial of free expression required in a SJW paradise is frowned upon by the modern "liberal" parties as nazi-ish and authoritarian in nature, and would never be supported.
:3
Dude, I dunno who you think liberals are, but if you think they're fans of what SJW's do you're completely incorrect. They take liberal values to extremes that Liberals would never want them to go. Ultimately Liberals seek a society that is more free in social matters (though in some cases less free in terms of personal agency). What SJW's seek is the illogical end of that train of thought. A society where all social norms are completely abolished and personal liberty is completely stripped away.
Equating the two is pretty silly just cause their values stem from the same root. "
Now leave me alone
"It would be clever if it actually made sense ":3"
SJW's dont require a rework of the existing system, well anymore than liberals do. They also don't need a strong figurehead, in fact they're known for breeding on communal tumblr blogs. Collectivist thinking does not necessarily require a leader. SJWs turn on their figureheads like flies.
SJWs aren't anything close to fascism, authoritarian maybe, but not fascist. And as I said before, if SJWs are fascist liberals can be called fascist for the same reasons.
Thats a nice way of saying you can't find anything specific they disagree on ideologically. Sounds just like another moderate vs radical muslim justification, heh."
Repeating the arguments of other retards doesn't make you less retarded fam.
#202 to #198
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] What online username should I pick to call to retards stupid.
#228 to #202
-
anonismouse (11/14/2015) [-] **anonismouse used "*roll picture*"**
**anonismouse rolled image**
"You're almost as big a faggot as myself lol"
**anonismouse rolled image**
"You're almost as big a faggot as myself lol"
#234 to #228
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] >username
>spaces
if you're gonna cry to me sanderman at least make your tears accurate, ye
>spaces
if you're gonna cry to me sanderman at least make your tears accurate, ye
#197 to #104
-
thesovereigngrave (11/14/2015) [-] And ideology that espouses liberty and equality. There are many different viewpoints one can hold on a variety of issues and still be considered a liberal.
#199 to #197
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Same goes with every ideology, doesn't change the fact the majority define the term.
#357 to #92
-
rockerforlife (11/14/2015) [-] I think I'm losing brain cells reading your comments tbh
#361 to #359
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] The trouble is I haven't showed you.
I suppose I was never meant to be a special ed teacher, I just can't educate retards.
I suppose I was never meant to be a special ed teacher, I just can't educate retards.
#362 to #361
-
rockerforlife (11/14/2015) [-] Part of me wants to be impressed with your insults and then the other part of me is just having flashbacks to 6th grade.
#363 to #362
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Can you really call it a flashback if it was just last week?
#368 to #367
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] >im impressed by your insults
>e..each one is ****
Something tells me i hit a nerve.
Dont feel too bad, I am by far the smartest person on this **** site, and am most likely among the most intelligent people on this earth. It's natural for someone of your capacity to feel intimidated by me. Rest assured though, I am human just like you, though with not as many flaws.
>e..each one is ****
Something tells me i hit a nerve.
Dont feel too bad, I am by far the smartest person on this **** site, and am most likely among the most intelligent people on this earth. It's natural for someone of your capacity to feel intimidated by me. Rest assured though, I am human just like you, though with not as many flaws.
#369 to #368
-
rockerforlife (11/14/2015) [-] learn how to read kid, I said I want to be impressed, but I can't, they suck. Which reminds me... I'm surprised you can read at all tbh.
if you think you're hitting a nerve over the internet... that's... that's actually kind of funny and sad at the same time. Is that your goal? Jesus, kid, get friends, go out.
Oh wait, those last two lines, gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8
if you think you're hitting a nerve over the internet... that's... that's actually kind of funny and sad at the same time. Is that your goal? Jesus, kid, get friends, go out.
Oh wait, those last two lines, gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8
#370 to #369
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] You not being impressed by me reflects poorly on yourself. Monkeys throw **** when they see genius after all.
But you're not a monkey, you're just a very dumb man. You are impressed by me, how could you not be. To you I must be akin to a deity, or an advanced alien of some sort.
I'm sorry I triggered your tiny feelings, man pays no consequence to the ants underneath him. That is what you are to me after all, a tiny insignificant ant.
I should write this little meeting off as charity work when taxes come around, there has to be some category for teaching the mentally handicapped.
But you're not a monkey, you're just a very dumb man. You are impressed by me, how could you not be. To you I must be akin to a deity, or an advanced alien of some sort.
I'm sorry I triggered your tiny feelings, man pays no consequence to the ants underneath him. That is what you are to me after all, a tiny insignificant ant.
I should write this little meeting off as charity work when taxes come around, there has to be some category for teaching the mentally handicapped.
#372 to #370
-
rockerforlife (11/14/2015) [-] I'm not a man I'm pyrofox-kin and don't use "you" my pronouns are xer, xe, xhe, and xhew
#373 to #372
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Yes kevin, those are words as well. Good job. Can you please give your full name and address so the IRS can contact you later for confirmation? Feel free to ask your mother/father/handler for assistance.
#218 to #82
-
mattythebeaver ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-] Affirmative action - classical and neo liberals literally hate it
Wage gap myth - classical and neo liberals don't give a **** about it
LGBT acceptance and promotion - toleration is the key principle in liberalism, not acceptance/promotion
Pro immigration - most ideologies are, it's open door immigration that's the issue
Socialism/romanticism of socialism - classical and neo liberalism are basically on the opposite end of the spectrum
PC language and behaviour - most liberals believe in unrestricted argument and debate
It's the pluralist (maybe sometimes modern) liberals that you need to look out for who take the principle of toleration in liberalism to the extreme.
Most of liberals today i.e. classical and neo, have nothign to do with this SJW crap
Wage gap myth - classical and neo liberals don't give a **** about it
LGBT acceptance and promotion - toleration is the key principle in liberalism, not acceptance/promotion
Pro immigration - most ideologies are, it's open door immigration that's the issue
Socialism/romanticism of socialism - classical and neo liberalism are basically on the opposite end of the spectrum
PC language and behaviour - most liberals believe in unrestricted argument and debate
It's the pluralist (maybe sometimes modern) liberals that you need to look out for who take the principle of toleration in liberalism to the extreme.
Most of liberals today i.e. classical and neo, have nothign to do with this SJW crap
#220 to #218
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] "Classical liberals" don't like it, the progressive and the far left in america hijacked that word a long time ago. American "liberals" are closer to democratic socialism or even outright socialism in some cases.
I think everyone knows who i was addressing when I used the word liberal.
I think everyone knows who i was addressing when I used the word liberal.
#224 to #222
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] The word "liberal" has lost all of its original meaning, hence why you have to categorize yourself as a "classical liberal".
Just call yourself a libertarian, because for the rest of time liberal in america will be associated with modern day progressives, thats just how it is. I don't make the rules.
Just call yourself a libertarian, because for the rest of time liberal in america will be associated with modern day progressives, thats just how it is. I don't make the rules.
#225 to #224
-
mattythebeaver ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-] Well here in the UK different kinds of liberal still barely live on so I'm gonna stick to it as long as they do
#238 to #225
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] From what I understand its still associated with the original meaning in europe so you should be good, I'm just talking about merica.
#322 to #319
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Come now, even you're not stupid enough to believe thats what I'm saying.
Or maybe you are, I have overestimated your intelligence before.
Or maybe you are, I have overestimated your intelligence before.
#325 to #324
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Ah, my mistake then.
I'll have to remember how feeble minded you are in the future.
No more big words for you, just "lol" and "kek".
I'll have to remember how feeble minded you are in the future.
No more big words for you, just "lol" and "kek".
#328 to #327
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] SJW's themselves never say that straights shouldn't have rights, they are vitriolic, yes, but so are liberals. You'll have your exceptions of course, the occasional "death to cis" tumblr blogs, but self proclaimed liberals do the exact same thing. It's worth noting that sjws rarely if ever call themselves sjws, when they do identify their politics they will self identify as liberal or progressive 99% of the time.
Also you're cherrypicking because you can't name any real ideological differences, just like everyone else. The most you plebs can come up with is some half assed desperate moderate vs radical argument that is so stupid it hurts.
If I wanted an echochamber I wouldn't even be educating these illiterate masses like I'm doing dummy, but its worth pointing out that politics is far from the /pol/ circlejerk you fantasize about, its been pretty ****** recently, sort of like what you did to religion with your autism.
Also you're cherrypicking because you can't name any real ideological differences, just like everyone else. The most you plebs can come up with is some half assed desperate moderate vs radical argument that is so stupid it hurts.
If I wanted an echochamber I wouldn't even be educating these illiterate masses like I'm doing dummy, but its worth pointing out that politics is far from the /pol/ circlejerk you fantasize about, its been pretty ****** recently, sort of like what you did to religion with your autism.
#382 to #328
-
Zaxplab (11/15/2015) [-] Sweetie pie, if you want to prove that the moderate and extreme liberals are the exact same thing, it's up to you to do that. You said it's stupid, yes, but you gave no reason why it's stupid.
I'm not going to group together the moderate right with Nazis, because that's silly.
Also the politics board is a pol circlejerk and you never denied it being an echo chamber. Deal with it.
I'm not going to group together the moderate right with Nazis, because that's silly.
Also the politics board is a pol circlejerk and you never denied it being an echo chamber. Deal with it.
#383 to #382
-
youregaylol (11/15/2015) [-] I already did by providing multiple examples of major topics you all agree on. You on the other cannot name one major ideological position that separates liberals from sjws. You're purposely vague because you know you can't.
Your comparison of moderate american right and national socialists to sjws and liberals is laughably retarded, but what can I expect from you.
You're a leftist faggot with a persecution complex who thinks everything thats not tumblr is a /pol/ conspiracy. Deal with it.
I guarantee you that your next reply will not give me any examples of major ideological differences between sjws and liberals. I am outright challenging you to name these specific issues because I know you won't/can't. Because you, just like every other tumblrite here, are wrong and I am right. You can tear up to me all day, but if you can't even name one specific example of how they are different issue wise, you're just another sjw crying because I'm telling the truth.
Sorry, cry about.
Your comparison of moderate american right and national socialists to sjws and liberals is laughably retarded, but what can I expect from you.
You're a leftist faggot with a persecution complex who thinks everything thats not tumblr is a /pol/ conspiracy. Deal with it.
I guarantee you that your next reply will not give me any examples of major ideological differences between sjws and liberals. I am outright challenging you to name these specific issues because I know you won't/can't. Because you, just like every other tumblrite here, are wrong and I am right. You can tear up to me all day, but if you can't even name one specific example of how they are different issue wise, you're just another sjw crying because I'm telling the truth.
Sorry, cry about.
#384 to #383
-
Zaxplab (11/15/2015) [-] SJWs are an extreme liberal group. They don't agree on the issues in the same way.
moderate liberal =/= sjw
Trying to fix the problem with blacks having a high crime rate =/= giving handouts every time someone wants money
encouraging women to negotiate and get more useful degrees =/= thinking that it's legal to pay women less
Thinking that gays should have rights =/= believing in third genders and gender fluidity and ****
Wanting better access for work visas so immigrants dont go into hiding when they expire =/= opening the borders
wanting public healthcare =/= wanting to be the USSR
Being respectful toward others =/= creating laws that forbid you from being disrespectful
moderate liberals don't agree with extreme liberals on most subjects.
moderate liberal =/= sjw
Trying to fix the problem with blacks having a high crime rate =/= giving handouts every time someone wants money
encouraging women to negotiate and get more useful degrees =/= thinking that it's legal to pay women less
Thinking that gays should have rights =/= believing in third genders and gender fluidity and ****
Wanting better access for work visas so immigrants dont go into hiding when they expire =/= opening the borders
wanting public healthcare =/= wanting to be the USSR
Being respectful toward others =/= creating laws that forbid you from being disrespectful
moderate liberals don't agree with extreme liberals on most subjects.
#385 to #384
-
youregaylol (11/15/2015) [-] Trying to fix the problem with blacks having a high crime rate = both prefer entitlement programs, welfare and EBT as well as federal aid for black scholarships and affirmative action programs in both the workforce and education
encouraging women to negotiate and get more useful degrees = most liberals do in fact believe in the wage gap myth, or is it your contention that every democratic frontrunner and many republican candidates are sjws because they believe in the wage gap myth
Thinking that gays should have rights = both supporting gay marriage as well as homosexual "representation" in media and kids shows. Gay rights has nothing to do with gender fluidity, which I'm certain no liberal would be against if not out outright pro "tolerance".
Wanting better access for work visas so immigrants dont go into hiding when they expire = both support amnesty for the illegal immigrants we already have her as well as a quicker process for entry, not even sjws believe in "opening the borders", well at least not anymore than liberals.
wanting public healthcare= both support this and sjws do not claim to want to be the ussr
Being respectful toward others = Is it your contention that every major college administration is run by sjws, because the mass majority of colleges have speech codes that are instituted by progressive liberal leadership.
So I challenge you and FINALLY get one of you idiots to answer me and this is what you come up with? Laughably pathetic. None of these make sense or are based on false assertions. This is just further proof that "sjw" is just a cover for the next evolution of liberals in america. The differences between you two by your examples are so tiny it would be humorous if you weren't so in denial.
Scratch that, its still humorous no matter what.
encouraging women to negotiate and get more useful degrees = most liberals do in fact believe in the wage gap myth, or is it your contention that every democratic frontrunner and many republican candidates are sjws because they believe in the wage gap myth
Thinking that gays should have rights = both supporting gay marriage as well as homosexual "representation" in media and kids shows. Gay rights has nothing to do with gender fluidity, which I'm certain no liberal would be against if not out outright pro "tolerance".
Wanting better access for work visas so immigrants dont go into hiding when they expire = both support amnesty for the illegal immigrants we already have her as well as a quicker process for entry, not even sjws believe in "opening the borders", well at least not anymore than liberals.
wanting public healthcare= both support this and sjws do not claim to want to be the ussr
Being respectful toward others = Is it your contention that every major college administration is run by sjws, because the mass majority of colleges have speech codes that are instituted by progressive liberal leadership.
So I challenge you and FINALLY get one of you idiots to answer me and this is what you come up with? Laughably pathetic. None of these make sense or are based on false assertions. This is just further proof that "sjw" is just a cover for the next evolution of liberals in america. The differences between you two by your examples are so tiny it would be humorous if you weren't so in denial.
Scratch that, its still humorous no matter what.
#387 to #385
-
Zaxplab (11/15/2015) [-] None of that is true, lol. You are talking straight out of your ass right now. Provide some proof for what you're saying.
The original post you replied to had to do with the behavior of each separate group anyway, so you really did just show up where no one wanted you.
If your next reply to me is not proof of what you're saying, I'm done with this thread. Go ahead though, give the last reply. I know you're one of those virgins who can't sleep at night if they don't have the last reply.
The original post you replied to had to do with the behavior of each separate group anyway, so you really did just show up where no one wanted you.
If your next reply to me is not proof of what you're saying, I'm done with this thread. Go ahead though, give the last reply. I know you're one of those virgins who can't sleep at night if they don't have the last reply.
#388 to #387
-
youregaylol (11/15/2015) [-] So liberals don't support entitlement, welfare, ebt, and affirmative action
So liberals don't believe in the wage gap myth even though the leaders of the democratic party publicly support them www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-still-decrying-gender-wage-gap-despite-paying-women-less/article/2561032
So gay rights has something to do with gender fluidity
So liberals and some rinos don't campaign on a Reagan style amnesty for illegals
So your contentention is that sjws literally want the ussr
So college administrators aren't known as being liberal
You just said all of this was true. You are either extremely delusional or clinically retarded to believe any of this, but knowing you both are likely true.
Also I know you're frightened of me but really the whole "if...if you respond that means I WIN" is at least in the top 10 most pathetic things about you, and thats saying something.
So liberals don't believe in the wage gap myth even though the leaders of the democratic party publicly support them www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-still-decrying-gender-wage-gap-despite-paying-women-less/article/2561032
So gay rights has something to do with gender fluidity
So liberals and some rinos don't campaign on a Reagan style amnesty for illegals
So your contentention is that sjws literally want the ussr
So college administrators aren't known as being liberal
You just said all of this was true. You are either extremely delusional or clinically retarded to believe any of this, but knowing you both are likely true.
Also I know you're frightened of me but really the whole "if...if you respond that means I WIN" is at least in the top 10 most pathetic things about you, and thats saying something.
#271 to #264
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Remind me to give you some pixels the next time I educate you kevin.
#273 to #272
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] Are you the king of ****** reaction webms
Use mp4s if you're going to post your low tier may mays, I know you think this is tumblr but at least try.
Use mp4s if you're going to post your low tier may mays, I know you think this is tumblr but at least try.
#277 to #273
-
twiceasfun (11/14/2015) [-] Random chicks laughing at your stupidity are memes now? Neat
#283 to #277
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] To tumblrinas like yourself they're the epitome of comedy.
Let me guess, orange is the new black is your favorite show, kek.
Let me guess, orange is the new black is your favorite show, kek.
#313 to #283
-
enragedonion (11/14/2015) [-] And in this thread we see a man who takes trolling very seriously
#315 to #313
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] The most efficient mechanism for trolling someone will always be telling the truth, because nobody wants to hear it.
#316 to #315
-
enragedonion (11/14/2015) [-] Impressively fast comeback,
Here, have my only green thumb, but not because I agree with you.
Here, have my only green thumb, but not because I agree with you.
#318 to #316
-
youregaylol (11/14/2015) [-] What a shame, if you'd agree with me there would be a chance that you might be intelligent by proxy, after all my intellect is so vast it tends to spread to others around me, save the especially hard headed.
But now it seems like you disagree with me, in which case you're most likely incurably retarded. You have my sympathies.
But now it seems like you disagree with me, in which case you're most likely incurably retarded. You have my sympathies.
#326 to #318
-
enragedonion (11/14/2015) [-] Oh you made me chuckle with that "intelligent by proxy" line. You have my sincerest sympathies too, gaylol.
#259 to #74
-
PenguinsOfMars (11/14/2015) [-] on behalf of all the reasonable conservatives out there, i would like to apologize for our retards as well.
#19 to #16
-
alfonshister (11/14/2015) [-] Ah damn it.
Admin, why is it not working? I can' upload any mp4's!
Admin, why is it not working? I can' upload any mp4's!
#17 to #6
-
totallytito ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-] 30 years from now, I will still look at this amazing openning as a modern classic.
The worst crime of this decade was when they decided to change the openning for the second half of the season.
The worst crime of this decade was when they decided to change the openning for the second half of the season.
#286 to #109
-
dharkmoswen (11/14/2015) [-] Well... there goes her career if the system does it's job for once. Hopefully he did what thee bitches do and called for assault, threatening(dunno what that would be technically), and attempted theft
#258 to #109
-
thesirofponies (11/14/2015) [-] >She's a professor of communications at the school
>Employee of the State of Missouri
>School is public
>School is regulated by the 1st Amendment
>Denies the freedom of speech and freedom of press
If she doesn't get fired for breaking the law of the land
>Employee of the State of Missouri
>School is public
>School is regulated by the 1st Amendment
>Denies the freedom of speech and freedom of press
If she doesn't get fired for breaking the law of the land
#106
-
therealtjthemedic (11/14/2015) [-] I like this, because it shows that libtards are as much a victim of dumbass SJWs as conservitards are.
#107
-
captainprincess ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-] Literally heard one of them say to a university professor
"It's NOT about creating an intellectual space!"
Like
Don't go to ******* university then like how is this difficul
"It's NOT about creating an intellectual space!"
Like
Don't go to ******* university then like how is this difficul
#296
-
zanybruh (11/14/2015) [-] >Implying cons don't the same for their opinions
I don't care what anyone's political opinions are, just don't be retarded about it.
Feel me?
I don't care what anyone's political opinions are, just don't be retarded about it.
Feel me?
#207
-
heretofuckshitup (11/14/2015) [-] middle baby is a female with a feminist rattle and wearing a pearl necklace? i wonder what the artist was implying here? hmmm....
#24
-
amagicalwhimsy (11/14/2015) [-] The easiest way to push this more to the fore and get the public questioning strongly is so convince the SWJ to burn books publicly, specifically intellectual and loved books, say Origin of the Species..
#320 to #24
-
doctorprofessornv (11/14/2015) [-] That... might actually be crazy enough to potato.
Somebody call 4chan, we got a mission to complete.
Somebody call 4chan, we got a mission to complete.
#269
-
Nekatroz (11/14/2015) [-] Is an excelent moment for radical leftists to rise and round up both petit-bourgois SJW and right wing reactionaries.
#344 to #269
-
feelythefeel (11/14/2015) [-] Overarching goal of modern Communism: To overthrow the bourgeoisie.
Overarching goal of modern Fascism: To overthrow the internationalist clique.
Due to this overwhelming consensus, we are both obliged to hate the everloving **** out of each other.
Overarching goal of modern Fascism: To overthrow the internationalist clique.
Due to this overwhelming consensus, we are both obliged to hate the everloving **** out of each other.
#312 to #289
-
ilikepatatas ONLINE (11/14/2015) [-]
that pic is edited upon ignorance
it really IS good in theory
it just that it'll get corrupted everytime because that's how humans work
so its good...but only in theory
it'll be never good outside of theory
also capitalism is the closest you can get to a dictatorship without actually being one so don't worship that **** either
classical democracy is the least ************* thing we have now
it really IS good in theory
it just that it'll get corrupted everytime because that's how humans work
so its good...but only in theory
it'll be never good outside of theory
also capitalism is the closest you can get to a dictatorship without actually being one so don't worship that **** either
classical democracy is the least ************* thing we have now
#377 to #312
-
Nekatroz (11/14/2015) [-] >evolutionary psychology says we are self-intested, and because of that, we are altruistic.
>Positive psychology says that profit isnt the only incentive to do stuff.
>Cybernetis emphasize the need for descentralization to achieve the flux of data, state control and capitalist control work on centralization.
>Ostrom's economical work proves the possibility of efficient communal ownership, showing that "The Tragedy of The Commons" is the exception, rather than the rule.
Wanna go further?
>Positive psychology says that profit isnt the only incentive to do stuff.
>Cybernetis emphasize the need for descentralization to achieve the flux of data, state control and capitalist control work on centralization.
>Ostrom's economical work proves the possibility of efficient communal ownership, showing that "The Tragedy of The Commons" is the exception, rather than the rule.
Wanna go further?
