Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(43):

waratworld has disabled anonymous comments.
Refresh Comments Show GIFs
43 comments displayed.
User avatar #1 - lupusluzulu (01/10/2016) [-]
Has the Hind's nose gun instead of the Warthog's gatling. 0/10
#6 to #1 - sirpoopcloud (01/11/2016) [-]
can you imagine though a turret mounted brrrrt? that pretty much putting a phalanx ciws on a aircraft, truly a weapon to surpass metal gear.
-1
#27 to #6 - willindor has deleted their comment [-]
#38 to #27 - spacehawk (20 hours ago) [-]
No, he doesn't. That is a Phalanx alright
<-- This is the Goalkeeper CIWS.
Honestly how do you even get those two mixed up? The Phalanx has a huge ass white cylindrical radome hat on it ffs
User avatar #41 to #38 - willindor ONLINE (19 hours ago) [-]
Sorry that I misread his comment, I thought he was talking about a system that uses the GAU 8, which is the goalkeeper, not that his image was of a goalkeeper
User avatar #43 to #41 - sirpoopcloud (16 hours ago) [-]
You may be right in that the goalkeeper would have been a better choice being that it fires 30mm shells over the phalanx's 20mm shells along with keeping the original gun of the A-10. However, as long as it make a satisfying brrrrt sound I don't much care which gets mounted on my A-10 ThunderHind
#26 to #1 - triggerhappywolf (01/11/2016) [-]
It does need the gun to be proper but it would still be a pain to shoot down.
#3 to #1 - kewolsky (01/10/2016) [-]
I was about to point out the lack of BRRRT aswel...
#5 to #1 - strigt (01/10/2016) [-]
To be fair, the GAU-8/A is the central piece to the A-10; The airplane is built around the gun. You don't strap such a great BRRRT to just any aircraft, you have to strap the right aircraft to such a great BRRT.
#14 - theuberzer (01/11/2016) [-]
&gt;Using the A-10's fuselage without the GAU-8/a   
How can you be that 			*******		 retarded?
>Using the A-10's fuselage without the GAU-8/a
How can you be that ******* retarded?
#12 - ayyylien (01/11/2016) [-]
choosing the best aircraft is like choosing the best waifu, there are those who like the f-22 and there are those who have bad taste inb4 no gau-8 inb4 the pieces don't fit together inb4 now just a show bird inb4 pak-fa is better inb4 maybe it's not the best waifu
User avatar #22 to #12 - brokentrucker ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-]
Here's an idea....

Take the f-22...A-10...and that thing that I always forget the name of....and mash em together.

Seriously, though. The 22 is the sexiest jet. P-38 sexiest prop.
User avatar #30 to #22 - theincorrigibleone (23 hours ago) [-]
P-61 is prettier imo than the P-38
User avatar #33 to #30 - brokentrucker ONLINE (20 hours ago) [-]
You mean the thing that's basically just a buff P-38?
User avatar #40 to #33 - theincorrigibleone (20 hours ago) [-]
Yeh, but that black for it's night runs is ****** sweet
#29 to #12 - friedgreenpomatoes ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
my friend when we're talking planefus accept no substitutes

glorious space dolphin master race
#42 to #29 - ayyylien (18 hours ago) [-]
GIF
>not liking the falken
yeah i know it's a drone but the cockpit is so cool
User avatar #13 to #12 - luciafoxx (01/11/2016) [-]
yay for the aeromorphs!
User avatar #15 to #12 - ZipGhost (01/11/2016) [-]
"there are those who like the f-22"
I uh... just read this.
www.wired.com/2013/02/stealth-pilots-coughing/
I was in the AF for six years and all i can say is the pilots hated it after a week.
User avatar #16 to #15 - banteringcat (01/11/2016) [-]
The f-22 was an impressive aircraft. But a piece of **** .

The f-35 is an engineering marvel. But a piece of **** .

F-15's are where it's at right?
User avatar #31 to #16 - battletechmech (21 hours ago) [-]
F-22 and F-35 get their hate from armchair generals, they were made in accordance with what congress wanted, and fufill the role they were asked to fill. The F-22 is an air superiority fighter with 5th generation technology, the F-35 is a versatile multi-role aircraft that understandably has a lot of compromises to be a jack of all trades.
User avatar #17 to #16 - ZipGhost (01/11/2016) [-]
History of the F-15
www.ausairpower.net/Profile-F-15A-D.html
Yeah it pretty much is considered the best combat fighter ever built. I also recall an Israeli F-15 loosing a wing and yet it was still able to land.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=M359poNjvVA
I do believe it's great due to the specific role it was built for. Unlike the F-22, and F-35 that were built for Multi Role. The F-15 was a true Fighter air frame that was later adapted for Multi Role.
User avatar #20 to #17 - datassman (01/11/2016) [-]
And it still ****** **** up as a multirole, the E is an amazing aircraft. I'm looking to take an officer's commission after I finish my degree, and hopefully I'll do well enough to fly 15's
User avatar #21 to #20 - ZipGhost (01/11/2016) [-]
Well this PDF is chocked full of info on the aptitude test
www.usarec.army.mil/hq/warrant/download/MilitaryFlight.pdf
Good luck in your endeavor and don't give up, because that is the only way you can actually fail a Military test.
User avatar #18 to #15 - ayyylien (01/11/2016) [-]
i was actually gunna mention that but if i listed everything wrong with the raptor i'd fall asleep. still a sexy bird though
User avatar #19 to #18 - ZipGhost (01/11/2016) [-]
**** yeah it's a great bird, to can tear any unlucky mother ****** out of the sky with that machine. Just pointing out the pilots who fly it are miserable.
#7 - thalene (01/11/2016) [-]
User avatar #4 - thedecodedgamer (01/10/2016) [-]
The A-10 was actually made to house it's BRRRRRRRRRRT machine
User avatar #23 - brokentrucker ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-]
Love the guy leaning out the side. Like "Yo, is that Tom? Hey Tom! **** yourself!"
#24 - improbablyyourdad (01/11/2016) [-]
Someone build this **** in space engineers so I can fly it, damn it.
User avatar #11 - roflstorm (01/11/2016) [-]
ALL OF THE YES
#2 - solidderking (01/10/2016) [-]
this is the greatest invention since the invention of the Sturmtiger
#25 to #2 - skumbaner ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-]
It's a shame that the usage and development of humans as projectiles did not progress very far after the end of WW2


#35 to #25 - solidderking (20 hours ago) [-]
humans need quite some time to grow, maybe thats why.....
the germans should have used Pickelhauben while being shot, that would have been lethal as **** ..... i know that pickelhauben were ww1, while the sturmtiger was ww2

pic related, its my great uncle Wilhelm minutes before she was fired at Fortress verun.....

#37 to #35 - skumbaner ONLINE (20 hours ago) [-]
I've read that the cost of human lives in the form of collateral damage when using human projectiles just was not worth it, when in comparison to the newly developed atom bomb that had relatively little, even when considering fallout.

a shame, really
#39 to #37 - solidderking (20 hours ago) [-]
shooting humans was never about the damage, we yes, i am german shot our brothers to show the enemy how serious we are dead serious to be exact

too bad all our human launch wunderwaffen were transformed into playground/pool devices/toys
User avatar #9 - pocketstooheavy (01/11/2016) [-]
>Removing the BRRRRT

"The Single Worst Aircraft Imagined" FTFY
#36 - petresko (20 hours ago) [-]
What have you done? ...
#34 - kuchikirukia (20 hours ago) [-]
You're missing something
User avatar #32 - captfuckhead (21 hours ago) [-]
you say greatest aircraft, I see the engines and tail off of an A-10. I'm expecting 3 BRRRRRRRRRRT minimum. You give me none.

Go to your room and think about what you've done.
#28 - widar (23 hours ago) [-]
So it's got the fuselage of an Mi-24D, wings, tail and engines of an A-10 with Russian S-8 rocket pods as well as a bomb I can't identify attached to the hardpoints. Seems pretty cool
User avatar #10 - mortolife (01/11/2016) [-]
Ignoring the lack of BRRRRRRRT on it, I kinda like the way it looks.
 

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)