Somebody I was talking to ages ago painted the picture and it said something else so we changed it to say 'To Victory!' for reasons Here's another version. As far as I know, until now I was the only one with these pictures
About what? Lots of things are backed with history/evidence, look at the game BOY for example. They could have named it as like game pocket or something that resembled portable gaming, but they chose boy. Marketing probably did lead to the influence of people understanding boys as gamers, but when I look at my social groups it's actually the women that are gaming. (Not ps4/360 but phone gaming etc.) My mom's tried starting my dad on Anipang, it's like a Korean version of Candy Crush, all of my aunts play it but the males of their generation don't find their appeal. I think it's pretty backed up.
Well yeah, but mobile games don't really count as "video games", they're a category of their own. That kind of "games are games" thinking is what led to the Video Game Crash of 1983.
This is something I agree with, but it doesn't really seem right that "a woman" is their expert, rather than someone who studies the subject, like a gynocologist.Also, I didn't notice them mention the actual function of the hymen in that video, although I am very sleepy.
Although it's episode on death was idiotic, ignored many points, and drew connections, like a man drinking mercury, to modern science. Was a stupid episode.
She can sing wild animals into doing house chores. That's an super power and a pretty awesome one.
He is super rich. So he has Batman's superpower.
It checks out.
Lannisters are still rich. They just no longer have gold mines. They are now landowners and moneylenders.
Just the Crown owes House Lannister over 3 million gold.
another three million to the Bravos, plus smaller amounts to several other banks, plus what crown borrowed from house Tyrell.
In the book they also owned two million to the Church, but Cersei bargained it away to allow church to have military. Another brilliant Cersei move.
At the beginning of the first book, Crown was six million in debt. By time Cersei made deal with the church she managed to drop the debt from nine to seven million.
And while members of the House Lannister are in control of the Crown, finances are very carefully kept separate. Tyrion asked Tywin if he is willing to forgive the Crown debt and Tywin just snorted at him.
That last part is because I'm assuming the Crown is funded by taxes paid by everyone in Westeros, while the individual kingdoms are funded by local taxes and the wealth of the lands (i.e. crops, gold mines, etc) owned by the nobles. Were you being serious when you said Cersei was brilliant? Because it sounds sarcastic, but I can't be sure. She's possibly the dumbest person with any influence in Westeros, except for Mace Tyrell.
Anyway, House Lannister's finances are not in the condition they used to be, and with Tywin dead, Tyrion gone, and Jaime abandoning Cersei , they're likely to get even worse. All of it's kind of a moot point though, because Tyrion is absolutely not rich hell, in the books he's a slave who joined a mercenary company.
Crown is mainly financed through crown lands and trade tariffs. There are some taxes coming from other kingdoms, but great houses don't pay tax, they, instead, have to maintain an army and serve as military for the Crown. (Westros is High Feudal system). Taxes from other kingdoms mostly come from cities, which pay tax directly to the crown.
I was being very sarcastic. Church militant is a horrible idea for a medieval ruler. Just look at how many years of war took Poland to get rid of Teutons. She also said to bank of Bravos she won't be payign them and she got child of her only ally arrested. She is an idiot.
Lannisters as a house are still pretty strong. For a while Tywin's brother became a head of the house. But yes, they are not what they used to be. None of the houses still is. (with, possibly, exception of the Dorne)
Tyrion isn't rich in current moment in the books, but he will soon be serving the Targaryens. We will see how it goes. But for the vast majority of the story he is incredibly rich.
Hey guys. Don't know why I'm coming to FJ for advice but I really don't know where else to go.
Last night during a movie I did some sexy stuff with a girl. First I put my arm around her, but she said she had a boyfriend so I backed off. However, I thought she was just saying this because my moves weren't very smooth I am a funny junker after all so I kept making advances. Eventually I ended up fondling her tits giggity WITH her consent and then the movie ended. She said I couldn't home with her so I went back to my place. Basically I found out that she actually does have a bf that she lives with.
Tf am I supposed to do? I really like, REALLY like this girl and I haven't gotten any action in about a year so I really want to keep going for her. But I feel bad because she's in a relationship. Wat do?
you came to the wrong place for moral advice pal but this Old man Funny junker here will give you some advice don't be a home wrecker and bros before hoes this girl is obviously not worth a long lasting relationship if she was willing to let you fool around with her and if you just want to bang her is that not unfair to her BF would you like it if some one ****** your GF i would be a true bro and tell her BF what she did but in this day and age she would probably say you forced your hands on her tits and you would be in jail for rape with the added bonus of her BF beating the living **** out of you so what i would really do is stop contacting her completely shut her down and let her come crawling to you tell her you are not interested in used meat wait for her to break it off then **** her and dump her
**** buddies but nothing serious. Cheaters tend not to change. If she's cheating with you she'll cheat with the next guy too. Enjoy her for now and leave it at that.
Basically what the other guy said, if she cheats on her boyfriend with you, then she will do it again with her next partner. If, however, you decide that after you fool around that you didnt actually like her and just wanted to get into her pants, then you are a horrible douchebag that caused her to cheat and ruin their relationship.
I think she might just want a FWB though. And if I were in a relationship with her I'd always be worried about her cheating on me since she was willing to do it initially. I'm not saying getting in a relationship with her would be impossible, but I don't think it's likely. Think I should just try banging her once or twice?
I say don't, unless you are completely satisfied with ruining the relationship, and possibly lives for 2 people for a while. Plus you will essentially become one of the biggest douchebags around.
i became a home wrecker and i regret it everyday. it ruins your sex drive. in my case we did the dirty and she left in the morning almost without a word. we never became a couple and we used to be good friends. i met her boyfriend at a bar and he knew, the guilt was killing me when it turned out he was a better person than what i expected, (he even bought me a beer!). i heave trouble becoming friends with girls that are in relationships because i am afraid i'l partially ruin their life. every-time i have sex, its even harder to stay in the moment because sex is the reason behind my guilt. LEAVE HER ALONE. is my only advice for your benefit. it only leaves you guilty and your moral bar lower.
Don't pursue a relationship. If it's that easy for her to let you cop a feel while she's with a partner, that could lead to anything, and she'd have no trouble letting someone else do it if she were with you. Just drop it and forget about her. Up to you if you want to risk having a **** buddy, but I don't advise it. Just play it safe, if you want a relationship it'll come along eventually.
Imagine what you´d want the guy to do if she was your girlfriend and the guy was you. Then do exactly that. But be honest with yourself. Cheating is a ************* thing to do, keep that in mind.