Sometimes wishes do come true
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
121 comments displayed.
#157 to #5
-
thebritishguy (11/07/2015) [-] "from the Department of Psychology at the University of Essex" That explains it
#83 to #5
-
elcreepo (11/07/2015) [-] This study is **** for all the reasons outlined in >82.
And I find adult vaginas disgusting. They're like a slab of roast beef and have nasty wirey hair and smell funny after just a few hours past showering....
If you have a vagina, I just can't understand why you'd want someone else's.
And I find adult vaginas disgusting. They're like a slab of roast beef and have nasty wirey hair and smell funny after just a few hours past showering....
If you have a vagina, I just can't understand why you'd want someone else's.
#138 to #137
-
danniegurl (11/07/2015) [-] I mean not all of them. Besides, some women just don't naturally have a lot of folds. Either way, they're still adults.
#140 to #138
-
elcreepo (11/07/2015) [-] Yeah but most women's vaginas still turn a gross darker fleshy color after awhile and as you get older it DOES sag, so...
Plus most women DO have folds.
I just don't find vaginas attractive, at all. I prefer penises, and there's not even a hint of bicurious in me.
So in addition to that study being **** for all the reasons other people have already said, there's a lot of girls like me who just aren't into other girls and can't comprehend why anyone even would be.
That said, it's fine to be a lesbian and all, people can be attracted to things other people aren't, just that to a straight person being gay just isn't something they can ever understand.
Plus most women DO have folds.
I just don't find vaginas attractive, at all. I prefer penises, and there's not even a hint of bicurious in me.
So in addition to that study being **** for all the reasons other people have already said, there's a lot of girls like me who just aren't into other girls and can't comprehend why anyone even would be.
That said, it's fine to be a lesbian and all, people can be attracted to things other people aren't, just that to a straight person being gay just isn't something they can ever understand.
#143 to #140
-
danniegurl (11/07/2015) [-] I mean I'm not attracted to vaginas, but I wouldn't consider them gross. I just think genitalia in general look odd.
I didn't realize you were also a woman, I don't think the study is correct, but I'm not revolted by women's genitalia either.
I didn't realize you were also a woman, I don't think the study is correct, but I'm not revolted by women's genitalia either.
#109 to #83
-
womanexplain (11/07/2015) [-] Adult?
Also if your vagina smells bad only a few hours after showering that's probably because you're sick or you're not washing it properly
Lilies are beautiful
Also if your vagina smells bad only a few hours after showering that's probably because you're sick or you're not washing it properly
Lilies are beautiful
#139 to #136
-
danniegurl (11/07/2015) [-] You know that smell is completely normal, and has been shown to increase arousal in heterosexual men. It's full of pheromones.
#156 to #141
-
womanexplain (11/07/2015) [-] If you find vaginas disgusting, that must have an effect on your own sex life.
You seem very eager to prove your heterosexuality, yet even if you are a heterosexual to not find your own genitalia appealing in any sense much be damaging to you.
If you persist to have this deep hatred of your own front butt, I suggest you visit a sex therapist, or a gynaecologist depending on the smell you're noticing
You seem very eager to prove your heterosexuality, yet even if you are a heterosexual to not find your own genitalia appealing in any sense much be damaging to you.
If you persist to have this deep hatred of your own front butt, I suggest you visit a sex therapist, or a gynaecologist depending on the smell you're noticing
#161 to #156
-
elcreepo (11/08/2015) [-] It doesn't. I have a male fiancee and I'm very happy. And sure I can get off to some freaky ass porn but I would never put my mouth on another girl's cunt.
I don't need therapy because I'm not attracted to vaginas and don't see them as beautiful. Why should I? That's like saying your asshole is beautiful.
It's a body part that looks ugly. My finding it ugly does not in any way impact my self esteem, so please take your feminist psychology elsewhere.
I don't need therapy because I'm not attracted to vaginas and don't see them as beautiful. Why should I? That's like saying your asshole is beautiful.
It's a body part that looks ugly. My finding it ugly does not in any way impact my self esteem, so please take your feminist psychology elsewhere.
#163 to #161
-
womanexplain (11/08/2015) [-] 'Feminist psychology'
SHE CALLED ME A FEMINIST LOOL NOOOOOOOOOO
DONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
BYEEE
SHE CALLED ME A FEMINIST LOOL NOOOOOOOOOO
DONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
BYEEE
#24 to #5
-
anon (11/06/2015) [-]
Nope, I can say with 100% certainly that I am 100% straight.
My ex was always trying to convince me I was a lesbo as well, or at least bi, but the thought of fiddling with another woman is repulsive.
Women get aroused at the sight of women in things like porn because we imagine that that stuff is happening to us. We are the ones being ****** by 10 horny black dudes, we don't look at the woman and get turned on by her tits or her noises or any of that **** . She is just there as the object to be ****** so I can imagine I am the one in her position.
My ex was always trying to convince me I was a lesbo as well, or at least bi, but the thought of fiddling with another woman is repulsive.
Women get aroused at the sight of women in things like porn because we imagine that that stuff is happening to us. We are the ones being ****** by 10 horny black dudes, we don't look at the woman and get turned on by her tits or her noises or any of that **** . She is just there as the object to be ****** so I can imagine I am the one in her position.
#34 to #24
-
mayoroftownsville (11/06/2015) [-]
It wasn't porn with 10 black dudes though, it was porn with just women. Learn to read, dumbass.
#35 to #24
-
ninjapizza (11/06/2015) [-] "Nope, I can say with 100% certainly that I am 100% straight. "
The autism... the anon... the FJ...
I am 100% CERTAINLY you are a faggot
The autism... the anon... the FJ...
I am 100% CERTAINLY you are a faggot
#37 to #35
-
tittystargalactica (11/07/2015) [-] Being straight is now considered being mentally handicapped?
Damn, I learn new things every day here!
Damn, I learn new things every day here!
#59 to #37
-
talpss (11/07/2015) [-] Don't worry, you can disregard the majority of anything said on this website because most of the people on this website are complete morons that call anything they don't understand autistic, faggotry, or just stupid, regardless of what their political leanings or personal beliefs are. The only reason I come on this website is to converse with the reasonable minority.
#111 to #59
-
ninjapizza (11/07/2015) [-] Woah calm your tits
everyone on FJ is a massive faggot
some people obviously can't handle a joke
i even tailored it to funnyjunk's part of the autism spectrum
faggot
everyone on FJ is a massive faggot
some people obviously can't handle a joke
i even tailored it to funnyjunk's part of the autism spectrum
faggot
#164 to #37
-
ninjapizza (11/12/2015) [-] A bit late on the reply, but the 'autism' I was referring to was them say certainly instead of certainty. Tried to make it obvious with the caps Certainly, but I guess not everyone got that..
#45 to #35
-
adrixtheslayer (11/07/2015) [-] **adrixtheslayer used "*roll picture*"**
**adrixtheslayer rolled image**Seeing something this dumb makes me check if they are massive trolls or just retarded.
Turns out it was the latter
**adrixtheslayer rolled image**Seeing something this dumb makes me check if they are massive trolls or just retarded.
Turns out it was the latter
#44 to #35
-
minecraftoutrage ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] That was actually well said, srry for FJ giving you a hard time m8
#108 to #44
-
ninjapizza (11/07/2015) [-] Eh I don't care. If everyone's getting butthurt from it, then they need to remember where they are. Everyone's a faggot on here, it's always been the ultimate truth.
#6 to #5
-
zerocalibre (11/06/2015) [-] Yeah, but women also experience genital arousal when looking at animals having sex too. Women are significantly less visual than men and rely on other queues. Males experience genital arousal when looking at a hard cock in the proximity of women, but not all guys want to have sex with other men.
#16 to #6
-
travishein (11/06/2015) [-] Arousal and sexual orientation aren't even on the same plane. I watch a guy jerking off, I might get aroused because somewhere in my primitive brain a connection is made that associates masturbation with orgasm which elicits a response that causes arousal. That means I was aroused by visual sexual stimulus. If I want to take that guy home to meet my mother and suck his dick later on in our apartment, that makes me gay (or "not straight"). We all get aroused at the sight of naked people because our brain automatically makes the exposed genitalia=sexy times connection. But I'm straight, because I have no desire to date, marry or **** a dude.
#134 to #16
-
alphagex (11/07/2015) [-] There is a scientific explanation about this and how it says you are a bit bi.But i don't know the fancy words like you but i know there is.Also the funniest thing is you could have CHOOSE to watch a NAKED WOMEN yet you choose a GUY.So much for your fancy explanation. in conclusion you a homo in closet.
#8 to #7
-
zerocalibre (11/06/2015) [-] 
Read up on it. Majority of men are turned on by the site of a penis. Why? Well, the video might help.
#11 to #10
-
zerocalibre (11/06/2015) [-] Well, if they're only interested in the penis and aren't attracted to any other masculine features. e.g. deep voice, broad shoulders, tight abs, then they probably are not gay. They might have some very light bisexual tendencies, but certainly not gay. That would be like saying a woman is a full out lesbian just because she's slightly aroused by her friend.
Arousal can be more primitive, which is what that study indicates, but orientation is more complex and has a variety of factors. What I'm saying is that you can't consider all women bisexual because they get aroused by images of other women because a majority of males also are aroused by the penis subconsciously.
In either case though women again are not nearly as visual as men are so measuring their visual response to stimulation is trying to treat their sexuality like mens and it doesn't quite work that way. As a whole, women are much less visual than men and become aroused by other factors.
Arousal can be more primitive, which is what that study indicates, but orientation is more complex and has a variety of factors. What I'm saying is that you can't consider all women bisexual because they get aroused by images of other women because a majority of males also are aroused by the penis subconsciously.
In either case though women again are not nearly as visual as men are so measuring their visual response to stimulation is trying to treat their sexuality like mens and it doesn't quite work that way. As a whole, women are much less visual than men and become aroused by other factors.
#13 to #12
-
zerocalibre (11/06/2015) [-] Um? I'm bisexual and not male...and no that doesn't mean anything. >.<
#70 to #8
-
ubercron (11/07/2015) [-]
Makes sense though. When I look at porn a guy that isn't hard is a turn off. I wanna see the dude **** her hard and hear her moans. Guy that can't get hard is ******* turn off cause she ain't having fun. In the end you think that it is your cock she is sucking/ ******* . Or you a cuck and like to watch muhahahaha. Mind you I pretty much only watch vaginal intercourse. Anal and lesbians just don't do the **** . Pisses me off when they hot girls and they are lesbians.
#9 to #7
-
zerocalibre (11/06/2015) [-] Also, "shemale" porn is one of the highest viewed categories for men, much like how lesbian is one of the highest viewed categories for women. But it's misleading since a lot of women don't look at porn anyway...so more visual people are probably going to be a bit more lesbian.
#82 to #5
-
ellojello (11/07/2015) [-]
This study tracked vaginal stimulation (by blood flow), which is proven to be not a good indicator of sexual arousal. The female "equivalent" of the penis, and what you SHOULD be looking at to determine arousal, is actually the clitoris. Further, the actual data has not been released (to my knowledge) to the public since the paper has not undergone proper peer review to be approved. For all we know, the "arousal" was only a 1% deviation from the norm, or some stupid **** like that (in other words confusing natural variance that occurs with time with arousal at a certain time). I can't say that for certain since there is no data released yet, but that's still the point, there is no data released yet. You can't claim anything; all these articals about this are horrendously preemptive and just looking for anything that supports the increasingly LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ1234%@?WTF biased/supporting agenda.
>tl;dr - This study is bad and you should feel bad.
>in b4 "it was a joke" - I don't care, someone somewhere will read this article and draw conclusions because their an idiot, hopefully this will stop them.
>tl;dr - This study is bad and you should feel bad.
>in b4 "it was a joke" - I don't care, someone somewhere will read this article and draw conclusions because their an idiot, hopefully this will stop them.
#48 to #5
-
mintea (11/07/2015) [-] >It found 82 per cent of the women tested were aroused by both sexes,
>Of the women who identified as straight, 74 per cent were strongly sexual aroused by videos of both attractive men and attractive women.
>When it comes to what turns them on, they are either bisexual or gay, but never straight
>Never straight
this don't add up man
>Of the women who identified as straight, 74 per cent were strongly sexual aroused by videos of both attractive men and attractive women.
>When it comes to what turns them on, they are either bisexual or gay, but never straight
>Never straight
this don't add up man
#155 to #152
-
womanexplain (11/07/2015) [-] www.critical-theory.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/jeremy-bentham.jpg
They kinda look similar, and I wouldn't know what any of the founding fathers look like... I'm not American and I've never studied American history >:C
They kinda look similar, and I wouldn't know what any of the founding fathers look like... I'm not American and I've never studied American history >:C
#25 to #1
-
trollmobile ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] do you just like, close your eyes and mash buttons untill the explanation is gone, every time this is exaplained?
#102 to #47
-
trollmobile ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] ah yes, we should never take content from tumblr.
roight
so, basically what you want is for 60% of FJ's content to just dissapear.
roight
so, basically what you want is for 60% of FJ's content to just dissapear.
#117 to #102
-
keltainenlumi (11/07/2015) [-] It's annoying to look at. So I would mind if they went away.
#121 to #117
-
trollmobile ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] well you did just make a self-contradictory statement.
#125 to #117
-
trollmobile ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] also, i'm fairly sure that if we stopped taking content from tumblr, we'd have a LOT less content
and less content=less traffic
less traffic=no FJ
and less content=less traffic
less traffic=no FJ
#126 to #125
-
keltainenlumi (11/07/2015) [-] Nice. I might actually do something productive for a change.
#53 to #43
-
SilverHammer (11/07/2015) [-] I think she was going for the cheek kiss thing, but so was Jen, therefore mistake-kiss-event.
#74 to #43
-
chickenfriednegro (11/07/2015) [-] It genuinely feels staged for me. I mean she licked her lips and puckered them...
Don't get me wrong, I still enjoyed it. But it feels like a publicity stunt.
Don't get me wrong, I still enjoyed it. But it feels like a publicity stunt.
#101
-
aadenoto ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] This is just like in the hunger games where she faked a relationship with peeta for the media
#80
-
harrykuntz (11/07/2015) [-] I don't know who these too are, but the one on the right, I'd suck a fart out of her ass
#71
-
virck (11/07/2015) [-]
I feel in about 20 years, you'll need to be lesbian and a feminist to be popular.
#90 to #79
-
harrykuntz (11/07/2015) [-] Seriously, who is this? I need to know for unhealthy fantasies leading to psychosis science
#93 to #91
-
harrykuntz (11/07/2015) [-] Googled the name, never would have pictured her as Margaery Tyrell or Irene Adler but definitely going to watch her scenes as them both now. Thanks whales, be back in a week, two if there are nudes
#94
-
qtrfuckinghazard (11/07/2015) [-] "we just kissed on camera"
Is she implying that they also kissed off camera?.
Is she implying that they also kissed off camera?.
