SJW are Ruining This Nation

Flag

marcusvega

(See more...)

random

Favorite Comment

✖ Top Next Comment

SJW are Ruining This Nation. In a time where college students are offended by pretty much everything, The Federalist Papers reports that one professor at UNC-Wi

In a time where college students are offended by pretty much everything, The Federalist Papers reports that one professor at UNC-Wilmington decided to cut through the rhetoric and let his students know that they aren’t the special snowflakes liberals and their parents would have them believe.

His epic class introduction has gone viral, and for good reason: this is the most common sense lecture to come out of any college in a long time.

Welcome back to class, students! I am Mike Adams your criminology professor here at UNC-Wilmington. Before we get started with the course I need to address an issue that is causing problems here at UNCW and in higher education all across the country. I am talking about the growing minority of students who believe they have a right to be free from being offended. If we don’t reverse this dangerous trend in our society there will soon be a majority of young people who will need to walk around in plastic bubble suits to protect them in the event that they come into contact with a dissenting viewpoint. That mentality is unworthy of an American. It’s hardly worthy of a Frenchman.

Let’s get something straight right now. You have no right to be unoffended. You have a right to be offended with regularity. It is the price you pay for living in a free society. If you don’t understand that you are confused and dangerously so. In part, I blame your high school teachers for failing to teach you basic civics before you got your diploma. Most of you went to the public high schools, which are a disaster. Don’t tell me that offended you. I went to a public high school.

Of course, your high school might not be the problem. It is entirely possible that the main reason why so many of you are confused about free speech is that piece of paper hanging on the wall right over there. Please turn your attention to that ridiculous document that is framed and hanging by the door. In fact, take a few minutes to read it before you leave class today. It is our campus speech code. It specifically says that there is a requirement that everyone must only engage in discourse that is “respectful.” That assertion is as ludicrous as it is illegal. I plan to have that thing ripped down from every classroom on campus before I retire.

One of my grandfathers served in World War I. My step-grandfather served in World War II. My sixth great grandfather enlisted in the American Revolution when he was only thirteen.These great men did not fight so we could simply relinquish our rights to the enemy within our borders. That enemy is the Marxists who run our public universities. If you are a Marxist and I just offended you, well, that’s tough. I guess they don’t make communists like they used to.

Unbelievably, a student once complained to the Department chairwoman that my mention of God and a Creator was a violation of Separation of Church and State. Let me be as clear as I possibly can: If any of you actually think that my decision to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence in the course syllabus is unconstitutional then you suffer from severe intellectual hernia.

Indeed, it takes hard work to become stupid enough to think the Declaration of Independence is unconstitutional. If you agree with the student who made that complaint then you are probably just an anti-religious zealot. Therefore, I am going to ask you to do exactly three things and do them in the exact order that I specify.

First, get out of my class. You can fill out the drop slip over at James Hall. Just tell them you don’t believe in true diversity and you want to be surrounded by people who agree with your twisted interpretation of the Constitution simply because they are the kind of people who will protect you from having your beliefs challenged or your feelings hurt.

Second, withdraw from the university. If you find that you are actually relieved because you will no longer be in a class where your beliefs might be challenged then you aren’t ready for college. Go get a job building houses so you can work with some illegal aliens who will help you gain a better appreciation of what this country has to offer.

Finally, if this doesn’t work then I would simply ask you to get the hell out of the country. The ever-growing thinned-skinned minority you have joined is simply ruining life in this once-great nation. Please move to some place like Cuba where you can enjoy the company of communists and get excellent health care. Just hop on a leaky boat and start paddling your way towards utopia. You will not be missed.

* * *
grrrgraphics.wordpress.com/

+1565

Views:	55805
Favorited:	390
Submitted:	12/08/2015

Share On Facebook

+Favorite Subscribe to marcusvega

Comments(411):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs

1 2 3 4 5 >>>

[ 411 comments ]

Anonymous comments allowed.

216 comments displayed.

+153

#1 - irishjohnny (12/08/2015) [-]

"Intellectual Hernia"

+708

#6 - tacotrainone (12/08/2015) [-]

I didnt agree with everything he said

didnt have an aneurism

git gud sjws.

-89

#40 to #6 - itumblr (12/09/2015) [-]

GIF

Well, all this racist misogynist did was rants about woman and feminism like the idiot he is. Congratulations for not agreeing with him, you're real great!

+25

#55 to #40 - theantimeme (12/09/2015) [-]

**theantimeme used "*roll picture*"**
**theantimeme rolled image**

Big fan of your work itumblr

+10

#130 to #55 - ogthegreat (12/09/2015) [-]

I like how the dust spews out like darkness.

+13

#201 to #130 - myreadyassyolk ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

She accidentally started the encounter.

+11

#164 to #40 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

+33

#45 to #40 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

**skelebones used "*roll picture*"**
**skelebones rolled image**>-300 acct
>acct name itumblr
KEEP IT AT ZERO GUIZ

+40

#68 to #45 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

No. Red thumb. Hide all. Hide all completely. Done. No comment, no fuss.

-68

#70 to #68 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

+23

#75 to #70 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

he is talking about itumblr m8

-74

#79 to #75 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

i dont care hes a faggot and a retard. hes talking about no fuss yet refuses to acknowlege that if you ignore it entirely and dont thumb up or down then you make even less of a fuss.
also **** you

+23

#160 to #79 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Calm your autism.

-54

#161 to #160 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

**** you too. act like you got a set

+42

#166 to #161 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

"Oh no this person doesn't have an account on the internet autism hotspot i'm so much better than u xd"

Grow up.

+51

#182 to #166 - tacotrainone (12/09/2015) [-]

"autism hotspot"

-41

#170 to #166 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

"oh no im posting a flagrant opinion and im going to be downthumbed but im a little bitch and i care about imaginary things on a website too much. i must click the box and post as anon"
**** off faggot

+18

#181 to #170 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Keep pretending you're not a raging autist right now.

-40

#187 to #181 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

keep pretending youre a special snowflake and that i actually give a **** and that this isnt some elaborate *********** attempt by my part kiddo

+15

#242 to #187 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

"I was only pretending to be retarded, I swear!"

#289 to #187 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Anonymity and Psuedonymity are cornerstones of the internet. Without them, we have no insulation between our actual selves, and our ****** selves that we like to be on the internet. We would lose one of our favorite, unaccountable vents for our "Id". And nobody wants that. That is why we go without the account. That is why we check the box.

-1

#316 to #289 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

implying youre not still anonymous with an account name that can literally be titty sprinkles for all anyone knows or cares. an account here is still anonymous and if you fail to see that then youre retarded

#322 to #316 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

So.... Which is it? Do you love getting trolled or do you love getting owned?
This comment string makes me think both....
Feel free to believe I'm the original anon if it would help.

#219 to #170 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

I logged out just to say no.

-1

#318 to #219 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

-1

#250 to #170 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

youre a ******

-1

#317 to #250 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

-1

#314 to #166 - segwaynazi (12/09/2015) [-]

#210 to #161 - TheVertigo (12/09/2015) [-]

Hey. I'll be logged in and say it. (Not the same guy)
Calm your autism.

#347 to #210 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]

Thanks man (same anon). I don't like logging in. Us anons sometimes get a bad rep but we're not all bad.

#353 to #347 - TheVertigo (12/10/2015) [-]

Not a problem, anonbro. I got your back.

-24

#211 to #210 - skelebones (12/09/2015) [-]

good on ya for having a set.
**** you for being just as autistic a faggot as the anon

#241 to #211 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

:^)

-18

#47 to #45 - thealmightyantler (12/09/2015) [-]

green thumb him, ruin his -400 goal

+12

#67 to #47 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

-400 has been reached many times. His goal is not -400, his goal is reactions.

Which, if you **** yourself over the thumbs he gets, is just MORE of what he wants.

#46 to #40 - oharo (12/09/2015) [-]

Guys, if we just ignore him maybe he'll go away. Just move along, nothing to see or thumb here.

-2

#155 to #40 - upyoursnumbnuts (12/09/2015) [-]

If this is sarcasm I'll admit that I don't get it. IF this is serious then you my friend are a ******* retard.

#320 to #40 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Huh. Hadn't noticed you in awhile.
Are you even trying anymore?

#222 to #6 - kitsunekoma (12/09/2015) [-]

GIF

Good for you, and good for North Carolina. This post pleases me, as does your reply.

#196 to #6 - bringmesolo (12/09/2015) [-]

+55

#8 to #6 - anon (12/08/2015) [-]

My thoughts exactly, I agree with some of his statements, not so much with others. For example, Marxism, while stupid in its own right, has jack-all to do with any of this ******** . Despite that, there's not much in the world that I would say is more important than the right to free speech, so overall I'd say I agree with his broader point.

+65

#22 to #8 - anon (12/08/2015) [-]

Another name for the SJW movement is Cultural Marxism, the destruction of boundaries between different cultural "classes", i.e. genders, races, sexualities

#188 to #22 - beatmasterz (12/09/2015) [-]

Call me naive but I doubt cultural marxism exists. Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.

-2

#192 to #188 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Pretty much the SJW hatters went full wonkas, and try now to confince anyone it´s bad because it´s Marxist, after all red scare Propaganda is still clung in some peoples head.

Both the SJW and their hatters reached new deeps of patethicness if you ask me.

-2

#194 to #192 - beatmasterz (12/09/2015) [-]

Funny how history repeats itself. I was learning about German history and the cold war the other day in school and it was just staggering how many parallels I could draw with the present day. Especially the refugee crisis.

#199 to #194 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

I want to be honest here:

Both extreme sides are ALWAYS wonkas. Regardless what Topic you talk about, regardless which time Periode or place you are, it is an ******* constante through humankinds entire history.

And People will gladly missinterprait and abuse the not so educaited parts of ideas to scare People away.

Many People overdraw how dramatic the refugee crisis is. The only Point in which it´s dramatic is about the immensiv amount of paperwork. Sure there will be black sheeps, we talk about an mass movement of People over entire continents, not witnessing assholes would be an ******* world wonder.

Also it is to consider that funnyjunk Shares certain parallels with Tumblr and other SJW sides, if it likes to admit it or not, far to many People here are in Close circlejerks, and think their extreme world view are somehow accepteble. the last 3 months it´s /pol/ who though it can now openly go full wonkers, and People get already now anoyed in great masses, as they spam the FrontPage over.

#217 to #199 - beatmasterz (12/09/2015) [-]

totally agreed

#273 to #22 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

If by "another name" you mean an idiotic slander by right wing nutjobs who don't know what marxism is but want their moronic followers to associate social justice with communism.

#35 to #22 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Even in that context, it's still not what the SJWs are pushing for. They want cultures to be identified, they just want the destruction of what they deem to be the patriarchal race. There's no transformation of society into one without culture classifications, rather the exact opposite.

-1

#42 to #35 - kamusioso (12/09/2015) [-]

and that's what marxists wanted, that the lower class unified and destroyed the upper class so that they would rule.

#191 to #42 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

The difference was that the lower class was an MAJORITY of the Country, with the upper class beeing corrupted leaders that used them however they felt like... Try to find an better analogy.

#223 to #191 - bojesus (12/09/2015) [-]

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

I know it's a wiki article but it outlines roughly what cultural marxism is.

#323 to #223 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

first of all that is not an wiki article, it´s an META article.

The only Wikipedia article i could find was as fallwoing:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory

This god ******* **** School of Frankfurt.

Okay now for serious mate:

Marx teached a lot but one of his integral ideas was always one: That People build open an culture of productivity. See now this is the Thing, you tell me that there seems to be (seemingless just loneys or very sarcastic People seem to love to title themself cultural Marxist) an Marxist idea, which says that anyone can not be on the same class, as cultured splits us apart, and yes it makes partly sense in some ways, but... in this case it was not about destruction of all culture to 0, but more about erasing of the parts of culture that disturb the idea of People beeing equal, or else it would countradict Marx primär ideals. So even than, every SJW would just be as much an Extremist in their own right again, not beeing able to be taken serious (which they are barrely)

But here Comes the Problem: Marx theory focused about production and state, but not about culture, for Marx culture was nothing more but an tool for Society to Archive higher productivity.

The heart, mind, and soul of orthodox Marxian socialism is this: the concept of economic determinism. Marx argued that socialism is historically inevitable because of the inevitable transformation of the mode of production. He argued that the mode of production is the substructure of society, and culture in general is the superstructure. He argued that people hold a particular view of society's laws, ethics, and politics because of their commitment to a particular mode of production. The dominant mode of production in 1850 was capitalism. Marx named this mode of production. The name has stuck, even though original Marxism is culturally dead.

Marx gained support for his position precisely because it was purely economic/materialist. It abandoned all traces of historical explanation that were based on the idea that ideas are fundamental to the transformation of society. Marx believed that the deciding arena of class warfare is the mode of production, not the arena of ideas. He saw ideas as secondary outgrowths of the mode of production. His view was this: ideas do not have significant consequences. Take this idea out of Marxism, and it is no longer Marxism.

So either Social Marxism calls itself just Social Marxism because 1.) it was created by the god ******* damn Frankfurter School, 2.) because idiots have no ******* idea that marx says that societys culture right now is nothing more but an mirror to fine tune productivity, or 3.) because right wing People think it sounds far more horrorfieng then: Liberal Socialist Extremist (which would be People that try to destroy social norms to "free" themself via the help of the state, even if it has to be forced.)

#330 to #323 - bojesus (12/09/2015) [-]

Thanks for the reply . Also, thank you for pointing out the fact that the article I linked wasn't actually a wikipedia article, thatnk completely avoided me. :p

But anyway, what people are referring to as cultural Marxism isn't taking Marx's theories of culture and applying them to our culture, but taking his theories of everything else and applying them to culture. For example, what you just described is pretty much the sort of thing you would find in a bell hooks book, but applied to culture and the concept of a patriarchy.

I agree with you that the term is overused and sounds stupid, but the point I'm making is that it isn't simply Marx's views on culture applied to the real world.

-1

#221 to #191 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

There are quite a lot of feminist textbooks that refer to the idea of a patriarchy exactly the way just described. Those are the people referred to as cultural marxists.

#321 to #191 - kamusioso (12/09/2015) [-]

Yes, I know that, but they believe that every black, asian, woman, every non white cis male is their lower class. I don't believe this **** , I was making the connection

#326 to #321 - blackmageewizardt ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Please look at my comment from >>@323

Fast teaching in about why the Name Cultural Marxism is almost just as stupid as it sounds. (because you have no ******* idea what Marx ideas where)

+28

#57 to #6 - thesecretbear (12/09/2015) [-]

He went a little McCarthy red scare on us. Aside from that I saw where he was going.
"The enemy is the Marxists within our University!" - Made me kek pretty hard.
I just imagine him doing this all drill sergeant style.

#278 to #57 - tealcanaan (12/09/2015) [-]

He's right, and McCarthy was absolutely vindicated by the Venona papers.

#302 to #278 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

When you engage in a witch hunt accusing thousands of innocent people of being communist agents, ruining careers and lives, and then later you find out that there were actually some communist agents (duh, of course there were)- this does not vindicate you. McCarthy was a blot on american history and one of the biggest demagogue ******** to ever hold elected office.

#324 to #302 - tealcanaan (12/09/2015) [-]

Every single person on his list received funds from the USSR though, so your point is moot, really.

+23

#25 to #6 - Sevenseas (12/08/2015) [-]

**Sevenseas used "*roll picture*"**
**Sevenseas rolled image**I could agree with everything he said in some sense.

I'd like to make sure he doesn't get in any sort of trouble for saying this though.

+212

#10 - asasqw ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]

+179

#36 - thelastelephant (12/09/2015) [-]

>ranking SJW below the French

this man knows how to bring the burn

+16

#51 to #36 - bumple (12/09/2015) [-]

non-american here... is there a history lesson I missed? Why is the french a cliché of a lesser man? They did help the colonist fighting off the british.. so.. ?

+26

#56 to #51 - stankape ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

they surrendered in WWII, so they have a reputation in america as being cowards.

#74 to #56 - bumple (12/09/2015) [-]

lol .. so by that logic, Norway and Denmark is also cowards

+61

#111 to #74 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Actually Charles de Gaulle is mostly responsible for the American hatred of the French.

He claimed the French liberated Paris themselves without acknowledging the fact they had american assistance nor the fact that it wouldn't have been possible without the extensive sacrifices of the allies on D-day and the ensuing invasion.

When DeGaulle later removed France from NATO and ordered all US soldiers based in France to leave seriously damaged relations to the point that President Lyndon Johnson directly ordered Secretary of State Rusk to ask DeGaulle if his order to remove all U.S. troops from French soil also included the 60,000+ soldiers buried in France from World War I and World War II. DeGaulle, embarrassed, got up and left and never answered.

Add in that the French are considered needlessly rude especially to Americans doesn't help matters.

#163 to #111 - dreygur (12/09/2015) [-]

This guy isn't wrong with his last point. My cousin went to France a couple of months ago, and the first thing I heard about the trip was how unpleasant it was to be a tourist there.

#114 to #111 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Oh! The more you know. Neat.

He was probably jealous that he didn't get to permanently keep a chunk of Germany.
(Other than Alsace and Lorraine)

#173 to #74 - hetzerdk (12/09/2015) [-]

Denmark did not have a army comparable with the french, hell, they even send motorbikes with onstrapped 20mm machine cannons against tanks and destroyed a few . They didnt have any tanks, their airforce was as good as nonexistent, and they run around with ww1 gear. Of course they surrendered quickly, because they didnt even have a fighting chance.

#82 to #74 - timmywankenobi (12/09/2015) [-]

yes.

#101 to #74 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

The Vikings have a pretty solid reputation for courage, though uncivilized. Pretty sure their culture died out at some point during the Crusades. I haven't heard much about Scandinavians' recent military acts, with an exception to Finland in the Winter War. Norway and Denmark were each occupied for most of WWII, I think, and Nordic countries didn't have the resources to fight at the same level as Britain or Germany.

#269 to #101 - angelious ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

finland isnt part of skandinavia.

#202 to #51 - jallelthalas (12/09/2015) [-]

I can't say for sure for everyone else, but for my experience, in school we learn about all the times France lost their country (or were on a losing trend within country borders) and needed help. So, in our youth, we would have people tell stupid jokes like that. After a while it just stops being a joke and becomes a mindset after hearing the same joke for a 1001 times.

#124 to #51 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Americans stereotype french people as being cowardly. I don't think anyone could have stood up to the German army at the beginning of ww2. French people have been kicking ass for most of history.

#116 to #51 - whiteoverblue ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Because the simpsons made that joke.

No worries. France is actually Europe's most military successful country in its history.

#107 to #51 - almightysausage (12/09/2015) [-]

it's a running joke on the internet, a lot of people do recognize past French military prowess and national pride.

#112 to #107 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

I, personally, think it stems more from Vietnam than WW2. After all, the French did fight (if only a little) in WW2 before going down and we weren't really up for hating on the French when we already hated on Nazis, Communists, and Imperialists. Vietnam, though? A small, indochinese nation that had been under French control for a while, and they botched the handling of the original insurrection so badly that they needed to call in America under the pretext that it was "Falling to Communism"? Yeah, I can see that pissing a few people off. Especially considering the caliber of people in the U.S at the time.

#113 to #112 - almightysausage (12/09/2015) [-]

I never actually looked at anything beyond WWII so I will actually have to look into that.

#272 to #51 - jackbanne (12/09/2015) [-]

people from canada also hate the french because the people of quebec are a bunch of needy cunts
tl;dr they almost split our country apart AND recently

+12

#71 to #36 - kibbleking (12/09/2015) [-]

The French were valiant fighters. Despite their intense war debt they still aided the colonies during our revolution.

#331 to #71 - thelastelephant (12/09/2015) [-]

Don't forget World War I.

#267 to #71 - tanitakavirius ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

French Military Victories - some perspective and swearing

+19

#100 - firedragonkong (12/09/2015) [-]

+73

#2 - anon (12/08/2015) [-]

Holy crap , that's the greatest thing I've ever read .

+49

#29 - ablock (12/08/2015) [-]

Wow what are the odds.

I go to UNCW. Lived in Wilmington for 21 of my 28 years.

I owe this professor a beer.

#53 to #29 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Same here. Last final is on Thursday then I am graduating and getting the hell out of here. Going back to the NC mountains.

+63

#3 - kristovsky (12/08/2015) [-]

thank you Based Garrison

#54 to #3 - hugestarwarsfan (12/09/2015) [-]

Ben "Aryan Thor of Baltimore" Garrison

+17

#21 to #3 - anon (12/08/2015) [-]

Based Ben is at it again

+31

#32 - jonswan (12/09/2015) [-]

******* BASED MILO

#298 to #32 - dorg (12/09/2015) [-]

Wait is that the same guy? I ******* hate his thoughts about religion.

+22

#33 - solarisofcelestia (12/09/2015) [-]

-5

#50 to #33 - robinwilliamson (12/09/2015) [-]

But it's the government that's constantly complaining about PC, not advocating extremes of it. People forget what "the government" actually means.

#205 to #33 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/09/2015) [-]

There's so many ******* things wrong with this image that I don't even know where to start. Political comics are so ******* stupid.

#38 to #33 - Zaxplab (12/09/2015) [-]

What's sargon doing down there?

#61 to #38 - elpsycongroo (12/09/2015) [-]

He commissioned the picture for one of his videos.

#134 to #33 - garymotherfingoak (12/09/2015) [-]

******* love Sargon of Akkad.

#266 to #134 - marcusvega [OP](12/09/2015) [-]

I follow him too, he is very good.

#268 to #266 - marcusvega [OP](12/09/2015) [-]

its what led me to make this content

+24

#43 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

while i absolutely despise SJWs
they're not the only ones that are trying to create their own "safe spaces"
this is a common trait by the extremists of both sides.

-1

#204 to #43 - sgtmajjohnson has deleted their comment [-]

-2

#303 to #43 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

>Complains about blocking
>Blocks

Just another dose of your daily sjw hypocrisy.

#306 to #303 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

you do realize that the screenshot is of someone deleting comments, yes?
at what point did i mention blocking?

-1

#313 to #306 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

>"you'll be blocked soon, he doesn't like to be wrong"
>"omg this has nothing to do with blocking"

How does it feel being exposed as a hypocrite? What am I saying, sjws like you probably get called out on it all the time, heh.

#319 to #313 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

i'm willing to bet my arse you're the cunt in the screenshot.

-1

#327 to #319 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Are you sure jamal would like you selling your pussy to other men.

Regardless, you're wrong.

I don't have to be to know you're the cunt in this screenshot though.
/Sjw+are+ruining+this+nation/funny-pictures/5764125/294#294

;)

#49 to #43 - darthblam (12/09/2015) [-]

Yeah, but no one here agrees with that kind of **** .

#106 to #43 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

>Extremists
Most people tend to do that, in my experience.

#157 to #106 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

i'm more of a "i disagree with everything you say, but i'll die for your right to say it" kinda person.

-1

#294 to #157 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

#295 to #294 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

and what would your name be?
i've got a screenshot saved of the reason for blocking pretty much everyone i've blocked in the past couple of months.

-2

#301 to #295 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

If you've blocked so many people that you cant identify me immediately just based on the fact that you blocked me, maybe you shouldn't go around preachinh how much of a defender of free speech you are my liberal.

Also the hypocrisy in this thread is off the charts, so many sjws whining about "de ebil /pol/" blocking when you all do the exact same ******* thing except 100x worse.

******* hilarious.

#305 to #301 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

ah, so you're afriad to be called out.
no, i screenshot people i block, because of whiny little bitches like you.

blocking is not impending your freedom of speech.
we are speaking right now, aren't we?
all you have to do is check that "post as anonymous" box, and you can say whatever you want to me.

most of the people i block, i block because they mention-spam me and such.
because they're butthurt little babies like yourself. that can't take being opposed.

#311 to #305 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

>"OMG WAAHHH SOME RACIST STORMFAG BLOCKED ME THEY OBVIOUSLY HATE FREE SPEECH AND CANT HANDLE CRITICISM THEY WANT SAFE SPACES JUST LIKE US, I MEAN SJWS!!!!"
>"blocking u doesn't mean anything you can still respond cant u, ur such a butthurt loser to care about blocking, whiny little bitches crying about blocks LOL"

10/10 retardation, you couldn't even wait a few threads to change your ****** position.

But let me guess, when "de ebil stormfags" block you its because they want a safe space, but when you block people it doesn't mean anything.

I'll never get tired of sjw hypocrisy, its hilarious.

#185 to #43 - darknesincontrol (12/09/2015) [-]

what a butthurt fag

#203 to #43 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/09/2015) [-]

Yeah, our resident Stormfags and /pol/tards are just as bad as SJWs, if not worse. They screech about having their "free speech" impinged on, but trip over themselves to block and deride others for having that same right. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so transparently hypocritical and pathetic. Pic semi related.

-3

#215 to #203 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

sjws infest the courts, have control of or set the tone for much of western media and doxx/ harass people and their employers to get them fired.

pol rants on the internet.

Power sets the sjw apart, they are dangerous opponents of free speech, free choice and free thought in a way that fascists and actual racists haven't been for decades.

Judging people or movements on moral standards is useless without taking their capabilities into account.

#216 to #215 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/09/2015) [-]

>anon

pls

-1

#296 to #203 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Meanwhile I've been blocked by you and the other neckbeards at religion more times than i can remember.

I guess hypocrisy is a stable of the left.

#357 to #296 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/10/2015) [-]

I'm guessing you're Conquistador right? I didn't block you to stop you from spreading whatever vile you feel like spewing, I blocked you because all you do when you comment on one of my comments is say "hur ur a ******** " or something to that effect. You had nothing to add and could only insult, so why would I tolerate that? Hanging up on a man that keeps calling you to yell at you isn't impinging his freedom of speech.

What IS impinging your freedom of speech is if I posted a content on some touchy political topic, then blocked you for voicing your opinion on the topic. That's what all of our resident /pol/tards and stormweenies do, and there is a huge difference between them. If you can't see that past your butthurt then you're even more far gone than I thought.

#358 to #357 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]

>Thinking every anti-SJW/liberal/subhuman person is me.

I must have really "triggered" you back then huh? And it's funny how you blocked me even though I rarely get on this **** hole, nonetheless talk to you.

-Con

Btw, I only showed up because you mentioned me.

#359 to #358 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/10/2015) [-]

The only other person I have blocked from /religion/ is syrian, so it was a 50% chance. And I still doubt the first anon is him because the writing isn't complete **** .

Conquistador

#360 to #359 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]

From what I recall, you have blocked other people.

And from what I can tell, that guy doesn't have the same style as me. He's not as aggressive, blunt, derogatory, or devastating.

-Con

#363 to #360 - nigeltheoutlaw (12/10/2015) [-]

I have blocked other people, but not from /religion/. I am assuming the anon was just too lazy to add the brackets.

>you
>devastating

jej

+22

#186 - thetaxman (12/09/2015) [-]

They targeted gamers.
Gamers.
We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.
We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.
We'll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.
Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.
Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?
These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a ****** head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.
Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You're not special, you're not original, you're not the first; this is just another boss fight.

-9

#195 to #186 - nimba (12/09/2015) [-]

ha. gaaaay

#198 to #195 - thetaxman (12/09/2015) [-]

please do not slander my ethics in gaming journalism

#209 to #198 - ghostisaho (12/09/2015) [-]

(12 year old me): you type like a ****** , and i ****** your mother

#220 to #186 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

sjw are just *********** conformists; in their attempt to dominate the lives of westerners have made the same mistake the marxists made: interfering with the bread and circuses.

Marxism doesn't allow independent nonmarxist organizations to exist without heavy political interference that shafts productivity, leading to heavy shortages and obscene prices of things like food, shoes and toilet paper.

Then they go after peoples hobbies and pastimes, no more youth camping groups without party affiliation or counselors, sports are coopted and all stadiums are under control of the state, no shooting ranges or hunting clubs, nothing on tv, in the newspaper or radio broadcast that says or does anything that conflicts with marxist dogmas or makes the state or party look bad.

Radicals are boring, they make life poorer and more miserable and for no good reason.

Gaming has nothing to do with anything, but even then they couldn't leave well enough alone. People can't even entertain themselves in peace without being called muhsogjnests.

Remember this: much like our late austrian f(r)iend, YOU DID NOTHING WRONG.
they scream because they want something form you that you have no responsibility or reason to give.

Jeer and heckle them when they speak, and write to their ad sponsors and complain,
and hold on. When the college bubble bursts and the university system gets a whole lot smaller these ******* will pay for their arrogance with interest.

#230 to #186 - Sinrik (12/09/2015) [-]

nah man they aint even worthy of being called a boss fight they're more along the line of tutorial island trash

+14

#48 - crlmsonhazard (12/09/2015) [-]

+16

#24 - lolollo ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]

Sounds like a class where I'd have way too much fun putting this guy to the test of his own philosophy...

Particularly since its a criminology class.

#369 to #24 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

The gayest ass-sex I ever had was with my uncle Edward "The Well-Endowed" Freckleby.

#370 to #24 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

I won, you little nigur, and don't you forget it.

<3

#371 to #370 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#372 to #371 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Aha! That's the exact reaction someone who'd read my comment would have!

I win again!

Don Quixote: 2.2

lolollo: 0.0

#373 to #372 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#374 to #373 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Don Quixote: 3.3

lolollo: 0.55

#375 to #374 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#376 to #375 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Don Quixote: 4.4

lolollo: 0.44

#377 to #376 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#378 to #377 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Ah! Game for autists!

Don Quixote: 5.5

lolollo: -5.5

#379 to #378 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#380 to #379 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Being proud of being autistic? You can't "being x a being y". It's illogic 101.

Don Quixote: 6.7

lolollo: -e^0.001

#381 to #380 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

Click to show spoiler

What?

#382 to #381 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Teach not thy lip such scorn, my lady.
Twas made for kissing, not for such contempt.

#383 to #382 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#384 to #383 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Salty eggs?

#385 to #384 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#386 to #385 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

They have nothing to lose now.

#387 to #386 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#389 to #387 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

See?

SEE?

I'm telling the ******* truth.

#390 to #389 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#388 to #387 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

They guy who made this image is retarded. He would be the one smelling the waters, since his head is the one which is not under the ******* water.

I'm disappoint.

#391 to #24 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

My gosh...

Writing for video games is definitely sub-par. Extra Credits were right.

#392 to #391 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#393 to #392 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Good point and well made.

But you definitely get better writing in the best of films compared to the best of video games, and I'm sure that the writing is ******** in the ********* of video games compared to the ********* of films.

Cinema obviously has a relative AND absolute advantage over video games.

#394 to #393 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#395 to #394 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

I don't think that MTG has a narrative, per se.

It's just autists playing childish card games--unlike adults who play poker.

Or sometimes gin rummy when they're really drunk.

#398 to #395 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#399 to #398 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

That game sucks balls.

#401 to #399 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#402 to #401 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Ah...

The good ol' days.

#403 to #402 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#404 to #403 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Yes.

#405 to #404 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#406 to #405 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Is that the newest Pokemon on the market?

#407 to #406 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

It only knows one move

remove kabab

#408 to #407 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Wait! I thought it could learn "Do God's work" when it reached level 2015...

#409 to #408 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

It was in the works until the developers realized it would've just been a rename of the move it knew already.

#410 to #409 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Oh, really?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivT-I-yxtdY

#411 to #410 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

Fersher

#412 to #411 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

99.99% of all persons on this planet love it.

That is why the world is still worthy of being lived in.

-1

#249 to #24 - migueldecervantes (12/09/2015) [-]

Insofar as my experience with you goes, you believe yourself to be intelligent yet are somewhat stupid. I would suggest you drop the smug tone.

#333 to #249 - lolollo ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Well, you do have the right to be wrong. So I guess I can't stop your opinions of me.

#334 to #333 - migueldecervantes (12/09/2015) [-]

Am I wrong in that you believe yourself to be intelligent, in that you are somewhat stupid, or on both accounts?

#335 to #334 - lolollo ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Yes

#336 to #335 - migueldecervantes (12/09/2015) [-]

That's not even slightly clever...

#337 to #336 - lolollo ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Weird how the only people who say that are the ones I'm actively insulting with my sarcasm.

Almost as though you lot are biased.

#338 to #337 - migueldecervantes (12/09/2015) [-]

I don't think you understand the definition of sarcasm (which should, again, be an index of your lack of cleverness, and thus should discourage you from being so conceited).

Your "Yes" was not sarcastic, for it was not ironic. It was just an unsuccessful attempt at being cleverly dismissive.

#339 to #338 - lolollo ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

If you say so, guy.

Like I said, you have a right to be wrong.

#340 to #339 - migueldecervantes (12/09/2015) [-]

Now that you have no arguments to make, no way to defend yourself from my accusation, you resort to maintain your prior demeanor in an effort to appear consistent so as not to lose face.

This is typical of stupid people who believe themselves to be intelligent. I had guessed your general response as I usually do with 99% accuracy rate.

I was just hoping to be entertained by some derivation from the typical norm. That I am somewhat disappoint needs not be explicitly mentioned.

#341 to #340 - lolollo ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

This also isn't an argument, its me reacting to a petty insult. I thought I was supposed to be the one taking himself too seriously?

#342 to #341 - migueldecervantes (12/09/2015) [-]

Are you saying that I am taking myself too seriously? If so, why?

I'm criticizing the manner in which you are reacting, by the way. I never said this was an argument; I said you didn't have any to defend your case against my accusation (which you conveniently prefer to term as "petty insult").

I will not apologize for trying to bring a cocky idiot with a superiority complex fueled by his egocentric idealism down a few rungs on the ladder of self-actualization. I consider it my duty as a good human being.

Is that being too serious, you think?

#343 to #342 - lolollo ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

The fact that you still think I'm taking any of this as anything close to serious is amusing.

#345 to #343 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

But...

But you yourself just claimed I was taking myself too seriously. Your confused incoherence is much more amusing than your inability to deflect my accusations.

#350 to #345 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

Whatever does it for you, guy

#361 to #350 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

Yet again the same kind of unclever dismissiveness...

I am genuinely curious: do you not feel stupid, or at least "not very intelligent"? How can you go on thinking of yourself with any form of respect while resorting to the tactics of a child or imbecile?

I can only guess it is the Danny-Kruger effect at work here.

#364 to #361 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

I'm not even reading your comments at this point.

#365 to #364 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

You are lying. You did read it.

The only thing is: you have nothing to answer because I am right and you are stupid.

#366 to #365 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

What?

#367 to #366 - migueldecervantes (12/10/2015) [-]

It's not working. I know you read it.

#368 to #367 - lolollo ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]

#64 to #24 - schneidend (12/09/2015) [-]

Most professors don't become professors so they can hear themselves talk. I'd imagine an impassioned guy like this would welcome more student input. Better have something good to say, though, because on the other hand he also seems like the type to shout you down for the slightest logical mistake or poor word choice.

#277 to #64 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

On the very first day of class, before a single student has questioned his opinions, he's screaming at his students about how butthurt liberals make him. And you think he'd welcome criticism? Pull the other one.

-1

#299 to #277 - youregaylol (12/09/2015) [-]

Hes describing how he doesn't like people afraid of other opinions, I know that scares you though.

#129 to #64 - taniv (12/09/2015) [-]

Then again, to be fair, the job of a professor includes hearing themselves talk so they can perfect the art of teaching. To be extra fair though, you don't get to be a professor by not listening to what other's have to say. unless you got your degree from the University of Bubble Wrap

#5 - thesinful (12/08/2015) [-]

GIF

Wow, it says something that I have like 10x more reaction pics/gifs to say how much someone sucks than how awesome they are.

#52 to #5 - saxong (12/09/2015) [-]

I've noticed that too, most of mine are vague disgust or lower

#123 to #5 - megiddo (12/09/2015) [-]

GIF

Here's a new one

#165 - mcmental (12/09/2015) [-]

GIF

#151 - mrforte (12/09/2015) [-]

GIF

Holy **** .

Look, I get that it's near-impossible for a professor to completely leave their political/religous bias outside the class room, I've seen plenty of it and I don't fault them for it, hell I would go as far to say that it helps diversify the students viewpoints a bit. But this takes it to a whole new ******* level. If you go out of your way to tell your students that they are a waste of space and need to leave the class if they don't share your political mentality, then you have no place being an educator.

#153 to #151 - mrforte (12/09/2015) [-]

So I've come to understand the story is fake, my point still stands though.

-1

#176 to #153 - cormy (12/09/2015) [-]

I believe the general idea here is that he's telling people who don't agree with the COUNTRY'S political mentality, not his, to leave.
Instead of having them force their beliefs on a system already in place that functions using different beliefs, they can leave to go somewhere that suits them better.
Things are the way they are in the places they are because people in those places wanted them to be that way. If there are people in that space that don't like it, they can go to another space to make a space run the way they want it to be run.

#180 to #176 - mrforte (12/09/2015) [-]

On the surface maybe, but you don't have to read much into it to see that he's actively vilifying the other mentalities.

On a side note, I don't agree with the idea that you should go elsewhere if you don't like how things are run for a couple reasons. First, 'going elsewhere' is commonly just not possible, especially when that entails completely leaving your native country. Second, if you firmly believe there is a problem with the system, then you should try and change it; problems would never get solved if those that recognized it simply left or ignored it.

#346 to #180 - cormy (12/10/2015) [-]

I get that, but constantly having people with different views trying to change the system to suit what they believe is the correct system seems like a silly system to have. You can't please everyone so why should the people who aren't among those who were pleased stay? If you can tolerate it and would prefer to stay, that's your own choice but why continue trying to change the system after those who are there have established what the majority believe is an okay system?

#351 to #346 - mrforte (12/10/2015) [-]

You realize what you described is the ENTIRE point of a democracy?

#352 to #351 - cormy (12/10/2015) [-]

Yep, I'm not a fan of democracy. Or rather, I'm not a fan of perpetually re-deciding what kind of system we decided on. It's not the same as voting for a new leader who may run the country slightly differently while still operating under the established rules of that country. The newly appointed rulers still function within the pre-determined system, democracies do not vote on their constitutions/rights and such at every election, they just vote on a leader/party.
If someone does no agree with the constitution and cannot tolerate living under it, they need to go elsewhere. They can't fight to change it unless an actual bit of a civil war goes on where not only the government is overthrown, but also the system that the government was running under.
It's just... A whole other level of fighting for what you believe in, and it's not one that is usually good for anyone. Leaving isn't nearly as costly as trying to uproot the foundations of a country.

#73 - studbeefpile (12/09/2015) [-]

Save us, Milo.

#77 to #73 - Shiny ONLINE (12/09/2015) [-]

Milo would probably be willing to be a politically correct demagogue if it meant more publicity.

#83 to #77 - studbeefpile (12/09/2015) [-]

How dare you, heretic.

#284 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]

Stopped reading when he compared communists with these femnazis. Two different political stances, and just because you hate them both doesn't mean saying they're the same is correct. Shaming a group that doesn't check facts and acts like retards through using what they use is like **** posting in a **** posters responses.

#263 - Penn (12/09/2015) [-]

I grew up in California, went to high school/college in New Hampshire where I studied business (accounting), then went (and am currently still enrolled) in college in Florida (CJ, forensics, anthro). I am going to graduate school at the start of next fall (CJ, MPA). I worked in the restaurant industry (cook, sous chef), the retail industry (cashier, middle management), and now I work for the government (undisclosed) and not once, NOT ONCE, have I experienced a person known as a 'SJW' outside the realm of the internet.

Do people get offended? Yes. Are they civilized people with rational (irrational as well) emotions and know how to be an adult and handle every day situations/disagreements? Yes.

I'm starting to think that the people who claim that those who get offended by something are actually claiming that those people are SJWs who can't take criticism and are ruining this nation.

People can very well be offended and people can very well react to it. It's normal behavior. Obviously there are crazy people who are known as 'radicals' who insanely go over the top about something and try to ruin someone's life (ie someone says abortion is okay and a person who disagrees with them decides to ruin their life through lies, etc.)

tldr SJWs aren't as common outside the internet as the internet makes it seem.