x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - vondarkmoor (07/24/2014) [-]
and those who don't know base 3
and those who don't know base 3
User avatar #4 to #3 - stabbedinthecrotch (07/24/2014) [-]
which base 3?
User avatar #5 to #4 - vondarkmoor (07/24/2014) [-]
0 1 2 10
User avatar #6 to #5 - stabbedinthecrotch (07/24/2014) [-]
your postulate makes little sense out of reference, show me the math please
User avatar #7 to #6 - vondarkmoor (07/24/2014) [-]
aparently googling base 3 is impossible
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_numeral_system
User avatar #8 to #7 - stabbedinthecrotch (07/24/2014) [-]
I can use google too, your postulate doesn't fit into any of those models, I am familiar with them all. That is why I asked you nicely to see the math
#12 to #8 - benhelmuth (07/25/2014) [-]
It's just base 3 instead of base 2. Duh.
User avatar #14 to #12 - stabbedinthecrotch (07/25/2014) [-]
I understand 4 different base 3 number & logic systems. My contention was that vondarkmoor did not.
User avatar #9 to #8 - ChromedDragon (07/24/2014) [-]
what don't you understand about ternary?
User avatar #2 - grayfullbuster (07/24/2014) [-]
i get it
User avatar #1 - jacksipian (07/24/2014) [-]
i get it.
#10 - rickjbucci (07/24/2014) [-]
I'm no ******* professional, but shouldn't that be 01 types of people?
#11 to #10 - benhelmuth (07/25/2014) [-]
No. Source: you're an idiot.
User avatar #13 to #10 - stabbedinthecrotch (07/25/2014) [-]
In memory it is read right to left, funny quirk

0000
0001
0010
0011
0100
0101
0110
0111
1000
1001
1010
1011
1100
1101
1110
1111
 Friends (0)