Sexist. . WHERE THE FUCK HHE THE BOYFRIEND? inv: . Odins lilli'. They're in the friendzone. Sarcasm Sexist WHERE THE FUCK HHE BOYFRIEND? inv: Odins lilli' They're in the friendzone Sarcasm
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (145)
[ 145 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#2 - messerauditore
Reply +227 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
They're in the friendzone.


*Sarcasm*
#8 to #2 - omegadynasty
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #9 to #2 - lyiat
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
That's... actually fairly accurate. The friendzone is basically 'Overly-Attached Non-Boyfriend'.
#10 to #2 - inkiie
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #27 to #10 - fukkentyranitar
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
That's looks like a canvas hat rather than a fedora.
#105 to #27 - anon id: e0a82c9a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
>Implying that any of the hats associated with fedora neckbeards are actually fedoras.

They're actually Trilby hats.
#62 to #27 - anon id: 04b67e27
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Thank god it's a canvas hat! I nearly thought it was a fedora for a minute there, but thankfully it's an entirely different thing. Now I think it's cool.
#103 to #62 - rdobet
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
#3 - anon id: 6214335b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
i should make a meme of my boyfriend for this..

'gets angry when i want to go to a pub with my gran on my 18th because i might get drunk and **** someone else'

'text back or i throw your guinea pig out the window'

'i talked to someone close to you i know all your secrets
..
was lying to try to get me to admit things'
User avatar #5 to #3 - imadps
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
It'll just be ******. The girlfriend one already sucks. Pairing memes doesn't work out. Just like what they did to "good guy greg".
#88 to #3 - pukki
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
I think you don't know what a meme is
#7 to #3 - anon id: 50673eff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
that's not a meme, you have a really ****** taste in men.
User avatar #17 to #3 - stillnotbob
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
le forced meme xD
User avatar #70 to #3 - iatedub
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Don't worry anon, We all act like that here.
User avatar #23 to #3 - sabotagesam
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
i don't know why people give you grief, that's actually mildly funny, and the exact mirror of the overly attached girlfriend meme. why do people assume that you lied? maybe you did, but that could be said for anything on this site, or every other site for that matter, and being truthful has nothing to do with memes or jokes. i think funnyjunk - even though they can't admit it to themselves - is pretty misogynistic.
User avatar #45 to #23 - deepgreen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Because there are no girls on the internet..
#55 to #45 - tsukaza
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
"There are no girls on the internet" stopped being funny a few years ago, sorry for breaking the bad news. I hope for your sake you were trying to be funny.
#57 to #55 - deepgreen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Thanks for letting me know you are the authority on what's funny.    
I can't seem to remember the last election though.
Thanks for letting me know you are the authority on what's funny.
I can't seem to remember the last election though.

#60 to #57 - tsukaza
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
It never once used to be funny, but to mean something.
That something is also irrelevant nowadays anyways 'cause people worship girls on the internet regardless.
#64 to #60 - deepgreen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Can you please stop? Clearly you have no sense of humor and are pompous enough to presume that what you find funny should be the norm.

1. There are no girls on the internet is funny
2. The message will stay true as long as the internet exists and the remnants of the imprinted biological behavior of focusing on reproduction are present in our brain. It exactly reflects the message that men aren't worshiping girls or women. Men are worshiping their bodies. Especially on the internet.

#66 to #64 - tsukaza
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Then you should be able to explain how it ever used to be funny. This content made me blow air through my nose more than "No girls on the internet" has ever done.

And the whole "No girls on the internet" was made because Bear with me here, I suck at explaining things. When you know girls offline, most people tend to be nice towards them because of this "things" they could do or give (This is where a lot of the "friend zone" thing also comes from.)
Now when this "there are no girls on the internet" was made picture sharing wasn't popular and live videos used to rape the average household net. So, the girls couldn't possibly give what they could whilst offline, so many stopped trying.
"There are no girls on the internet" means "it doesn't matter" "We're all equal here now"... But Like I said, this rule doesn't exactly apply any more because being a girl on the internet a lot of the time gets you special privileges even if you don't give any photos or videos out because now there is a good possibility.
"There are no girls on the internet" was never made to be funny and when used by a person like you who doesn't try whatsoever to inject any humour into it whatsoever and uses as a one and only line then yes, it isn't going to be funny at all. Before you try to tell me what is or isn't funny then at least try to put some effort into it.
Oh, and know your origins next time.
User avatar #85 to #66 - deepgreen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
I tried bearing with you but clearly you can't form a cohesive argument and are just rambling.

My original comment wasn't even intented to be funny but was an explanation regarding the question "Why do people assume that you lied?" (which was directed at the "female" anon). So there was no need to inject it with personal humor (which is laughable in itself, since there's not much to do with such a statement rather than to apply it in different situations, else you lose part of the message or just add random **** to it).

It is funny because of multiple reasons:
1. The statement is ambiguous, it references to another meaning (since they're clearly are girls on the internet)
2. Girls aren't inherently more interesting (For me personally, guys are more interesting. They have better humour, have more interesting stories, aren't as emotional, often are more adept at things I value such as playing instruments, sports, reading,...)
3. When the physical aspect of interaction is lost, men stop caring about the fact that you're a girl, because all of its appeals lie in the physical aspect.

To sum up: Men are the mentally more interesting gender. Since on the internet human interaction loses its physical nature, noone is interested in you solely because you are a female. So anyone who mentions that they're a female without any physical to show for it, are attention whoring and aren't mentally interesting enough to compete with other people. They need their girl advantage back.

If you can't see how that's funny, that isn't my problem. I didn't make that statement for you.

#124 to #85 - tsukaza
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Your "There are no girls on the internet" comment wasn't even an explanation, and if it wasn't for satire then it was completely out of place.
Needless to mention irony in most cases isn't funny either.
Also, you just reinforced my statement of "on the internet we're all equal" therefore; "There are no girls on the internet".
However if a girl has to show a physical aspect, Most would call that attention whoring and that again is proving my point of how the phrase "There are no girls on the internet" is becoming less relevant, because girls can show their physical sides now. More ways than one.
User avatar #129 to #124 - deepgreen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
I should prescribe you some antipsychotics because you're completely delusional and aren't making any logical inferences or deductions.

My comment explained why the anon got red thumbed to death. Not to mention if you check out the top comment by pedobearson, my argument only gets further enforced. His comment "Lies about having a crazy boyfriend to get attention on the internet."

The anon got redthumbed because she mentioned that she was a girl and was attention whoring. "There are no girls on the internet" and attention whoring are two intertwined concepts. The first results in the other. Girls want their girl advantage back so they attention whore and mention that they're girls. But the internet doesn't care unless they degrade themselves by posting physical nudity. But even then it doesn't matter for the internet has won and still doesn't give them any special privileges or attention based on the fact that they're girls.

Seriously, what the hell? How can girls nowadays show their physical side? Every other week you see a post complaining about girl-gamers. Girls who show their physical side but aren't interesting for anything else. They are mocked to the ground besides 14 year olds who haven't discovered pornhub yet I guess or manginas. The picture of 4chan explaining there are no girls on the internet, regularly gets the frontpage. If I recall correctly, even a few weeks ago.

Btw you clearly have no idea what irony or satire is. Although I guess if I wanted to teach the internet to acknowledge and respect women, you could see my comment as satire. But noone would ever see it that way, so it would be a very lousy form of satire.

User avatar #4 to #3 - tendividedbysix
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Hey, look if a guy threatens to throw your hamster out of the window you should really drop his ass. Fair enough if he's joking and you knew he was joking, but if that was serious, stop dating that guy.
User avatar #75 to #4 - EdwardNigma
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
I believe they said "Guinea Pig"
User avatar #106 to #75 - tendividedbysix
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
You're right O.o how did I make that mistake? Still, no furry critters should be chucked out the window.
#6 to #3 - pedobearson
Reply +117 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
*Lies about having a crazy boyfriend to get attention on the internet*
#38 - foreverone **User deleted account**
Reply +45 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I'm pretty sure ******* are far from being overly-attached
#25 - Mesmus
Reply -18 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yeah i think i know how.
User avatar #47 to #25 - helenwheels
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Do you even know who that is?
User avatar #104 to #47 - greedtheavaricious
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
A mighty douchebag that's who it is.
User avatar #127 to #104 - helenwheels
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
But that doesn't mean Mesmus knows who he is.
User avatar #126 to #104 - helenwheels
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yes, indeed he is.
User avatar #15 - timmywankenobi
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
well men are jailed for stalking and such at a much higher rate simply because they are male so technically it is sexism. Of course much of this is due to rampant demonizing of men and fear mongering by ardent feminist organisations in order to increase government funding.
#46 to #15 - ttubkcid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#24 to #15 - ivoryhammer
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #18 to #15 - badmotorfinger
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
yeah, its kinda like how the Jews made up the Holocaust so they good get more money
#22 to #18 - filipskit
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#48 to #18 - anon id: dda19535
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
well no jew tend to say it was tradiy for there people even though plenty of diable gypies etc were killed not just jews jews tend to think they were solo victim of ocurse not all just those hwo like using guilt as weapon but then again ever group has thsoe type femnazis for example librial guilt etc
#28 to #18 - naturalman
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
On many levels they did.
User avatar #59 to #18 - timmywankenobi
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
I don't think the holocaust was made up, I mean they did find a lot of corpses/remains like 5-6 million people worth.
#117 - yuukoku
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Nobody takes the insane girls seriously until she poisons your food and keeps your dead body in her bed for a year.
#120 to #117 - devexx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
And even then all that insane girl has to do is cry in court and she gets away with it...

YAY Society!
(pic related)
User avatar #121 to #120 - yuukoku
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yeah, they can get away with more because gender roles dictates that they're more innocent than men. Then children are more innocent than women, so they get away with more than women. It's almost like a hierarchy of innocence that our society follows.
#125 to #121 - devexx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
yeah we're screwed...

its like we've put evolution in reverse where the weak survive and the strong are punished
pic semi-related
User avatar #128 to #125 - yuukoku
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Well, we've always felt a need to protect the weaker in most cultures. That's where the idea of never killing women or children comes into play. However, in economics and politics, we shouldn't be protecting the weaker because it does drain upon the successful. This is because we have more today than we used to. People began to think that the rich have everything and can solve all their problems, which is wrong. It's like the idea that stealing a pack of chips won't hurt a grocery store because they make enough money to buy more. When everybody does it, that grocery store's gunna be down a little revenue, don't you think?
#132 to #128 - devexx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
Yeah I agree, it is obviously really important to protect the weak, actually reading my comment I realized I sounded a bit more harsh than intended...
But yeah I get what you mean, I just hope that through the next few decades centuries maybe things flatten out and these flaws in society are fixed...
User avatar #133 to #132 - yuukoku
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
Yeah, it looks like we're going to have to learn the hard way at a certain point. We've begun making mistakes and that's going to have to change if we want to progress in a good way.
#134 to #133 - devexx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
Yeah if we don't flatten it out our selves something will probably happen and we'll go "oh **** we did something wrong..." dunno what but yeah you get the point
User avatar #135 to #134 - yuukoku
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
Oh, yeah. I get the point. Like pretending that there's an infinite amount of tax dollars to throw out?
User avatar #26 - itsthetie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Christ.. inb4 sexist rage debate
User avatar #29 to #26 - tittentei
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
you mad bro? you mad? sage sage
User avatar #110 to #29 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
>sage
For what purpose.
#30 to #29 - itsthetie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
my jimmies are somewhat rustled
my jimmies are somewhat rustled
User avatar #63 to #29 - ugoboom
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
>tfw you can't sage on FJ
User avatar #111 to #63 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
FJ works differently from imageboards like 4chan, so saging would be absolutely pointless.
User avatar #130 to #111 - ugoboom
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
i don't care
User avatar #131 to #130 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
How would be able to sage anyway? There's no e-mail thing on here.
User avatar #142 to #131 - ugoboom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
User avatar #144 to #142 - mayormilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/28/2013) [-]
Har har. I win.
User avatar #20 - waaw
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link

Donald Glover on Crazy boyfriends. Couldn't find a youtube link.
User avatar #21 to #20 - Sethorein
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
hehe... dong lover...
User avatar #91 - jsrf
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
overly attached boyfriends are ether refered to as creeps or stalkers
#100 to #91 - deviroux
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
yes
#68 - lesolan
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
>MFW Funnyjunk.