Scientists
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
45 comments displayed.
#4
-
cdm (11/26/2015) [-] "The program used for the calculations lists run-time of approximately one hour. This is a bald-faced lie. Expect to leave it running overnight."
#5
-
migueldecervantes (11/26/2015) [-]
Science is the most useless human endeavor. I really don't understand how ******* retarded one must be to go into a STEM program.
If only everything could get a Women's Studies degree and draw snarky political cartoons, then humankind would actually have a chance at greatness.
But before that, we must burn cis-scum texts of philosophy and literature, too. A society is better off when they are not intellectually/emotionally confronted with difficult ideas/stories.
And the law needs a lot of restructuring (the women who have Gender Studies degrees (the second most important degrees of all)) can endeavor to do this.
As soon as this is put in place history must be erased from our collective memory up until that moment. No one should know about racism, fascism or general oppression, so that these things will never happen again.
Finally, language will be altered a little. "White cis males must die" will replace "hello" for instance.
If only everything could get a Women's Studies degree and draw snarky political cartoons, then humankind would actually have a chance at greatness.
But before that, we must burn cis-scum texts of philosophy and literature, too. A society is better off when they are not intellectually/emotionally confronted with difficult ideas/stories.
And the law needs a lot of restructuring (the women who have Gender Studies degrees (the second most important degrees of all)) can endeavor to do this.
As soon as this is put in place history must be erased from our collective memory up until that moment. No one should know about racism, fascism or general oppression, so that these things will never happen again.
Finally, language will be altered a little. "White cis males must die" will replace "hello" for instance.
#37 to #35
-
migueldecervantes (11/27/2015) [-]
You don't seem to understand that, unlike you, I am not abashedly retarded and thus can write a medium-length comment while still maintaining a healthy life-style during which I have time to nourish myself, sleep occasionally, work on my own creative and, I might add, lucrative projects, and, finally, to enjoy another large host of leisurely activities like novels, movies, video games and music.
You see, this comment, which is probably taking you two hours to decipher, took me only one minute and a half to write.
Bear in mind, neoraed, I am not boasting, only making a point (which I am sure you will fail to grasp, just as you did that of my previous comment).
Have a good one nonetheless, friend.
You see, this comment, which is probably taking you two hours to decipher, took me only one minute and a half to write.
Bear in mind, neoraed, I am not boasting, only making a point (which I am sure you will fail to grasp, just as you did that of my previous comment).
Have a good one nonetheless, friend.
#41 to #37
-
neoraed (11/27/2015) [-] My only problem with your comment is that , aside from the retarded content i hope you dont sincerely belive, is that on this website is noting but cheap bait and the fact that you migh've wasted more than a mnute on such tells more about your inteligence than it does about mine.
unless , of course, you sincerely belive in what you just wrote then you're welcome to do humanity a favor and throw yourself out of the nearest window/bridge.
unless , of course, you sincerely belive in what you just wrote then you're welcome to do humanity a favor and throw yourself out of the nearest window/bridge.
#42 to #41
-
migueldecervantes (11/27/2015) [-]
I'm more than ready to spend a minute of my time on something that I believe to be funny (and hope others will find so as well).
It would not be a testimony to my "inteligence", but to my sense of humor, if anything. Yet, unfortunately for you, your lack of understanding of what "inteligence" is and its misapplication to a post the intent of which is humorous, says once again much about your levels of "inteligence".
And people have found it funny. You may display the positive and negative thumbs that my foremost comment has obtained so far by clicking "votes" under said comment's settings menu (the little square with five gray bars in it on the far right of the comment box, on the left of the thumbs count). You will find that SOME people found it funny. Not most, no, but that is to be expected from a site on which most people are of a level of "inteligence" comparable to yours (read: extreme autism and total retardation mingled with both forms of down syndrome).
I'm still happy that some people found it funny enough to thumb it up. They understood, unlike you, that it was supposed to be irony, not "bait".
(see comment #36, by defski).
It would not be a testimony to my "inteligence", but to my sense of humor, if anything. Yet, unfortunately for you, your lack of understanding of what "inteligence" is and its misapplication to a post the intent of which is humorous, says once again much about your levels of "inteligence".
And people have found it funny. You may display the positive and negative thumbs that my foremost comment has obtained so far by clicking "votes" under said comment's settings menu (the little square with five gray bars in it on the far right of the comment box, on the left of the thumbs count). You will find that SOME people found it funny. Not most, no, but that is to be expected from a site on which most people are of a level of "inteligence" comparable to yours (read: extreme autism and total retardation mingled with both forms of down syndrome).
I'm still happy that some people found it funny enough to thumb it up. They understood, unlike you, that it was supposed to be irony, not "bait".
(see comment #36, by defski).
#43 to #42
-
neoraed (11/27/2015) [-] well, i suppose i'm the one who comes off as the moron in this litlle discuscion, i did reply to obvious bait, still for somebody that claims to have posted something ironicaly you sure were quick to defend yourself when i claimed that you needed a hobby mayhaps you have something to act defensive about, but i suppose that is none of my bussiness, how people get their jollies is intirely up to them.
also just because SOME people found it funny doesnt mean that some foud it retarded and inane and if you are incampable of discerning the intent of my post was to state my opinion about the content of your post and not about judging your lifestyle then talking is all you're good at.
Also this discussion is becoming way too pretentious so ill drop it here.
have a good one.
also just because SOME people found it funny doesnt mean that some foud it retarded and inane and if you are incampable of discerning the intent of my post was to state my opinion about the content of your post and not about judging your lifestyle then talking is all you're good at.
Also this discussion is becoming way too pretentious so ill drop it here.
have a good one.
#44 to #43
-
migueldecervantes (11/28/2015) [-]
I was mostly joking with you (kind of like the first comment I made on this post). I hope I didn't offend you with my insults. I obviously don't actually believe that you are stupid.
Have a good one as well.
Have a good one as well.
#39 to #38
-
migueldecervantes (11/27/2015) [-]
I do love word puzzles. My foremost comment is just bait/satire of SJWs.
#25 to #5
-
migueldecervantes (11/26/2015) [-]
I'm just happy that most of you fags got thumbs for calling out the bait. Not sure how obvious it was.
Happy Thanksgiving, you virginal autists.
<3
Happy Thanksgiving, you virginal autists.
<3
#26 to #5
-
migueldecervantes (11/26/2015) [-]
I'm just happy that most of you fags got thumbs for calling out the bait. Not sure how obvious it was.
Happy Thanksgiving, you virginal autists.
<3
Happy Thanksgiving, you virginal autists.
<3
#11
-
nimba (11/26/2015) [-] "This control was omitted because it was 5.30 and the stock manager/supervisor was getting a bit testy.
#23
-
mooghens (11/26/2015) [-] This scientific approach to solving this problem was chosen on the basis that it was the first thing to pop up when we googled possible solutions.
#27
-
angelusprimus (11/26/2015) [-] I was once involved in a study that, among other things, had me and an old jew carrying a drugged pig through engineering building, once a week.
I needed extra credits. Found it best to not ask too many questions.
I needed extra credits. Found it best to not ask too many questions.
#19
-
whiteoverblue (11/26/2015) [-] "I didn't put the catalyst in the solution because my wife left me"
#10
-
yiffcario (11/26/2015) [-] You don't know how it feels. You don't know how it feels, to be me.
#45
-
anon (12/01/2015) [-]
One of my colleagues didn't actually read a paper he cited in our publication and it turned out it stated the exact OPPOSITE of the result we wanted. Almost cost us the paper. Yeah, we double checked our papers after that..
#24
-
nerfhead (11/26/2015) [-]
i think they should pay the paywall and do the other things better. i just think its science is important enough to do those things properly and it could make them more money is they figure out more things
#17
-
IamPinhead (11/26/2015) [-]
Sometimes you have to say ' **** it' for convenience so you can go home.
