Science Intensifies. In the last few frames, Bill Nye looks a bit like former US president George W. Bush... Psyche! That's the wrooooong theory. bill nye science guy Ken Ham Debate science intensify
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (130)
[ 130 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
65 comments displayed.
#1 - bitchesbanthymine
Reply +144
(02/10/2014) [-]
Psyche! That's the wrooooong theory.
Psyche! That's the wrooooong theory.
#2 to #1 - deadmansdope ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/10/2014) [-]
idontunderstandthereference.jpg
#3 to #2 - fnoogernooger
Reply +6
(02/11/2014) [-]
Supa hot fire VS b-bone (first battle ORIGINAL) If it doesn't imbed right, skip to 1:02.
#13 to #3 - thatguyyoumightno
Reply +7
(02/11/2014) [-]
#14 to #13 - fnoogernooger
Reply +5
(02/11/2014) [-]
That depends. What else are you looking for?
That depends. What else are you looking for?
#4 to #3 - deadmansdope ONLINE
Reply +4
(02/11/2014) [-]
#82 to #1 - animedudej
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
i loved how bill nye kept asking him like "but do you have any way of predicting things" and he kept redirecting him to different books
#95 to #1 - daggieboy
Reply +7
(02/11/2014) [-]
but I'm not a scientist
#7 - barndar
Reply -42
(02/11/2014) [-]
For ****** sake, ENOUGH about this god damn debate.
For ****** sake, ENOUGH about this god damn debate.
#25 to #7 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
For ****** sake, ENOUGH about your ancient Osiris fan fiction.
#71 to #7 - terrorproof
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
#80 to #7 - dinonator
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
but i laughed
#104 to #7 - leafonthewind
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
I didn't hear anybody damning god
#70 to #7 - asmodeu
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
No.
People need to be reminded that there are some idiots out there who have spent millions of dollars building a museum and gathering proof to a concept about our coming into being that's simply too outdated, doesn't respect scientific methods and concepts and is enforced on other people so much that it should legally be called rape.
#26 to #7 - nonanonnon
Reply +2
(02/11/2014) [-]
This is the same website that, when we all decided to not post on sunday, the front page was filled with posts saying "No post on sundays"

In other words, you probably dragged this dead horse along another few weeks just by posting that.
#27 to #7 - profkitty ONLINE
Reply +4
(02/11/2014) [-]
On another note, I hate the kids in this .gif.
#8 to #7 - crazyeyedbioll
Reply +95
(02/11/2014) [-]
Just buckle up and take it, FJ will jerk off this debate til there is no more fanboy jizz left in the ballsack of the community
#22 to #8 - upyoursnumbnuts
Reply +2
(02/11/2014) [-]
So basically, give it a few years?
#105 to #8 - AztecJew
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
tell it like it is brotha
tell it like it is brotha
#72 to #8 - barndar
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
Yeah, you're right, but I really think that should have happened long ago by now
#87 to #72 - mookiez
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
Individually the ball sacks of fj are weak, but together they form a mighty faggot.
#15 - navadae
Reply +54
(02/11/2014) [-]
bill nye the science guy, and ken ham the religion man
#107 to #15 - matrixone
Reply -1
(02/11/2014) [-]
it's ken ham the historical science guy you uncultured ****
#103 to #15 - gitanisme
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
iamnotacleverman.jpg

pls explain
#56 to #15 - zumzizeroo
Reply +2
(02/11/2014) [-]
#18 to #15 - hybridxproject
Reply +12
(02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#16 - xsappyx
Reply +44
(02/11/2014) [-]
Bill Nye looked absolutely livid whenever he was looking at Ken Ham. It was pretty scary.
#30 to #16 - joekerr
Reply +3
(02/11/2014) [-]
He was probably keeping his **** together to a) not burst into laughter and b) try to follow ham's ********.
#47 to #30 - ccccmoney
Reply +11
(02/11/2014) [-]
No, that look was "Holy ****, do you actually believe the **** you are spewing? You are looking real smug after that contradiction you just made. I'll write that one down too. Pretty sure you'll just dodge the question and say "bible" again, but I can't punch you in the face right now so destroying your argument in 2:31 will just have to do. "
#50 to #47 - joekerr
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
Can't spot a great difference that would justify the "No" ;) Totally agreeing!
#126 to #50 - ccccmoney
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
lol "no" to the laughing, it's not a laughing matter after all. It would be funny if it werent such a dangerous way of thinking Ham presented.

#127 to #126 - joekerr
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
To be honest, it is a sad thing that it is taken so seriously and being considered "dangerously". Ages ago we talked in school about fundamentalism and how it is ******** ... in religion. Teacher was math and religion teacher and she said that it was horrifying how many people take the bible by word ... well, the majority comes from the US, so you got the most problems with them. Can't help but think that these people are stubborn uneducated ********* who really think that this is something that can be solved via "debate" ... I mean ... how can you so willingly ignore all of the evidence and be naively conviced, that this thing that got translated a **** ton of times to be accurate ... hell, do they even know that the bible as it is is the result of a big conference held by Konstantin like 2000 years ago to make it easy for everyone? Christmas was originally some heathens' sun celebration, they just took it for the birth of their "god".

Srsly, someone who represents creationism or intelligend design is an uneducated ******** ...
#12 - pedobeardisguised
Reply +37
(02/11/2014) [-]
#20 to #12 - vladhellsing [OP]
Reply +2
(02/11/2014) [-]
#31 to #20 - npfortytwo
Reply +2
(02/11/2014) [-]
one of these needs to become desktop resolution
#55 to #31 - taintedangel
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
Seconded.
#17 - flyinjoo
Reply +31
(02/11/2014) [-]
#85 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
Flying Jew?
#129 to #85 - flyinjoo
Reply 0
(02/12/2014) [-]
That was my original FunnyJunk name but I can't remember the password for **** so I made a new account.
#39 - sadistikal
Reply +21
(02/11/2014) [-]
*rоll 2*
#86 to #39 - folkflunky
Reply -3
(02/11/2014) [-]
. *roll 2* nailed it
#58 to #39 - mrbrown
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2* crap i think it's broken
#61 to #39 - redstonealchemist
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
**redstonealchemist rolls 92**
#78 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2*
#81 to #39 - tempman
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2* ****, I can't too
#83 to #39 - stolenusername
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
**stolenusername rolls 60** let me try
#84 to #39 - olisaurus
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
**olisaurus rolls 07**
#94 to #39 - marioslmg ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2* Wut?
#97 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 64**
#109 to #39 - fukkendragonite
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#110 to #109 - fukkendragonite
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#111 to #39 - fukkendragonite
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roII 2*
#112 to #111 - fukkendragonite
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
Capital letter 'i' instead of L.
#128 to #112 - hopporto
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roII 2*
#122 to #112 - sadistikal
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
nope, it's a small L
#49 to #39 - xolotyl **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2*
#59 to #49 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 76** suck on that faggit.
#41 to #39 - hopporto
Reply +8
(02/11/2014) [-]
wait what?
#44 to #41 - sadistikal
Reply +14
(02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#91 to #41 - tranquilizer
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
**tranquilizer rolls 777**
or alternatively... ROLL BLUE TRIPS!!11!!!one!
#90 to #41 - tranquilizer
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
*roII 2*
It's easy once you've figured it out
#5 - bjornkrage
Reply +15
(02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#96 to #5 - gorillaztwentyfour
Reply +3
(02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#34 - thunderchanter
Reply +11
(02/11/2014) [-]
Whatever your opinions on the debate are, you have to admit some pretty good photos and .gifs have come from it
#21 - chrizzle
Reply +8
(02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture