Science Intensifies. In the last few frames, Bill Nye looks a bit like former US president George W. Bush... Psyche! That's the wrooooong theory. bill nye science guy Ken Ham Debate science intensify
x
Click to expand

Comments(130):

[ 130 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #15 - navadae (02/11/2014) [-]
bill nye the science guy, and ken ham the religion man
User avatar #103 to #15 - gitanisme (02/11/2014) [-]
iamnotacleverman.jpg

pls explain
User avatar #107 to #15 - matrixone (02/11/2014) [-]
it's ken ham the historical science guy you uncultured ****
#1 - bitchesbanthymine (02/10/2014) [-]
Psyche! That's the wrooooong theory.
Psyche! That's the wrooooong theory.
User avatar #2 to #1 - deadmansdope (02/10/2014) [-]
idontunderstandthereference.jpg
User avatar #3 to #2 - fnoogernooger ONLINE (02/11/2014) [-]
Supa hot fire VS b-bone (first battle ORIGINAL) If it doesn't imbed right, skip to 1:02.
#14 to #13 - fnoogernooger ONLINE (02/11/2014) [-]
That depends. What else are you looking for?
That depends. What else are you looking for?
User avatar #82 to #1 - animedudej (02/11/2014) [-]
i loved how bill nye kept asking him like "but do you have any way of predicting things" and he kept redirecting him to different books
User avatar #95 to #1 - daggieboy (02/11/2014) [-]
but I'm not a scientist
#16 - xsappyx (02/11/2014) [-]
Bill Nye looked absolutely livid whenever he was looking at Ken Ham. It was pretty scary.
User avatar #30 to #16 - joekerr (02/11/2014) [-]
He was probably keeping his **** together to a) not burst into laughter and b) try to follow ham's ******** .
#47 to #30 - ccccmoney (02/11/2014) [-]
No, that look was "Holy **** , do you actually believe the **** you are spewing? You are looking real smug after that contradiction you just made. I'll write that one down too. Pretty sure you'll just dodge the question and say "bible" again, but I can't punch you in the face right now so destroying your argument in 2:31 will just have to do. "
User avatar #50 to #47 - joekerr (02/11/2014) [-]
Can't spot a great difference that would justify the "No" ;) Totally agreeing!
User avatar #126 to #50 - ccccmoney (02/11/2014) [-]
lol "no" to the laughing, it's not a laughing matter after all. It would be funny if it werent such a dangerous way of thinking Ham presented.

User avatar #127 to #126 - joekerr (02/11/2014) [-]
To be honest, it is a sad thing that it is taken so seriously and being considered "dangerously". Ages ago we talked in school about fundamentalism and how it is ******** ... in religion. Teacher was math and religion teacher and she said that it was horrifying how many people take the bible by word ... well, the majority comes from the US, so you got the most problems with them. Can't help but think that these people are stubborn uneducated ********* who really think that this is something that can be solved via "debate" ... I mean ... how can you so willingly ignore all of the evidence and be naively conviced, that this thing that got translated a **** ton of times to be accurate ... hell, do they even know that the bible as it is is the result of a big conference held by Konstantin like 2000 years ago to make it easy for everyone? Christmas was originally some heathens' sun celebration, they just took it for the birth of their "god".

Srsly, someone who represents creationism or intelligend design is an uneducated ******** ...
#5 - bjornkrage (02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#31 to #20 - npfortytwo (02/11/2014) [-]
one of these needs to become desktop resolution
User avatar #55 to #31 - taintedangel (02/11/2014) [-]
Seconded.
User avatar #34 - thunderchanter (02/11/2014) [-]
Whatever your opinions on the debate are, you have to admit some pretty good photos and .gifs have come from it
#85 to #17 - anon (02/11/2014) [-]
Flying Jew?
User avatar #129 to #85 - flyinjoo (02/12/2014) [-]
That was my original FunnyJunk name but I can't remember the password for **** so I made a new account.
#77 - MysticTomatoe (02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#39 - sadistikal (02/11/2014) [-]
*rоll 2*
User avatar #58 to #39 - mrbrown (02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2* crap i think it's broken
User avatar #61 to #39 - redstonealchemist (02/11/2014) [-]
**redstonealchemist rolls 92**
#78 to #39 - anon (02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2*
User avatar #81 to #39 - tempman (02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2* **** , I can't too
User avatar #83 to #39 - stolenusername (02/11/2014) [-]
**stolenusername rolls 60** let me try
User avatar #84 to #39 - olisaurus (02/11/2014) [-]
**olisaurus rolls 07**
User avatar #86 to #39 - folkflunky (02/11/2014) [-]
. *roll 2* nailed it
User avatar #94 to #39 - marioslmg (02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2* Wut?
#97 to #39 - anon (02/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 64**
0
#109 to #39 - fukkendragonite has deleted their comment [-]
0
#110 to #109 - fukkendragonite has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #111 to #39 - fukkendragonite (02/11/2014) [-]
*roII 2*
User avatar #112 to #111 - fukkendragonite (02/11/2014) [-]
Capital letter 'i' instead of L.
User avatar #128 to #112 - hopporto (02/11/2014) [-]
*roII 2*
User avatar #122 to #112 - sadistikal (02/11/2014) [-]
nope, it's a small L
User avatar #49 to #39 - xolotyl **User deleted account** (02/11/2014) [-]
*roll 2*
#59 to #49 - anon (02/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 76** suck on that faggit.
User avatar #41 to #39 - hopporto (02/11/2014) [-]
wait what?
#44 to #41 - sadistikal (02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #91 to #41 - tranquilizer (02/11/2014) [-]
**tranquilizer rolls 777**
or alternatively... ROLL BLUE TRIPS!!11!!!one!
User avatar #90 to #41 - tranquilizer (02/11/2014) [-]
*roII 2*
It's easy once you've figured it out
#21 - chrizzle (02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#60 - redstonealchemist (02/11/2014) [-]
for anyone that wants it
#6 - trogatoga (02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#116 - madeyegubbins (02/11/2014) [-]
Either side is willing to concede provided proper evidence. However neither side will agree upon what constitutes legitimate evidence so it's basically two sides going ''Prove it'' and the other going ''I just did you 			*******		.'' In the end it's all for naught.
Either side is willing to concede provided proper evidence. However neither side will agree upon what constitutes legitimate evidence so it's basically two sides going ''Prove it'' and the other going ''I just did you ******* .'' In the end it's all for naught.
User avatar #118 to #116 - vladhellsing (02/11/2014) [-]
You misunderstand the nature of evidence.
User avatar #120 to #118 - madeyegubbins (02/11/2014) [-]
Perhaps I wasn't clear.
Fossil records and what they show us provides, what I would consider, proper evidence whereas the creationists refute it and point to the bible as their proof.
User avatar #121 to #120 - vladhellsing (02/11/2014) [-]
Right, I misunderstood.
User avatar #123 to #121 - madeyegubbins (02/11/2014) [-]
No worries. It's my bad for not making myself clear
User avatar #79 - dinonator (02/11/2014) [-]
as seen in the comment section ye twat
User avatar #88 to #79 - vladhellsing (02/11/2014) [-]
I made the one in the comments section, ye twat.
User avatar #93 to #88 - cormy (02/11/2014) [-]
I have had this link saved since I saw it 17 hours ago.
www.funnyjunk.com/Orgasms+how+do+they+feel+like/funny-pictures/5012375/19#19
I AM WITNESS TO ITS CREATION! Woop woop! Yeah... Glory... Or something.
#33 - potatophucker (02/11/2014) [-]
This ******* debate
#48 to #33 - ccccmoney (02/11/2014) [-]
>Important debate which will affect the direction the country goes from this point forward   
>Cancer   
   
...right.
>Important debate which will affect the direction the country goes from this point forward
>Cancer

...right.
User avatar #68 to #48 - xxmarkusxx (02/11/2014) [-]
debates... don't... decide anything?
User avatar #124 to #68 - ccccmoney (02/11/2014) [-]
Didn't decide anything, just showed why religion is dangerous. If the fact that ham answered "no, nothing could ever change my beliefs" didn't terrify you, I don't know what will. The fact that someone when presented with hard evidence decides his cult is more important, it shows the mindset these people have, and they are the majority.

#130 to #124 - anon (02/17/2014) [-]
With terms such as "cult" and saying "religion is dangerous" clearly shows that you are not mature or qualified enough to discuss the matter either. If anything Nye hurt his cause more by validating him with a debate in the first place. Nye is the one who ****** up. That and Nye was quite petty with subtle insults which doesn't help in a debate. Sadly, there are a lot of people who left that debate thinking Nye was wrong. Stop validating something and it will go away. I guess Nye never took a sociology class.
#28 - thewulfman (02/11/2014) [-]
This Nye gif never gets old. Can't stop laughing at it. Thank you to whomever made it a day or so ago.
This Nye gif never gets old. Can't stop laughing at it. Thank you to whomever made it a day or so ago.
User avatar #29 to #28 - vladhellsing (02/11/2014) [-]
You're welcome.
User avatar #115 - suikerpapa (02/11/2014) [-]
Please dear god stop calling this the 'debate of religion vs. science'

they are not polar opposites. Science and religion go together perfectly well. Look for example.. idunno, at the ENTIRE 19TH CENTURY
User avatar #117 to #115 - navadae (02/11/2014) [-]
they only go well together if people let them go well together

a lot of people DONT let them go well together
#99 - Medication (02/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
[ 130 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)