Radiation in a nutshell. . Bl PERSPECTIVE nuclearpowerplant . . 009 mum from are to thant Mar llama! may uranium mine for 1 year I mam. MFW I had 8 CT scans last year, 2 MRIs, and several x-rays ... Radiation in a nutshell Bl PERSPECTIVE nuclearpowerplant 009 mum from are to thant Mar llama! may uranium mine for 1 year I mam MFW had 8 CT scans last 2 MRIs and several x-rays
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (29)
[ 29 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
27 comments displayed.
#14 - yunonomynameeh
Reply +26
(11/18/2013) [-]
MFW I had 8 CT scans last year, 2 MRIs, and several x-rays ...
MFW I had 8 CT scans last year, 2 MRIs, and several x-rays ...
#26 to #14 - colonelroymustang
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
That'd still only be a few rads and twenty rads is the lowest exposure to be observed to have ANY adverse effects on the body.
#27 to #14 - fantomen
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
MRIs are just really powerful magnets.
They won't hurt you.
Unless you're wearing a stainless steel watch, in that case they'll amputate your hand.
#23 to #14 - PRotofuzz
Reply +3
(11/18/2013) [-]
What kind of doctor would advise 8 ct scans. In a single year no less.
#19 to #14 - generaljosh
Reply +4
(11/18/2013) [-]
Why in the hell did you have 8 CT scans?
They really don't show all that much, doctors usually prescribe them so that, in the off chance that you do have something that would show up on a CT but not an X-ray, you can't sue them out the ass.
#24 to #14 - rgmayhem
Reply +9
(11/18/2013) [-]
You ded as **** noa.
#8 - moshimoshi
Reply -20
(11/18/2013) [-]
Tell that to Marie Curie.
#11 to #8 - revoll
Reply +26
(11/18/2013) [-]
Well, marie curie actually handed the uranium.
And by "living near" he means "living within 400-600 meters of distance".
So yeah, **** you
#12 to #11 - moshimoshi
Reply -9
(11/18/2013) [-]
You must be fun at parties.
#13 to #12 - revoll
Reply +6
(11/18/2013) [-]
I thought you were srs
#17 to #13 - dafuckisthishit
-3
has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - kanedam ONLINE
Reply +11
(11/17/2013) [-]
sources for those facts?
#29 to #1 - mooproxy
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
The IFLS website and facebook page. They're usually pretty accurate in what they say.
#9 - dwarfman
Reply +7
(11/18/2013) [-]
Minimum annual radiation to inflict $80b of damage to your country.
#16 - alkamer ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
Can someone traslate this mrem unit to RADS?
#20 to #16 - rhodg
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
1 RAD is 1000 mREM.
#18 to #16 - generaljosh
Reply +2
(11/18/2013) [-]
1 rem = 1 rad, so 1 mrem (milli Roentgen Equivalent in Man) is equal to 1/1000 of a rad
#22 to #18 - rhodg
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
ninja'd
#21 to #18 - alkamer ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
Thanks pal.
#25 - DontDeleteMeAgain
Reply +1
(11/18/2013) [-]
but at what point does you skin begin to flake off?
#6 - ilovehue
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
I'm not sure what the biggest cube is? anyone please?
#7 to #6 - nothingatall
Reply +1
(11/18/2013) [-]
The amount of rads that has been actually shown to relate to the presence of cancer, 10 000 mrem annually MIGHT give you cancer
#28 - bknob
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
Can someone compare what OP posted to the "Elephants Foot" from the Chernobyl disaster? Someone said the guy in this photo, as well as the photographer died in the same day because of radiation. Can anyone shed any light on this? I love learning about this stuff, especially chernobyl but I'm a moron when it comes to calculations especially when it comes to Radiation.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corium_(nuclearreactor)#Chernobylaccident
#15 - endboss
Reply 0
(11/18/2013) [-]
yeah well you dont need a lifetime risk to get it just once and then live with it. im not savin up to get cancer at 80, but wouldnt want to get it before 20 either.
#3 - firecash ONLINE
Reply -1
(11/17/2013) [-]
**firecash rolled a random image posted in comment #19 at You, just, cant, see, me ** OP in a nutshell
**firecash rolled a random image posted in comment #19 at You, just, cant, see, me ** OP in a nutshell
#4 to #3 - whatdafuq [OP]
Reply 0
(11/17/2013) [-]
Yes pretty close
[ 29 comments ]
Leave a comment