Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#20 - samoaspider
Reply +209
(05/03/2014) [-]
now here's the big question - why didn't he just get 2 buttered pieces of toast? (or 2 cats)
#128 to #20 - flyingcube ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/04/2014) [-]
The answer is simple: He didn't have two cats or two toasts just one of each. I mean the dude looks poor
#63 to #20 - infotechexplain
Reply +4
(05/03/2014) [-]
We've been through this.
#38 to #20 - cheeseboyofdoom
Reply +3
(05/03/2014) [-]
Toast always lands butter side down. So they will just separate and fall down.
Do you even science
#39 to #38 - samoaspider
Reply +2
(05/03/2014) [-]
he could totally duct-tape those 2 pieces of buttered toast together aswell
he could totally duct-tape those 2 pieces of buttered toast together aswell
#95 to #39 - cattestacles
Reply 0
(05/04/2014) [-]
Except then the butter is covered and can no longer see the ground, so it will just fall and fail
#33 to #20 - attifyon
Reply +35
(05/03/2014) [-]
If he used two buttered toasts, the one with more butter would count as more buttered toast, and neutralize the other side.
Taping two cats together is not really an easy task, let alone taping them exactly so their backs meet.
#53 to #33 - helpthepeople
Reply +8
(05/03/2014) [-]
taping two cats together also results in more cat, and neutralizes it
#27 to #20 - golfbob
Reply +3
(05/03/2014) [-]
Science doesn't work that way
#25 to #20 - IAmManbearpig
Reply +49
(05/03/2014) [-]
or butter both sides of the toast?
#37 to #25 - anon
Reply 0
(05/03/2014) [-]
Or butter the cats back
#54 to #37 - huffe
Reply +19
(05/03/2014) [-]
because then it's not toast
#23 to #20 - lurifax
Reply -2
(05/03/2014) [-]
Well, cats are too floppy. I can't tell you why he didn't just use toast though