Nigger. Source: imgur subscribe for free drugs.. You can't call me a 'cracker', only we can call each other 'crackers'. You can say 'cracka' but not 'cracker'. Nigger Source: imgur subscribe for free drugs You can't call me a 'cracker' only we can each other 'crackers' say 'cracka' but not
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (173)
[ 173 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
81 comments displayed.
#21 - returned
Reply +75
(12/26/2013) [-]
You can't call me a 'cracker', only we can call each other 'crackers'. You can say 'cracka' but not 'cracker'.
#50 to #21 - anon
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
black people don't call each other *******, they might call each other ****** but ****** is still pretty offensive.
#13 - Toximan
Reply +65
(12/26/2013) [-]
callin' me a cracker, takes me back to the time I used to own land, and people..
#19 - drachma ONLINE
Reply +37
(12/26/2013) [-]
#20 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(12/26/2013) [-]
NIIGGERRSSSS


#103 to #19 - ugoboom ONLINE
Reply +1
(12/27/2013) [-]
oh boy that really rustles my bingos
did anyone else see it?
#108 to #103 - darkchoc
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yup.
#24 to #19 - whichever
Reply +14
(12/26/2013) [-]
naggers
#28 to #24 - drachma ONLINE
Reply +22
(12/27/2013) [-]
#53 - themongoose
Reply +21
(12/27/2013) [-]
The meaning behind the word is "negro," Spanish for "black." It's not ok to be called the English derivative of "Black" from Spanish, but it IS ok to be called "Black." Eventually, "******" would be bad and then "colored" would be right but "black" wrong. Then "Colored" wrong and "Black" right. Imagine calling a  Black guy "colored" today, even though there is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) which is still active today. Yes that makes perfect sense.    
   
Getting offended over it is retarded, in the most literal sense of the word - "to slow down the development or progress of." Seriously. White people don't get offended over being called cracker or honkey, so it completely takes the power away from anyone who would want to huwt ouw wittle feelews. To advance, be better than your assailants. To be better than your assailants, don't let them hurt you.
The meaning behind the word is "negro," Spanish for "black." It's not ok to be called the English derivative of "Black" from Spanish, but it IS ok to be called "Black." Eventually, "******" would be bad and then "colored" would be right but "black" wrong. Then "Colored" wrong and "Black" right. Imagine calling a Black guy "colored" today, even though there is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) which is still active today. Yes that makes perfect sense.

Getting offended over it is retarded, in the most literal sense of the word - "to slow down the development or progress of." Seriously. White people don't get offended over being called cracker or honkey, so it completely takes the power away from anyone who would want to huwt ouw wittle feelews. To advance, be better than your assailants. To be better than your assailants, don't let them hurt you.
#75 to #53 - xdeathspawnx
Reply +2
(12/27/2013) [-]
the same goes for mentally disabled people. At one point retard was the politically correct and polite word but people started using it as an insult so they had to start using mentally challenged, which is now becoming more and more of the incorrect term.
#78 to #75 - themongoose
Reply +1
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yeah, and they want to change "disabled" to "differently abled." This crap is not worth my time. Call a spade a spade and a fitz a fitz. If it's what it is, why be upset about it?
#85 to #78 - nimba
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
I tend to call spades shovels
#88 to #85 - themongoose
Reply +7
(12/27/2013) [-]
THIS IS WHY YOU CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS
#89 to #88 - nimba
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
there is no real consensus on that; that spade is just as much a square shovel as that shovel may be a bladed spade and don't get me started on trowles
#90 to #89 - themongoose
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
You think you can stop this madness?
#10 - kanedam
Reply +14
(12/26/2013) [-]
i still dont get it why black people use the word ***** while getting offended by it at the same time.
i mean if i dont like a word, i shouldnt use it, right?
#23 to #10 - sotalokki
Reply 0
(12/26/2013) [-]
Imo the word means many things, you can be a chill ass ***** and that's positive or you can be a ************* ****** who ruins everyones ****.   
   
Gif related, cool *****
Imo the word means many things, you can be a chill ass ***** and that's positive or you can be a ************* ****** who ruins everyones ****.

Gif related, cool *****
#33 to #10 - jajathezombie
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
I grew up in Baltimore city and I'm probably the whitest person to have lived in Baltimore over the past 20 years. I say *****. To black people. They don't care. They care if you say ****** - they don't say that either - and they care about context. It's not about the word itself, it's all about context and inflection. Kind of like how it's okay for adults to swear but not okay for kids to because they don't really know how to swear and/or when it is appropriate to.
#40 to #33 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
***** and ****** are pronounced differently or what?

and also, as i said in #38: if its just the context no reason to get overhyped over someone saying ******. like the news "the n word" i mean... come on!
either its alright and just personally inadquate because of the situation or it isnt. but then nobody can claim the historical ******** to be the reason why its not alright to say it
#74 to #40 - jajathezombie
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yeah they're pronounced differently.

As for the news thing, it's just because it's a word people would give them a lot of **** over. Actually you'd probably get more upper-middle-class white people enraged over it than anyone else. They get off on getting offended.
#52 to #10 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
If you came up to me and called me a dumbass bitch, you'd wonder why I was offended? I might let my friends call me a dumbass bitch because I know it's all in fun, but I wouldn't let a stranger do it.
#164 to #52 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
thats just a normal insult. there is a difference between that and saying something is a racist swear word that has deep historical meaning and therefor a large group of people is not allowed to use it. (whites, and maybe other ethnicies).

everybody can get offended for beeing called an asshole, and everybody can curse someone as an asshole...
look at comment #45
#155 to #10 - disniggahere
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
there's a difference between ***** and ******.
#35 to #10 - redrex ONLINE
Reply +2
(12/27/2013) [-]
at least with me and my friends, we're always calling eachother horrible names and it's cool because they're my friends. but if some random person started calling me names, good god that **** is not cool
#38 to #35 - kanedam
Reply +1
(12/27/2013) [-]
then ****** is nothing else but calling someone asshole.
no reason to get all overhyped then.
#39 to #38 - redrex ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
well, calling someone an asshole isn't really as bad as calling someone a ******* ********. maybe ****** is just worse than the others. i don't know, i'm trying to put reasoning behind it
#43 to #39 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
at least with me and my friends, we're always calling eachother horrible names and it's cool because they're my friends
so it doesnt matter if your friends call you something worse or not, right?
also: even if it is a worse curse word, its still nothing to get all over tense. (sure, someone can start a quarrel because of beeing called that, but it shouldnt be anything political or racist then)
#54 to #43 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
It's a racial slur just like wetback or chink. I'm sure many hispanics call each other wetbacks as a joke but if an Asian walked up and called them a wetback all hell would break loose. Racial slurs don't belong in politics.
#163 to #54 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
i dont want to argue with someone who uses assumptions.
if you can say you KNOW that hispanics call each other that way just like black people call each other ****** than your argument may be valid, but until then its just an assumption not necessarily true
#166 to #163 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
I can't speak for every hispanic person in the entire universe but my school is pretty diverse. 40% white #30% black and 10% middle eastern 17% hispanic and 3% asian.

I feel like you just refuse to understand the significance and the shock that comes when someone calls you a ******. Doesn't matter WHAT race says it. ***** is okay as long as you're friends but ****** means ignorant and no one calls each other that except 12 yr old white boys who think it's cool.
#167 to #166 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
i'm not native english speaker so i didnt even know there was a difference between ***** and ******. lol

i live in a german speaking country, we had nazis. and the words used by the nazis for other populations (like the one my parents are from) are not used by us now to tell us we are friends or to use among ourselves!
thats just why it seems so stupid to a lot of us... i mean, i wouldnt use the word (even if it is slightly changed) to call out to my friend if the word was used by someone torturing my ancestors.
#168 to #167 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
It all depends on the person, some black people don't say it period, some embrace each other with it.
#169 to #168 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
in my opinion its racist to be allowed to use a word if you are black and not be allowed to use it if you are white or hispanic.
its just racist...

and to claim to be against racism while beeing racist or doing racist things is in my opinion just stupid
#170 to #169 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
I've heard all types of people refer to their friends and each other as ****** (no matter their skin color).
But no one runs around calling each other *******, ****** means ignorant so calling someone a ****** is extremely rude.
#171 to #170 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
****** doesnt mean ignorant.
****** is a racist term for black people.

#172 to #171 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
for many people (including some that are prominent African-Americans) state that "******" simply means a dull, ignorant person. It does not necessarily mean "A black person", though usually when saying "******" in the definition I have stated above, it is referring to an African-American who acts in such a way to ruin the name of the rest of their culture; whereas variations are given to other races and ethnicies
#175 to #172 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
then it isnt even a racist curse anymore?

lol... sorry. it sounds even dumber now to get agitated on a big scale like that... like having to say "the n word"
#44 to #43 - redrex ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
with me and my friends, it doesn't ******* matter. but if some random person called me a ******* ******** i would be more pissed than if they were to call me an asshole
#45 to #44 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
yeah but it wouldnt be something like "oh my god! he really used that word?"
or "i cant believe a teacher said something like that!"
or "a cop isnt allowed to say that!"
or anything like that...
#46 to #45 - redrex ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
good point. like i said, i don't know, i'm just trying to put some logic behind this
#162 to #46 - kanedam
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
dont try putting logic somewhere there is none...
#66 - mrsockz
Reply +10
(12/27/2013) [-]
Both words are bad, its just the media and society that forces one to be worse.
#132 to #66 - coolcalx
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
****** is worse because of the slavery connotations associated with it. cracker and ****** are not equally offensive.
#157 to #132 - farblaze
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_(pejorative)
>One theory holds that the term derives from the "cracking" of whips, either by slave foremen in the antebellum South against African slaves, or by rustics to guide their cattle.[4][5][6][7] Those white foremen or rural poor who cracked their whips theoretically became known as "crackers."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger
>The word originated as a neutral term referring to black people, as a variation of the Spanish/Portuguese noun negro, a descendant of the Latin adjective niger ("color black").

By your logic, cracker is a worse term.
#11 - anon
Reply 0
(12/26/2013) [-]
We asked 6 black people whether '******* or 'cracker' is more offensive... I wonder which word they will pick.
#42 to #11 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply -19
(12/27/2013) [-]
ask 6 white people which is worse. you guys are adorable thinking black people don't ACTUALLY have problems for being black. Being black ******* SUCKSSSSS because everyone with power is still pretty much white and has been for like a thousand years. literally. a ******* millennia of white people kicking ass. honestly two millennia if you count the romans. two millennia of slavery and oppression and you assume that **** just corrects itself in 50 years.
#146 to #42 - anon
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
yes because romans had slaves that were black more than slaves that were white.
do you even history?
#107 to #42 - lordmoldywart
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Your stupidity knows no bounds
#76 to #42 - anon
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
the first person to own a slave in america was a BLACK MAN.. your argument is invalid.. DONT TRY TO SOUND SMART ON FUNNYJUNK!!! f*ckin nig*er
#77 to #76 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
lol and he bought a white person?
#106 to #77 - magicboudha
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Nha, even black people know how good of a slave they do.
#72 to #42 - xdeathspawnx
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
The president of the USA, one of the most powerful men in the world (if not then most) is black and you still think that there are no black people in power.

And black people have not been oppressed for 2000 years, the enslavement and oppression of Africans by whites only lasted a couple hundred years. People of all races have been enslaving each other since humanity first existed.
#73 to #72 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply +3
(12/27/2013) [-]
tell me that the way romans had slaves was the same way that black people were treated.
#79 to #73 - xdeathspawnx
Reply -1
(12/27/2013) [-]
that's irrelevant, I said since the beginning of human history and then you bring up one example of when slaves were treated better thinking it will prove anything.

I don't think the way slaves were treated was right but I also don't think being black is nearly as bad as you are acting. At this point racists are treated much worse than people of any ethnicity are even close to being treated, and everyone has equal rights. We even have things like affirmative action to balance out any of the discrimination left to the point where people of all races are very close to being equal.
#80 to #79 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply -3
(12/27/2013) [-]
black people were treated the worst.
period.
also jews didnt build the pyramids, paid laborers did.
#112 to #80 - BLOCKATIEL
Reply +2
(12/27/2013) [-]
So what? You weren't. Just like I didn't enslave a single person, let it the **** go.
#147 to #80 - anon
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
********,
poor people who couldn;t afford taxes and had to pay for their taxes another way built the damn pyramids.
#82 to #80 - xdeathspawnx
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
I never said anything about jews or the pyramids. Again you are bringing up specific examples and expecting them to prove something.

It seems like you aren't even reading the comments you are responding to at this point.
#131 to #72 - coolcalx
Reply +2
(12/27/2013) [-]
"People of all races have been enslaving each other since humanity first existed."

okay, I can't let this slide. slavery has existed for as long as we have existed, this is true. HOWEVER, ancient slavery was NOT based on race. The Romans, for example, enslaved people captured during war.

the enslavement of Africans was entirely race driven. the "White Man's Burden." Africans were enslaved because they were thought to be inherently inferior to white people.

ancient slavery and slavery of the post-enlightenment period were incredibly different, and to not acknowledge this would be incredibly naive.
#153 to #131 - xdeathspawnx
Reply -1
(12/27/2013) [-]
when I said people of all races have been enslaving each other I did not mean that slavery was based on race, in fact I meant the exact opposite.

You write out a long response contradicting me and saying you "can't let this slide," when my comment never suggests I don't already understand the thing you are supposed to be "educating" me on.
#70 to #42 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
all the white supremacists thumbing me down can go ******* suck an alabaman meth runners moldy cock
#69 to #42 - mayormilkman
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
>other comment is "****** ****** ****** ******"
I wouldn't be surprised if this is a troll.
#49 to #42 - anon
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Found the black person.
#104 to #42 - yuukoku
Reply -1
(12/27/2013) [-]
Slavery began in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Yes, slavery was ironically started by Africans.

The Romans worked especially hard to enslave and kill off Anglo-Saxon peoples, or the ancestors to most of today's "white people." The Romans would later become they Byzantines and then eventually become Russia. You don't see white English and Americans getting pissed at Russians for enslaving them all that time ago, do you?

My people were enslaved by the Mongols, who fired giant, flaming balls of rotting animals and **** at us, economically drained by the British, who hooked our entire country on opium to the point that the Emperor was high at all times, raped and killed by the Japanese, who marched through Nanjing spearing women and babies on bayonets and killing people with swords for fun, and then they turned the Emperor into a political puppet, and then a bunch of communists tried to destroy our culture, killed almost half of our population, and persecuted many of us just for having money. ABSOLUTELY NOBODY GIVES A ******* **** ABOUT THAT!

Have the Chinese ever complained about that as much as Black people complain about being slaves for a couple centuries? Of course not. It's a frame of mind that people like you can't get out of. It's not all black people, it's just a stupid group of them that can't get over the slavery thing. Kiss my ass and stop complaining about something that happened to your ancestors. Get up and make a better life for yourself so their sacrifice wasn't for nothing.
#58 to #42 - tyroneisanigger
Reply -2
(12/27/2013) [-]
Stopped reading at "everyone in power is white and always has been."
That's ********.
The United States of America commonly known as the most powerful country in the world. and the president, the most powerful man in the world is a black man.

Don't ******* say "everyone that has power is white" that **** is so ******* incorrect.
#60 to #58 - hoponthefeelstrain
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Barack Obama is half white.
#63 to #60 - tyroneisanigger
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yes, Obama is mixed.

What's your point?
#68 to #58 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply -2
(12/27/2013) [-]
lol i figured this whole congressional breakdown would've proved that barack obama only has the power to destroy the world, not make laws.
#148 to #68 - tyroneisanigger
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Go on, faggot.
#31 to #11 - stepsword ONLINE
Reply +8
(12/27/2013) [-]
i guess those two white people at the end do LOOK black at first glance
#32 to #31 - blobboy
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
I've seen this report before.
The guy on the top right is oddly ethnical. Don't really know what he is but he's on the ****** side.
The lower one is great. He's friends with Zimmerman and actually gives decent points of view instead of just yelling the same thing over and over like the rest of them do. He was on with Nancy Grace once. She was an absolute bitch to him and I ******* hate her.
#150 to #32 - mrdrpage
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
The guy in the top middle tells it like it is.

He's not pretending (like the guy in the top right and the chick) that Trayvon "used the term 'cracker' correctly."
#154 - worried
Reply +7
(12/27/2013) [-]
you do realize that ****** is derived from Niger a country in africa yet cracker is derived from the sound a whip makes.... right?
#160 to #154 - icedcarbon ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
****** is a retarded version made by ******* derived from Negro... and to be more clear, negro means "black" (or "dark" depending on what the word is used in) in Portuguese ... it is also rude to call someone "black (preto)" in Portugal, you either call him "coloured" or "negro/negra (female)".
Because of the retarded part of the american society spreading, blacks are getting more weirder with the word negro, but it won't change that it isn't an offensive word, only an asshole would think so.

"Escuro (pronounced *shkooroo* assuming 1 would try to read it in english)" also means dark, but it's not really used on people. Negro and negra is what's used.
#179 to #160 - worried
Reply 0
(12/28/2013) [-]
because portugal was the main country that was importing slaves back then....
#98 - kaycie
Reply +7
(12/27/2013) [-]
lets just pretend "cracker" is an offensive term for white people, for the sake of black people's egos
#25 - axtinguisher
Reply +7
(12/26/2013) [-]
And here I though the term "cracker" came from the type of snacks with the same name - 'cause they're white. Please tell me I'm not the only one.
#29 to #25 - andriod
Reply 0
(12/27/2013) [-]
Multiple interpretations
Cracker- Like how you described
Cracker- Someone who would crap whips at slaves
Cracker- Someone who raised/herded cows in Florida
Cracker- Some redneck white person who lives in Florida
#86 to #29 - nimba
Reply +1
(12/27/2013) [-]
*crap whips*
sticky lengths of rope
me sides
#30 to #25 - icespine
Reply +1
(12/27/2013) [-]
i actually thought this too