Meatland. . M] 6005; wway axe, atrial, we ! rai WHICH agil, NH!. He wasn't going to meatland in the first place, he is a ginger. saturday morning
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (252)
[ 252 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#25 - willindor
Reply +362 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**willindor rolled user linktheherooftime **
**willindor rolled user linktheherooftime **
#26 to #25 - linktheherooftime
Reply +706 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
>Berrypicker as ****.
#77 to #26 - jibb
Reply +46 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#96 to #26 - darkbringer
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
#172 to #26 - stripey
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
for those who don't get it

link, that was perfect
#215 to #26 - pearfield
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
User avatar #135 to #26 - revengeforfreeze
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I think that is a hilarious.. thing
User avatar #235 to #135 - revengeforfreeze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
man what was i thinking creating this comment

*facepalms internally*
User avatar #154 to #26 - dyalibya
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
berries burst out of loincloth .....
#239 to #26 - spoodermanz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**spoodermanz rolled a random image posted in comment #20 at Animals ** hey look
#160 to #26 - ompalomper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
this was such a good refection i think you used mirror force
User avatar #132 to #26 - Dwarf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I like the cut of your jibb.
User avatar #202 to #132 - welliguessitsaname
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
"What's a jib?"
User avatar #206 to #202 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
promotethatman.homersimpson
User avatar #233 to #206 - HomerSimpson
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
hey cutie
#245 to #233 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #247 to #202 - thumbaccountlol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Part of the rope system on sail boats.
User avatar #240 to #132 - jibb
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
huehuehue
User avatar #241 to #26 - olfactory
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
berry picker ass ****
#31 - anon id: 07cb09c2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
welp another great comedian ruined by LE ENLIGHTENMENT OF ATHEISM
**** this
User avatar #118 to #31 - hellsjester
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
wait so a typical fedora atheist didn't ruin that to begin with how?
User avatar #133 to #31 - snaresinger
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Except for that small part where atheist comedy has been Zach Weiner's shtick for a long time, you crowd-following, fedora-crying *******.
User avatar #167 to #133 - thebritishguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I'd hate God too if my second name was weiner
User avatar #232 to #133 - nogphille
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
#134 to #133 - anon id: 07cb09c2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
crowd following? I've been hating on annoying atheists since they started springing up, it's not my fault the rest of the internet finally realized it was retarded. Stay salty, you godless ****.
User avatar #209 to #134 - snaresinger
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Really? And how do you classify "annoying"? Because all I see here is poignant humor, not annoying ranting. If you don't happen to like it, that's cool, you're allowed to, and I'm allowed to disagree with you when you say that a comedian was "ruined' by atheism when that was what that comedian did in the first place. Good god, you're illogical. But, I guess that's to be expected, eh?
User avatar #138 to #134 - nogphille
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
it's a ******* joke, don't get so bent out of shape over it.

and who cares if i'm going to no meat land?

i'm already a vegetarian.
#139 to #138 - anon id: 07cb09c2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
"don't get so bent out of shape over it"
says the kid who's raging over #31
User avatar #140 to #139 - nogphille
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
#31 you say?

and is this #31 here with us right now?

he's everywhere, you say?

how do you know?

you read it in a book, dated thousands of years ago, written, not by a prophet, but by clergymen and edited to suit monarch's desires?

i see...
#155 to #140 - anon id: 07cb09c2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
When did I ever say I was Christian? Typical 14 year old Atheist right here.
"If he's not Atheist, he's KKKristian or Muslim!"
User avatar #158 to #155 - nogphille
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
because you got booty-trouble by a harmless joke, which is what religious people get offended by most easily.

i didn't understand what you meant at all by 'raging over #31', so like a good atheist, i tried to drive holy lance through your hemorrhoids, see if it would pop.

but i see you're as godless as me, how else could you judge me as anything, let alone a typical 14 year old atheist, that would be for his divine lord to do.
#223 to #158 - anon id: 4f748b81
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Again, judgement only applies to the Christian faith. You know nothing about religion, like most Atheists (which is why they are Atheist)
User avatar #228 to #223 - nogphille
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
>judgement only applies to the christian faith
>you know nothing about religion

seems contradictory, i obviously at least know something about the christian faith.

which, i assumed you were part of, since it's the most practiced faith, at least in my vicinity.

your statement is quite 'elitist' though.
you obviously consider atheism wrong, since you find that atheists are only atheist because they know nothing about religion.

maybe it's the opposite? they know so much about religion that they're discouraged to follow it because of contradiction in it or posed by 'leaders' of the faith.

but you're free to your superiority and welcome to have porridge from golden spoons in whichever walhalla or reincarnation you prefer.
User avatar #243 to #223 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Really? Where's your source saying that most atheists don't know anything about religion? If you were actually informed, you'd know that quite a few atheists are apostate.
User avatar #159 to #138 - achimp
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
This, this is the funniest ******* atheist comment I've come across in a long while.

Not only are you so stuck up and arrogant to assume that you're better than religious people, you are so infatuated with yourself that you find it necessary to say things like "I'm a vegetarian" as if it somehow affects the conservation.

Jesus ************* Christ, you are the most elitist little **** I have ever seen.
User avatar #213 to #159 - snaresinger
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
1. ...You really think he's talking about actual vegetarianism? Have you not been following the conversation?
2. How is he stuck up? He stated his belief, how is that stuck up? I don't see any arrogance or implication that he's better than anyone else. You have to learn to back up your arguments with logic. It's okay kiddo, you'll get it one day
User avatar #163 to #159 - nogphille
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
i'm arrogant because i think people should be able to take a joke?
where did i assume to be better than anyone?

i however found it nice to know that, after i die and go to no meat land, i'll pretty much have the same life i've been living the past few years.

but i guess a thanks are in order, but since i'm an elitist, i suppose i'll have someone send those thanks to you if i can find the time between banging supermodels and writing humorous anecdotes online.
User avatar #170 to #163 - achimp
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
You're arrogant because you assume people care about your vegetarianism, and/or your atheism.
Also, your own ******* words show how damned arrogant you are. Consider this quote:

"you read it in a book, dated thousands of years ago, written, not by a prophet, but by clergymen and edited to suit monarch's desires?"

This implies YOU are better, because YOU didn't read it in a book, or are "enlightened" enough to know what is true and what isn't true, and thus YOU are better.

What a little cunt you are. I can just imagine meeting you in real life. "I'm a vegetarian AND an atheist."
User avatar #198 to #170 - nogphille
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
nope, just poking the agitated bear.
i get along well with most christians. i just don't deal well with people who can't take a joke.

nowhere does it state i am 'enlightened' enough to know what's true. i just know the bible has been edited multiple times, which is why i'm using it as a basis to poke holes in credibility of an anon who i know nothing about other than that he can't take a joke about religion.
User avatar #214 to #170 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
HURR DURR NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR BELIEFS, HOW DARE YOU SAY THEM

...it's almost as if this is a comments section, devoted to people saying what they think, isn't it?
User avatar #226 to #214 - achimp
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I keep trying to reply to your latest comment, but you keep commenting. Maybe you're the one who needs to calm down, hmm?

Speaking of which, saying "calm down" is very typical of internet atheists - it implies your opponent is stupid, emotional, or delusional, and that you are not. Clever little ****, you are.

Vegetarianism is in no way relevant on the conversation regarding atheism. You see it as a way to cleverly reference the content, I see it as a way to force something most people aren't interested in to the conversation. See, we both have our opinions - because you agree with him in regards to religion, nothing else he says or does is wrong.

"It's a completely objective statement of fact" - Yeah, no. That's ignoring the fact that it comes from a biased source, ignoring the fact that the bible can be interpreted different ways and with different definitions beneficial to either side of the argument. You're delusional because you want to be right.

Here's a shocker for you buddy. Not everyone believes what you believe. What YOU think are facts are in fact in DISPUTE and SOME might not necessarily agree with you, or believe that those 'facts' are true.

You desperately want to be superior, it is clear - calling me stupid, the "HURR DURR" quote implies YOU are literate and I am not. Saying "it's okay, kiddo" is an even more blatant attempt, however laughable.

Relax, my friend. The comment section is indeed a place for people to share their opinions, and my opinion is that nogphile is a stuck up elitist ****. You, too, it seems.
User avatar #242 to #226 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
I didn't actually say my beliefs, now did I? Tell me what I said that expressly states that I am atheistic. You have been caught making a clear assumption; this is inarguable. I purposefully didn't state my beliefs because I was waiting for you to make the mistake of assuming them, and therefore outing yourself as irrational.

That being said, you must be a troll. The words you say are illogical, unduly angry, presumptuous, assuming, and worst of all, unnecessarily vulgar, a fact which betrays your lack of fitness to hold a rational, intelligent conversation. I could respond to every fallacious, malicious, and otherwise repugnant thing you've said, but there's no point, because you are clearly trying to elicit a response for kicks. No normal person is actually this bad at communication, and if you are not a normal person, then I have no place talking to you, because you need professional help. Have a nice day, sir/madame; I hope you enjoy your hobby of trolling about the internet and/or receive medical attention for your debilitating brain condition, whichever applies.
User avatar #248 to #242 - achimp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/10/2013) [-]
Yet another fantastic attempt to imply superiority.

I assumed you had atheistic leanings due to the fact that you agreed with nogphiles biased definition of the bible. Just because you do not explicitly state something doesn't mean it isn't evident. You are defending an atheistic comment, in an atheistic thread, against the religious anon above. Saying that I'm irrational for assuming you're an atheist if like me saying YOU'RE irrational for assuming I'm not an actual chimp. "I never said I wasn't an actual, speaking, chimp, snare. Jesus, stop assuming things!"

Saying words like "****" and "elitist" is evidence that someone isn't able to hold a conversation, but mocking someone by saying "HURR DURR NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR BELIEFS, HOW DARE YOU SAY THEM" is? What? saying things in all caps and with no grammar is polite conversation while using words like "****" to emphasize a point isn't? Are you nuts?

You criticize me for "assuming" things (that are completely clear, by the way) yet assume I am angry. I'm not angry - I started out this conversation by saying how humorous nogphiles comment was.

You throw around words like "illogical," but I fail to see how exactly my comments (any of them) were illogical. I must conclude that you don't understand the meaning of the word. In fact, one might say that claiming something without evidence is a true sign ignorance.

If I need professional help for the use of profanity, YOU need professional help because mockery is much worse.
User avatar #250 to #248 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
It still speaks!?!? What is this madness?? Let this monstrosity be gone from our midst!
User avatar #251 to #250 - achimp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
It still has no argument, or any ability to refute any points!
User avatar #252 to #251 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/11/2013) [-]
You do realize I was talking about you, yes? So actually... yeah, you're finally correct here.
User avatar #212 to #170 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Oh by the way, I love your quote. It's a completely objective statement of fact, and yet you think it implies superiority. Hmm. If the facts make you sound stupid, with no addition from the speaker, then maybe they're right.
User avatar #205 to #170 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Holy **** dude. He's not stuck up. He said it because it was relevant to the situation. Christ. Calm down.
User avatar #210 to #205 - achimp
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Irony becomes you.
User avatar #211 to #210 - snaresinger
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Does it, though? Empty half-responses that don't qualify as actual conversation become you.
User avatar #161 to #159 - achimp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
conversation*
#119 to #31 - sinclairr
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
luckily willindor made this picture
luckily willindor made this picture
User avatar #32 to #31 - kirkbot
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**** you
User avatar #36 to #31 - willindor
Reply +175 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I'll see you in no meatland
User avatar #3 - mrmuffins
Reply +134 123456789123345869
(12/08/2013) [-]
He wasn't going to meatland in the first place, he is a ginger.
#33 to #3 - indev
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
mfw I'll never go to meatland
#37 to #33 - moorbs
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Fixed
User avatar #6 to #3 - stcronin
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
They lack meat spirit
#12 - theluppijackal
-14 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #66 to #12 - theluppijackal
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
THAT'S IT, **** it, I'm deleting my comments.
I knew I shouldn't have commented
But nooo.
User avatar #67 to #66 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
It was just a few thumbs down, who cares?
User avatar #68 to #67 - theluppijackal
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
It wasn't that it was everyone else vilifying what I was saying and forcing me into corners.
I couldn't be bothered to reply to everyone and try and keep all my arguments straight.
User avatar #70 to #68 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Theological discussions are tough.
#71 to #70 - theluppijackal
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Especially when trying to do like 3 at once.
User avatar #141 to #71 - mrgreatnamess
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Pfft, casual
#143 to #141 - theluppijackal
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
User avatar #72 to #71 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
It's why I tend to not share my opinions on here; you have five guys jump down your throat about different things and it's too hard to counter all of them.
User avatar #73 to #72 - theluppijackal
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I made the number one mistake: tried to start a religious debate on the internet.
I have failed myself today.
User avatar #142 to #73 - mrgreatnamess
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Such casual
Much noob
User avatar #75 to #73 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
For shame.
#40 to #12 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I mean, if the Bible was guided by a perfect God, you think he wouldn't make any errors. You know, like when He says don't kill people, but then lays down a bunch of guidelines as to when you are compelled to kill others for their actions.

And on a side note, if Moses actually did exist, it's likely that when he came down from Mount Sinai with his tablets, he was tripping nuts seeing as how ancient Hebrews relied heavily on hallucinogens during their rituals, and there's some primo Ayahuasca that grows at the bottom of Mount Sinai from what I hear.
#79 to #40 - omegadynasty
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #48 to #40 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Also, God isn't perfect, at least not in the human sense. Here, I have endless passages to refer to.
He lets Abraham beg for the sparing of Sodom 'if there are 50 righteous people'
He has to search the Garden of Eden for Adam and eve
If we was perfect and 'all knowing' in the sense we say so, he would've known not let the snake talk to Eve.
From there I have to clarify argument of free will and that's too headache inducing to get into at this rate.
User avatar #51 to #48 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Well this is just me working with Google here but:
Job 37:16
Do you know the balancings of the clouds,
the wondrous works of him who is perfect in knowledge.

Stuff like this is why I don't think I'll ever be able to get behind the Bible. Rationalizing it is too difficult IMO. I don't mean to be that guy, but it's all just a bit too much for me.

But yeah, I don't ever think you could allow free will given an omnipotent God. Too much confusion.
User avatar #55 to #51 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Oh, that's the new international version
The newer the translation, the worse off you are.
User avatar #57 to #55 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Here's another verse then that says that God is perfect. It's got a bunch of different translations.

biblehub.com/psalms/18-30.htm
User avatar #59 to #57 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
His way is perfect, meaning the path of goodness
But now I'd just be getting into semantics and would refer back to my original point that you had this old book written by a bunch of people by hand, a long time ago.
User avatar #52 to #51 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Well no, the whole idea of free will is that God DOESN'T know what we're going to do, otherwise that defeats the purpose of free will.
To say he knows what we're going to do but still allows us the choice of what to do is nonsense.
User avatar #56 to #52 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, but you can't say that God is all-knowing and yet still say that He doesn't know what we're going to do. Those things contradict each other.
User avatar #58 to #56 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
That's...that's my point
He isn't all knowing in the sense you think so.
Otherwise we don't have free will.
You're making my argument for me here.
User avatar #62 to #58 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Exactly, one has to be wrong, yet the Bible says that both are true.
User avatar #64 to #62 - theluppijackal
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
He's not all knowing in the sense we say all knowing.
Finite beings can't really grasp infinite concepts.
#47 to #40 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Damn -12 thumbs.

>You know, like when He says don't kill people, but then lays down a bunch of guidelines as to when you are compelled to kill others for their actions.
The commandment is not 'thout shalt not kill' it's 'thou shalt not murder' which specifically refers to unlawful killings

But I dunno why I'm bothering trying to argue at this point
User avatar #49 to #47 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I actually see what you're saying there and that does make sense. I just don't think that killing someone for preaching other faiths or most any of the other things the Bible says to put others to death for can ever actually be justified. I get where you're coming from with the "child doesn't know why something is bad, it just is" argument, but I've never understood what makes God so special that He gets to make the rules. Whenever you ask someone that you just get some circular argument that just ends with something along the lines of "God gets to because he's God."
User avatar #50 to #49 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Well I always try to avoid getting into that level of argument. If it's a matter of defending religion tho, that I can usually do.
User avatar #53 to #50 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
No worries, I'm not trying to attack you for your religion. Just trying to start a conversation because I've got an exam in about two hours and I'm stalling before I get down to doing some studying.
User avatar #54 to #53 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I'm not even Christian.
#14 to #12 - kathendight
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Your defense for the contradictions of the Bible is that it was hand written?
#15 to #14 - anon id: 1279d8a5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
There are no contradictions in the Bible, just things people who love sin more than truth refuse to study hard enough to understand.
#16 to #14 - theluppijackal
-2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #27 to #16 - mrgreatnamess
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
>word of god
#17 to #16 - kathendight
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
No, I agree, your absolutely right. But I think your missing the point. If it has contradictions, why believe in it? How do you know whats right and whats wrong? Why not just do what you think is right regardless of what a book that is inherently imperfect says. At that point, why need the religion?
#18 to #17 - theluppijackal
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#20 to #18 - kathendight
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Morality? Why do you need the Bible for that? That still doesn't answer how you know whether or not what your cherry picking is the right part. I never said that it was all wrong. Your adding the slippery slope to the argument yourself. And just for random curiosity can I get some kind of example of how you can tell what is metaphorical and what isn't?
#23 to #20 - theluppijackal
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#38 to #23 - macabrealucard
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
***** you don't make any sense I've actually studied the bible all my childhood and young adult life and more importantly it was joke and don't you talk **** on smbc....however your grammar is impeccable . Remember, only a Sith deals in absolute.
#43 to #38 - theluppijackal
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#41 to #38 - theluppijackal
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #60 to #23 - useroftheLOLZ
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
So what you're saying is, the bible is ok, even in spite of all it's blatant contradictions, it's blatant lies, it's blatant ********, and it's blatant shaming? You are also saying that because parents don't want to do their job, and instill the proper morals, they must resort to fear tripping their child, by saying if they don't follow the word of the magical spaghetti monster, they will go to hell, where they will burn for all eternity, in pain that is infinite, and there shall be no salvation for them, that's what you're saying? How about this, parents give children the base moral of "Do not be a dick," And let them take it from there? My father was Catholic, and my mother was Christian, and yet, not once did they force religion on me, they taught me to be a good person, and let me decide how I would do so, they didn't lie and promise me things like heaven and hell, they told me to be a good person because that's what being a human is.

If you need a book to tell you to be good, and do what is right, all in promise of Heaven, then you are the worst kind of person, you are acting not upon your desire to be good, and brotherly, you are acting upon a selfish desire. And regardless, good and evil are arbitrary terms used to bring order to a universe that is infinite, and without order, nothing is ever black and white, it's all varying shades of gray that's color is situationional, the second you decide to enforce arbitrary rules, boundaries, and limitations, you are imposing limits on how far you are willing to go to do the BEST thing, not the RIGHT thing. AKA what's best isn't always right, what's right isn't always best.
#63 to #60 - theluppijackal
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #69 to #63 - useroftheLOLZ
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
That still doesn't make sense, you don't need to be religious to have a strong set of morals. History has proven that some of the most moral individuals, don't have to be religious, it has also proven that some of the most religious individuals, have the most corrupt and impure morals.

You don't become religious because you believe that you're children will be immoral otherwise, you bash your doubts, and decide that you will do what it takes to make sure that your child will know the most ways how to react, when put under any situation, because there is no "right" or "wrong" way, like religion teaches, you teach them the most number of ways to react, and let them decide how they wish to do so, that's the job of a parent.

Making sure they grow up to choose the best options, ones that benefit more than just them, is the job of a good parent, and you do that by instilling life experiences into them, take them to meet other people, expand their view of the world, show them that earth is a really ******* small place, in the vast expanse of the cosmos, show them that as far as we know, we are alone, all we have is each other, and that screwing each other will get us nowhere. That's being a good parent, you teach them to be good without any sort of compensation, other than it's the best thing to do.
User avatar #74 to #69 - theluppijackal
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I'm not going to bother
I made the mistake of trying argue for religion on the internet.
Good luck to you friend
#35 to #23 - hitro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Thats all fine and dandy, but i believe why most people expect it and want it to be perfect is because so not only is it the supposed word of god so you'd think it would be perfect, but because that so many people judge their life off of it that it starts to affect those of us that dont reflect our life through it, with such things as laws, or One Nation Under GOD.

User avatar #24 to #20 - theluppijackal
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I realize I sort of went off at a tangent at the end there, but to answer your last question more directly: you can tell if you do research, quite simply.
User avatar #19 to #12 - willindor
Reply +109 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
This has nothing to do with the bible. It's about meatland and no meatland.
User avatar #44 to #19 - snowshark
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Bloody christians always gotta make it about them. Tch. They can go straight to No Meatland for all I care.
#61 to #19 - anon id: 47cb9cd0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
IS METAPHORICAL!
User avatar #65 to #61 - willindor
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Talk like that will make you end up in no meatland.
#1 - warlockrichard
Reply +62 123456789123345869
(12/08/2013) [-]
#82 to #1 - Kairyuka
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
I win.
#2 to #1 - yoursandwitch
Reply +85 123456789123345869
(12/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #80 to #2 - tittentei
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
is that from clockwork orange?
#97 to #80 - anon id: b7568bd1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Nah. Its from the exorcist.
#124 to #2 - anon id: 82d1c2a4
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
god dammit skywalker
#91 - lotengo
Reply +83 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
because he is going to no meatland
User avatar #9 - stipulateprism
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
This week in science? Rock not for eating.
User avatar #10 to #9 - thechosentroll
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Fire is ouch.
User avatar #147 to #10 - vampireinarm
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
no air in water
#11 to #9 - hermaeousmora
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
#81 - zameckis
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
oh magic conch, will i go to meatland?
#200 to #81 - muswellhillkid
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #204 to #81 - headlessmamii
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**headlessmamii rolls 4** Can I go to meatland?
User avatar #208 to #204 - headlessmamii
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**headlessmamii rolls 5** How bout' now?
#207 to #204 - headlessmamii
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#218 to #81 - jimmytwoshoes
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #219 to #81 - jimmytwoshoes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**jimmytwoshoes rolls 1** oh might magic conch, will i ever find love?
#221 to #219 - jimmytwoshoes
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
oh happy day! =D

mfw i find that special someone
User avatar #234 to #81 - niggastolemyname
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
****************** rolls 8** meatland or no meatland?
User avatar #165 to #81 - dumbassvtwo
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**dumbassvtwo rolls 11** Will i go to meat land?
User avatar #166 to #165 - dumbassvtwo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
That moment when you accidentally dubs AND get into meatland.
#189 to #165 - anon id: b54fcf81
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Yes yes

Well the magic conch loves you
User avatar #117 to #81 - humorouswaste
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**humorouswaste rolls 0** im a meatetarian
User avatar #127 to #81 - whichever
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**whichever rolls 4** will I roll dubs
User avatar #128 to #127 - whichever
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**whichever rolls 3**
User avatar #129 to #128 - whichever
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**whichever rolls 6** srsly magic conch
User avatar #130 to #129 - whichever
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**whichever rolls 14** yes I want it
User avatar #131 to #130 - whichever
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
dammit magic conch
User avatar #144 to #81 - stolenusername
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**stolenusername rolls 6** magic conch will somebody get the pink username?
User avatar #146 to #81 - vilememory
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**vilememory rolls 6** Oh Magic Conch will I get to Meat Land?
User avatar #173 to #81 - falloutfanatic
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**falloutfanatic rolls 8** will i go to meatland?
User avatar #174 to #173 - falloutfanatic
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
THE CONCH HAS SPOKEN!
User avatar #199 to #174 - falloutfanatic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
ahhhh... all that stress from finals is now relieved, thanks magic conch!
User avatar #194 to #81 - xsamos
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**xsamos rolls 0** Will I go to meatland oh great and wise magic conch?
User avatar #197 to #194 - xsamos
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**xsamos rolls 6** will I go to Meatland if I do?
#195 to #194 - xsamos
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #151 to #81 - wydell
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**wydell rolls 1** magic conch, is meatland actually just full of penises?
#164 to #81 - dumbassvtwo
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #123 to #81 - crispymcpee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**crispymcpee rolls 0** Is OP catiously bisexual?
#125 to #123 - crispymcpee
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
i am teroras
User avatar #120 to #81 - zeroguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**zeroguy rolls 3** Will i get to meatland?
User avatar #93 to #81 - thescyle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**thescyle rolls 0** i like my meat young and bloody... can i has sum?
#94 to #93 - thescyle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
#217 to #94 - acexll
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #100 to #81 - emberstar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**emberstar rolls 4** I go to meatland?
User avatar #101 to #100 - emberstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**emberstar rolls 6** Me go to meatland?
User avatar #102 to #101 - emberstar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**emberstar rolls 31** Yay! Meatland!
User avatar #83 to #81 - zameckis
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**zameckis rolls 3**
#84 to #83 - zameckis
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**zameckis rolls 4**
meatland or no meatland?
#85 to #84 - zameckis
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**zameckis rolls 0**
will i go to meatland, oh magic conch?
come on, i want the answer damn it!
#87 to #85 - zameckis
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
welp, even magic conch forsaken me
see you guize on no meatland
User avatar #86 to #85 - psyachu
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**psyachu rolls 6** will he go to meatland upon killing himself?
#88 to #86 - psyachu
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
mwahahah! Your fate is under my control!
#92 to #88 - zameckis
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
what do you require to let me go to meatland?
what do you require to let me go to meatland?
User avatar #95 to #92 - psyachu
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
the best shopped picture you can make.

It should involve a bear, Yaranaika, Trogdor, Snoop Dogg, dickbutt, and anything of your choice. Only then can you make it to meatland!
#106 to #95 - zameckis
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
can i go to meatland now?
#185 to #106 - psyachu
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
sure, just don't go to the wrong meatland
#98 to #95 - zameckis
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
what a choice there   
my photoshop skill is a bit rusty    
but hey, it's for the sake of meatland!   
let's see what i can do
what a choice there
my photoshop skill is a bit rusty
but hey, it's for the sake of meatland!
let's see what i can do
User avatar #107 to #98 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Still waiting.
User avatar #108 to #107 - zameckis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
>>>#106
User avatar #109 to #108 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Fair enough for me. Let's wait for psyachu.
User avatar #110 to #109 - zameckis
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
i hope i will ascent to meatland
User avatar #112 to #110 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**spainisbad rolls 0** Can I go to meatland?
User avatar #115 to #112 - zameckis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
magic conch sure hate meatland
User avatar #116 to #115 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Yup.
User avatar #114 to #112 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
Well ******* great.
#111 to #110 - spainisbad
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#180 - brodofaggins
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**brodofaggins rolls 48**
#196 to #180 - Das
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#183 to #180 - brodofaggins
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
#122 - heyayayakilla
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(12/09/2013) [-]
**heyayayakilla rolled user thegamerslife **