Magic exists. Magic exists. It's called technology. @All the bronies: sorry, unicorns don't exists nor will they in future... Here's the real difference though: Technology costs money, unless your super smart or talented you can't make or invent anything yourself, not to mention techno Magic exists It's called technology @All the bronies: sorry unicorns don't nor will they in future Here's real difference though: Technology costs money unless your super smart or talented you can't make invent anything yourself not to mention techno
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (288)
[ 288 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#34 - infinitereaper
Reply +191 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [+] (73 replies)
stickied by namesmeannothing
Here's the real difference though:

Technology costs money, unless your super smart or talented you can't make or invent anything yourself, not to mention technology is a crutch and magic is a strength, I mean that's the thing, while you might not have as much magic as another magic is free. Technology, is not. Magic is universal, technology is not. Technology is bound by the natural laws of physics, magic is not.

Technology isn't magic. It's technology. It's the product of the sweat, tears, and brains of people usually greater than most of us. If we want it we must purchase it. Without money we cannot eat. Magic is different though. Magic can be used to help you survive. It's a source of power, it's an equalizer in this big ball of **** we call nature. But we don't live in a world of magic.

The two are not the same.

If you want to call anything magic, it's money. Because money gives you access to all that technology, it lets you bypass the rules of our world and do whatever you want. It'll fill you up to your hearts content and fill your belly. It gives you power over everything.

In short. Don't tell me technology is magic, because I'm a muggle, and I understand what the true "magic" sad as it may be. I'd prefer a world of real magic.
#100 to #34 - kez
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
What a ******** post
#103 to #34 - anon id: 9ff176b5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Spells use mana
User avatar #155 to #103 - infinitereaper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
technology costs money
User avatar #199 to #155 - wooyoungkim
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Yea but I'm sure mana refills automatically through time.
User avatar #200 to #199 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Another reason magic is not the same as technology. Another reason I prefer magic.
User avatar #201 to #200 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Unless potions are necessary to fill mana, which in turn costs money.
#109 to #34 - anon id: 6a78a946
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
why yes money is power, i mean it even allows you to control other people and calling them employees in the process.
#117 to #34 - darkparadox
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
"Magic" in movies and such must be discovered, or invented first, much like technology.  You must spend time learning the magic, or spend money learning how to do it.  (Books and ****)  The time invested to learn that magic can easily be transmuted into time gaining money.  Simply put, Time=Money and Magic=Technology.
"Magic" in movies and such must be discovered, or invented first, much like technology. You must spend time learning the magic, or spend money learning how to do it. (Books and ****) The time invested to learn that magic can easily be transmuted into time gaining money. Simply put, Time=Money and Magic=Technology.
User avatar #145 to #117 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
What I was trying to say is that magic is money. As in, a resource that holds all the same characteristics. To accomplish tasks (Spells) you spend money (mana) in order to get the desired result.
#185 to #145 - darkparadox
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
A better way to phrase that would be money is mana then, as each are needed to do work in their respective fields
#73 to #34 - anon id: 128111ae
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
it's magic if you can't explain it. when you can explain what the discipline is, it's science. magick (adding a 'k' at the end separates stage magic from the real stuff) requires a focus. praying, candles, wands, tai chi, tarot, technology-- these are focus for our energy. to direct it where ever we want. technology is no more limiting than anything else, if used as a focus. foci come in all forms. i dunno what a muggle is, but i say you don't understand "magick".
User avatar #99 to #73 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Do not turn to mediums or necromancers; do not seek them out, and so make yourselves unclean by them: I am the Lord your God.
#76 to #34 - anon id: 02488a36
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
You obviously haven't bought even just a health-potion in D&D.
That **** costs half a car translated into todays money.
#93 to #34 - testaburger
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#274 to #34 - anon id: f59923c2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
#56 to #34 - namesmeannothing [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
In Harry Potter you had to go to the wizard school Hogwards in order to become a good wizard.

In our world we also have to. Only if you have a good education, you can master most of the magic ;)
User avatar #65 to #56 - mion
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I agree with infinitereaper.

While you had to go to a magic school to master your magic skills, you could use it.
Just think of how both, Harry and Tom, could use magic when they felt threatened or harassed.
User avatar #193 to #65 - pokemonstheshiz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
they were also really powerful wizards (and harry had a part of Voldermort's soul in him, which we can assume increased his power since we at least know it allowed him to speak Parsletongue). If we're using fictional examples, look at Jimmy Neutron, Doogie Howser, or Dexter (Dexter's Lab). They all used their own innate genius to create technology, normal people can still use technology, you just might need to specialize to create it.
User avatar #67 to #65 - kievaughnb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
All that you need is the transcension of modern social infrastructure and you can eschew the concept of currency in favor of plain barter.
User avatar #113 to #34 - jukuku
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
You sound quite pessimistic.
#121 to #34 - garymotherfingoak
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
you're not wrong though
#266 to #34 - TCRCPRODUCTIONS
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
It is not right to compare something that exists and something non-existant. You give magic all of these qualities, which simply aren't true because magic isn't real. Rather if you replaced the world magic with knowledge. That is the strength you are looking for, knowledge is free (at least depending on the way you pursue it.) Just as it would take time and effort to learn "magic" it takes time to gain knowledge. With knowledge reaper, you may see just how magical this universe really is.
User avatar #269 to #266 - desiduratum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Didn't the content compare magic and technology?
User avatar #268 to #266 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I'm just a fan of fantasy so I have a little lore knowledge. I'm going off those concepts. But yeah, it goes both ways, it's just fun to think about.
User avatar #158 to #34 - hentaisweetie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Potions, magic books, wands, etc. cost money too. Also money gives you power but there are still limitations to it. There really are things that money can't buy.
#135 to #34 - sergeantnovak
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Assuming magic as this unlimited resource and has no cost is bit unimaginative in kind of a lore perceptive. The best fantasy fictions in my opinion depict great magical power acquired through much hardship and/or sacrifice. It's what makes it interesting and not vapid and without consequence. Take mages in the Dragonlance books for instance.     
   
In our universe we don't have the properties we see in our fantasy story, all we have is our tools. And if you take a look at it from a certain perceptive, it kind of resembles magic.   
   
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - A. C. Clarke
Assuming magic as this unlimited resource and has no cost is bit unimaginative in kind of a lore perceptive. The best fantasy fictions in my opinion depict great magical power acquired through much hardship and/or sacrifice. It's what makes it interesting and not vapid and without consequence. Take mages in the Dragonlance books for instance.

In our universe we don't have the properties we see in our fantasy story, all we have is our tools. And if you take a look at it from a certain perceptive, it kind of resembles magic.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - A. C. Clarke
#186 to #135 - anon id: 6dd21306
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
And "Any sufficiently practical magic is indistinguishable from technology" - Anonymous
User avatar #258 to #186 - personz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
"any sufficiently understood magic is indistinguishable from science" -Agatha Hetrodyne
#95 to #34 - anon id: 1c1ff632
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Actually magic is none of that because it does not exist.
#94 to #34 - bann
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
So what you're saying is that magic is for the lazy? Sounds about right.
User avatar #267 to #34 - desiduratum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
What do you mean when you state that technology is a crutch? In what ways?
User avatar #271 to #267 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Well for one when the power grid goes down it's absolute chaos. Streets don't work, stores are out, fridges stop working, etc. What I'm trying to say is that technology is so heavily "relied" on that it's become a crutch, magic though, I feel is more of a strength as opposed to luxury, internally especially.
User avatar #277 to #271 - desiduratum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
In a way I can see what you're saying. But in reality I can see technology being a strength. It seems like it's often Humans vs. Animals/wild. With technology we are much more effective against them/it, no? There are many dangerous animals that posses many strengths and fewer weaknesses compared to humans. However, these animals with strengths can be wounded or become ill. So it seems somewhat applicable that when a power grid goes down, we have suffered an injury or sickness.

Another thing. As long as people have books, remain smart, and so forth, something as big as a power grid failure could not be permanent. We as people were not handed technology by some god, we created it and built on top of it. It shall remain with us faithfully if we nurture our minds. Maybe I'm wrong, have any thoughts?
User avatar #286 to #277 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I just want to shoot fire beams out of my eyes.
I just feel like our world is rather limited. It takes so much effort. My body is unwell to top it off, no healing spells, just modern medicine. I like technology I just like magic more. But only one of them exists, so we settle for what we have.
User avatar #281 to #277 - fantasma
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Yeah, we aren't like the Covenant, we made our ****.
User avatar #282 to #281 - desiduratum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Exactly.
User avatar #283 to #282 - fantasma
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I wonder if engineer like creatures exist.
That would be epic.
#284 to #283 - desiduratum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Ants and beavers, sorta. They make stuff. But I'm pretty sure humans are the "engineer like creatures" of which you speak.
#287 to #284 - fantasma
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Engineer, lol
User avatar #288 to #287 - desiduratum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Oh I see. My fear is that if there is intelligent life out there, they may be more intelligent than us and will destroy us or make pets out of us. And my other fear is that if there is lesser intelligent life out there (maybe they're just behind us a few generations) we will either destroy them or make them pets...or then again we could **** them too and have kinky interracial alien sex. hmm.
User avatar #290 to #288 - fantasma
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Dat sex.
But uh, if there's a super intelligent space faring race, I doubt they either A. war often; B. would take much notice of us.
I mean, seriously, we're probably seen as retarded organisms by any real INTELLIGENT life.
(I bet there's life like ours on the exoplanets.)
(I would lol if they were furries.)
(I mean all out piss myself LOL if they were furries.)
(Little gray men are a tad disturbing though.)
User avatar #90 to #34 - murphyslawtesties
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
But technology is a more economical alternative since you know...magic ain't real ?
#168 to #34 - Deeticky
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Your punctuation is really good. You're nearly perfect. Here's how you can make it perfect.

See attached image.
User avatar #173 to #168 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Sorry I tend to typo a lot. Doesn't help that I don't get much sleep.
User avatar #191 to #173 - Deeticky
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Just a typo, eh? That's good. You seem real intelligent, so I figured it'd be a shame if you were confused on the different forms of "your/you're". It looks like you're not though, so my apologies.
#194 to #191 - infinitereaper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
No no, as an aspiring writer I can use all the reminders on proper English that I can get.
User avatar #75 to #34 - twiztidxson
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
You should read the Dresden Files by Jim Butcher. If Magic was real, thats how I would want it to behave.
#142 to #34 - autoxx
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #66 to #34 - kievaughnb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Why is technology a crutch? Why is magic a strength? Both are things to be utilized. That's the full extent of it. Technology can be free, if you have the time and training. Technology isn't only iPhones. It's a bow and arrows as well. Anyone can fashion that for free. Anything that exists in the physical world is bound by physics.

Technology is used to survive. Take hammers and anvils. Sickles and scythes. Farming and basic industry. The sum of a bunch of people working together is greater to meet those ends is far greater than the inventor of the frivolous technologies we use on a day to day basis.

Also, we don't need to subscribe to the established social infrastructure. There a plenty of tribal people even today that live happy lives by bartering and making everything themselves. they procure food with the technology of bows, spears, and farming.

Finally, nothing can bypass the rules of our world. If it's in our world, it's part of it. Money isn't the magic. It's the labor behind the money. The only things that hold true value are goods and services. Money is worthless. Everything runs on the economy. It used to just be straight barter but we've added the middle man of currency.

TL;DR: Not only does Hitchen's razor make all of your points invalid, but they can all be countered easily. Stop being so emo.
#70 to #66 - namesmeannothing [OP]
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Just realizing: Money is our Mana
Just realizing: Money is our Mana
#157 to #70 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Finally someone who gets it
User avatar #244 to #157 - kievaughnb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
>people don't agree with me
>therefore they don't get what I'm saying

I completely understood what you were saying and I'm rather sorry to say that it was all a very bad argument. You're also completely misinterpreting what money is.
#245 to #244 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
You're entitled to your opinion.
You're entitled to your opinion.
#110 to #34 - jukuku
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #116 to #34 - cabbagemayhem
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
You still don't get it.

1. "Technology costs money" - So does all that Harry Potter stuff.

2. "Unless you're super smart you can't make or invent anything yourself" - Unless you're a master wizard, you can't make or invent anything either.

3. "Technology is a crutch and magic is a strength" - That doesn't even make sense. The only difference between a crutch and a strength is your perspective, and it implies wands, potions, brooms, scrolls, and the whole of magic are crutches as well.

4. "magic is free" - Not at all, and are you complaining about the penny it costs your mother to energize your computer for an hour?

5. "[Technology] is the product of the sweat, tears, and brains of people usually greater than most of us" - How is that not like typical magic?

6. "Magic can be used to help you survive" - For God's sake, man, look around you.

7. "If you want to call anything magic, it's money" - No, money is a redeemable token for someone else's help. Money is what fails your criteria for magic. It's not free, and can't help you survive.

Your current fantasy of magic is just the incomplete realization of technology. From the perspective of an animal, everything we do is magic. You can't see that because you've taken it for granted your whole life. You might as well have been born into Hogwarts complaining that there's no spell to summon a girlfriend.
#153 to #116 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
MONEY is magic. Like mana. You use it up to accomplish the known "spells" of the world. Technology is just the magical tool, like a wand or scepter I didn't explain it particularly well but that's more like what I was getting at.

I don't think you appreciate the learning curve either. Magic is capable of feats that technology wouldn't be able to do for 1000 years or in most cases not at all. When I said free, I mean available in the world in limited supply. After all, most magic is naturally corruing in those settings right? You can't make magic., hell, even money is made.

1. I can't set fire to a forest with my water bottle.
2. It's harder to be a genius than to master wizardry. Probably.
3. We learn on technology, we rely on magic. Figuratively.
4. Again, naturally occurring is what I meant, like air.
5. It's not the same. Magic is far more universal. Knowledge in respective fields is specialized.
6. If you can afford it. You might have mana you can use though.
7. It fits a hell of a lot better than technology

Sorry but I just live in the real world. I'm not delusional enough to blindly praise a world without magic. We build, create and under the laws of the natural universe. Magic is much easier though, that's kind of the whole point. Do you realize how much scientific progress it would take to make something grow instantly, teleport, or morph into something else?

That's what makes magic and lore special. It transcends what we know is possible. It's fun. It's nifty. I'm not downplaying technology, but I think you're downplaying magic.
User avatar #181 to #153 - cabbagemayhem
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
2. Considering those terms are relative to your peers, no. Not even in the Harry Potter universe is anything effortless.
Understand, the only difference is perspective. You're gazing across another fence completely taking for granted how reality is functionally the same. It's only different in the details. You're view of magic is just a world with different physical laws. Do you not see that if you were living in that world you would still say, "Sorry but I just live in the real world. I'm not delusional enough to blindly praise a world without [real] magic. We build, create and under the laws of the natural universe."
Wake up and start manipulating the universe you're in, like a wizard, instead of wishing no one had to expend effort for anything like a muggle That's all for today.
User avatar #183 to #181 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
The whole point was that we are muggles.
Technology isn't magic and it never will be.

Technology is the product of science; the product of humanity.
It's likely our greatest accomplishment over the natural world, granted we still operate under very strict rules, unlike magic which has it's own set of special rules.

Stop being so egotistical and try to listen what I'm trying to say here.
I appreciate the self loving hype trip you're completely missing my point here.
User avatar #189 to #183 - cabbagemayhem
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I know what you said. Most of it is nonsensical, and I assumed you were bs'ing your point because it's pretty dumb to me. What I told you isn't from self-love, it's reality. When you all wake up out your hippie liberal fantasy worlds, and you will, you'll see a world that's been hidden from you.
#192 to #189 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Well you're entitled to your own opinion.

You can call it nonsense if that makes you happy but I'm also entitled to my own opinion.

Magic and technology are not the same. Science is not magic.
The only poeple who would call it that are those who don't understand it.
I can create an illusion that I'm being cut in half, and I can use magic to actually cut myself in half.

But the two

are not the same.
User avatar #217 to #192 - cabbagemayhem
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
My analysis is there, but I apologize for being obtuse. I was working and didn't have time to proof-read my message for exaggerated and insensitive remarks.
User avatar #219 to #217 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Meh. Honestly this is all just nitpicking. I've said all I can say. The details really don't matter. I'm looking at this more literally I guess. After all "like" isn't "is". Which still goes back to what I was saying. Sure it's magical, but it is what it is.
#239 to #192 - pkrbarmovie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
"You're entitled to your own opinion."

Well, you coped-out, and you're obviously 12 years old.
User avatar #215 to #192 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Fine, you have my attention.

- No one said anything about science or magic tricks.
- You assume many things about the difficulty of learning, using, and developing "magic".
3. "We learn on technology, we rely on magic. Figuratively." is obviously wrong in anyway this can be interpreted.
4. Naturally occurring like air, unlike electricity?
5. Magic is far more universal? I can't think of any myth or story that doesn't differentiate types of magic. If you mean how wands are flexible, so are phones, and wands can't replace potions, or brooms, or any other of the massive number of magical artifacts in Harry Potter alone.
6. Money does not help you survive. You give it to people so they might use their abilities or technology to help you survive. In the wilderness, by yourself, you might as well use it as kindling.

You haven't thought this through all the way. "Magic" is like technology.
User avatar #222 to #215 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Maybe the issue is that I have a pretty large knowledge of magical lore, I'm not just referring to the concepts found in Harry Potter here. As for 3, what I mean is that in most cases magic flows through people, it's an extension of you, you don't lean on your arms do you? (figuratively) you rely on them. Electricity isn't like air, you can get air easily, electricity can be harnessed from the world but is usually generated instead. Unlike magic. A wand can do almost anything granted you know the spell a phone cant. Money won't help you survive in the forest but neither will paper. However, in society you'd rather have one over the other. I'm tired of talking about this.
User avatar #238 to #222 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I won't grind you anymore.
In that sense, I think we still have that kind of magic. Maybe not the kind that violates the laws of physics as we know them (even supernatural magic has limits), but I know if we find our flow, we can have a great effect on the outcome of events. I believe we all use magic everyday, but it seems normal. However, I can see we may not be talking about the same exact abstract image here, so what I said may not apply to you, so feel free to disregard. It's such an unimportant debate. If you're done, take care bro.
User avatar #224 to #222 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
And you hit the nail on the head. Tech is like magic, but it isn't magic. It's magical, but it isn't magic.
User avatar #166 to #153 - kousei
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
couple of things I'd like to point out. While by and large I agree technology and magic are not as similar as some would like you to believe, I can hardly call money a more fitting substitute. In any lore you look at mana (or whatever you wanna call it) isn't magic, it's a raw energy. Much like kinetics, it is nothing but a raw resource, useless. Until it is refined and directed I cannot call it magic.

2) seriously? You think understanding the ebb and flow of mystic energies, shaping them to become perfectly what you will, and aiming them with pinpoint accuracy is easy?
3) we rely on technology, be honest here. Where would you be without your computer?
5) It's not so much universal as it is flexible. A single wand can do everything you learn to do, where as you'd need many pieces of technology.

On my final note, don't go wishing to be in that magical place without understanding that there are problems EVERYWHERE. Those who want to be a medieval knight would still have to learn to wield a sword. Those who want to be a star-ship captain must possess the leadership and intelligence. And those who want to be the almighty wizard will have to learn to cast spells. Going to another time or place will not change how much work you have to do, only where the work should be applied.
User avatar #177 to #166 - infinitereaper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
There is no need to be upset, all I'm saying is that I'd call tech magical but I wouldn't call it magic. I mean, magic isn't exactly science, while magic does have it's own "science", I'm just saying that money is closer to magic than technology is. Technology is a product, magic is not. That's a huge difference, in a way money is a resource, but it's not like magic exists to begin with.

2) I doubt it's harder than learning quantum physics, what I like about magic is that it's more accessible to some extent.
3) What I meant was that if you fought a dragon but had no gun you'd be screwed. But you might have a chance with magical punches/powers. Magic flows, technology is a tool. While it's similar in the fact you have to be able to tap into something, I'd rather have enhanced strength and defense than a machine gun.
5) that's exactly what I mean. You need a blender to blend, but a wand can do all sorts of stuff.

How do I put this? I'd rather cry in a Ferrari than a bike. Magic isn't a cure all, it's another option. We live in a void. All we have is our tools. In a world without magic, well, there simply isn't any.
User avatar #190 to #177 - kousei
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I'm not upset. I'm not sure where I gave off that vibe. Also, technology is both a product and a channel, while man built assembly robots, assembly robots build just about everything.

Now, the money thing, if you really want the best simile to magic, it's not money, it's consumerism. Money = mana, exchange = spell, product = result. "You exchange money for a product" becomes "you cast a spell using mana to get a result." Is this not the most fitting description?
User avatar #204 to #190 - infinitereaper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Well there are certainly people that are upset.

Anyways, tech isn't magic, nor will it ever be, tech is the product of science. And science isn't magic, it's science. All I'm saying.
User avatar #205 to #204 - kousei
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
And i never disputed that, though i consider it a lot closer than money.
#207 to #205 - infinitereaper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Either way, I've said my bit.
User avatar #13 - apylon
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I always wanted to be able to teleport so i could get places quicker
User avatar #14 to #13 - leagetshitpack
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
i think they call it runing
#21 to #14 - apylon
Reply +131 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
***** you trying to tell me you would get from one country to another faster by running then teleporting
#71 to #21 - avocatdudiable
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
No he said 'runing'
User avatar #40 to #21 - motherfuckingkenji
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Well, you could run from Germany to France in about 0.1 seconds.
I dunno about you, but that seems faster than using a teleporter.
User avatar #42 to #40 - leagetshitpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
you can walk from norway to sweden to finland and so to russia in one 1.5 hour's
#22 to #21 - leagetshitpack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
well.....no, but its the closest we get teleporting. (whitout machines that is)
well.....no, but its the closest we get teleporting. (whitout machines that is)
User avatar #25 to #22 - apylon
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
not true you can get from the top of a 25 story building faster by jumping then you can running down all the stairs.
User avatar #105 to #22 - unncommon
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Running may be the closest thing that you have to teleporting, but the closest thing that I have to teleporting is Jack Daniels. Last thing I remember was being around a bonfire then in the blink of an eye I'm on a ******* island in the rain crying with no money and someone else's boots.
User avatar #108 to #105 - leagetshitpack
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
a guy once got drunk and woke up in paris
User avatar #29 to #22 - myaccountisnew
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
But the whole point of the post is that tech is the real magic.
#7 - theannoyingFJguy
Reply +31 123456789123345869
(01/12/2014) [-]
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
-Arthur C. Clarke, physicist & science fiction author
User avatar #28 to #7 - derpwolf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
I had a teacher that would constantly quote this to me.
Every time I didn't know the answer to something, I would say, "It's magic!"
#9 - muffioso
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
But can I have fire hands without magic?
But can I have fire hands without magic?
#10 to #9 - doktorpaj
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
If you believe in yourself you can be the fire entirely.
If you believe in yourself you can be the fire entirely.
#24 to #10 - jntcoolman
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #112 to #10 - brawlanator
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
How it feels to chew 5 gum.
#12 to #10 - muffioso
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Oh my god it's human torch  well he was
Oh my god it's human torch well he was
User avatar #102 to #10 - urumasi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Is he kill?
#137 to #102 - ishekill
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
yes, and so am i
User avatar #20 to #10 - metacobalion
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
This needs to be edited to look like an OC creator burning in thumb downs
#124 to #10 - ljxjlos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
...wannabe.
#96 to #10 - newdevyx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
"**** this gay Earth"
"**** this gay Earth"
User avatar #89 to #10 - niggernazi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
damn son, thats brutal
User avatar #47 to #10 - geiner
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Did that person die?
User avatar #64 to #47 - sardinez
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
pepsi
User avatar #107 to #47 - codethename
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Isded lel why light self on fire before jumping
#122 to #107 - ljxjlos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
How dare you question the actions of the Truchsess of Gondor?
User avatar #15 to #10 - moevleboevle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Russian Johnny Storm
User avatar #11 to #10 - doktorpaj
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
"Mom look, I'm a meteor! "
#233 to #9 - mystacheisop
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
close enough.
#33 - crowsnest
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #30 - nought
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
****** knew it was gonna say technology can I have a medal
#31 to #30 - infinitereaper
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#32 to #30 - infinitereaper
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
#74 - infamoustrapper
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Except for the fact I'm poor as ****
User avatar #133 to #74 - opodoromo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
And you still benefit from technology. The machine you use to access this very site is a manifestation of this. When your Computer is able to run funnyjunk it has to be more advanced than the best Computers of the richest men just some years ago.
User avatar #249 to #74 - novembersky **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
If magic was real do you think it would be cheap?
#212 - tamnguyen
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
the only magic i know
the only magic i know
#48 - aquamagnus
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
>increasis   
>SIS   
   
YOU COULDN'T WRITE A GOD DAMN E?
>increasis
>SIS

YOU COULDN'T WRITE A GOD DAMN E?
User avatar #232 to #48 - racetothebottom
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
*****, he switched verb tenses in the same clause about 12 times and that's what you're complaining about?
User avatar #270 to #232 - aquamagnus
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2014) [-]
Ignorance is bliss
#2 - shallowandpedantic
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(01/12/2014) [-]
Technology is the answer