Let it be. . Swiss Watch Discovered ' ]!!- Chinese Timh, Might be Freema -sf 1' Ime Travel. The watch was set to "4:20PM. Further inspection would reveal the words "blaze it faggot" inscribed on the back. Let it be Swiss Watch Discovered ' ]!!- Chinese Timh Might Freema -sf 1' Ime Travel The watch was set to "4:20PM Further inspection would reveal the words "blaze faggot" inscribed on back
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (260)
[ 260 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - economic [OP]
Reply +144 123456789123345869
(02/26/2014) [+] (15 replies)
stickied by economic
User avatar #105 to #2 - lebarricuda
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
that "iphone" is a notebook....
User avatar #221 to #105 - agrofenlas
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Probably, but I'm just posting links to what I've found.
Also,what about the man who met himself?
User avatar #251 to #221 - lebarricuda
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
I never looked for stories backing that up, however, I assume it's fake as well as that would be easy to fake. Actually, it was recorded on a mobile phone so just check the EXIF data to see if it was actually recorded in the future. The two tattoos both look fresh, there is very little fading and that guy is way younger than 70. Which is how old he estimated his twin from.

So, I don't see this likely at all. In fact, almost all of those are obviously fake.
User avatar #257 to #251 - agrofenlas
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
*Shrug* Kay, but I'm going to stay hopeful.
User avatar #189 to #1 - sirslowass
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
User avatar #126 to #1 - UnforgivingOne
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1096959/Mystery-century-old-Swiss-watch-discovered-ancient-tomb-sealed-400-years.html

Here's the original.

The watch is 100 years old. No time travel involved. Someone took a old news story and twisted it.
User avatar #190 to #126 - sirslowass
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
well ****. I posted this far later than you. I should look at the comments before typing...
User avatar #42 to #1 - ThatFuckingGuy
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Looks more like a god damn ring than a watch.
User avatar #166 to #42 - AdamBaum
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
That's because it is a ring watch.
#134 to #42 - animedudej
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
it's just the watch part, not the strap
hint hint, it probably eroded
User avatar #195 to #134 - biscuitsunited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Actually, I read the article, Its a ring-watch
#196 to #195 - animedudej
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
looking at the article i now agree with you
User avatar #66 to #42 - missglorianicole
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
There are actually rings with watches on them.


I kinda wanna get one.
#96 to #1 - europe
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
"swiss carved in the back"
And of course they don't show a picture of that
User avatar #12 - I Am Monkey
Reply +477 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
The watch was set to "4:20PM. Further inspection would reveal the words "blaze it faggot" inscribed on the back.
User avatar #168 to #12 - hairysmellyanus
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
It's not set to 4:20.
User avatar #176 to #168 - gardenmanly
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
so debbie, when did you graduate from killjoke academy
User avatar #179 to #176 - hairysmellyanus
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
2013 was my graduating year and my name is Deborah, not Debbie.
#211 to #179 - ibangbabys
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
How about you debore my dick
#210 to #179 - lemmyouttahere
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Close enough?
#60 to #12 - anon id: 3a576b06
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
hahahahahaha
User avatar #153 to #12 - guffie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
ayyy
#186 to #12 - anon id: 9c30e813
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
why are your comments always on the top? they're not exceptionally funny.
User avatar #135 to #12 - Accidentalninja
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
"Dat weed was so dank I ended up in the ming dynasty"
#10 - redrunner
Reply +324 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
#59 to #10 - anon id: 3a576b06
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
ok you win the internet today.
User avatar #16 to #10 - misterobotunicorn
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
for Asians
#47 to #16 - anon id: c921bd81
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
You wear your watch on your penis?
User avatar #109 to #47 - eanirae
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
You don't ?
User avatar #94 - TheHutchie
Reply +173 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
If that's prove of time-travel, then it's also proof of tiny wee time-travelling midgets.
User avatar #151 to #94 - VKMBernbaum
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
The article says is a ring designed to look like a watch.
#160 to #94 - failzer
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
We have Proof!
#178 to #160 - anon id: 7c728add
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
what the **** is wrong is you?
User avatar #183 to #178 - failzer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Lol oh shiiiit i didnt see that, someone else beat me to it like 4 hours ago XD
#106 to #94 - bigfoote
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Time traveling midgets you say?
#8 - thefifthdoctor
Reply +141 123456789123345869
(02/26/2014) [-]
**** thats were i left my watch
**** thats were i left my watch
#137 to #8 - thebacondroid
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
you're awesome
#244 to #137 - thefifthdoctor
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Not so bad yourself there sailor
Not so bad yourself there sailor
#14 - mouldyfish
Reply +109 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
#3 - anon id: 376d33b1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/26/2014) [-]
Carbon date it. Then we will talk.
#19 to #3 - internetshakespear
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#21 to #19 - anon id: bbbc0f3a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
There are other radioactive isotopes that can be used on inorganic materials for dating, so they could get a rough estimate of its age either way probably.
#22 to #21 - internetshakespear
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
That is absolutely correct. Seeing as it is a watch, it most likely contains some kind of crystal (probably quartz), so we may be able to use thermoluminescence dating to figure out when the crystal was heated up. However, in my original comment I was merely pointing out that C 14 dating wouldn't work.
That is absolutely correct. Seeing as it is a watch, it most likely contains some kind of crystal (probably quartz), so we may be able to use thermoluminescence dating to figure out when the crystal was heated up. However, in my original comment I was merely pointing out that C 14 dating wouldn't work.
#23 to #22 - anon id: bbbc0f3a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
You are indeed correct, just adding some detail to what light you already shed on the subject.
#29 to #3 - anon id: b47f2f45
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
what would dating the watch prove. either it was made 400 years ago and will appear 400 years old. or it was made in the future send back to 400 years ago and will appear 400 years old. or it was inspired by a device seen on a time travelers wrist and will appear 400 years old.

to me it looks like it part of a larger piece of jewelry and the "watch face" is just flat because its where a gem is supposed to be placed.,
#31 to #29 - internetshakespear
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Actually, it would be older than 400 years old. Consider this: let's pretend the watch was made in 2100. Someone buys it and keeps it until 2120, at which point they go back in time. They then lose the watch and it is buried for 400 years. When we unearth it, the watch would have existed for a total of 420 years (20 in the future, plus the 400 in the past), so the watch would be 420 years old - since it starts aging the moment it is made, not the moment it is brought back in time.
Actually, it would be older than 400 years old. Consider this: let's pretend the watch was made in 2100. Someone buys it and keeps it until 2120, at which point they go back in time. They then lose the watch and it is buried for 400 years. When we unearth it, the watch would have existed for a total of 420 years (20 in the future, plus the 400 in the past), so the watch would be 420 years old - since it starts aging the moment it is made, not the moment it is brought back in time.
#57 to #31 - anon id: 3346bacc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Yes, because they definitely didnt round to 400 years...
User avatar #75 to #3 - niggernazi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
you cant do carbondating at stone, retard. it has to have carbon inside
#79 to #3 - smorgies
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #138 to #3 - wolviewolverine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
it's a ring. It has nothing to do with watches. Carbon dating would reveal it's 4000 years old, so?
User avatar #148 to #3 - anonymoose
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
>Carbon date
>Metal watch
User avatar #163 to #3 - wiredguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
oookay, so

carbon dating only works on living remains, because it's testing the ratio of carbon 12/14 present from carbon dioxide. Notice that, dioxide, breathing, living.

And even if it did apply to inanimate objects, which it can, it would be applying to the very formation of the substance itself, not when it was carved. That isn't exactly a chemical landmark from an individual atom's point of view.
the only time that is useful is in dating the age of a particular layer of rock, for working out how old something is you've dug down to.
#13 to #3 - captnpl
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
They did, apparently it doesn't exist yet.
#20 to #3 - internetshakespear
Reply +61 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
I like your skepticism, but carbon dating won't work. The watch is inorganic, and carbon dating only works on organic materials. It works by measuring the Carbon 14 in an organism and figuring out how many half-lives went by to estimate an age.    
   
   
tl;dr - good thinking, but carbon dating only works on things which were once alive.
I like your skepticism, but carbon dating won't work. The watch is inorganic, and carbon dating only works on organic materials. It works by measuring the Carbon 14 in an organism and figuring out how many half-lives went by to estimate an age.


tl;dr - good thinking, but carbon dating only works on things which were once alive.
User avatar #80 to #20 - jokesexplain
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
>implying future watches will not be living tissue
I should just go now.
User avatar #99 to #80 - garin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
No don't leave, I have missed watching you explain things to people. It has been so long
User avatar #101 to #99 - jokexplain
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
this guy has nothing to do with me.
shame on you for mixing us up.
User avatar #103 to #101 - garin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
I have brought so much shame on my family with this mix up. I will seppuku the second I get home.
I love you
User avatar #100 to #99 - jokesexplain
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Oh, you must be mistaking me with jokexplain, i am jokesexplain totally different.
Sort of.
User avatar #102 to #100 - garin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Oh my god, I am so sorry. Well do you explain things about sex then?
How sensitive would it be if I rubbed peanut butter on my nipples?
User avatar #104 to #102 - jokesexplain
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Well, i normally explain jokes, but ok, ill try to make an exception.
It would be quite a dry sensation, as peanut butter it filled with salts, therefore making it good at taking in liquid. But you would feel a pleasure beyond the normal level of pleasure, because of the awesomeness in Peanut butter. Combine it with some Jelly, and you will get a shock of stimuli that will last between 3-5 hours.
Sex explained
Hmm, not my usual catchphrase...
User avatar #119 to #104 - garin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
It should become your usual catchphrase, I am now slathered in the stuff and my nipples will be hard for months
User avatar #30 to #20 - Blargosnarf
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Also I'm pretty sure a Carbon 14's half life is well beyond 400 years.
User avatar #51 to #30 - adplum
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
carbon 14's half life is 5730 years, and thats not how carbon dating works. Because its a half life, the carbon will continue to half again and again, and will in theory never reach zero, which is how they measure how old something is; by measuring how much carbon 14 is left.
#150 - mrspastastic
Reply +52 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
im a little impressed with ad placement
#181 to #150 - anon id: 666ccd93
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
duude, you are browsing funnyjunk at 8AM...
#180 to #150 - OllieArmageden
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
If you hold the Windows Key and press print screen, it automatically saves the current screenshot to your pictures folder.
#155 to #150 - khhpedersen
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
I see you needed som help screenshotting
#157 to #155 - mrspastastic
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
I'm new to pc's
User avatar #162 to #157 - kitarierose
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Search for "Snipping Tool" in your start menu.
User avatar #167 to #157 - hashtronaut
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
fun fact: if you hold alt when you hit the print screen button, it only captures your active window.

then just open mspaint, hit crop, and ...crop. takes less time than preparing a cup of soup. fj has a built in editor too,but i dont like using it
#159 to #157 - khhpedersen
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Good for you!
#28 - twentyandahalf
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1096959/Mystery-century-old-Swiss-watch-discovered-ancient-tomb-sealed-400-years.html
Updated December 18, 2008

It's not just the watch that time-traveled - the entire article did too!
#142 to #28 - feudd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
An expert pointed out. Need an expert to know watches didn't exist 800 years ago. Also this expert isn't even right Switzerland was founded in the 11th century and the Ming Dynasty started in 1368... I call ********
#27 - BigSammy
Reply +35 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #32 to #27 - rockmanfan
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
technically it already happened.
#33 to #32 - funnyguyz
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
Technically it hasn't happened yet... O.O
User avatar #34 to #33 - rockmanfan
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
time travel is weird.
#36 to #34 - butteryweiner
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #37 to #33 - butteryweiner
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/27/2014) [-]
technically it's still happening