Kid is smarter than the teacher. Let the religion storm begin!. My daughter' s geography test. She added her own answer. Success eriberto I . the mail cancrum:
x
Click to expand

Kid is smarter than the teacher

Kid is smarter than the teacher. Let the religion storm begin!. My daughter' s geography test. She added her own answer. Success eriberto I . the mail cancrum:

Let the religion **** storm begin!

My daughter' s geography test.
She added her own answer.
Success eriberto I . the mail cancrum: mu,“
1. The age or the Earth in ) -
a The Earth wan crud by "I..
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1162
Views: 68630
Favorited: 67
Submitted: 01/01/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to GARFVADER submit to reddit

Comments(571):

[ 571 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - stungun (01/01/2014) [+] (45 replies)
stickied by garfvader
This is sad that it was on a test, but not surprising.
'Merica'
#24 - cartoonbacon (01/01/2014) [-]
Complete 			********		 why would one of the correct answers be "4.6 billion years" and then the next correct answer be god? This was obviously self printed.
Complete ******** why would one of the correct answers be "4.6 billion years" and then the next correct answer be god? This was obviously self printed.
User avatar #26 to #24 - garfvader (01/01/2014) [-]
It is most likely a Private school, it would have been a religious school again most likely a Catholic school and it would be most likely that one of the parents does not believe in creationism and may have told the daughter differently causing the child to then go on and do this, whilst the test was most likely a geology test
User avatar #34 to #26 - cartoonbacon (01/01/2014) [-]
It cant be a religious school because one of the correct answers was "4.6" billion years, wouldnt that conflict?
#40 to #26 - anon (01/01/2014) [-]
This might just be the case in Europe, but I have never met a Christian who believes the earth was created in six LITERAL earth days. I doubt even the pope believes that.
#149 to #40 - grandterskrasao (01/02/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's that Bible "scientist" ( I don't know what to call them) have measured out the amount of time between Adam and Eves banishment from Eden to now is only around 6-7 thousand years. They do it by coinciding history with the bible and how many generations of children each major person had.
#47 to #24 - danzey (01/01/2014) [-]
It says "The most correct" isn't it possible there is no religion or anything here, its just a geography paper?
User avatar #93 to #24 - niggernazi (01/01/2014) [-]
maybe because god is older than 4.6 billion years?

use your ******* brain
User avatar #102 to #93 - mrgreatnamess (01/01/2014) [-]
How old is god?
User avatar #106 to #102 - niggernazi (01/01/2014) [-]
older than 4.6 billion years
User avatar #107 to #106 - mrgreatnamess (01/01/2014) [-]
How do you know?
User avatar #109 to #107 - niggernazi (01/01/2014) [-]
because i am a follower of god and i have met him personally several times
#269 to #109 - ookichinchindesu (01/02/2014) [-]
Exodus 33:20 But he added, “You cannot see my face, for no one can see me and live.” If you see God you WILL DIE. I am Christian too so I had to drop in and say that you couldn't be here to type that sentence if that was true.
User avatar #110 to #109 - mrgreatnamess (01/01/2014) [-]
Are you gonna meet him again sometime soon?
User avatar #114 to #110 - niggernazi (01/01/2014) [-]
nope, i am already a good christian
#115 to #114 - mrgreatnamess (01/01/2014) [-]
Only bad christians get to see god?
#134 to #115 - lunargreenhouse (01/01/2014) [-]
then be ready to meet him lel
User avatar #141 to #136 - lieutenantpansy (01/01/2014) [-]
**** this account switching
User avatar #140 to #136 - lunargreenhouse (01/01/2014) [-]
that was a god tier pun
#131 to #115 - anon (01/01/2014) [-]
his name, is **********
#288 to #114 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
Certainly are with that good christian username.
#133 to #24 - anon (01/01/2014) [-]
Can I get source of that gif?
#359 to #24 - wolviewolverine (01/02/2014) [-]
This image has expired
It actually sounds like a comprehension test about some text rather than plain questions.

Also it is common knowledge it was Ymir, the ice giant who whose death let the Earth emerge by hand of Odin, the Father of Knowledge.
User avatar #383 to #24 - desuforeverlulz (01/02/2014) [-]
Has second page underneath, seems legit.
#451 to #24 - gabbelabbe (01/02/2014) [-]
do you have the source of this gif?
#503 to #24 - animedudej (01/02/2014) [-]
i concur... i do not consider myself all that smrt... but even i smelled the 			********		 through the internet
i concur... i do not consider myself all that smrt... but even i smelled the ******** through the internet
#160 to #24 - jaguarjam (01/02/2014) [-]
I second that. Also, as I wrote here, the Earth wasn't diretly created by Big Bang, its forming was only was a much latter consequence, so that answer is kindo incorrect too.
User avatar #405 to #24 - xdeathspawnx (01/02/2014) [-]
maybe because the majority of Christians have now accepted that the earth is older than a couple thousand years old.
User avatar #157 to #24 - drldrl (01/02/2014) [-]
A lot of religious people have accepted that the Earth is older than what the Bible says. This could easily be from a private school.
#261 to #157 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
Genesis 1:1-5
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and desolate, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep, and God’s active force was moving about over the surface of the waters. And God said: “Let there be light.” Then there was light. After that God saw that the light was good, and God began to divide the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, but the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, a first day."

This says nothing about the earth and the entire universe being created within the 7 creative "days" (which can't be literal days anyway - the word used for "day" can also be translated as "period of time"). So...the Bible doesn't say the earth is 6k years old. You now understand the Jehovah's Witness stance on the creation of the universe.
#385 to #24 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
Only a few fundamentalists believe the earth is 7000 years old or whatever, most Christians don't reject that. Young earthers are considered ******* by almost everyone
User avatar #170 to #24 - useroftheLOLZ (01/02/2014) [-]
Because some Theists believe that the universe is **** old, but still think that it was created by god, billion of years ago
User avatar #532 to #170 - teoferrazzi (01/02/2014) [-]
this
#25 to #24 - cartoonbacon (01/01/2014) [-]
And another things schools have strict guiltiness when it comes to religion and school no right minded teacher would ever put this on a test.
And another things schools have strict guiltiness when it comes to religion and school no right minded teacher would ever put this on a test.
User avatar #362 to #25 - pokemonstheshiz (01/02/2014) [-]
unless it's a private school
they have less regulations in that manner
User avatar #83 to #25 - zzforrest ONLINE (01/01/2014) [-]
Unless it's a catholic school
But you are definitely right, of all the *********** fabricated tests, this test was the most ******** fabricated.
User avatar #207 to #83 - swifterly (01/02/2014) [-]
I went to a Catholic school the first 8 years of my life. We had a teacher for each subject if I remember correctly and in our Science class, our tests never once mentioned religion. But hey, each school is different.

I look back now and it was horrible. Parents made me go their in hopes of a better education, not any religious reasons.
#104 - gearrader (01/01/2014) [-]
>geography test
>religious questions
doubt<
#10 - kresskh (01/01/2014) [-]
They were okay with the answer that said the earth is 4.6 billion years old, but not with the big bang?
#486 to #10 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
The vast majority of Christians believe in Big Bang theory and evolution but guided by God.
User avatar #504 to #10 - animedudej (01/02/2014) [-]
ok, hear me out here! what if... WHAT IF the entire universe is a simulation created by some hyper advanced civilisation
#45 to #10 - danzey (01/01/2014) [-]
"The most correct"
#95 to #45 - sofakingood (01/01/2014) [-]
Why isn't aliens the most correct?
#113 to #95 - danzey (01/01/2014) [-]
I didn't say i agreed with it, if it's true it's clearly a personal opinion question that can't be marked without bias, I just explained how it can answer god as creating the world and 4.6 billion year as the earths age
User avatar #90 to #10 - zzforrest ONLINE (01/01/2014) [-]
Intelligent design, my friend.
Really popular in christianity as of late.
Basically, god set up big bang and god guided evolution.
#211 - durkadurka ONLINE (01/02/2014) [-]
The answer was obviously D.
#215 to #214 - durkadurka ONLINE (01/02/2014) [-]
Dammit. Oh well, time for spiderman thread.
#216 to #215 - puffyclouds (01/02/2014) [-]
only spiderman pic i have
User avatar #11 - youhei (01/01/2014) [-]
why is the answer "god" when the question below it is about geologic eras and evolution and **** ?
#73 to #11 - danzey (01/01/2014) [-]
"The most correct"
#392 to #11 - gingerjew **User deleted account** (01/02/2014) [-]
perhaps because they are not mutually exclusive concepts   
I'll take my red thumbs now
perhaps because they are not mutually exclusive concepts
I'll take my red thumbs now
User avatar #283 to #11 - thatguybehindyou (01/02/2014) [-]
Because post is fake
#173 - princepeanut (01/02/2014) [-]
What is this   
A test for geographic priests?
What is this
A test for geographic priests?
#365 - pxthreezerothree (01/02/2014) [-]
>Geography
>Geology questions
User avatar #257 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
If the kid is smarter than the teacher, why did she get it wrong?

Kid: 0
Teacher: 1
#233 - daemascus (01/02/2014) [-]
sorry but i really doubt this. Why would the parent put a child in a private (catholic)? school but be proud of them being religion denouncing smart-asses? not to mention the questions blatantly name the age of the earth, which goes against the bible.

make a fake test
make a smart ass answer
say you kid did it
??????
profit
#188 - MasterManiac (01/02/2014) [-]
Before the 			*********		 ensues let me just point out a few things:   
1) What kind of geography test is this? What exactly is the &quot;most correct&quot; answer? This test is 			********		.   
2) Most Christians don't take the Bible literally, especially when it comes to the creation of the universe, so I don't know why everyone is saying that someone cannot both believe in God and understand that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old.    
3) The Big Bang Theory is exactly that, a theory. It has evidence supporting its claim, but there is also evidence supporting other universe creation theories such as the universe being the output of another universe collapsing (if you want a crash course in such theories go and watch BBC's documentary Horizon: What Happened Before the Big Bang?). We pretend like we know a lot about the creation of our universe and outer space, but astrophysicists are constantly finding flaws in their work such as planets that have densities too low to be able to exist by our laws of physics actually existing. That being said there is nothing wrong with believing that God initiated the Big Bang, so it's quite possible that one or more of the answers are correct. In all fairness is someone could actually prove what the universe was created by, or how it was created they would be extremely famous, so I have no idea why someone would put a question like that on a kid's test paper.   
   
I realise I kind of went off on a tangent there, but I just felt the need to point out the 			********		 that is this entire content.
Before the ********* ensues let me just point out a few things:
1) What kind of geography test is this? What exactly is the "most correct" answer? This test is ******** .
2) Most Christians don't take the Bible literally, especially when it comes to the creation of the universe, so I don't know why everyone is saying that someone cannot both believe in God and understand that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old.
3) The Big Bang Theory is exactly that, a theory. It has evidence supporting its claim, but there is also evidence supporting other universe creation theories such as the universe being the output of another universe collapsing (if you want a crash course in such theories go and watch BBC's documentary Horizon: What Happened Before the Big Bang?). We pretend like we know a lot about the creation of our universe and outer space, but astrophysicists are constantly finding flaws in their work such as planets that have densities too low to be able to exist by our laws of physics actually existing. That being said there is nothing wrong with believing that God initiated the Big Bang, so it's quite possible that one or more of the answers are correct. In all fairness is someone could actually prove what the universe was created by, or how it was created they would be extremely famous, so I have no idea why someone would put a question like that on a kid's test paper.

I realise I kind of went off on a tangent there, but I just felt the need to point out the ******** that is this entire content.
User avatar #191 to #188 - garfvader (01/02/2014) [-]
Good effort
gold star
#197 to #188 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
You misunderstand what a scientist means by "theory". A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step—known as a theory—in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Source: www.livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-scientific-theory-definition-of-theory.html
User avatar #199 to #197 - MasterManiac (01/02/2014) [-]
Yes, but if you read further down the article you will get to this paragraph which explains what I don't think you understood:

"A scientific theory is not the end result of the scientific method; theories can be proven or rejected, just like hypotheses. Theories can be improved or modified as more information is gathered so that the accuracy of the prediction becomes greater over time."
#490 to #188 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
"2) Most Christians don't take the Bible literally, especially when it comes to the creation of the universe, so I don't know why everyone is saying that someone cannot both believe in God and understand that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old. "

This comes from atheists desperate to paint Christians in a stupid light. The vast majority of Christians believe in Evolution and the big bang theory and the Catholic Church was quick to accept the theory of evolution around 70 years ago. Atheists, through their awfully inept understanding of literal and figurative language of the Bible, have made it look like it's impossible to believe in God and the big bang/evolution, when in fact there is zero wrong wit that.
User avatar #222 - jacklane (01/02/2014) [-]
Which Obama is a ****** ?

a.) Obama
b.) Michelle
c.) Both
d.) None
e.) ******
#122 - bitchpleaseshutup (01/01/2014) [-]
Everyone knows it A
User avatar #196 to #122 - schwerdaddy (01/02/2014) [-]
Not even in standard Greek mythology did Zeus create the world, though.
User avatar #249 to #196 - bitchpleaseshutup (01/02/2014) [-]
I know, just let me feel special
#138 - Seority (01/01/2014) [-]
Some Christians take the bible more metaphorically then literally.
According to the Bible, God made the earth in 6 days and on the 7th he rested. Well, to us humans, days are just calculated periods of time. So in a sense, God took 6 periods of time to create the world (Or did 6 different actions, whatever your take is on it is). It doesn't have to be literally 24 hour periods. It could of been millions of years at a time.
To those who believe that, then we are still in the "7th day" where God doesn't do anything to alter the universe.

This is what I believed when I was Christian.
User avatar #274 to #138 - playerdous (01/02/2014) [-]
I like this
#342 to #138 - xtremedeath (01/02/2014) [-]
what if it did take 6 periods, and the 6 periods were all the cosmic lifes of other stars before ours came from the last one??
User avatar #164 to #138 - matriculator (01/02/2014) [-]
We all know that that's not actually what was meant. Plus, a day is a day, which most of the time is on average 24 hours. It's been like this for a while. A second is a second. That's like saying that it took 1 second to do something then turn around and say, "oh no, a second is just a period of time, I meant a second as in 200 million years." As with almost everything in the bible, it's meant to be taken literally. Twisting things to make their seem logical doesn't make them factual like "'intelligent' design".
#279 to #164 - hudspud (01/02/2014) [-]
He made the sun on the fourth day. I can't help but feel that he wouldn't have been measuring his time in days in the way we view them since of definition of a day is based around the sun
User avatar #335 to #279 - peanutmonkey (01/02/2014) [-]
yea cause back then they knew how the sun worked with days and nights
User avatar #334 to #279 - matriculator (01/02/2014) [-]
I'm going under the assumption that the gospels were written by people-John, Luke, Matthew etc... who knew the meaning of a day, and also knew what a day meant to the people who'd read it. I'm pretty sure that any author would elaborate on what they meant by a known word if they were using it any way other than it was defined as. I stand behind the fact that no matter how much people try to twist things in the bible and other religious book to be taken literally when true- most of the time trivial- and figuratively when they're called out as complete ******** , is retarded.
#155 to #138 - captainstinkypinky (01/02/2014) [-]
I've never thought of it like that. That actually makes more sense that the generic "god is watching out for all of us" thing
User avatar #158 to #155 - calawesome (01/02/2014) [-]
It comes from the ancient hebrew word YOM, which meant period of time, but was thought to mean day when translated.
User avatar #374 to #138 - rnftrumpet (01/02/2014) [-]
I guess since there wasn't a sun it would make sense that God uses whatever units he wants.
User avatar #325 to #138 - peanutmonkey (01/02/2014) [-]
Iv'e heard this argument from several christians. The problem is theyre just trying to change the meaning of something thats already been said. If the bible says the earth was created in 7 days or the earth is 6000 years old that's exactly what the bible means. Back in ancient times when it was written thats what it meant and it wasn't questioned.

Science eventually disproves some sort of religious claim though and most people go bananas. They just won't admit it when part of their outdated holy book is wrong. They fight and fight until they have to change their opinion instead of just admitting the facts. This causes problems with the acceptance of scientific findings and encourages people to be stubborn and close-minded.

The point I'm trying to make is that stubborn people are stubborn and they shouldn't be taken seriously.
#488 to #325 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
That's complete ******** the vast majority of the bible was metaphorical story. The only reason there is some thought that it's not metaphorical is a) brainwashing by religious extremists b)atheists desparate to prove christians wrong.
#302 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
...This is so fake it's not even funny.
#305 to #302 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
If this were real, it wouldn't ask for the 'age of earth' and then suddenly ask if it was made by God. The physical age of Earth does not sync up with biblical teachings on the formation of Earth.

Barring that, and humoring some creationist-evolutionist hybrid belief, the last question is worded poorly. It was obviously written by someone with little knowledge of Geology (or English, for that matter, as it has a few errors in that department as well.) The Age of Reptiles isn't a characteristic of the Mesozoic era, it's another *name* for the Mesozoic era. And the *formation* of the Rocky Mountains is exclusive to the Mesozoic Era, obviously they continued to exist afterward.
User avatar #311 to #305 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
The fact that you responded to yourself because despite nobody caring to ask you why in the first place is funnier than the actual post.
#314 to #311 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
Wow, don't think I've ever used this twice on one post before.

Hint : How would it have made any sense for me to use that set of images if I waited for someone to ask me why? That was the entire joke, buddy.
User avatar #316 to #314 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
Yeah, okay, it was a "joke." A long, 4 minute delayed joke.
#321 to #316 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
...They're posted two minutes apart.  That's more than a reasonable amount of time to upload an image, type a few sentences, check my spelling, and post the comment.  And the images and captions make it pretty obvious that it was a solo set-up.
...They're posted two minutes apart. That's more than a reasonable amount of time to upload an image, type a few sentences, check my spelling, and post the comment. And the images and captions make it pretty obvious that it was a solo set-up.
User avatar #323 to #321 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
2 minutes apart? ....Okay, we're done here. Congratulations on your terrible joke that you wasted all of our time with.
User avatar #327 to #323 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
...Y'know, the time of the post is clearly written above it. They'll fluctuate at most a minute (because it rounds, so it'll read either 2 or 3 minutes apart.) I'm not sure if you're trolling or just too stupid to read.
User avatar #331 to #327 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
Whatever makes you feel better for exerting effort on a joke in the comment section of a post that will A) be pushed to a different page in about an hour and B) only a few people will see.
#317 to #311 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
User avatar #313 to #311 - youngneil (01/02/2014) [-]
I think he was just clarifying. Plus, it works with the pictures he posted.
User avatar #315 to #313 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
It doesn't matter. I'd guess that he so desperately wanted someone to bite, but since no one did, took it upon himself to post anyway, because he cared THAT much about a random picture that he'll most likely never see again.
User avatar #320 to #315 - youngneil (01/02/2014) [-]
It probably took him 2-3 minutes to type out the second comment, which was how much time was between the two comments. He didn't wait at all before writing the second comment. If he desperately wanted someone to "bite" he would have waited at the very least 5 minutes.
User avatar #322 to #315 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
...Why would I have used those images / captions if I wanted someone to bite, when they're obviously made to be used together with no prompting? And, given that the only person those images would be insulting is OP, who is offline, why would I expect a bite within two minutes?
User avatar #326 to #315 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
(Fun fact: They're more than 2 minutes apart, but at least you tried to cover your tracks.)
#343 to #326 - APGrammarNazi (01/02/2014) [-]
You just responded to yourself 6 minutes apart you hypocrite
User avatar #346 to #343 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
I'm not the one desperately trying to make a joke.

Unless you have something useful to say, don't waste my time, please.
#347 to #346 - APGrammarNazi (01/02/2014) [-]
Just pointing it out jack off.
User avatar #348 to #347 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
I guess reading comprehension is just too much to ask of you. Weird, considering "grammar nazi" is in your name.
#349 to #348 - APGrammarNazi (01/02/2014) [-]
You got me so good. Faggot.
User avatar #350 to #349 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
Wow, what a unique insult. Did you come up with that just now? It's so original! I bet you had to spend a lot of time thinking it up, just waiting for the perfect chance to use it.

Gee, I'm so glad I was the first to see your masterpiece. You're a true wordsmith.
#354 to #350 - APGrammarNazi (01/02/2014) [-]
Sarcastic comebacks are also unoriginal. Queer.
User avatar #355 to #354 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
Your persistence to use ad hominem insults is admirable.
#356 to #355 - APGrammarNazi (01/02/2014) [-]
Nice word. Butt Pirate.
User avatar #357 to #356 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
I don't think I can be here any more. Your ability to come up with such soul piercing insults on the spot is just too much for me.

Enjoy having the last word. Make it count, since this is probably the only thing you've done right all day!
User avatar #328 to #326 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
Fun fact : That's not me you're talking to, actually.
User avatar #333 to #328 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
You read it, didn't you? I rest my case.
User avatar #337 to #333 - penileburglar (01/02/2014) [-]
Yet you could easily have just responded to me, instead. Just because I hear you doesn't mean you don't look silly when you can't even keep track of who you're talking to.

Also, I thought you were 'done here'? regardless, I am, and it's pretty obvious your trolling.
User avatar #339 to #337 - anenemy (01/02/2014) [-]
At least you're really good at trying to cover your flounders, even though you always fail miserably.
#528 - crazyeyedbioll (01/02/2014) [-]
both answers are wrong because neither have fully been proven. theories. Just let 			*******		 believe whatever they want and everyone should quit forcing their opinion on each other
both answers are wrong because neither have fully been proven. theories. Just let ******* believe whatever they want and everyone should quit forcing their opinion on each other
User avatar #549 to #528 - mooproxy (01/02/2014) [-]
That's how theories work in the world of science. A theory is never considered proven and never becomes a law. Gravity isn't a fully proven theory, after all

The religious side isn't a theory, it's a hypothesis. It's just as valid as believing that the world was ruled by flying pink unicorns before humanity killed them all and destroyed all the archaeological evidence.
#575 to #528 - anon (01/03/2014) [-]
^ does not know what a theory is
#407 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
Today I learned that nobody knows what a Catholic school is.
#123 - anon (01/01/2014) [-]
Wait, what?

The Earth would not be 4.6 billion years old if that was a creationist test. I smell ******** .
#351 to #123 - anon (01/02/2014) [-]
it asks what is most correct. Whether or not you are a theist, you have to know Zeus was never responsible for creating Earth in the mythology. Hercules certainly didn't either. The earth had already been around by the time both were born.

I don't know if anyone believes the Earth was CREATED by aliens.
User avatar #81 - arkadia (01/01/2014) [-]
If God is the real answer then wouldn't the previous answer have to be 6,000 years old?
#84 to #81 - danzey (01/01/2014) [-]
It says, "the most correct"
User avatar #91 to #81 - zzforrest ONLINE (01/01/2014) [-]
Intelligent design
God created universe, god set up big bang, god guided evolution
Very popular belief in christianity now.
User avatar #108 to #91 - syntheticdoll (01/01/2014) [-]
It actually sounds much more believabla than the whole God created Adam and Eve thing.
#124 to #108 - anon (01/01/2014) [-]
Funny how religion can switch out their beliefs throughout the years.
User avatar #120 to #108 - zzforrest ONLINE (01/01/2014) [-]
probably the reason it's popular.
User avatar #94 to #91 - derpyhuubes **User deleted account** (01/01/2014) [-]
Hai guy who is using mah same gif.
#97 to #94 - zzforrest ONLINE (01/01/2014) [-]
Use this one, it scales better for FJ profile icons.
Use this one, it scales better for FJ profile icons.
User avatar #99 to #97 - derpyhuubes **User deleted account** (01/01/2014) [-]
Thank you im actually eatmaishorts,I got a new profile because my name annoyed me soooo much,just because of the mai
[ 571 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)