It's half past... .. 3 should just be ¬9 6 should be ¬9!
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - ecalycptus (11/11/2013) [-]
3 should just be ¬9
6 should be ¬9!
#2 to #1 - qwertyupp (11/11/2013) [-]
the information one is wrong.
#3 to #2 - ecalycptus (11/11/2013) [-]
I know it should be this because of the Hawkings Radiation
#4 to #3 - ecalycptus (11/11/2013) [-]
Wrong one
#6 to #4 - qwertyupp (11/11/2013) [-]
good man.
#5 to #1 - bronydash (11/11/2013) [-]
each hour needs to be somehow made up of 3 nines, it's a pattern. i completely agree with you though. i don't like redundancies in my maths >.<
User avatar #9 to #5 - YourName (11/12/2013) [-]
9/9 is only two.
#7 - slaughterpill ONLINE (11/11/2013) [-]
five o clock is also wrong, the answer to that one is 601.395219105
#8 to #7 - Rascal (11/11/2013) [-]
I think they meant for the factorial to be outside the radical, but screwed it up.
#18 to #8 - slaughterpill ONLINE (11/13/2013) [-]
that would make ssense yes
User avatar #16 - shadowstepone (11/12/2013) [-]
why isn't 9 just... 9?
#17 to #16 - Rascal (11/12/2013) [-]
On top of that, why isn't 7 just 9-sqrt(9)+(9/9) instead of +.9999999...

this clock is just horribly done.
User avatar #13 - asasqw (11/12/2013) [-]
Shame I never memorized an analog clock or something
User avatar #11 - wired (11/12/2013) [-]
I don't get 5
#12 to #11 - narflarg (11/12/2013) [-]
Because **** factorial.
User avatar #14 to #11 - krazeeguitarist (11/12/2013) [-]
5 is incorrect ... whoever made this clock has little knowledge of factorials.
User avatar #15 to #14 - reginleaf (11/12/2013) [-]
They just ****** up and put the factorial in the square root, instead of outside it:

(sqrt 9)! = 6

#10 - Happytreefriend (11/12/2013) [-]
****		 it..
**** it..
 Friends (0)