Is it true or yes?. In case of mirrors was it a selfie or yes?. Making of the wurr: l' s THE FIRST PIC UH_ _ UEH h.. Except that it is not the first camera. It is simply the biggest. Mirrors justin timberlake
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Is it true or yes?

In case of mirrors was it a selfie or yes?

Making of the wurr: l' s
THE FIRST PIC UH_ _ UEH h.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+867
Views: 33379
Favorited: 55
Submitted: 04/02/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to rappwr E-mail to friend submit to reddit

Comments(64):

[ 64 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - felixjarl (04/02/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Except that it is not the first camera. It is simply the biggest.
#9 - thrashmash (04/02/2014) [+] (17 replies)
First picture
#7 - xtremedeath (04/02/2014) [+] (1 reply)
the 2nd camera
#11 - zourch (04/02/2014) [-]
theirs like 12 pictures that people claim are the first pictures ever
#12 - thatguyyoumightno (04/03/2014) [+] (1 reply)
1) Pictures have been taken before the first camera was created. That camera probably used the same method of picture taking as they did before hand: make a sealed box and poke a hole in one side. The light goes through the box and hits some light-reactive chemicals on the other side. Though this may have been the first 'camera' - the first thing capable of multiple uses and can move around without being dissassembled - the picture could have been taken by the older method.
2) The caption says "MAKING the world's first camera", not just a picture of the world's first camera. If they were still making it, it wouldn't be able to take pictures yet, so it couldn't be a selfie.
3) It's a picture on the ******* internet with no evidence of it's claims. It could be the 127th camera for all we know.
User avatar #22 - thebaseballexpert (04/03/2014) [+] (5 replies)
that is the first camera, not the first picture
#32 to #30 - thebaseballexpert (04/03/2014) [-]
welp... forget everything i said then
#36 - thedividerofzero (04/03/2014) [+] (1 reply)
I'm already tired of these explain accounts
#46 - bakagaijin (04/03/2014) [+] (5 replies)
maybe it was the first camera ever built but it was taken by the second camera ever built...
#8 - anonymous (04/02/2014) [+] (3 replies)
maybe that's the first camera ever made and the picture has been taken by a second one (obviously created later), i actually can't belive people didn't get it already.
User avatar #10 to #8 - huffe (04/02/2014) [-]
it says "making of"
User avatar #56 - thunderkrux (04/03/2014) [-]
That's not true. The world's first "cameras" are a handful of millenia old. They were small dark rooms with a pinpoint hole in the wall. Anyone or anything standing outside could be seen on the other wall but upside down and whoever was inside the room could just sketch out what was displayed on the other wall. Even if you don't want to consider those cameras, the first cameras had film couldn't even hold the images for very long. Then, Niepce was the very first person to take a picture with "film" that could hold an image, but the exposure required 8 hours so they weren't very good pictures. Niepce and his partner spent a lot of time developing a film that required a shorter exposure, but his partner was the one in the end who made the new film after Niepce died. But it was a complicated process to develop the film. So fast forward to modern cameras now we have digital **** .
#34 - KingTroll (04/03/2014) [+] (4 replies)
"Making of the first camera" as in it wasn't finished... so if it wasn't finished how would it take the picture.
User avatar #60 to #59 - leonhardt (04/04/2014) [-]
Or maybe the person who put the text on the picture is a retard and we're grossly overthinking this.
#29 - heyfuckoff (04/03/2014) [-]
Well firstly it has been said that's the "Making" of the camera, so maybe it's just a highly skilled painter? Hmmm?
User avatar #2 - rebuilt ONLINE (04/02/2014) [-]
yes
#65 - anonymous (08/19/2014) [-]
I cannot believe that there are so many morons here. Try actually using the internet for a change to gather information rather than speculate over some stupid claim written on an old photo. This is NOT the worlds first camera. If you really give a damn then try Google or Wikipedia.
Now MOVE ON morons.
#53 - anonymous (04/03/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 5,155**
#52 - anonymous (04/03/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image** the first picture
#4 - anonymous (04/02/2014) [-]
I've seen that picture of couple of times, not sure if anyone's thought of this but before proper cameras were built, pinhole cameras existed. (Back to about 6th century BCE) They're very simple to make but require exposure times of at least 5-10 seconds if memory serves. Here's a picture showing the geometry www.askamathematician.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/1981-11-03.jpg and if you want to know more, look it up your damn self.
#3 - anonymous (04/02/2014) [-]
or the pic of the worlds first camera is from the worlds SECOND camera....
User avatar #1 - assassindash (04/02/2014) [-]
That explains the two amish looking people looking at the mirror as if jesus was gonna pop out any second....
[ 64 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)