Interesting Facts n Shit 5. If you see something wrong, feel free to point it out. Previous versions. /channel/fucking-facts/Interesting+facts+n+shit/mownGzb/ / Interesting Facts n Shit 5 If you see something wrong feel free to point it out Previous versions /channel/fucking-facts/Interesting+facts+n+shit/mownGzb/ /
Upload
Login or register

Interesting Facts n Shit 5

+868
Views: 53526 Submitted: 12/26/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (289)
[ 289 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#30 - angelusprimus
Reply +143 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
When Chaplin refued to shake hands with german ambassador, ambassador asked him "Are you a jew?" And Chaplin replied "I do not have the honor."

While russian armored troops are largest in the world, most of it is parked in semi-abandoned bases through Siberia, and would take huge restoration to work again. That said, the smaller core of new, high quality, well maintained tanks is still pretty goddamn large.
User avatar #100 to #30 - popkornking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
It says "Fields the largest armored force" I would assume that wouldn't be counting tanks in abandoned bases in Siberia
User avatar #158 to #100 - angelusprimus
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Yugoslavia in ww2 "fielded" one of the europe's larger airforces. Except their planes were antiques unworthy of being used.
Same thing with russia's tanks. You can field them, but you won't get much use of those cold war antiques.
User avatar #249 to #158 - popkornking
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Oh okay, I thought "fielded" meant they had to be in service.
#5 - respectyourmom
-55 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#44 to #5 - anon id: 8223b98e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
nope they actually dont...
User avatar #62 to #5 - chaossniper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
t90 eats abrams for breakfast
#83 to #5 - anon id: bafe2f26
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
typical thick head like you made america a joke.
#99 to #5 - anon id: cf6f4db2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Hate to break it to you, but the British Challenger II tank is vastly superior to the American Abrams. In literally every way.
#177 to #5 - voltism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
what is a tank going to do against a thousand nukes? You can have all the tanks in the world and they can be the best tanks too, it won't do you any good.
User avatar #194 to #5 - respectyourmom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
i have totally given up giving a **** about this post anymore. you retards dont know **** about tanks and it clearly shows you are all nothing but fanboys. i am a master gunner and i could care less what you bitches have to say.
User avatar #188 to #5 - rokulda
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I would say they suck, but they are definetly outdated. Nothing compares to the Abrams.
#192 to #5 - foreverone **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
But can your Abrams run on chechens?
#76 to #5 - newall
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Challenger II

Zero combat losses.

3 total damaged C2s, all 3 in friendly fire incidents during training, with other C2s. 0 casualties.

Thicker armour, larger caliber, rifled, more accurate main armament, quieter, longer fuel range, longer engagement range, faster, carries more ammo (with a higher payload.) Safer

Oh, and it has a kettle.
User avatar #176 to #76 - tavafanduvill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Why the hell would you use a rifled tank gun? Doesn't that prevent you from using HEAT rounds?
#287 to #176 - newall
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yes and no.

We use HESH and APFSDS rounds more than HEAT rounds, Yes, this requres two shots to confirm kill something like a t90, however, it WILL destroy it. a HEAT round has a solid chance of not penetrating modern armour, a steel DU sabot does not. However, you can sabot a heat round and fire it from the challenger, if you so desired.

The reason the rifled cannon is used, is because it gives the gun much greater accuracy, and an effective range (on the HESH round) of almost 10 KM.
It is also the only NATO MBT with a rifled cannon, giving it a unique speciality, range.
User avatar #127 to #76 - itsmewaffle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
mostly because it hasn't seen any combat other than the Iraq War
#286 to #127 - newall
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
the same Iraq war in which the US lost 250+ Abrams? the same battle, infact.
#46 to #5 - hurrdurka
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
You do know the British Challenger 2 is much stronger than the Abrams.
#90 to #46 - xxgeneralxx **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
if you only have 3 of the damn things than chances are your going to not lose 1
#41 to #5 - satrenkotheone
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Comrade please.

I'm not being serious here, please don't hit me.
#55 to #41 - leeuwenborgh
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
#31 to #5 - leeuwenborgh
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
> Abrams
This tank is the most expensive tank in buying and maintaining, even the Netherlands considered buying the Abrams at first but then heard about the maintenance costs, then they bought the Leopard tank series.

The newest T-90MS is ONE of the most modern MBT's on the world.
Same goes for Leopard 2A7+ your Abrams is equipped what a Leopard has, just a little bit downgraded.

Your abrams carries a L44 the Leopard carries the L55 which has greater range and better firepower.

Your Abrams goes 67 Km/h the Leopard goes 72 Km/h

Your Abrams has a operational range of 265 Miles the Leopard has 340 Miles

Abrams uses Cobham armour and depleted uranium plates which proved useless against the RPG-7, The leopard use 3rd Gen Composite, which proved to be efficient against RPG-7's

Also the Leopard uses 1200 Liters of fuel, while the Abrams uses 1900 Liters of fuel.

Conclusion;
Abrams, a more expensive version of the Leopard 2 with more maintenance costs, less operational range and less firepower.
User avatar #207 to #31 - sodaberg
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
also you're ignoring the fact both tanks have sophisticated software an imaging equipment which is as important as having a big gun and a fast engine. And I'm guessing the German stuff is a downgraded export version of the American stuff because lockheed martin or boeing seem to write the software for everything decent
User avatar #198 to #31 - sodaberg
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
what about TUSK?
#121 to #31 - markonj
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Basically Apple vs Microsoft
inb4hate
User avatar #38 to #31 - lilnuggetbob
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Keep in mind that that you are talking about the M1A2, and the M1A3 is in development, and might improve a lot of these features.
Development on the M1A3 started in 09' btw.
#161 to #38 - anon id: 8c669632
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
But so is the next version of L2, which just means that Leopard is one step ahead.
#35 to #31 - anon id: 3b427c0d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Couple of things. The t-90ms is not really all that modern more of an upgrade. The range of the cannons is more dependent on actual rounds than barrel. The U.S. and Germany use different rounds. Against rpg's you are correct. The depleted Uranium was used in order to fight kinetic projectiles. Due to the lack of survivability against heat rounds the U.S. adopted the Tusk variant. Also the acceleration of the Abrams is amazing due to the engine.
#7 to #5 - eldiganto
Reply +128 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
if you want to throw an Abrams against a Leopard 2, you're going to have a bad time
#124 to #7 - reaperriley
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Ask Israel, it isn't the number or size of the "weapon" it is how you use it.
#151 to #124 - anon id: 8c669632
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Did you just forget WW2?
User avatar #195 to #151 - sodaberg
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
The only thing proved in WW2 was that you win armoured combat by having more tanks than the enemy
User avatar #210 to #195 - snuifduif
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Yes yes, this man knows how it works. Wow, Tiger tank is the best tank of WW2! No, it was not. It was the T-34.
User avatar #212 to #210 - sodaberg
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Exactly. The Russians produced more tanks that were of a better quality than the German tanks. It didn't matter that nothing was remotely as impressive engineering-wise as the Tiger, but there were never enough Tigers around to beat the T34s
User avatar #213 to #212 - snuifduif
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Lel and all those 'fantastic' Tiger II's that only got stuck or had mechanical issues before they could even fire at a reliable T-34. Or M4 for that matter. Goodnight, fellow tanker.
User avatar #216 to #213 - sodaberg
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
The most disastrous problem with the German 'mega tanks' they were making at the end of the war was that there wasn't even enough petrol for their giant engines. They were almost self-defeating in a way
User avatar #239 to #216 - lamarisagoodname
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
if they could support them, they would have been damn formidable. the nazis produced a million and one fantastic bits of engineering (both evil and otherwise)
#14 to #7 - respectyourmom
-12 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #119 to #14 - thismustbeseen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
"your" Abrams? You own a main battle tank? What are you wasting your time on FJ for!? Are you bored of it or something?
User avatar #120 to #119 - thismustbeseen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
2nd amendment ftw, I guess...
#73 to #14 - anon id: adc065d7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
"lol" as if you are anywhere close to mature "lol" enough to even live outside your mom's basement "lol".

Saying something on the internet doesn't make it real, "son".
#8 to #7 - respectyourmom
-12 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #9 to #8 - eldiganto
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I think that the leo has little to fear from the XM256 because of the L55 on the leopard, also the leopard can go up to 72km/h as the abrams just goes 67.5km/h.
User avatar #196 to #9 - sodaberg
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
The Abrams and Leopard 2 use the same gun...
User avatar #277 to #196 - eldiganto
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
not the new M1A2 that uses the 120mm XM256
#293 to #277 - anon id: dc07d58f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/23/2015) [-]
the XM256 is the american version of rheinmetall DeTec 120mm L44
#10 to #9 - respectyourmom
-8 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #11 to #10 - eldiganto
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
are you implying that the leo isn't able to do all of the above?
also good job on the mikegolf
#13 to #11 - respectyourmom
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #15 to #13 - eldiganto
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I agree the sep v2 is one hell of a beast but the new A7+ is nothing to be laughed at
#16 to #15 - respectyourmom
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #17 to #16 - eldiganto
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
so, shall we call it quits and agree that the abrams and the leo are the dominating tanks of the world today?
#18 to #17 - respectyourmom
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #183 to #10 - bucketofhurt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
From all my experience; those who brag about their service are usually the immature arrogant twats that always bitches about everything more or less all the time. You make me vomit in my mouth. If you really had any experience at all you'd be smarter than what you've shown thus far.

"I can go all day son" Pathetic patronizing basement dweller thinking he is anything.
#57 to #10 - crackedpepper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
parkourdude go home
#153 to #8 - anon id: 8c669632
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Leo 2 is an upgraded version on abrams, much like HK416 is an upgraded version of M4.
User avatar #68 to #8 - tkfourtwoone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
You are genuine proof that the average 'merican is a moronic idiot.
#88 to #68 - xxgeneralxx **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Hey eurofag, who needs mbts when we have nuclear powered aircraft carriers?
User avatar #91 to #88 - tkfourtwoone
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Hey 'muricunt,

Who needs anything when we all got nukes?!

Now shut the bloody **** up.
#93 to #91 - xxgeneralxx **User deleted account**
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
piece of **** socialist. we are the only ones with missile defense systems. suck my dick
User avatar #94 to #93 - tkfourtwoone
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Know something? Go **** yourself. Right now. With a rake.

I'm really not in the mood to have "conversations" with bloody primitive gun-totting, burger-munching idiots.

Go **** your sister or something.
#98 to #94 - xxgeneralxx **User deleted account**
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
id **** your mother with my fat man, if you get my drift. i can do this all day eurofag. i hate talking to socialist trash, but i do it just to let you know all people dont agree with your ******** worldview. eat a Depleted uranium penetrator and die. btw man dont you have like potatoes to go dig up? wouldnt want you to starve!
User avatar #106 to #98 - tkfourtwoone
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
"i hate talking to socialist trash"

> implying that every European is socialist
> implying your President isn't socialist
> implying you know **** about another continent

Get lost, americunt
#292 to #106 - xxgeneralxx **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
**** you. when whatever hovel of a slum you claim as your own gets a space program get back to me k?
User avatar #117 to #106 - opticmonkey
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Can't tell if you guys are trolling each other or actually mad
User avatar #104 to #98 - vikingesnumerouno
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Are you 12 years old? "My views are better than yours *mum-insults*"
#160 to #93 - anon id: 8c669632
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
You're STILL afraid of socialism?

how pathetic.
#157 to #88 - anon id: 8c669632
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
who needs nuclear powered aircraft carriers when you have nukes?
#2 - kingsombra
Reply +81 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Damn, he's good looking

I'm not gay, but I wouldn't mind lieching his stein, if you know what I mean
#6 to #2 - respectyourmom
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
pause
User avatar #3 to #2 - deathhardiv [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
wat
#37 to #3 - stunner
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
please tell me that's not cropped gfur i recognize in your picture
#43 to #3 - anon id: 4a46405e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Lol the photo was probably taken a while ago...
User avatar #101 to #2 - popkornking
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Pretty sure that makes you gay
User avatar #22 to #2 - jshyu
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
his full name is Johannes Hans Adam Ferdinand Alois Josef Maria Marko d'Aviano Pius von und zu Liechtenstein

and he's in his 60's
#260 to #22 - rdobet
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Is there a 90+ year old king? Or is it more of an honorary title? I'm confus
User avatar #276 to #260 - jshyu
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
He's the reigning monarch of Liechtenstein. Lichtenstein is a principality. As a kingdom has a king (or queen) as it's ruler, a principality has a prince (or princess)
#29 to #22 - youxbarstard
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
While I believe you on the name part I don't however believe you when it comes to his age.
#34 to #29 - chrislee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
#254 to #34 - anon id: 1ace3710
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
It's true. Money does slow aging.
User avatar #125 to #34 - jshyu
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
thanks bro
#116 to #34 - youxbarstard
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Fair enough.
#64 - bohemianblasphemy
Reply +64 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an admin. That’s not my business. I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone - if possible - /b/tard, Redditor - blue name - white. We all want to make one another laugh. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other’s support- not by each other’s criticism. We don’t want to hate and despise one another. In this website there is room for everyone's opinions. And the good Internet is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of Funnyjunk can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way.
User avatar #112 to #64 - misticalz
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
That speech is ******* annoying.
Mostly because I hear it in almost EVERY ******* CHILLOUT SONG.
#71 to #64 - inanimateobject
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I want to live by your happiness.
#133 to #71 - bohemianblasphemy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
As do I with you
#107 to #64 - thesinful
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#85 to #64 - driplone
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Thumbs have posioned men's soul.
User avatar #135 to #64 - bohemianblasphemy
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Content have poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded Funnyjunk with conceit, has goose-stepped us into misery and blame-giving. We have developed OC, but we have shut ourselves in. Good posts that give thumbs has left us in want. Our levels have made us cynical. Our jokes, hard and unkind. We think too little and disregard opinions too much. More than OC, we need good posts. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, Funnyjunk will be violent and all will be lost....
User avatar #136 to #135 - bohemianblasphemy
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
The frontpage and various boards have brought us closer together. The very nature of these inventions cries out for the goodness in men - cries out for universal brotherhood - for the unity of us all. Even now my comment is reaching millions throughout this site- millions of despairing men, women (yes, women on the internet), and whiny children - victims of a system that makes men torture and make fun of innocent people.

To those who can read this, I say - do not despair. The misery that is now upon us is but the passing of greed - the bitterness of men who fear the way of human enjoyment. The hate of men will pass, and admins die, and the illusion of power they gave to the people will be taken from the people. And so long as good people make good content, humor will never perish...
#23 - SteyrAUG
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Wow, someone's more powerful than obama? The guy who won't even give up one micrometer of political ground for the good of the people he governs?
#24 to #23 - feelythefeel
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #25 to #23 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
So is your ignorance of everything Russian since 1991 willing or involuntary?
User avatar #131 to #25 - SteyrAUG
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Both sentences were a reference to obama. Sorry about the bad punctuation.
User avatar #282 to #131 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
I'm confused. Who's not giving an inch here?
User avatar #26 to #25 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Unless you're talking **** about Putin. Not quite sure.
#81 to #26 - roarflmao
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Wait wut? All he mentioned was that Obama cant do ****, putin is a dictator.. obviously he has more power since he doesnt have to worry about getting re elected and his party doesnt have to compromise, "democratically elected" in a election where over 100% of the population voted.
#146 to #23 - anon id: 276c8025
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Point is that Obama is the executive of the world's greatest power and the commander in chief of the most powerful military force in the world. They're not talking about his ability to pass healthcare.
User avatar #53 to #23 - baditch
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I agree. Comparing a man who holds only a small portion of legislative power and does a poor job of lobbying for the approval of Congress and his constituates with Putin, who doesn't take **** from anybody, seems pretty unfair.
#33 - jellybaby
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Neurotoxin?
Neurotoxin?
User avatar #40 to #33 - shadownigga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Botulinum. Made by Clostridium botulinum. And causes botulitis
#148 to #40 - anon id: f37deb8c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Cause botulism, not botulitis.
User avatar #163 to #33 - rectophobia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
There was actually a case where a woman received botox injections illegally by an unregistered doctor. The dosage was too high (and I can only assume other complications) and she eventually became completely paralyzed. She would have died regardless of where she was at the time (As her organs began to stop), but it just so happened that she was in her pool/spa when she started to lose her motor functions and slowly slid to the bottom of the pool, unable to move a muscle.
User avatar #180 to #163 - shadownigga
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
1000 ways to die, Botixicated
User avatar #84 to #33 - timmity
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
danm glados is sexy
#110 to #84 - europe
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Come again?
#111 to #110 - timmity
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
for her, GLaDly
for her, GLaDly
User avatar #231 to #84 - nightmareschild
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
User avatar #244 to #231 - timmity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
LESBIAN PORN!?
User avatar #243 to #231 - timmity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
no, anything but GLaDOS with a vagina!
#139 - manofiron
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Come on OP. I had to squint for half of these.
User avatar #263 to #139 - deathhardiv [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Sorry
I thought the shadow looked a bit better
I'll make sure to make a clear outline next time
#39 - lethallizzie
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I lol'ed when I saw this guy xD
User avatar #79 to #39 - billythewizard
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
i think anyone that uses 'XD' shouldnt be allowed to reproduce
User avatar #132 to #79 - misticalz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
ur a feg
#175 to #79 - anon id: 1c2ce19f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD
xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD
xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xDxD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD
xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD
xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD xD
#42 to #39 - neggernegernger
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
"xD"
#105 to #39 - vikingesnumerouno
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
#51 to #39 - obitouzumaki
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - nospyonme
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Yeah, sure there are tanks, but most of those are Soviet relics from the Cold War, nothing to shake a stick at, but look at the Highway of Death in 1991
User avatar #61 to #1 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Where do you get your facts from rofl
User avatar #140 to #61 - crazypat
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
from 200 dead russian tanks. alos they died at the hands of 12 US bombers.
User avatar #172 to #140 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
1. Link or it didn't happen
2. I'm pretty sure any tank would explode from a bomber missile.
User avatar #199 to #172 - sodaberg
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
no link but it happened in the first gulf war
User avatar #211 to #199 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
so 20 years ago.
what makes you think that the russian military wouldn't have improved in the last 20 years? use your brain pls.
User avatar #214 to #211 - sodaberg
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
the point is they were cold war T64s and T72s and nospyonme makes the point that the majority of Russian tanks are actually these old cold war tanks.
User avatar #247 to #214 - rarityrarityrarity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
yes they were... during the cold war.
I'm not sure where you're going with this.
User avatar #245 to #214 - nospyonme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Exactly.
User avatar #246 to #172 - nospyonme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Just google "Highway of Death in 1991"
#114 - Zanchoff
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
The largest air force in the world is the U.S. Air Force. The second largest is the U.S. Navy.
#141 to #114 - comradewinter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
The US Navy isn't even a Navy. Most Navy's fight at sea, whereas the Americans haven't seen aquatic warfare if that's even a word in like 50 years. It's like all the funding is being shoved onto the Navy because of their contribution against the Japanese.
#143 to #141 - anon id: 7f312bc0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Actually, we cram a lot of money into naval warfare. There isn't a nation on the planet that can compete. Our technology is 50 years ahead of everyone.
#144 to #143 - comradewinter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
********. Drones are effective only against targets that aren't defended. If the US waged war on a powerful nation like Russia or China they'd see that most of their human life-sparing equipment would be very ineffective.
#155 to #144 - imadeyoureadthis
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Or, maybe, just maybe, we could stop insulting America and various other countries.
Please be gentle with your hate
#164 to #155 - comradewinter
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
I'm not insulting America. I'm just criticizing the technology they use. It costs way more than needed. Like how an AK-47 costs like 50$ to produce while an M-16 is closer to 150$. Both are equally effective.
User avatar #167 to #164 - imadeyoureadthis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Either way, judgment is wrong.
#197 to #167 - comradewinter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Well, I'm sorry. I thought I was allowed to express my opinion about how the US could spend the money in other ways, that actually have a positive effect on its people.
#179 to #164 - anon id: 7f312bc0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
Dumb ******. Bring a gun to an F-22 fight. I bought an Ak from ... another country.... it had "seen combat" but was "never fired" why? Because the towel head holding it died before he could get a shot off.

the Ak-47 is ****** lovely. Seriously, it's a joy to shoot. But it's not the best rifle by any means. A rifle means nothing if you can't shoot it.
#168 to #144 - anon id: 7f312bc0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
LOL, hows your delusion treating you? China and Russia could combine forces and still never own the air against the US. If you can't own the air, you can't own the sea. If you can't own the sea, you can't own land.

Drones are not the only thing that makes us the most powerful nation in the world. The **** you see during combat operations is the **** that's 40 years old. Here's a protip, we're not spending 700 billion a year maintaining old equipment and people alone. 30 trillion in spending over the course of 50 years makes a lot of cool **** to dick smack any enemy.

You've got to be out of your mind to think even both nations could overpower the US.
User avatar #238 to #168 - OsamaBinLadenz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Yes, because we should be proud of being seen as warmongering psychopaths to the rest of the world.
#255 to #238 - anon id: 37994681
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
Rather be seen as a warmongering psychopath than a cowardly pussy who couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag.
User avatar #256 to #255 - OsamaBinLadenz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/27/2013) [-]
We could prevent that by spending a reasonable amount on our military rather than overspending. We don't need that much equipment, unless there's something I don't know about going on/
#115 to #114 - Zanchoff
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/26/2013) [-]
(To be fair, they mostly consist of eagles and freedom)