Interesting Facts n Shit 5. If you see something wrong, feel free to point it out. Previous versions. /channel/fucking-facts/Interesting+facts+n+shit/mownGzb/ /

Interesting Facts n Shit 5

  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 53456
Favorited: 69
Submitted: 12/26/2013
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to deathhardiv Subscribe to fucking-facts


Anonymous comments allowed.
#30 - angelusprimus (12/26/2013) [-]
When Chaplin refued to shake hands with german ambassador, ambassador asked him "Are you a jew?" And Chaplin replied "I do not have the honor."

While russian armored troops are largest in the world, most of it is parked in semi-abandoned bases through Siberia, and would take huge restoration to work again. That said, the smaller core of new, high quality, well maintained tanks is still pretty goddamn large.
User avatar #100 to #30 - popkornking (12/26/2013) [-]
It says "Fields the largest armored force" I would assume that wouldn't be counting tanks in abandoned bases in Siberia
#158 to #100 - angelusprimus (12/26/2013) [-]
Yugoslavia in ww2 "fielded" one of the europe's larger airforces. Except their planes were antiques unworthy of being used.
Same thing with russia's tanks. You can field them, but you won't get much use of those cold war antiques.
User avatar #249 to #158 - popkornking (12/27/2013) [-]
Oh okay, I thought "fielded" meant they had to be in service.
#64 - bohemianblasphemy ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an admin. That’s not my business. I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone - if possible - /b/tard, Redditor - blue name - white. We all want to make one another laugh. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other’s support- not by each other’s criticism. We don’t want to hate and despise one another. In this website there is room for everyone's opinions. And the good Internet is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of Funnyjunk can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way.
User avatar #112 to #64 - misticalz ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
That speech is ******* annoying.
Mostly because I hear it in almost EVERY ******* CHILLOUT SONG.
#71 to #64 - inanimateobject (12/26/2013) [-]
I want to live by your happiness.
#133 to #71 - bohemianblasphemy ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
As do I with you
#85 to #64 - driplone (12/26/2013) [-]
Thumbs have posioned men's soul.
User avatar #135 to #64 - bohemianblasphemy ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
Content have poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded Funnyjunk with conceit, has goose-stepped us into misery and blame-giving. We have developed OC, but we have shut ourselves in. Good posts that give thumbs has left us in want. Our levels have made us cynical. Our jokes, hard and unkind. We think too little and disregard opinions too much. More than OC, we need good posts. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, Funnyjunk will be violent and all will be lost....
User avatar #136 to #135 - bohemianblasphemy ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
The frontpage and various boards have brought us closer together. The very nature of these inventions cries out for the goodness in men - cries out for universal brotherhood - for the unity of us all. Even now my comment is reaching millions throughout this site- millions of despairing men, women (yes, women on the internet), and whiny children - victims of a system that makes men torture and make fun of innocent people.

To those who can read this, I say - do not despair. The misery that is now upon us is but the passing of greed - the bitterness of men who fear the way of human enjoyment. The hate of men will pass, and admins die, and the illusion of power they gave to the people will be taken from the people. And so long as good people make good content, humor will never perish...
#2 - kingsombra (12/26/2013) [-]
Damn, he's good looking

I'm not gay, but I wouldn't mind lieching his stein, if you know what I mean
User avatar #3 to #2 - deathhardiv [OP](12/26/2013) [-]
#37 to #3 - stunner (12/26/2013) [-]
please tell me that's not cropped gfur i recognize in your picture
#43 to #3 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
Lol the photo was probably taken a while ago...
User avatar #101 to #2 - popkornking (12/26/2013) [-]
Pretty sure that makes you gay
User avatar #22 to #2 - jshyu (12/26/2013) [-]
his full name is Johannes Hans Adam Ferdinand Alois Josef Maria Marko d'Aviano Pius von und zu Liechtenstein

and he's in his 60's
#260 to #22 - rdobet (12/27/2013) [-]
Is there a 90+ year old king? Or is it more of an honorary title? I'm confus
User avatar #276 to #260 - jshyu (12/27/2013) [-]
He's the reigning monarch of Liechtenstein. Lichtenstein is a principality. As a kingdom has a king (or queen) as it's ruler, a principality has a prince (or princess)
#29 to #22 - youxbarstard (12/26/2013) [-]
While I believe you on the name part I don't however believe you when it comes to his age.
#254 to #34 - anon (12/27/2013) [-]
It's true. Money does slow aging.
User avatar #125 to #34 - jshyu (12/26/2013) [-]
thanks bro
#116 to #34 - youxbarstard (12/26/2013) [-]
Fair enough.
#139 - manofiron ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
Come on OP. I had to squint for half of these.
User avatar #263 to #139 - deathhardiv [OP](12/27/2013) [-]
I thought the shadow looked a bit better
I'll make sure to make a clear outline next time
#33 - jellybaby (12/26/2013) [-]
User avatar #40 to #33 - shadownigga ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
Botulinum. Made by Clostridium botulinum. And causes botulitis
#148 to #40 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
Cause botulism, not botulitis.
User avatar #163 to #33 - rectophobia (12/26/2013) [-]
There was actually a case where a woman received botox injections illegally by an unregistered doctor. The dosage was too high (and I can only assume other complications) and she eventually became completely paralyzed. She would have died regardless of where she was at the time (As her organs began to stop), but it just so happened that she was in her pool/spa when she started to lose her motor functions and slowly slid to the bottom of the pool, unable to move a muscle.
User avatar #180 to #163 - shadownigga ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
1000 ways to die, Botixicated
User avatar #84 to #33 - timmity (12/26/2013) [-]
danm glados is sexy
#110 to #84 - europe (12/26/2013) [-]
Come again?
#111 to #110 - timmity (12/26/2013) [-]
for her, GLaDly
for her, GLaDly
User avatar #244 to #231 - timmity (12/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #243 to #231 - timmity (12/27/2013) [-]
no, anything but GLaDOS with a vagina!
#23 - SteyrAUG (12/26/2013) [-]
Wow, someone's more powerful than obama? The guy who won't even give up one micrometer of political ground for the good of the people he governs?
#24 to #23 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
#146 to #23 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
Point is that Obama is the executive of the world's greatest power and the commander in chief of the most powerful military force in the world. They're not talking about his ability to pass healthcare.
User avatar #25 to #23 - feelythefeel (12/26/2013) [-]
So is your ignorance of everything Russian since 1991 willing or involuntary?
User avatar #131 to #25 - SteyrAUG (12/26/2013) [-]
Both sentences were a reference to obama. Sorry about the bad punctuation.
User avatar #282 to #131 - feelythefeel (12/27/2013) [-]
I'm confused. Who's not giving an inch here?
User avatar #26 to #25 - feelythefeel (12/26/2013) [-]
Unless you're talking **** about Putin. Not quite sure.
#81 to #26 - roarflmao (12/26/2013) [-]
Wait wut? All he mentioned was that Obama cant do **** , putin is a dictator.. obviously he has more power since he doesnt have to worry about getting re elected and his party doesnt have to compromise, "democratically elected" in a election where over 100% of the population voted.
User avatar #53 to #23 - baditch (12/26/2013) [-]
I agree. Comparing a man who holds only a small portion of legislative power and does a poor job of lobbying for the approval of Congress and his constituates with Putin, who doesn't take **** from anybody, seems pretty unfair.
#12 - adamthehuman (12/26/2013) [-]
Education For Death - Disney WWII Propaganda Cartoon Sauce for that WWII Disney propoganda
#113 to #27 - adamthehuman (12/26/2013) [-]
Neat, I had only seen the one I had posted before.
User avatar #142 to #113 - hacksaw (12/26/2013) [-]
there is one more with donald, but i can't find it...
#165 - iviagic has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #184 to #165 - benjamino (12/26/2013) [-]
#191 to #184 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
That was America's fault anyway for using stupid strategies. We deserved to lose it.
User avatar #193 to #191 - benjamino (12/26/2013) [-]
It still refutes his point.
The most damage they did to Vietnam is what the chemicals do to it's civilians now, they didn't really 'devastate' the Vietcong, more the other way around.
And their air force didn't do the much good.
User avatar #202 to #193 - InflictorOfPain (12/26/2013) [-]
More viet cong died to Americans than vice versa.
User avatar #203 to #202 - benjamino (12/26/2013) [-]
And yet America lost
User avatar #205 to #203 - InflictorOfPain (12/26/2013) [-]
Lol, "lost". You mean withdrew? That was because of protests in the home front.
User avatar #237 to #205 - benjamino (12/26/2013) [-]
Withdrew because of protests on the home front which actually resulted in civilian death, withdrew because of the body count, withdrew because there was literally no support for the war anymore (Bear in mind that when a country loses all support for a war, defeat isn't far behind- see British Naval Blockade WWI and the German people ******* that war noise because they were hungry as **** ), withdrew because their soldiers were being driven insane, so much so that they started to shoot up innocent villages, and withdrew because they spent several thousands of dollars killing even 1 vietcong.
America lost in Vietnam. 'Withdrew' is the word that was used to safe face by the government.
They left the country because they saw no hope of victory and were losing a lot more than they were gaining.
Sure, you can call that 'withdrawing'. You can also call it retreat, or 'giving up'- but they're all synonymous with 'losing'.
User avatar #258 to #237 - mikhailovych (12/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #221 to #205 - kinginyellow (12/26/2013) [-]
It was a Pyrrhic victory if anything, it was good they pulled out when they did. I thought it was supposed to be considered neutral loss because of the body count on both sides.
User avatar #224 to #193 - kinginyellow (12/26/2013) [-]
Air force is really useless in an area like that too, with no easy visuals of the enemy soldiers and how easy friendly fire could occur. The equipment is based on the field of battle.
User avatar #233 to #165 - mikhailovych (12/26/2013) [-]
"every single time"
>Struggled across Europe during the second world war, e.g there were more American casualties at the battle of the bulge than there were in the entire civil war
>Had to pull out of Vietnam after a bunch of 3rd world infantry kept killing enough U.S troops to cause public opinion to turn against the U.S
>Chinese troops forced American troops to pull back to the 38th parallel in the Korean war
Don't be retarded
User avatar #190 to #165 - Dwarf (12/26/2013) [-]
The Civil War
#114 - Zanchoff (12/26/2013) [-]
The largest air force in the world is the U.S. Air Force. The second largest is the U.S. Navy.
#141 to #114 - comradewinter ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
The US Navy isn't even a Navy. Most Navy's fight at sea, whereas the Americans haven't seen aquatic warfare if that's even a word in like 50 years. It's like all the funding is being shoved onto the Navy because of their contribution against the Japanese.
#143 to #141 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
Actually, we cram a lot of money into naval warfare. There isn't a nation on the planet that can compete. Our technology is 50 years ahead of everyone.
#144 to #143 - comradewinter ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
******** . Drones are effective only against targets that aren't defended. If the US waged war on a powerful nation like Russia or China they'd see that most of their human life-sparing equipment would be very ineffective.
#155 to #144 - imadeyoureadthis (12/26/2013) [-]
Or, maybe, just maybe, we could stop insulting America and various other countries.
Please be gentle with your hate
#164 to #155 - comradewinter ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
I'm not insulting America. I'm just criticizing the technology they use. It costs way more than needed. Like how an AK-47 costs like 50$ to produce while an M-16 is closer to 150$. Both are equally effective.
#179 to #164 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
Dumb ****** . Bring a gun to an F-22 fight. I bought an Ak from ... another country.... it had "seen combat" but was "never fired" why? Because the towel head holding it died before he could get a shot off.

the Ak-47 is ****** lovely. Seriously, it's a joy to shoot. But it's not the best rifle by any means. A rifle means nothing if you can't shoot it.
User avatar #167 to #164 - imadeyoureadthis (12/26/2013) [-]
Either way, judgment is wrong.
#197 to #167 - comradewinter ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
Well, I'm sorry. I thought I was allowed to express my opinion about how the US could spend the money in other ways, that actually have a positive effect on its people.
#168 to #144 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
LOL, hows your delusion treating you? China and Russia could combine forces and still never own the air against the US. If you can't own the air, you can't own the sea. If you can't own the sea, you can't own land.

Drones are not the only thing that makes us the most powerful nation in the world. The **** you see during combat operations is the **** that's 40 years old. Here's a protip, we're not spending 700 billion a year maintaining old equipment and people alone. 30 trillion in spending over the course of 50 years makes a lot of cool **** to dick smack any enemy.

You've got to be out of your mind to think even both nations could overpower the US.
User avatar #238 to #168 - OsamaBinLadenz (12/27/2013) [-]
Yes, because we should be proud of being seen as warmongering psychopaths to the rest of the world.
#255 to #238 - anon (12/27/2013) [-]
Rather be seen as a warmongering psychopath than a cowardly pussy who couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag.
User avatar #256 to #255 - OsamaBinLadenz (12/27/2013) [-]
We could prevent that by spending a reasonable amount on our military rather than overspending. We don't need that much equipment, unless there's something I don't know about going on/
#115 to #114 - Zanchoff (12/26/2013) [-]
(To be fair, they mostly consist of eagles and freedom)
#20 - firebomber (12/26/2013) [-]
Nice comp. but, you need to get a better font. Keep it up!
#1 - nospyonme (12/26/2013) [-]
Yeah, sure there are tanks, but most of those are Soviet relics from the Cold War, nothing to shake a stick at, but look at the Highway of Death in 1991
User avatar #61 to #1 - rarityrarityrarity (12/26/2013) [-]
Where do you get your facts from rofl
User avatar #140 to #61 - crazypat (12/26/2013) [-]
from 200 dead russian tanks. alos they died at the hands of 12 US bombers.
User avatar #172 to #140 - rarityrarityrarity (12/26/2013) [-]
1. Link or it didn't happen
2. I'm pretty sure any tank would explode from a bomber missile.
User avatar #199 to #172 - sodaberg (12/26/2013) [-]
no link but it happened in the first gulf war
User avatar #211 to #199 - rarityrarityrarity (12/26/2013) [-]
so 20 years ago.
what makes you think that the russian military wouldn't have improved in the last 20 years? use your brain pls.
User avatar #214 to #211 - sodaberg (12/26/2013) [-]
the point is they were cold war T64s and T72s and nospyonme makes the point that the majority of Russian tanks are actually these old cold war tanks.
User avatar #247 to #214 - rarityrarityrarity (12/27/2013) [-]
yes they were... during the cold war.
I'm not sure where you're going with this.
User avatar #245 to #214 - nospyonme (12/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #246 to #172 - nospyonme (12/27/2013) [-]
Just google "Highway of Death in 1991"
#137 - sausydangles (12/26/2013) [-]
Doesn't matter how many tanks the russians, the A10 warthog will take care of them. It literally was built to kill russian tanks.
User avatar #150 to #137 - saltyfries (12/26/2013) [-]
and yet that thing is going to be replaced soon by something far more powerful and tank busting... think about that
#236 to #137 - nightstar ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
USAF is trying to retire that entire fleet.
and even if they do, the AH-64 will step up.

The other branches of the military are why it's still in the air...
#145 to #137 - yoursandwitch (12/26/2013) [-]
So are ICBMs
#154 to #145 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
ICBMs are obsolete now. We can swat down hundreds at a time, if not every single one on the planet. The US is the only nation on the planet with the ability to strike with a nuke undetected until it's reached it's target.
#215 to #154 - pwnfrnzy (12/26/2013) [-]
The U.S. also literally have LASER GUNS on naval ships now.
And literally costs $1 to fire.
There's currently 1 mounted vessel right now, the USS Ponce, It was fitted less than a few months ago, more ships are to be outfitted in 2014.
Pic related, it's the "LaWS", or Laser Weapons System.
User avatar #217 to #215 - pwnfrnzy (12/26/2013) [-]
And to add, there's experimental versions being worked on for Light Armoured and Heavy Armoured vehicles. But I think that's still a good few years from now.
#178 to #137 - mrnoodlez (12/26/2013) [-]
US Air power. "Overkill is still a kill!"
US Air power. "Overkill is still a kill!"
#149 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
Having a lot of tanks means jack and **** . Iraq had 4230 tanks at the start of the gulf war. Less than 200 survived and my guess is primarily because they weren't part of active duty. the coalition had 3000 tanks in service. we lost 4.

If you can't own the air, you can't own the ground. No one in the world can out air power the US. Period. This isn't going to change for at least 50 years. If we stopped building today, China would overtake us in power and technology (and economy) in 40 years. If... we stopped... now.

Like the US or not, doesn't matter. We're the strongest military in the world.
User avatar #152 to #149 - saltyfries (12/26/2013) [-]
4 of those were not even the great M1A1 Abrams tank, apparently not 1 tank has been disabled or destroyed since the tank's creation! Only 1 actual tank was lost and that was an M60A3 Patton during an Airport raid I believe.
User avatar #166 to #152 - oosulley (12/26/2013) [-]
Lost to enemy fire surely?

Im fairly sure a bit of blue-on-blue occured with an Apache in 1st Gulf.

From Wikipedia '. A total of 23 M1A1s were damaged or destroyed during the war. Of the nine Abrams destroyed, seven were destroyed by friendly fire, and two were purposely destroyed to prevent capture after being damaged'
User avatar #171 to #166 - saltyfries (12/26/2013) [-]
well then, R. Lee. Ermey is a big fat liar
#174 to #171 - oosulley (12/26/2013) [-]
Just Saying, fellow.   
Thats WIkis sauce. 
			You need to login to view this link
Just Saying, fellow.

Thats WIkis sauce. You need to login to view this link
User avatar #89 - dontshoot ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
the largest air force in the world is the untied states air force, the second largest is the united states navy. tanks are antiquated
User avatar #4 - fuckberries (12/26/2013) [-]
white text with a black border does wonders eh?
#19 to #4 - jesusjellybeans (12/26/2013) [-]
******* yes. got so unreadable i scrolled away :/
#242 - flybager (12/27/2013) [-]
Too bad the concept in modern warfare is more of use for 'showing off' or 'depleting enemy morale' rather than use, due to the tons of developed anti-tank methods.
(about every infantry squad has at least 1 AT)

Tanks are still the coolest thing on the battlefield, though.
#162 - ethiopia ONLINE (12/26/2013) [-]
User avatar #169 to #162 - ihatem (12/26/2013) [-]
That sounds like it's from Call of Duty Finest Hour
#170 to #162 - anon (12/26/2013) [-]
damn, now thats optimism
User avatar #69 - defender (12/26/2013) [-]
I like how people with no military experience are arguing about something that would require military experience
User avatar #261 - thrakerzad (12/27/2013) [-]
hopefully vladimir's stance on homosexuality spreads to other nations soon.
User avatar #262 to #261 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/27/2013) [-]
0/10 account made recently obvious troll.
User avatar #267 to #262 - thrakerzad (12/27/2013) [-]
I will end you
User avatar #278 to #268 - thrakerzad (12/27/2013) [-]
I am not about to start such a destructive argument with a fellow furry
User avatar #279 to #278 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/27/2013) [-]
A furry would be more accepting of homosexuality.
User avatar #284 to #279 - thrakerzad (12/27/2013) [-]
also how can you not remember that one time we did this
User avatar #289 to #284 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/27/2013) [-]
Oh wow, I forgot that was you.
User avatar #283 to #279 - thrakerzad (12/27/2013) [-]
alright now that no one is looking anymore, yeah I was trolling
User avatar #280 to #279 - thrakerzad (12/27/2013) [-]
I must take some time to ponder this
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)