Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#36 - dantemp
Reply -4
(10/15/2013) [-]
I really can't understand all the guys that are complaining about girls showing of their bodies? What the ****? You tell me you DON'T want beautiful girls gracing us with the ultimate eye candy? Are you gay? And I dare you to blame rapes on clothes, I double dare you madda facka!
That being said, there is an inside joke in this content and it made me laugh, don't think I thumbed it down.
#120 to #36 - rhiaanor
Reply 0
(10/15/2013) [-]
Well, quite frankly if that was even all I cared about, it only makes it mean less.
#49 to #36 - deathweaver
Reply +4
(10/15/2013) [-]
It's not about guys getting eye candy. It's indecent and disrupts the public.

#50 to #49 - dantemp
Reply +2
(10/15/2013) [-]
there has been a time when seeing a girl's ankle was indecent
there has been a time when having a 12 year old boy as a lover is decent
It's a matter of perception
#51 to #50 - deathweaver
Reply +3
(10/15/2013) [-]
You are correct, and as of today, society's perception of people dressing like this is indecent/inappropriate.
#110 to #51 - dantemp
Reply +1
(10/15/2013) [-]
this is what's bugging me
I have the feeling that the main reason that is so is because there is still left overs from the time that the only worth of a woman is her being a wife. So, by loosing her integrity she is lowering her worth. And this is stupid, because in modern days a hardworking girl can take care of herself with no problems. Also, the more disturbing reason, it's socially acceptable for a rich guy to take care of a girl without her being his wife... I strongly believe that the notion that a girl should be "decent" is a remenance (I'm not wasting time googling that ******* word) of a passed time and it will be less and less... what do you do with a notion? ****, I really need English lessons.
Whatever, I believe that a girl should CHOOSE to be virtuous or slutty, aggressive or submissive, independent or codependent. It should not be something that is right or wrong.
#69 to #51 - memberforcontent
Reply +1
(10/15/2013) [-]