If Google was a guy - vaccines. www.youtube.com/user/PandaRevolutionMusic.. check this out.
x
Click to expand

Comments(242):

[ 242 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #49 - thegrimreaver (07/12/2014) [-]
Disturbing fact:
Every single person who had autism, had been exposed to oxygen.
Let the truth be known.
#164 to #49 - deckbox (07/12/2014) [-]
Apparently, it might be down to genetic protein strains, and it is less prevelent in females, IFLS have a bit on it somewhere.
User avatar #218 to #49 - SteyrAUG (07/12/2014) [-]
No, you don't understand. It's a chemical called Dihydrogen Monoxide that's causing autism. Every single person who's ever consumed DHMO has died, and they're mixing this sinister chemical into vaccines and injecting them into our children!
User avatar #71 to #49 - rhiaanor (07/12/2014) [-]
every person ever has died after drinking liquid. Ban liquids for a better future.
User avatar #158 to #71 - masterjogi ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Ha not true, unborn/babys for example
User avatar #203 to #158 - lunargreenhouse (07/12/2014) [-]
They drink the liquid in the amniotic sac...
User avatar #238 to #203 - masterjogi ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
abortion before the form a mouth, also thats ingestion and not "drinking"
User avatar #245 to #238 - masterjogi ONLINE (11/01/2014) [-]
Wow, someone replied to a comment 4 months ago, color me impressed.
0
#244 to #238 - maronapup has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #86 to #49 - muffaletta (07/12/2014) [-]
More people have died on earth than on Mars. We need to pack the **** up.
#8 - Sworley ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
you should be able to throw plastic balls at the idiots, knock some sense into them
you should be able to throw plastic balls at the idiots, knock some sense into them
#11 to #8 - John Cena (07/11/2014) [-]
Vaccines are not 100%
User avatar #30 to #11 - thesoulseeker (07/12/2014) [-]
Of course they are not, neither are condoms, but sensible people still use them because they work MOST of the time.
User avatar #34 to #8 - tastywheat (07/12/2014) [-]
One of the most under rated shows of all time right there!
User avatar #37 to #34 - infexis (07/12/2014) [-]
Well what show is it? :C
User avatar #40 to #37 - darkor (07/12/2014) [-]
Penn and Teller Show i think. Its about many subject.
User avatar #53 to #8 - deviousluchador (07/12/2014) [-]
Or rocks.
User avatar #18 to #8 - ohhh ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
I'm sorry what? Throw my balls at them? Okay.
User avatar #62 to #8 - sedativechunk (07/12/2014) [-]
YES, I LOVE PENN AND TELLER ******** !
User avatar #7 - roguekilla ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #201 to #7 - kolpster (07/12/2014) [-]
99 lines of code for three words.
**** , that's classy.
#135 to #7 - leproon (07/12/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#211 to #7 - lepard (07/12/2014) [-]
I 			*******		 KNEW IT
I ******* KNEW IT
#163 to #7 - deckbox (07/12/2014) [-]
man that has opened my eyes I totally believe that Vaccines cau......
User avatar #107 to #7 - captainrattrap ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
I knew it!
#199 to #7 - John Cena (07/12/2014) [-]
TOLD STATUS: 
[ ] NOT TOLD 
[x] TOLD 
[x] ******* TOLD 
[x] CASH4TOLD.COM 
[x] KNIGHTS OF THE TOLD REPUBLIC 
[x] TOLDERONE 
[x] STONE TOLD STEVE AUSTIN 
[x] CURE FOR THE COMMON TOLD 
[x] BEN TOLDS 
#99 to #7 - dasbrot (07/12/2014) [-]
neat.
neat.
#5 - Harkonnen (07/11/2014) [-]
He forgot to mention that the data in the one result was a forgery, the researcher made it up
He forgot to mention that the data in the one result was a forgery, the researcher made it up
User avatar #6 to #5 - tdogmeds (07/11/2014) [-]
And was arrested for basically killing people.
#125 - nimithecat (07/12/2014) [-]
I was just born autistic.
So I guess that means being born causes autism.

Better go crawl back into my mom's vagina and think about what I did wrong.
User avatar #176 to #125 - thisisuser (07/12/2014) [-]
only an autist would think that
#236 to #176 - nimithecat (07/12/2014) [-]
But I am autistic.
Thanks for noticing.
#14 - chonfobetti (07/11/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuOBzWF0Aws

Here's the source, someone else had to be just as frustrated as me that the link in description wasn't the source.
User avatar #16 to #14 - lilnuggetbob (07/11/2014) [-]
I didnt this that part in there, or part 2?

Is there a part 3 that im missing?
User avatar #24 to #16 - inconspicuousguy (07/12/2014) [-]
Part three was posted on college humor's site yesterday. Should be on youtube within a couple weeks. Its hilarious as ****
link: www.collegehumor.com/video/6979707/what-if-google-was-a-guy-part-3
User avatar #77 to #17 - altairibnlaahad ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Holy **** the Sonic the Hedgehog part had my dying
#69 - nytor (07/12/2014) [-]
I know she's just an actress, but holy **** , I have never seen anyone whose body language made me want to punch them more than hers did in the beginning.
User avatar #92 to #69 - Cobaltsushi (07/12/2014) [-]
She is a ******* good actress then
#59 - zomaru (07/12/2014) [-]
#60 to #59 - mrpavelowgrimm (07/12/2014) [-]
The stupid are already vaccinated its their children that they are sorting out.
User avatar #61 to #60 - zomaru (07/12/2014) [-]
If we kill the stupid ones, they won't have kids, problem solved VIA darwinism.
#63 to #61 - notarepost (07/12/2014) [-]
it seems like a great idea, just like eugenics did, but all it takes is one asshole to say that one race is genetically superior to others and ruin the whole thing for everyone.
User avatar #64 to #63 - zomaru (07/12/2014) [-]
Well, Obviously the races who are less culturaly advances are more superior in this regard because members of their community must all care, if one does not that one dies.
In first world countries the stupid can still work menial jobs or worse get government money.
#67 to #64 - notarepost (07/12/2014) [-]
of course, i totally understand. the problem is that i'm surrounded by a country that finds that kind of talk offensive.
User avatar #70 to #67 - zomaru (07/12/2014) [-]
Alas, many people wish to baby the weak of mind instead of educating them.
User avatar #90 to #70 - raideoactivepilot (07/12/2014) [-]
"But if we do that they'll get their feelings hurt and you will be oppressing them, blah blah blan blah....."-tumblr
#73 to #70 - notarepost (07/12/2014) [-]
But not just that. America's school system has gotten to the point where even if you completely fail school, they just pass you instead of holding you back so you can actually learn the material. so even the educated are uneducated.
User avatar #74 to #73 - zomaru (07/12/2014) [-]
I think you can blame Bush for that one. 'No Child Left Behind' my ass, a great idea to help the country get back into #1 in education. Except for the huge cuts to the Education budget, and a lax in requirements for educators.
#75 to #74 - notarepost (07/12/2014) [-]
see, if they did the exact opposite of that we'd be in business
User avatar #65 - subtard ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
The way she moves her head while saying the first line pisses me off more than it should.
User avatar #87 to #65 - allamericandude (07/12/2014) [-]
That line alone should piss you off.
User avatar #91 to #87 - subtard ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
You hear that Homestar Runner is coming back?
#1 - economic (07/11/2014) [-]
**economic rolled image** I have 3 million results that say big foot is real if i google it. Not for what she's saying but the logic is full retard.
User avatar #94 to #1 - ICEDgrunge (07/12/2014) [-]
It's called belief bias, and it is a very common happening in things like this.
#21 to #1 - John Cena (07/11/2014) [-]
Except these are scientific studies done by actual scientists...and your google responses are blogs, tabloids, and conspiracy theorists.
User avatar #56 to #1 - lifesavers (07/12/2014) [-]
And I have 20 million that says he isn't. So, uh, what about that logic?
User avatar #102 to #1 - aoogaaooga (07/12/2014) [-]
if you watch the whole vid right after that seen he says "just because it shows up doesnt mean it's true"
#12 to #1 - John Cena (07/11/2014) [-]
But. . . But are any of those big foot results founded on scientific experimentation?
User avatar #22 to #12 - Sethorein (07/11/2014) [-]
they did do a scientific study on big foot... no big foot, but a prehistoric bear was discovered.
#15 to #12 - John Cena (07/11/2014) [-]
2
User avatar #205 to #15 - envinite (07/12/2014) [-]
Gay.
#192 - lookatmyhouseofwax (07/12/2014) [-]
I was having such a calm day
And then this ******* post comes along and ***** me in the ass
User avatar #194 to #192 - ass (07/12/2014) [-]
It's ok bro.
#195 to #194 - lookatmyhouseofwax (07/12/2014) [-]
I know that it's supposed to make fun of all the retarded people who claims that vaccines gives you autism and whatnot, but damn, 			****		 got me all heated up
I know that it's supposed to make fun of all the retarded people who claims that vaccines gives you autism and whatnot, but damn, **** got me all heated up
User avatar #196 to #195 - ass (07/12/2014) [-]
You, me, same boat.
#137 - grimmwaters ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Being that ignorant, she just being around other people must cause autism.
Being that ignorant, she just being around other people must cause autism.
#144 - samoaspider (07/12/2014) [-]
Yahoo answers:

Q: Do vaccines cause autism?

best answer chosen by asker:
A: maybe

***** asker: I knew it! thank you so much, no I can be sure!
#19 - John Cena (07/11/2014) [-]
This is the 			****		 I have to deal with in Colorado and people who smoke weed. There are literally numerous reports from various universities, government, and other institutions that say weed has negative effects, namely, it's addictive.   
   
"Nah bro, that's the government spreading fake information to stop people from smoking weed".   
   
I couldn't care less if you smoke so long as you're not an asshole about it. What I do care about is when people go from ignorance to stupidity by opting onboard the "it's a conspiracy" train.
This is the **** I have to deal with in Colorado and people who smoke weed. There are literally numerous reports from various universities, government, and other institutions that say weed has negative effects, namely, it's addictive.

"Nah bro, that's the government spreading fake information to stop people from smoking weed".

I couldn't care less if you smoke so long as you're not an asshole about it. What I do care about is when people go from ignorance to stupidity by opting onboard the "it's a conspiracy" train.
User avatar #43 to #19 - prohibullion ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
except people actually do try and spread misinformation about weed
User avatar #85 to #19 - muffaletta (07/12/2014) [-]
Dude, everything can be addictive. ******* exercise is addictive.
User avatar #133 to #19 - buttinspecter (07/12/2014) [-]
That gif is multiplying bread like Jesus.
User avatar #178 to #19 - rifee (07/12/2014) [-]
everything is addictive though.
User avatar #206 to #19 - narcomancer (07/12/2014) [-]
as long as you don't walk around telling people what the **** should they do with their lives

i'm ok with this.

i smoke weed and i can confirm the downsides, also IT IS ADDICTIVE
but the fact that alcohol is worse (and alcohol is also a drug) is ignored, creating double standards for the same kind of poison gives me butthurt.

but hey, at least the muslims won't kill me for being a jew.
see where i'm going with this?
#127 to #19 - John Cena (07/12/2014) [-]
another thing to note is that the research done on weed was never scientifically sound. Because of the laws surrounding illegal substances the majority of the research (99%) was done in to the negative effects of weed, to try and gain information for propaganda. Not to mention the government funded dodgy trials. In fact, you could argue that because of the last 100 years of research in to it's negative effects, that it is pretty god damn safe if they cannot come up with any substantial evidence.
It's also pretty retarded to be against the use of soft drugs like marijuana when alcohol and tobacco use is widely considered normal.
#129 to #127 - John Cena (07/12/2014) [-]
It's also worth noting that things like artificial sweeteners are known to be bad, yet are completely legal and widely used. ( look into aspartame and excessive consumption of PHE )
#25 to #19 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
Several problems, namely logical fallacies with your statement;
1, claiming weed is addictive. This is TECHNICALLY true, but the way you stated it intentionally misleads the uniformed reader into drawing false conclusions. Weed is PSYCHOLOGICALLY addictive, NOT physiologically. To put this in perspective, cheese is psychologically addictive. Chocolate is psychologically addictive.
2, claiming there are other negative side effects with out listing them. Here are the proven negative side effects, of which none are permanent. Short term memory lose, to put it in easy to understand terms, THC effects the software of the brain and how said software sorts memories. This is completely temporary, quit and this will go away. Decreased lung capacity, yet again, temporary, quit smoking and it will go away.
3, claiming numerous reports have shown the above. Numerous reports have shown that while the above are true, there are also many positive effects to smoking weed (or consuming it in other ways). For instance, weed smoke is a bronco dilator. This means it opens up the airways in the lungs, so for mild forms of chronic breathing disorders smoking weed actually can treat them. It can also treat seizures as well as numerous psychological conditions such as PTSD.

It is also worth noting that the only study to "prove" that smoking weed causes brain damage was done under Nixon, and because of how the study was done it couldn't be performed here, but was done in South America. The study used monkeys that weigh about half of an adult male and have a brain about 1/3 that of our brain mass to body mass ratio. These monkeys were forced to inhale 100 times the dosage needed to get an adult male high (so in other words, around 600 times the dosage they needed) constantly. Later review of brain scans that were claimed to prove brain damage showed that the brain damage was due to oxygen derivation, and later studies have shown that you lose as many brain cells smoking weed as with cigs.
User avatar #39 to #25 - azumeow (07/12/2014) [-]
Finally, somebody who understand the difference between psychological and physiological addiction....
#52 to #39 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
addiction is tossed around too much. of course a lot of terms are thrown around too much.
#119 to #25 - bobbysnobby (07/12/2014) [-]
There is some miss information in your post.

1. Weed is extremely psychologically addictive comparing it to cheese is ridiculous. People coming off from weed suffer a number of issues including extreme depression.

2. There are lots of negative side effects the memory loss is not necessarily reparable depends on how long you smoke. Lung cancer for those that smoke traditionally it is just as much if not more of a risk than cigarettes because most users dont use a filter.
CANNABIS USE AND RISK OF LUNG CANCER: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Eur Respir J. 2008 February; 31(2): 280--286.

3. There are possitive side effects for a lot of things, that does not mean they do not have negative side effects. The primary reason that say you are issued medicine that has negative side effects is that the doctor tends to weigh the risk of the side effects vs what the medication is treating and decides that the medication is worth it.
#226 to #119 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
Studies have shown that the psychological addiction to cheese can be comparable to a heroine addiction.

Also, depression? Yeah, ******** . I've quit for prolonged periods several times (as long as three years) and never suffered any issues. I've known several people who have quit weed for prolonged periods of time (if not for good) and suffered no issues.

Provide links citing you're sources. You are providing these facts, it is not up to me to look them up.
#232 to #226 - bobbysnobby (07/12/2014) [-]
Links are provided #202 there are more those are just those related to physiological addiction and ill effects on the brain and on the physiological profile.
#177 to #119 - John Cena (07/12/2014) [-]
1.I quit weed,when i grew out of"Do it to be cool"
I may smoke a joint once or twice in months,when im feeling or having sleep/eating problems.Or to relax and have stupid fun.
2.There are fcuking negative side effects to many ******* things!To the air you breath to the food you eat.
3.If you got a problem and you need medicine to fix it.They label it on all of their products,that it may have side-effects.Maybe not all ,but to some.
You are ******* noted.
#184 to #25 - dross (07/12/2014) [-]
As much as I personally can't handle smoking weed, and hate 'weed culture' being shoved down my throat, I really don't mind people smoking weed at all. Complete mongs are better to work with that piss-heads (construction industry) and even people who are so stoned they don't give a 			****		 are still more cognitive and useful than someone on speed, smack, or drunk.   
   
I think once the world actually finds out what happens with Colorado (ie not the media fire-wall about hysteria and murders etc) the entire world will follow. You can't have a drug banned geographically a walking distance from where it's legal.
As much as I personally can't handle smoking weed, and hate 'weed culture' being shoved down my throat, I really don't mind people smoking weed at all. Complete mongs are better to work with that piss-heads (construction industry) and even people who are so stoned they don't give a **** are still more cognitive and useful than someone on speed, smack, or drunk.

I think once the world actually finds out what happens with Colorado (ie not the media fire-wall about hysteria and murders etc) the entire world will follow. You can't have a drug banned geographically a walking distance from where it's legal.
#214 to #184 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
I'm not some 420 SMOKE WEED FAG kinda guy, but something I love to point out; on a political talk show, four police chiefs from various big cities were asked, "If weed and alcohol were illegal, and only one could be made legal, which one would you want legal?" all four responded at the same time, saying, "weed".

The simple fact that the cops would rather deal with stoned people than drunk people speaks volumes.
User avatar #181 to #25 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Forgot the part where you run the risk of psychosis: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_effects_of_cannabis#Chronic_psychosis
#227 to #181 - vkd (07/12/2014) [-]
hurr durr wikipedia said something negative it implies for everyone.

"increases the risk of psychosis in people with certain genetic or environmental vulnerabilities"

If you manage to read and analyse that sentence correctly, you would realize that you're argument is comparable to denying everyone access to vehicles because a handicapped person can't drive a vehicle without crashing it.

just because someone with a disorder run the higher risk of psychosis, which is pretty logical, doesn't make it a valid argument to use against everyone.

generalizing something out of proportions makes it in fact a invalid argument.

so we should take it in to account to ban medicine, games and alcohol just because a minimal % of people can't handle it?

I may have miss read what you wrote, sorry if that is the case.
User avatar #229 to #227 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
"genetic vulnerabilities"
Tell me, how can you know that your genetically predisposed towards psychosis? And how can you know your NOT genetically predisposed to it? I mean before it happens of course. It's not a gamble I'd want to take, but I doubt most people who do drugs actually care about the risks.
#230 to #229 - vkd (07/12/2014) [-]
Because those genetic vulnerabilities usually lies in the part that has to do with how the brain develops, and such vulnerabilities are pretty noticeable and already diagnosed in a early stage of life since it affects you personality and brain function. there is always a risk, but that risk is so low it goes hand in hand with other "dangers" in life that we don't care about on a daily basis.
User avatar #231 to #230 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure those vulnerabilities can be more discreet than you assume, but hey it's you're life. Just don't ignore the proven risks and side-effects, because that's just stupid. It's much more interesting when people acknowledge the side-effects and just admit that it's a bad habit.
#234 to #231 - vkd (07/12/2014) [-]
as i said it's ALWAYS a risk.
im not ignoring anything, but it's a pretty safe risk if you ask me.

i'm more concerned about mercury and arsenic in the water, when putting it to perspective as you ingest it everyday.
I have heard about one guy going in the psychosis, but not by weed.
but he has a list of disorders and have been doing some hard drugs until he had a heart stop.

but when you think of how many uses weed, it's a pretty safe thing to do, when speaking of psychosis and brain damage. but always a risk.
User avatar #235 to #234 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Yeah and a pretty unnecessary risk to put you'reself under if you ask me, but do whatever you want
#237 to #235 - vkd (07/12/2014) [-]
im not doing it.

life is full of unnecessary risks

do you use gum? gum has the hormone disturbing chemical BHA which is not good for the body at all.
water contains toxins and heavy metals which hurts the body, CNS and brain.


life is full of risk.

also remember weed increases the risk, it does not cause psychosis. think how many harmful substances you ingest each and everyday which does not only increase chances for a list of things, buy also harms you're body permanently.

in the bigger pictures everything is death. and so much of it is unnecessary.
the chances weed is going to **** you up compared to everything we do in life each day it's close to zero.
User avatar #239 to #237 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Yeah and adding more risks to my life seems pointless, especially considering I don't see the appeal of weed. I'm just fed up with people pretending that weed is harmless and riskless
#215 to #181 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
And you forgot the part where it is stated that it CAN, but is not proven, and that it MAY have an effect ONLY on those who already have an environmental or genetic predisposition to psychosis.

Facts son.
User avatar #217 to #215 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
And how would you know whether or not your predisposed before it happens?
#219 to #217 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
What I stated was shown right in the source you provided. So either you're source is wrong (and if so, then you're entire comment is null and void), or the point you were trying to make is null and void because it is as of yet unproven.

Either way, the facts you provided a source to are against you.
User avatar #221 to #219 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
"Although most do not experience such problems, some cannabis users develop chronic psychosis with a risk directly related to high dosage, frequency of use and early age of introduction to the drug."
Can't read?
#223 to #221 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
"Long term cannabis use increases the risk of psychosis in people with certain genetic or environmental vulnerabilities, but does not cause psychosis.[7] A risk does exist in some individuals with a predisposition to mental illness to develop symptoms of psychosis;[8] the predisposing factors identified include genetic liability, childhood trauma and urban upbringing.[7] Although most do not experience such problems, some cannabis users develop chronic psychosis with a risk directly related to high dosage, frequency of use and early age of introduction to the drug."

"people with certain genetic or environmental vulnerabilities", but does not cause psychosis"
DOES NOT CAUSE PSYCHOSIS

right out of your source.

So, can you read?
User avatar #225 to #223 - Kairyuka ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
It increases the risk. Which means that if you had a predisposition (which is pretty difficult to assess whether you do or not) it can be the thing that triggers it, and it's directly related to amount of use, starting age etc.
So basically it's a gamble. And I'd rather NOT smoke weed than risk becoming a permanent psychotic. Oh and I don't need that **** either, but that's another thing, that's just me personally.
0
#222 to #219 - tomthehippie has deleted their comment [-]
#193 to #25 - billburr (07/12/2014) [-]
I agree with everything you said but I really think you're downplaying the addiction part a little bit. Granted it is a psychological addiction but its not even close to chocolate or cheese, its much much stronger.
A friend once told me to watch out, because weed is a "sneaky addiction". I don't think I've heard it put a better way, I found it harder to quit than cigs
#213 to #193 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
Studies have shown that the psychological addiction to cheese can be stronger than heroine.

Yet people are still able to go without eating cheese.
#224 to #213 - billburr (07/12/2014) [-]
Yeah, but that's just because of a chemical in cheese that acts a little like an opiate, the lack of negative consequences and the fact that eating cheese is only mildly frowned upon in public
And obviously in 99.99 % of cases a heroin addiction would be much stronger because you have a strong psychological addiction and a strong physical addiction I also found out that there's something called cheese-heroin when I fact-checked that
User avatar #170 to #25 - monkeysniper ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
and even then weed can be digested for the effects, aka pot brownies
User avatar #157 to #25 - ilovetocuddle (07/12/2014) [-]
Just to clarify, was the brain cell study under Nixon as well?
#220 to #157 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
I'm not sure.
User avatar #134 to #25 - pokemonstheshiz (07/12/2014) [-]
weed is physiologically addictive, just at a very low level. The level is low enough that psychological dependencies are the more prevailing concerns, but it's kind of important to distinguish this fact. Anything can be psychologically addictive, this is determined by the user not the thing used.

this is not so much directed at you, but at bobbysnobby and others who think like him.
#202 to #134 - bobbysnobby (07/12/2014) [-]
Cannabis and suicide: longitudinal study.
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;195(6):492-7.

Cannabis use and the risk of developing a psychotic disorder.
World Psychiatry. 2008;7(2):68-71.

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol effects in schizophrenia: implications for cognition, psychosis, and addiction.
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Mar 15;57(6):594-608.

Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use.
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1383-91.

Its more addictive than cigarettes and has serious heath concerns its not, "A little addictive"
#82 to #25 - John Cena (07/12/2014) [-]
I completely agree with you but i can name one negative side effect... The ******* pot heads.
#57 to #25 - tomagod (07/12/2014) [-]
There is also a few things you missed, smoking weed while not fully matured will stunt brain growth and physical growth, inhibiting a person from reaching their potential iq, effectively making them dumber, this only happens under the age of 19 though. also chronic weed usage has been shown to correlate strongly with testicular cancer in young males. and a recent study showed cannabis abuse can affect the addiction center of the brain making you more susceptible to addictions of other kinds as well, so it is very slightly responsible for addiction to alcohol and tobacco and harder drugs even if it is not itself addictive.
#98 to #57 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
My own research has only shown proven connections with the possibility of infertility in males that start smoking (and smoke heavily) from early puberty, although studies have shown a possible connection with the things you have listed, but nothing has been proven yet. Also, correlation=/=causation, which you seem to have confused there. Many things can skew statistics, such as genetic predisposition to testicular cancer being linked to a genetic predisposition to cannabis usage, or environmental predispositions, ect. So, did the studies you mentioned do anything to screen for things that could skew their statistics, or where they going purely off of numbers?   
   
And "addiction center" of the brain is really improper terminology; what you are referring to is the pleasure center. Which can be affected by exercise or gambling, or food, or masturbation, or sex, or pornography, or video games, ect, ect, ect... do you see where I am going with this? That statement, "can affect the addiction center of the brain" really means nothing.
My own research has only shown proven connections with the possibility of infertility in males that start smoking (and smoke heavily) from early puberty, although studies have shown a possible connection with the things you have listed, but nothing has been proven yet. Also, correlation=/=causation, which you seem to have confused there. Many things can skew statistics, such as genetic predisposition to testicular cancer being linked to a genetic predisposition to cannabis usage, or environmental predispositions, ect. So, did the studies you mentioned do anything to screen for things that could skew their statistics, or where they going purely off of numbers?

And "addiction center" of the brain is really improper terminology; what you are referring to is the pleasure center. Which can be affected by exercise or gambling, or food, or masturbation, or sex, or pornography, or video games, ect, ect, ect... do you see where I am going with this? That statement, "can affect the addiction center of the brain" really means nothing.
User avatar #44 to #25 - prohibullion ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
you have the most fitting name for this comment
User avatar #41 to #25 - xtremeweed (07/12/2014) [-]
4, Pure THC oil has anti-tumor effects.
#50 to #41 - tomthehippie (07/12/2014) [-]
and hemp seeds are better for you than sunflower seeds and hemp oil is high in omega threes and fatty acids.
#200 to #41 - John Cena (07/12/2014) [-]
-citation needed-
#10 - netflixguy (07/11/2014) [-]
Related
#28 - clarkxonehundred ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
**clarkxonehundred rolled image** What ACTUALLY causes autism
#191 - argento (07/12/2014) [-]
Dammit, she managed to discover big pharma's plot! Quick, irrorate her with our finest barrels of Barium '98 -chemtrails!

pseudoscience and conspiracy theories really make me mad
#190 - BloodyTurds ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
A recent Scientific Study Finds that Tumblr may in-fact cause Autism
#210 to #190 - aldothenazi ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
**aldothenazi rolled image** They were actually unsure if its wether tubmlr attracts autistic people or people gradually get infected with the level of autism in there.
[ 242 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)