I kick ass for the Lord!. . Lawful good does not always mean lawful nice. Ive got a paladin for ya
x
Click to expand

Comments(193):

[ 193 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#16 - spant (10/04/2013) [-]
>Having a lawful good paladin in the group/party
#32 to #16 - timerce (10/04/2013) [-]
lol that pic is hilarious. gj sir
User avatar #33 to #16 - gokombwantu (10/04/2013) [-]
I have lawful good pali in my d&d group.... :I
User avatar #50 to #33 - wliia (10/04/2013) [-]
I dislike playing classes that have some alignment as a requirement, as it'll just lead to arguments and such.

Disagreements should come from roleplaying, not being forced to act a certain way or you'll lose class powers
User avatar #118 to #50 - schneidend (10/05/2013) [-]
Well, perhaps the person playing the Paladin genuinely wanted to roleplay that sort of character?
Maybe quit trying to murder innocent people or steal everything in sight and the Paladin won't raise any objections.
#141 to #16 - anon (10/05/2013) [-]
Every time someone wants to play paladin I try to convince them to be a really passive-aggressive Lawful Good.

Like, they wouldn't try to stop us from looting and murdering and causing mayhem, they'd just complain the whole time and be like "Well, fine, then. I'm going over here where people aren't damning themselves to eternal helfire."
#2 - jewishbastard (10/04/2013) [-]
Ive got a paladin for ya
User avatar #18 to #2 - mechaemperor (10/04/2013) [-]
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMEN
User avatar #30 to #2 - ompalomper (10/04/2013) [-]
this man threads the fine line between lawful good and chaotic good

shame that he made himself chaotic evil in the end. it was logical but i think he deserved a more noble end then that
User avatar #132 to #30 - asasqw (10/05/2013) [-]
He didn't make himself chaotic evil as much make him a lawful good creature.
#53 to #2 - killerliquid ONLINE (10/04/2013) [-]
tfw he died
#121 to #2 - anon (10/05/2013) [-]
Is that Blue exorcist?
User avatar #168 to #121 - kschmidty (10/05/2013) [-]
No it's Hellsing
#81 to #2 - thisistheguy (10/04/2013) [-]
Awwwww yeah just remembered Hellsing Abridged in less than a month
#124 to #2 - newforomador ONLINE (10/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#13 to #2 - thadin ONLINE (10/04/2013) [-]
Paladins in space.
#14 to #13 - thadin ONLINE (10/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #31 to #14 - ompalomper (10/04/2013) [-]
nah, grey knights are more like the bad-ass, space version of ghost-busters
#133 to #13 - killerblue (10/05/2013) [-]
Then what's the inquisition?
#9 to #2 - MaelRadec (10/04/2013) [-]
i've got a vampire fo ya
#21 to #9 - thechosentroll (10/04/2013) [-]
Uhm........................... I have a puppy, if that helps.
#40 to #29 - zuflux (10/04/2013) [-]
This is now a Solaire Thread.
This is now a Solaire Thread.
User avatar #54 to #29 - PVTDickStryker (10/04/2013) [-]
Considering how many crusades the Arabs won.....
#129 to #54 - builditbetter (10/05/2013) [-]
Yes, it is true that we did not win many crusades, but if you look at the condition of Western civilization vs that of Middle-Eastern civilization it becomes clear who did the most damage. After the crusades Baghdad, once the center of science and mathematics for the world, closed up shop and kicked out all who did not fit into their idea of a "Ideal citizen" (religion,culture, etc.). The Middle-east basically ****** themselves to purge any non-native blood. Many of the Arabian Emirates are just now recovering.
User avatar #57 to #54 - conoriskool (10/04/2013) [-]
well, given the sheer logistical nightmare of travelling to the holy lands from western europe back then its a testiment to the crusdaer's will and strength that
they managed to win as many as they did.
User avatar #58 to #57 - PVTDickStryker (10/04/2013) [-]
Didn't the crusaders only win the first? And I remember that in one of the crusades, the main fighting force was children, children that were sold as slaves as soon as they reached southern Italy....
User avatar #62 to #58 - Crusader (10/04/2013) [-]
1 - The Children's Crusade was more of a pilgrimage
2 - We won a few, the first crusade was to take the holy land, second crusade was to defend, third was to leave
3 - I wouldn't say we sold kids, I mean most of them were adolescent at least, and they weren't sold, I would say they were more . . . Given with the implication that we expected a generous donation
User avatar #85 to #62 - kingrui (10/04/2013) [-]
>we
#175 to #62 - gerfox (10/05/2013) [-]
I wonder how the world would have looked today if not Frederick Barbarossa had died, and most of his army dispersed on his way to join the 3rd Crusade. Especially considering the fact that the initial strength of the English delegate under Richard Lionheart was at 8000 men, the French under Filip 2. was at 2000 men - but the German delegate under Holy-Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa was at 100 000 men. And since Richard kind of ****** up Saladin at times as well, that could have been decisive for the future of the middle east.
User avatar #156 to #62 - hudis (10/05/2013) [-]
Who are "we"? Christians? The Papacy? France, Germany, England, Hungary?
User avatar #174 to #156 - Crusader (10/05/2013) [-]
Crusaders in general
#61 to #58 - presentdent (10/04/2013) [-]
The Children's Crusade was not a real crusade -- a better name would be the Children's Pilgrimage to the Holy Land, but at any rate, yes, it did not end well.

However, there were more crusades than those that are numbered (there are seven numbered crusades in total, the first two and the fourth being the most successful). Steadily, the Crusader targets drifted from the holy land towards Egypt, where the Mamelukes had their center of power. The Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople for the greedy Duke of Venice and was a complete failure in terms of Muslim killing.

The largest crusade, however, was won by the Christians, and is not known as a crusade. The Reconquista of Spain was a centuries-long war to return the Spanish Peninsula to Christian hands after the Visigoths were driven back by the Berbers. As a result of this holy war (which did not feature nearly as many cannibalistic atrocities as those in the holy land) we have modern-day Catholic Spain and Portugal.
User avatar #67 to #61 - thesovereigngrave ONLINE (10/04/2013) [-]
Don't forget the Prussian Crusade against the Baltic pagans in Prussia, which ended up causing the complete eradication of Prussian culture.
#66 - cactusupthebutt (10/04/2013) [-]
Whenever I play MMORPG's I tend to lean towards Paladin-esque classes. I enjoy absorbing all the damaging then healing then deal damage. It's a happy rinse and repeat cycle that makes you a very scary opponent at higher levels.    
   
MFW The priest dies and I'm still tanking.
Whenever I play MMORPG's I tend to lean towards Paladin-esque classes. I enjoy absorbing all the damaging then healing then deal damage. It's a happy rinse and repeat cycle that makes you a very scary opponent at higher levels.

MFW The priest dies and I'm still tanking.
#68 to #66 - saltyfries (10/04/2013) [-]
FIEVEL GOES WEST!  I love that movie
FIEVEL GOES WEST! I love that movie
User avatar #158 to #68 - zoidz (10/05/2013) [-]
Give'm the 'ol 'CRAZY EYE'!! Love that movie, got it on VCR (no VCR to play with tho)
#22 - thechosentroll (10/04/2013) [-]
Obligatory Warhammer 40k pic.
0
#136 to #22 - killerblue has deleted their comment [-]
#137 to #22 - killerblue (10/05/2013) [-]
Good nuetral coming through, also drop any artifacts you have here
User avatar #172 to #137 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
Why are Blood Angels using Ultramarine drop pods?
#72 to #22 - fargtwo (10/04/2013) [-]
Obligatory Paladin post.
#98 to #72 - krasnogvardiech (10/05/2013) [-]
This is what a level 20 Paladin in Warhammer 40,000 looks like.
#102 to #98 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
But that's a Living Saint. The one I posted is called a Paladin.
#103 to #102 - krasnogvardiech (10/05/2013) [-]
>implying Sisters of Battle aren't r34 paladins IN SPAAACE!!!!
#104 to #103 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
>implying WH40k R34

Seriously, have you seen some of that **** ? It's horrifying.
User avatar #149 to #104 - granodd ONLINE (10/05/2013) [-]
Wait is that a Grey Knight?
User avatar #153 to #149 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
I think it's supposed to be a Blood Angel or Knight of Blood.
#110 to #104 - krasnogvardiech (10/05/2013) [-]
It's not always bad. I picture the most heretical of content as alternate incarnations of Him on the throne.

I think this may be a throwback to his days as that Ancient Terran saint-soldier woman. The one who liberated the ancient nation of Franc.
#113 to #110 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
Why bother with porn when you could just jerk off to Sanguinius?
#115 to #113 - krasnogvardiech (10/05/2013) [-]
Not that he isn't unattractive at all. Were I a woman and a mortal, I think I would fall too.

Do you miss the days before the Heresy, brother? I miss our lord.
#120 to #115 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
I miss the good ole' days when the Thousand Sons and the Iron Warriors didn't have raging hate-boners for the Imperium.
User avatar #167 to #120 - oxadelore (10/05/2013) [-]
So uh, does no one else like Necrons? I think they're the most visually appealing army, and I liked their Fluff before Matt Ward ****** up the mystery of it all.
#171 to #167 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
I'm extremely biased against Necrons since they're what my friend would always steamroll my Imperial Guard army with. I kind of like their updated lore, partially since it pissed off that same friend.
User avatar #176 to #171 - oxadelore (10/05/2013) [-]
Hehe I have one quite a few games against Imperial Guard with Necrons. Good times. What are your thoughts on 6th edition Codecies? I'm all for it. I love the new flyers, and the Night Scythe is ******* awesome.
User avatar #177 to #176 - fargtwo (10/05/2013) [-]
I think Necrons are the only 6e codex I've read. I quit not too long after it came out when I realized how much money and time I'd spent on the game.
#79 - doktorandus (10/04/2013) [-]
I never thought I'd actually get to use this.
User avatar #28 - muffioso (10/04/2013) [-]
I prefer Chaotic Good.You can do what goes with your own morality
User avatar #116 to #28 - schneidend (10/05/2013) [-]
Well, not exactly. Chaotic Good characters that excuse everything they do as their "own morality" don't remain good very long. Chaotic Good means you will do what is right heedless of laws or codes.
User avatar #97 - vatra (10/04/2013) [-]
Of course it doesn't mean nice. They are following the law, the law is meant to limit certain exploits and control others.
#96 - krasnogvardiech (10/04/2013) [-]
Neutral Good.

Because screw you both, there's an option that will benefit everyone and I'm going to find it.
User avatar #162 to #96 - exclamation (10/05/2013) [-]
Chaotic evil checking in.
I like to destroy **** without reason except for amusement.
User avatar #166 to #96 - kschmidty (10/05/2013) [-]
What's that from?
User avatar #169 to #166 - krasnogvardiech (10/05/2013) [-]
No idea.
#134 to #96 - anon (10/05/2013) [-]
Neutral Good Diplomatic Cavalier reporting in!
User avatar #145 to #96 - tiredofthis (10/05/2013) [-]
Chaotic Good: Because screw the law or being nice, I'm doing what's right!
User avatar #41 - mattnn (10/04/2013) [-]
"I kick ass for the lord"...
I cried a little tear
User avatar #47 to #42 - mattnn (10/04/2013) [-]
wat
I Kick Ass For The Lord!
#26 - nucularwar (10/04/2013) [-]
Lawful Good doesn't always make you a good person
User avatar #35 to #26 - ompalomper (10/04/2013) [-]
perfect example of the quote: "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"
User avatar #46 to #35 - nucularwar (10/04/2013) [-]
or in this case "The road to losing your special abilities"
User avatar #75 to #46 - ompalomper (10/04/2013) [-]
or even more in this case "the road to not getting into paladin heaven"
User avatar #73 - captainfuckitall (10/04/2013) [-]
Chaotic Neutral master-race reporting in.
User avatar #82 to #73 - ChaosShuffle (10/04/2013) [-]
Becomes sometimes I just wanna do whatever the hell I want.
#151 - granodd ONLINE (10/05/2013) [-]
User avatar #95 - charagrin (10/04/2013) [-]
That is exactly how I play Paladns too. Lawful Good and Lawful stupid are two different things. My paladin is a raping/ murdering/theiving psychopath, even worse than my friends rogue. But I do it "for the greater good" so I can do whatever I want because regardless of what I or my Dm thinks, my paladin in game genuinely believes it.
User avatar #71 - felixjarl (10/04/2013) [-]
Through all my battles i have witnessed many horrors, from entire platoons ripped apart by vile magic to ambushes tearing swathes through once powerful warriors. But the worst i ever saw was a paladin who was my superior officer ordered us to burn down a peaceful village. The look on his face was the face of one who considered his duty done. I asked him why later. His answer was simple.

They sheltered a cultist from our grasp, thus they committed a hideous crime against the law. They deserve none better.

I was left standing watching at the broken bodies of the innocent villagers who never even knew why they was put to this fate.

Be prepared for the evil who will do all to destroy you. But fear the good, because they will destroy anyone who does not fit their view of good.

Your thoughts?
User avatar #128 to #71 - asasqw (10/05/2013) [-]
You did not have a paladin my friend. You had a crusader. A paladin will only use his blade if no other option presents itself. A crusader will kill anyone who even looks like he is thinking something bad.
#60 - chaoticlaw ONLINE (10/04/2013) [-]
True neutral master race.
#38 - darman (10/04/2013) [-]
Get out of here Paladins. Lawful Evil will rise.
User avatar #49 to #38 - roninneko (10/04/2013) [-]
you imply that Paladins were not Lawful Evil.
User avatar #117 to #49 - schneidend (10/05/2013) [-]
Paladins that aren't Lawful Good simply are not Paladins.
User avatar #69 to #49 - darman (10/04/2013) [-]
The post implied they were lawful good sir.
User avatar #189 to #69 - roninneko (10/05/2013) [-]
Judging by their actions, the crusaders were Lawful Evil. They obeyed a strict set of rules that enabled them to commit genocides in the name of religion.
#17 - chrolt (10/04/2013) [-]
And sometimes they're the bad guys.
And sometimes they're the bad guys.
#34 to #17 - ompalomper (10/04/2013) [-]
poor, insane bastard   
   
shame Tsukiko didn't raise her as an undead warrior   
   
 secret confession, i got a heavy feel when red-cloak killed her
poor, insane bastard

shame Tsukiko didn't raise her as an undead warrior

secret confession, i got a heavy feel when red-cloak killed her
User avatar #181 to #34 - chrolt (10/05/2013) [-]
Really? I was almost overjoyed. She was a huge bitch. Excellent character though, I liked her as a villain because she anooyed me, and I admire that he made a lawful good character into such an excellent villain.
User avatar #187 to #181 - overjoyed (10/05/2013) [-]
Can I be overjoyed as well?
#157 - lovecranes (10/05/2013) [-]
Hail to Paladin!
[ 193 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)