Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(333):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 333 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
160 comments displayed.
User avatar #1 - kommandantvideo (08/07/2015) [+] (33 replies)
stickied by peanutbitter
1st
#249 to #218 - SHOOOPDAWOOP (08/07/2015) [-]
great, Im horny now. Do you see what you have done?
#273 to #249 - lunex (08/07/2015) [-]
what you done i cant believe it
#309 to #249 - ubermasterfaggot (08/08/2015) [-]
All according to plan
#164 to #28 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #315 to #284 - baronvonhuckle (08/08/2015) [-]
Who is she?
User avatar #317 to #315 - newfeliperuiz (08/08/2015) [-]
Grace Helbig
#246 to #243 - deadmice (08/07/2015) [-]
Fixed, made it smoother
User avatar #261 to #196 - hydraetis (08/07/2015) [-]
**** , that's actually in sync for me
#301 to #28 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
#235 to #28 - shaturnex ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#224 to #212 - mikasuh (08/07/2015) [-]
Jesus christ what the **** .
0
#79 to #28 - professorballsack has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #125 to #80 - drtrousersnake (08/07/2015) [-]
been looking for this gif forever
User avatar #145 to #125 - ijustwannaplay (08/07/2015) [-]
i just wanna know what its from already
#148 to #145 - Sorpah (08/07/2015) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUDy4S4BdOE
It's a Bootsy Collins music video.
User avatar #234 to #148 - onlylettersyousay (08/07/2015) [-]
wow, I never knew that. Thanks, man.
#210 to #28 - scandaldog ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #9 - timelordjam (08/07/2015) [-]
REMEMBER THAT TIME YOU **** YOURSELF FOR US
#159 to #9 - classynick (08/07/2015) [-]
His bowels aren't the only thing he left behind
User avatar #230 to #229 - timelordjam (08/07/2015) [-]
d...did you make this?
User avatar #239 to #230 - Koreawontletmefap (08/07/2015) [-]
Yeah, sorry it's a little clumsy I'm not an amazingly experienced editor
User avatar #244 to #239 - timelordjam (08/07/2015) [-]
Yeah, i wont lie. Its not great, but it's hilarious and you'll only get better as time goes on.


idk who downvoted you tho
User avatar #252 to #244 - Koreawontletmefap (08/07/2015) [-]
Hey thanks man, and it was prolly peanutbitter
#268 to #252 - peanutbitter [OP](08/07/2015) [-]
it was not. it made me lol
#270 to #268 - Koreawontletmefap (08/07/2015) [-]
son of a bitch
#319 to #270 - ugoboom ONLINE (08/08/2015) [-]
oilsaurus what do you have to say for yourself
how could you red thumb OC
User avatar #255 to #252 - timelordjam (08/07/2015) [-]
well then i guess peanutbitter is probably feeling a bit salty about it
User avatar #10 to #9 - peanutbitter [OP](08/07/2015) [-]
no
User avatar #12 to #10 - timelordjam (08/07/2015) [-]
TRYNA LEAVE THAT PART OF YOUR LIFE BEHIND?


fuccboi
#21 - failtolawl (08/07/2015) [-]
Peanutbitter. How long have you've been back? Have you seen your FJCW character? Do you still have nightmares?
#132 to #21 - deavasy (08/07/2015) [-]
shut the **** up
User avatar #297 to #21 - tiles (08/07/2015) [-]
What is this FJCW that I've been hearing about?
#119 to #21 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
have you've....
#64 - junkk (08/07/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #276 to #64 - salamandermander (08/07/2015) [-]
that gif goes with that gandalf saxophone one really well
#58 - ugoboom ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
Thanks peanutbitter, with your version I've made a directors' cut of the original video
#137 to #58 - oinos (08/07/2015) [-]
Man you guys find some ****** up **** . Nothin like a good ******** . Continue bringing the enjoyable crap to the table.
#43 - almightysausage (08/07/2015) [-]
**** man, I always thought to myself " **** , I could do that weird tongue thing, i'll become famous easy" but it turns out he was actually a good singer also.
#70 to #43 - algorath (08/07/2015) [-]
Vitas - Lucia Di Lammermoorr (il dolce suono)
User avatar #92 to #43 - daentraya (08/07/2015) [-]
this guy is sort of praised in russia for his amazing vocal range
he is a bunny-ears lawyer kind of singer, i guess
User avatar #48 to #43 - malcolmcz (08/07/2015) [-]
is that bearded Mel Gibson ?
User avatar #100 to #48 - waacson (08/07/2015) [-]
No, it's Saddam Hussein.
#32 - dendo ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#53 - lordnerevar ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #101 to #53 - sealcubclubbinclub (08/07/2015) [-]
Or y'know, maybe he's just having fun in a unique way.
#141 to #101 - jaked ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
He means cause he's gritting his teeth, which is a super common symptom of MDMA and (to a much lesser degree) coke
#134 to #53 - oinos (08/07/2015) [-]
Pretty sure he just raided the whole damn stash of drugs not just one or two types of them.
User avatar #154 to #53 - heartbleed ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
That guy really reminds me of Scott Manley
User avatar #76 to #53 - Dakafal (08/07/2015) [-]
This kids, is what it looks like when you take waaaaaay too much MDMA. Or possibly coke, but I doubt it.
User avatar #91 to #76 - DemonBowx (08/07/2015) [-]
Pingas
User avatar #89 to #76 - theugandanhero (08/07/2015) [-]
Don't think coke would do that
#136 to #89 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
It makes you gurn, but not to that extent iirc
User avatar #77 to #76 - chadisyounggg (08/07/2015) [-]
I miss those nights.
#117 to #53 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
Looks like hes on both
#31 - kuchikirukia (08/07/2015) [-]
"High quality", eh?

You should be using Opus in webm.
User avatar #170 to #31 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
What spectrum analyzer is that?
#206 to #170 - sdziscool (08/07/2015) [-]
It's spek ( spek.cc )
#68 to #31 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
whats Opus?
User avatar #171 to #68 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
It's an audio Codec, a good one.
User avatar #36 to #31 - peanutbitter [OP](08/07/2015) [-]
Apparently I can't with the video editing software I'm using. I was calling it high quality compared to the original, but I can see how the title can be misleading VITAS - Седьмой элемент / The 7th Element
User avatar #123 to #31 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
Forget Opus, they just need a good file.
Even ******* ... 160kbps mp3s can get better range than that.
However you are right in that Opus is godly.

Opus>OggVorbis>AAC>V0MP3>MP3
These are all lossy compression formats, obviously the lossless ones are better.
User avatar #149 to #123 - garymotherfingoak (08/07/2015) [-]
teach me how to audiophile
User avatar #169 to #149 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
I wouldn't say I'm an audiophile, but after years of downloading things for free, I learned what's good and what's not.
It all started out... WITH YOUTUBE RIPS. THE WORST POSSIBLE QUALITY FILES YOU CAN IMAGINE. Only through experience and research did I figure out the errors of my ways. Then I went to random downloads that people uploaded, which often turned out to be youtube rips themselves... So I had to go deeper.
After lots of trial and error I found certain sites that were far more reliable than others for downloads, as some of them kept being destroyed and/or demanded I register to them, which I refused to do. I brought up my standards, only demanding the best mp3s of 192kbps (CD quality) or higher. Youtube hosts CD quality and the youtube ripping sites have gotten significantly better but it's not good enough anymore.
The next step... Was detecting the lies. There are files encoded at 320kbps but the sources for those files were originally 192kbps so although the 192kbps quality is encrypted better, it still doesn't surpass the range of your average 192kbps mp3 file. This is detectable through spectrum analysis like in the picture kuchikirukia uploaded. As you can see, the range cut off is 15kHz. A 160kbps mp3 can easily reach that and the human ear is very much capable of detecting 17kHz. Good ears can even reach 20kHz but you're gonna have to be in a perfectly sound-proof room with high volume to hear that.
Audacity has spectrum analysis so you can download that for free to check your files easily enough. Pretty much everything starting from 192kbps upwards can hold the "full" range of a song, up to about 22kHz however the quality of the encoding increases significantly with higher bitrates and ESPECIALLY with variable bitrate, in which a file is encoded on a sample per sample basis, depending on what's needed. This allows more bitrate to be used for the more complex/higher parts of a song and less for the simple crap that doesn't need it. MP3 was originaly intended to be used in variable bitrate anyway so this love for constant 320kbps that everyone has is retarded. Variable 256kbps is significantly better.

ANYWAY, get Ogg Vorbis whenever you can, unless you want to go lossless in which case FLAC is fine. Remember that CDs and CD players do not have decoding software so it needs to be in RAW formats like WAV when you put stuff on there, I highly recommend using Winamp for all your audio stuff, VLC for video and Irfanview for GIFs and pictures. Websites to download from: Pleer.com and myfreemp3.biz
Occasionally the authorities crack down on certain songs really hard and you won't find them, in which case you'll have to resort to torrenting. ThePirateBay rotates between 6 domains, I believe it's currently on You need to login to view this link and You need to login to view this link
μTorrent is a good Torrenter, just remember to turn off your torrents if you don't have unlimited internet, seeding can make you go over your limits if you leave it on endlessly. If you have unlimited, you may want to turn it off anyways when you're streaming/gaming 'n' **** , keep your lag down.

As for teaching you to audiophile... You really had to read **** . Besides bitrates, sample rates are also really good, as is bit-depth. Standard bit-depth is 16, standard sample rate is 44.1kHz though 48kHz is easy enough to find, especially in videos. I don't suggest looking for higher numbers in those but it's good to make sure your files are at least at those standards.
Besides Pleer and myfreemp3, LivingElectro and Zippyshare are good places to find remixes and more electronic stuff.
User avatar #194 to #169 - garymotherfingoak (08/07/2015) [-]
sweet, thank you for the tips.

I agree that youtube rips can be asbolute **** depending on what you use. I have the only known copy of one of my favorite remixes (since the author had a big episode 1 night and deleted all of his **** , online and offline), but i used youtube-to-mp3 which downgrades quality significantly.
User avatar #195 to #194 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
What song is that?
User avatar #197 to #195 - garymotherfingoak (08/07/2015) [-]
it was something along the lines of "pokemon red/lance theme heavy metal remix" by En's Realm. everything is gone from his youtube channel and his soundcloud only has 3 uploads he salvaged.
User avatar #200 to #197 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
It's not this, is it?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=buifCKc9RNU
User avatar #205 to #200 - garymotherfingoak (08/07/2015) [-]
nope, but thanks
User avatar #333 to #169 - samoaspider ONLINE (10/16/2015) [-]
thanks for this rant, I'll keep that in mind

( was rustling through old favourites and noticed this gem )
#204 to #149 - sdziscool (08/07/2015) [-]
I reccomend this site for leanring how to audiophile. it's the preparation site for the private whatcd tracker, but except for the rules, this has everything you ever wanted to know about digital music and it's proprietary formats!
www.whatinterviewprep.com/prepare-for-the-interview/
0
#180 to #149 - ryander has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #139 to #123 - ugoboom ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
Which containers support Opus?
Which converters support Opus?

I use Handbrake and there's no entry for that codec. Vorbis master race it is, I guess.
User avatar #143 to #139 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
Wikipedia says both Ogg and MP4 are valid containers.
Dunno where the conversion comes in though.
User avatar #142 to #139 - cormy (08/07/2015) [-]
I HAVE NO IDEA.
As far as I know, Opus is only currently being used for streaming. Youtube uses it during certain livestreams.
I've never encountered an actual Opus file.
Maybe there is no container yet? Can only send it as raw signal.
#110 - thatonesmartdude (08/07/2015) [-]
Nice to know it's actually a decent song and not just some weirdo chuckling and trilling.


In other news, that guy's smile is rather enticing. inb4 "no homo" & inb4 "all the homo": I'm bisexual, so 50% homo.
#131 to #110 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
I'm just curious and not trying to be mean, but you can get boner (if you're a guy) from both naked man and woman?
#157 to #131 - thatonesmartdude (08/07/2015) [-]
I can almost always be aroused by an attractive woman, but I can also be aroused by a man if he's damn cute or if I'm extremely horny.

I can be aroused by either, but I don't necessarily get an erection.

I am transgender (female brain in a male body), so I do currently have a penis, but my discomfort (both physical and emotional) with getting an erection has made instances of arousal to very rarely cause an erection (less than 10% of the time). Usually, I'll get just enough of a partial erection to suffice for masturbation, and what I do with my hand during my masturbation technique resembles clitoral stimulation.

When thinking about my sexuality in the context of being transgender, I asked myself which sex I'm attracted to. I almost immediately felt that it was unfair to make me choose, but then I remembered that being bisexual is a thing. Plus, being bisexual makes the semantics simpler: If I like women, does that make me heterosexual as a male body that likes female bodies, or does it make me homosexual as a female mind who likes other females?
#254 to #157 - joelis (08/07/2015) [-]
Sounds a bit more like pansexual my friend.
User avatar #263 to #254 - thatonesmartdude (08/07/2015) [-]
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with this term. What does it mean to be pansexual, and how does it differ from being bisexual?
#265 to #263 - joelis (08/07/2015) [-]
It pretty much means bisexual.. except all genders are considered as one instead of seperate. I guess being more broad spectrum is the only real difference.
User avatar #275 to #265 - thatonesmartdude (08/07/2015) [-]
Seems too subtle a difference to warrant a distinction.
#277 to #275 - joelis (08/07/2015) [-]
Perhaps, but it's not the slightest change that has it's own term. There like a whole wiki of them somehwre.
#325 to #277 - anon (08/09/2015) [-]
I think the term pansexual also refers to attractiveness. It's more of the personality of men and women to be the desirable instead of the body. You can still be attracted to someone physically but it is not the desired part of a significant other.

But then again what do I know? I haven't researched this. I remember watching something on family guy about it.
#326 to #325 - joelis (08/10/2015) [-]
That is right too, but I struggle to explain that part correctly. x-x
User avatar #130 - aliennova (08/07/2015) [-]
Russian may have banned gays, but nobody will ever forget there phase.
User avatar #201 to #130 - wtfduud (08/07/2015) [-]
Where?
#153 to #130 - swiftarrow (08/07/2015) [-]
This guy is probably gay as hell. But he has a wife, and a daughter.
#114 - truekraken (08/07/2015) [-]
mfw I see high quality Vitas content
User avatar #216 to #114 - ninjafaggots (08/07/2015) [-]
I honestly can't tell if he's just singing very loudly and moving the mic away or if he's stopping and moving the mic away to give the illusion of the theory I mentioned first. If it's the second I feel like that takes ridiculous skill. If it's the first.....it's still really ******* cool
#108 - CrowbarNinja ONLINE (08/07/2015) [-]
Aww yiss
Aww yiss
#30 - ohhh (08/07/2015) [-]
#127 to #30 - anon (08/07/2015) [-]
cancer
User avatar #2 - goobyman (08/07/2015) [-]
don't we already have one of those?
User avatar #8 to #2 - lectonar (08/07/2015) [-]
As far as I know, there was only a partial one that lasted a few seconds, but I don't have the link handy.
User avatar #44 to #8 - ralps (08/07/2015) [-]
I like this one better. We can see the lady in the white dress raving
#266 - stoicnick (08/07/2015) [-]
this mah ****
User avatar #199 - sackit (08/07/2015) [-]
I've come to give this song
I've come to give this song
I've come to give this song
I've come to give this song
Chandra Brambra Chandra Chandra Bendram...

I've come to give this song
From the world of dreams
I've come to give this song
From crystal tears
I've come to give this song
For love
I've come to give this song
Chandra Brambra Chandra Chandra Bendram...
Aperently this is the lyrics
[ 333 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)