High ground
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
102 comments displayed.
#7 to #6
-
oxidoferroso (12/28/2015) [-] 
Every frame has a special effect, there's so much going on, it's so dense
#68 to #15
-
ohemgeezus ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] This is great, I never noticed a lot of it is nodding at stuff that will happen in the originals, like I never realized Gen Grevious is a nod to Vader because he's a cyborg, until I watched commentary.
#70 to #68
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] Its really interesting. Apparently all the three major prequel villains (Maul Dooku Grievous) represents a part of Vader.
Maul: The ferocity. The pure evil. Truly a Sith warrior.
Dooku: The fallen Jedi.
Grievous: The "more machine than man".
Maul: The ferocity. The pure evil. Truly a Sith warrior.
Dooku: The fallen Jedi.
Grievous: The "more machine than man".
#73 to #70
-
ohemgeezus ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] See I knew Dooku and Grev represented him, I never could figure out what Maul was supposed to represent, if he was at all. Also, adding on to my last comment, I also never knew Maul didn't blink at all he was on screen except for when he was cut down by Obi. Little things like that are great
#74 to #73
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] Yeah, maul is the trickiest one to figure out. A neat detail is that in RotS when Vader and Palpatine looks at the death star Vader holds his hands exactly like Maul does when he first appears as a hologram in episode 1.
#76 to #74
-
ohemgeezus ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] If only Vaders left hand was on top like Mauls was that would be perfect. I really like all the little easter eggs throughout each one, other than LotR, Star Wars is my favorite series
#97 to #76
-
cisdroidcommander (12/29/2015) [-] Me too. The easter eggs make star wars really interesting.
I slightly prefer star wars over LotR, but LotR is still great.
I slightly prefer star wars over LotR, but LotR is still great.
#60 to #58
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] I do. Here the star wars poetry source www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ZW1gtCljs
And heres the music source www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN_q-_nGv4U
Great music
And heres the music source www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN_q-_nGv4U
Great music
#34 to #33
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] Ive already watched that video and at the time of its release i agreed with him. Then i rewatched the prequels in a star wars marathon and got a new appreciation for them,i love all six movies equally.
Thanks btw for sharing his videos instead of RLM. While i dont agree with the video, its better than RLM IMO.
Thanks btw for sharing his videos instead of RLM. While i dont agree with the video, its better than RLM IMO.
#39 to #35
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] While the dialouge can be a bit awkward (especially AotC) it doesnt really bother me. And i find the story of the prequels really interesting.
They did build a lot of practical effects for the prequels and the CGI only helped them to make so many new and interesting planets, which im a fan of. They also helped expand the universe of star wars which was great.
I do have my share of problems with the prequels, but my enjoyment surpasses them every time i watch them.
They did build a lot of practical effects for the prequels and the CGI only helped them to make so many new and interesting planets, which im a fan of. They also helped expand the universe of star wars which was great.
I do have my share of problems with the prequels, but my enjoyment surpasses them every time i watch them.
#47 to #43
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] Not really. I actually find Jar jar harmless, not funny but i dont hate him . But what i like about the prequels is the story. Palpatines manipulation is interesting to watch and i love how it shows the galaxy before war times in TPM. Also how how somber it becomes at the end of RotS.
#51 to #49
-
cisdroidcommander (12/28/2015) [-] Like i said, my opinion. I dont find Palpatines manipulation convoluted. I dont find it out of character that Palpatine and Yoda use Lightsabers, and what General Grievous character? The micro series? That Grievous was just the typical silent antagonist that barely speaks there wasnt any character to **** up.
#66 to #43
-
ohemgeezus ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] "You like the prequels? ALL YOU CARE ABOUT IS CGI, LIGHTSABER FIGHTS AND JARJAR, WHY DOESN'T ANYONE LOVE ME."
People like you are what's wrong with the Star Wars fanbase
People like you are what's wrong with the Star Wars fanbase
#71 to #66
-
ohemgeezus ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] ridivey, if you're going to be a nostalgiafag, don't delete your comments like a bitch, stick with your opinion. The red thumbs only hurt for a little bit.
I never said you can't criticize something, but saying someone only cares about CGI if they say they liked the prequels is what I'm talking about. Also, did you not see 7? JJ took into consideration about what people hated about the prequels and stayed more true to the originals.
I never said you can't criticize something, but saying someone only cares about CGI if they say they liked the prequels is what I'm talking about. Also, did you not see 7? JJ took into consideration about what people hated about the prequels and stayed more true to the originals.
#50 to #30
-
sliferzpwns (12/28/2015) [-] At least say you enjoyed that corucant space battle, **** was intense
#8
-
oxidoferroso (12/28/2015) [-] It's really cute and dumb that Obi Wan seriously considered the small gap between them ''the high ground'' and thought Anakin would surrender after all the ******** they have been dueling on
#53 to #12
-
anon (12/28/2015) [-]
'Aight, here's the thing. They aren't actually trying to hit one another. Like, not just the actors aren't, the characters aren't. Lightsaber fighting between qualified opponents happens on levels most observers, and sometimes even the combatants themselves, aren't fully able to perceive. The reason for this is they can both see the future and know exactly how the fight is going to play out five, six moves in advance. The closer you are to an event, the easier it is to predict it via the Force, especially if your life is in danger. You don't even have to be conscious of it, as the Force will partially control your actions to react. So when Obi-wan jumps like a moron, for instance, he does it because he knows that if he hadn't, Maul's leg sweep would have been for real; Maul knows he's going to, so he doesn't bother going for it and instead saves some momentum for the next swing (or the swing after the swing after the swing after the swing after the next). In fencing terms, it's all fifth and sixth intentions. Watching a fight is like trying to decipher a chess match between grand-masters. Sometimes one will just concede out of the blue because they know that their position is unwinnable when the average observer has no idea why.
Of course, this all smells a little like ******** because it was pulled from someone's ass shortly after episode I to explain the bad choreography, but hey.
Of course, this all smells a little like ******** because it was pulled from someone's ass shortly after episode I to explain the bad choreography, but hey.
#17 to #13
-
TheHutchie (12/28/2015) [-] How can every hit with a lightsaber be fatal if two main characters have lost their hands to lightsaber wounds and survived?
#79 to #8
-
frostbeard (12/28/2015) [-] thing is, darth maul already watched star wars and knew that obi-wan had to survive, so he had to tear them apart and kill off his master first
he knew anakin will become a sith because obi-wan was never ready to train anyone, i mean he always had a trainee's blue lightsaber
he knew anakin will become a sith because obi-wan was never ready to train anyone, i mean he always had a trainee's blue lightsaber
#9 to #8
-
lettersonlywhy (12/28/2015) [-] Well he was his best friend, it was probably worth a try seeing as Obi Wan probably didn't want to hurt him.
#19 to #8
-
thepizzadevourer (12/28/2015) [-] From what I've read on Star Wars lore (which is quite a lot) having the "high ground" was a significant advantage in the highly-specific, form-driven duels of the old Jedi order. In closely contested duels, it was nearly impossible to assail someone who had taken the high ground without opening yourself up to attack.
The sole reason Obi-Wan was able to overcome Darth Maul taking the high ground in Episode I is because Maul became so overconfident he completely let his guard down.
The sole reason Obi-Wan was able to overcome Darth Maul taking the high ground in Episode I is because Maul became so overconfident he completely let his guard down.
#42
-
anon (12/28/2015) [-] fool me once shame on you
fool me twice shame on me
fool me three times REEEEEBELS GET OUT
fool me twice shame on me
fool me three times REEEEEBELS GET OUT
#80 to #42
-
lurkerlarry (12/28/2015) [-] As soon as the guy took off his mask, I almost couldn't stop myself from laughing. He looks like a kid who spent most of his time in high school inside of his own locker.
#82 to #80
-
carneymaster (12/28/2015) [-] did you see his tantrums? he was probably home schooled when not training with luke.
#45 to #29
-
totallytito ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] The first one sucked, the second one mostly sucked(but Yoda going beastmode launched a hype train like no other), and the third one was pretty enjoyable in its second half.
I also hate to say it, but as a kid I liked Jar Jar binks(and I somewhat cringe at my childhood imitation of him, but then again i was just a kid. I had fun.)
To be honest, Episode 1 was never really needed.
Anakin's genius abilities to build droids or other machinery never really showed up again in the series, you never see him tinkering with a new superweapon(he didn't even design the DeathStar himself). His fighter piloting skills were about average when he grew up. And even his 'relationship' development was more of a cougar later falling in love with a child.
The movie itself wasn't entirely bad(it was hella fun for its time), it would've been nice under its own name and different characters, but it really did very little to connect with episode two and beyond.
I also hate to say it, but as a kid I liked Jar Jar binks(and I somewhat cringe at my childhood imitation of him, but then again i was just a kid. I had fun.)
To be honest, Episode 1 was never really needed.
Anakin's genius abilities to build droids or other machinery never really showed up again in the series, you never see him tinkering with a new superweapon(he didn't even design the DeathStar himself). His fighter piloting skills were about average when he grew up. And even his 'relationship' development was more of a cougar later falling in love with a child.
The movie itself wasn't entirely bad(it was hella fun for its time), it would've been nice under its own name and different characters, but it really did very little to connect with episode two and beyond.
#41
-
totallytito ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] If people could just stop swinging their light sabers like a bunch of dull baseball bats, and focused on penetration value instead of slicing value, then many of these lightsaber battles would've been over in mere seconds.
But let's be honest... then we wouldn't get as many "vroom vroom" noises, or cool sweeping streaks of light.
But let's be honest... then we wouldn't get as many "vroom vroom" noises, or cool sweeping streaks of light.
#55 to #41
-
lampmountaindew (12/28/2015) [-] you get hate for this, but you are technically correct. however one avenue you have to look down is that the lightsaber, which burns so hot it instantly cauterize any living tissue it touches, wouldnt that mean it doesnt cause as much damage? no bleeding, no bacteria released that can cause infection/death. even the most skilled swordsman will miss his mark in battle, so if he/she doesnt hit the right spot they could still be coming at you as opposed to cutting off the arm his weapon is in then killing them when they cant attack you. with blades, yes thrust its harder to defend against and more deadly. with an energy based plasma sword, disable then kill for efficiency .
#59 to #55
-
totallytito ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] Now, if lightsabers were more like katanas, then yeah... a sweeping motion is necessary for a clean cut(katanas are awful at stabbing things)
#57 to #55
-
totallytito ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-] It doesn't matter if the wound is sealed up. Damaged muscles become unresponsive just as easily as a severed arm.
If a wound is instantly sealed up, you also need to take into account the inflammatory response, and furthwe swelling from cut circulation. Essentially, you could have your wound have a flesh bubble full of blood, or you could even bleed out within yourself if a major artery is struck.
If you focus less on making easily predictable, evadable, highly visibly counter-able attacks, you would be much harder of an opponent. Also, the fencing stance treats the sword as more of an extension of your arm(specifically to keep your body parts out of reach instead of having to block every single blow up close).
It's all about high speed retreats and attacks, and more easily having a higher likelihood of disabling your opponent's striking hand before being offered the opportunity to slay him or spare him.
If you're dealing with white hot multi-color laser beams that evaporate your flesh on impact, then a fencing stance would be all the more necessary for this fighting weapon. It's practically like having a knife fight with your friend while butt-naked: no armor has stood a chance, your clothing is worthless to it, and even coming close to you is enough to set you on fire.
If a wound is instantly sealed up, you also need to take into account the inflammatory response, and furthwe swelling from cut circulation. Essentially, you could have your wound have a flesh bubble full of blood, or you could even bleed out within yourself if a major artery is struck.
If you focus less on making easily predictable, evadable, highly visibly counter-able attacks, you would be much harder of an opponent. Also, the fencing stance treats the sword as more of an extension of your arm(specifically to keep your body parts out of reach instead of having to block every single blow up close).
It's all about high speed retreats and attacks, and more easily having a higher likelihood of disabling your opponent's striking hand before being offered the opportunity to slay him or spare him.
If you're dealing with white hot multi-color laser beams that evaporate your flesh on impact, then a fencing stance would be all the more necessary for this fighting weapon. It's practically like having a knife fight with your friend while butt-naked: no armor has stood a chance, your clothing is worthless to it, and even coming close to you is enough to set you on fire.
#69 to #57
-
lampmountaindew (12/28/2015) [-]
yes, but with a sweeping attack you also add in the ability to fake. keeping him at a distance with the fencing strategy is a good defensive strategy, however if you get inside by drawing an attack and deflecting the blade out of the way, you can penetrate inside where you would want 2 hands. the force of a 2 handed blow with a lightsaber is enough to knock an opponents lightsaber out of the way if theyre using a one handed approach. it would literally be a game of whose better at defense. the "sweeping" fighter would need to counter attack, just like the fencer
#21
-
feru (12/28/2015) [-] JJ Abramms is **** . new starwars movie, its was ok but it was more like a tv series than a movie, even the stormtrooper spins his galactic steel stick better than those jedi.... and kylo ren is an emo fagget
#77 to #21
-
yoloswaggins (12/28/2015) [-] You mean a trained stormtrooper spins a weapon he probably trains with better than Finn who had never used a lightsaber before?
Colour me surprised.
Colour me surprised.
#26 to #25
-
feru (12/28/2015) [-] lmao good luck with that. Lost was ok so what? it doesnt mean everything he shat will be good.
I repeat the new starwars movie made by JJ abrahms, is **** and you know it. even the first movie had better lightsaber fights, even the villians, the ******* stormtrooper is more memorable than the heroes.
Dont a be a bitch and acept it or prove me wrong, why is the force awaken a good movie?
I repeat the new starwars movie made by JJ abrahms, is **** and you know it. even the first movie had better lightsaber fights, even the villians, the ******* stormtrooper is more memorable than the heroes.
Dont a be a bitch and acept it or prove me wrong, why is the force awaken a good movie?
#27 to #26
-
donatelo (12/28/2015) [-] "good" is subjective...but in my opinion i think the new movie is good because it does service to both fans of the pre-quels and sequals as well as newer fans who may be getting into the movies.
Although i do have issues with a few things (like throwing 25 books of extended universe out the window), i still think its good.
Although i do have issues with a few things (like throwing 25 books of extended universe out the window), i still think its good.
#83 to #27
-
carneymaster (12/28/2015) [-] Any time you are making a movie that has extended stuff from books you have mostly ignore the books. Most of your target audience hasnt seen the 10 or 20 extra books. It also allows them to make new storylines that may not be ruined as easily. Everyone knew who kylo ren was but in the books he also had a brother and sister who were twins. Its also the cost of how many actors you can pay for. I liked the movie though it was good. Not great, but good. Jurassic park was great, guardians of the galaxy was great, the pirates of the Caribbean movies were great steadily going to good.
#37
-
newdevyx (12/28/2015) [-] No Anakin jumping into lava yelling wararara or something along that line. Disappointing.
#44
-
grimsho (12/28/2015) [-] Well to be fair, as Darth Vader the suit doesn't really let him raise his arms easily, making the high ground much more of an advantage.
