He has a point you know. . wll: rtil' n/ tor all petunia. For all ?, Dwh. Well... he's not wrong.
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - conebonesixtynine (05/17/2014) [-]
Well... he's not wrong.
Well... he's not wrong.
#53 to #1 - Aezync (05/18/2014) [-]
He is wong though.
#20 to #1 - anon (05/17/2014) [-]
What about lesbians who go to semen banks?
User avatar #22 to #20 - rustyspunktube (05/17/2014) [-]
then where does the semen come from my little naive anon
User avatar #23 to #22 - amangottaeat (05/17/2014) [-]
could have also been gay men donating inb4 aids, hiv, stuff like that. well that well they do blood tests there
User avatar #38 to #22 - Dember ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
Probably not a straight couple.
User avatar #14 - sciencexplain (05/17/2014) [-]
Hehe... Gaybies.

Laugh you imbeciles. I am the next generation of brilliant comedy.
#24 to #14 - berkut (05/17/2014) [-]
You sure will be, mate.
#44 to #14 - imgood (05/18/2014) [-]
sciencexplain, explain laughter
#50 to #44 - ktom (05/18/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddV6jyDeCKA    here's a video on it but i'm too lazy to type it out
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddV6jyDeCKA here's a video on it but i'm too lazy to type it out
User avatar #16 to #14 - alucaard (05/17/2014) [-]
Insert scientific laughter here.
#2 - camzore (05/17/2014) [-]
I'd gladly make gay babies with George Takei no homo
I'd gladly make gay babies with George Takei no homo
#46 to #2 - temariroxs (05/18/2014) [-]
no lie but he was a good looking man back in the day all the homo
#10 to #2 - notreposter (05/17/2014) [-]
actually, if you're planing on making babies then it would be necessary for you to be female, thus straight sex.

#13 to #10 - yuukoku has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #9 to #2 - hlynur (05/17/2014) [-]
once i sucked my friends dick and didn't say no homo
#28 to #9 - camzore (05/18/2014) [-]
#43 to #9 - elmarcocfc (05/18/2014) [-]
You have no idea how long it took to get this, with the correct "You're", and still, it's thumbnail size.
#3 to #2 - nerduin (05/17/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#15 - kanatana (05/17/2014) [-]
**kanatana rolled image** God, I love George Takai. He's seriously one of the coolest homo sapiens on the planet.
#54 - kingkaga (05/18/2014) [-]
Because we all know we need more of these people being treated as 'normal'
Fun fact: over 50% of all AIDS infections in the US are by gay men, despite being less than 2% of the population.
User avatar #55 to #54 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
they are actually 3% of the population and transgender people are 0.899% of the population.
#56 to #55 - kingkaga (05/18/2014) [-]
Like that makes a difference? That's still an overwhelmingly small population that makes up for an overwhelmingly large majority of a problem.
User avatar #57 to #56 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
true enough.
#59 to #54 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
Actually, not 2%. The real number, from all the research I've done (and that's quite a lot) is between 9 and 12 percent.
User avatar #61 to #59 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
would you happen to have sources on this 12% claim ,I would very much like to see them for scientific reasons as it would prove humans have a higher propensity for homosexual behavior/homosexual offspring then other mammals;except dolphins.
#64 to #61 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
Source I found by googling: www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-percent-of-the-population-is-gay-more-than-you-think-5012467/?no-ist

If there really are less homosexual animals, it could be because homosexual animals never have offspring, while homosexual humans often, in the past, reproduced out of fear of being shunned, inadvertently spreading gay genes and increasing the percentage. That's just my instinctual guess. Probably wrong.
User avatar #67 to #64 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
that survey is not very scientific it counts all non heterosexual people as gay and they used using a veiled/misleading/confusing questions to trick bi sexual etc people into being added to the homosexual pool. they never confirm the people were homosexual they only confirmed they were not heterosexual there's a difference.

TLDR. the surveys administrators were being sneaky snakes.
#68 to #67 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
Not the survey administrators, the article title writers. The name of the survey is "The Size of the LGBT Population and the Magnitude of Anti-Gay Sentiment are Substantially Underestimated", so I guess their method applies.
User avatar #69 to #68 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
well, yes if the article had stated LGBT instead of homosexual specifically then yes the method would apply. but it say homosexuals are 12% of the population which is false it should have said LGBT people make up 12% of the population. which I would agree with as there are far more bi sexual people then gay people.
#71 to #69 - wheatleygone has deleted their comment [-]
#73 to #71 - timmywankenobi has deleted their comment [-]
#75 to #73 - wheatleygone has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #77 to #75 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
no because the survey already accounted for that by using veiled questions that don't force you to specify you sexual preferences outright.
#78 to #77 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
But that study came up with the 20% number, not the individual ones. The 20% mark is (relatively) correct, still probably a bit under, but your sources (as far as I know) didn't even use veiled questioning.
User avatar #79 to #78 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
oh your right they didn't.
User avatar #70 to #69 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
sorry 12-20%
#72 to #70 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
I always thought that the 12% figure was for gay and lesbian people, not just LGBT in general. Maybe I'm rarer than I thought.
User avatar #74 to #72 - timmywankenobi (05/18/2014) [-]
well we know trans people are between 0.1 and a maximum of 1.24% and we know bi is the largest group and we know their are slightly more gay men then gay women but only slightly and the latest numbers I have seen from the government say homosexuals make up no more then 5.8% but as little as 2.2% conservatively as of 2013 so that leaves us with a pool of 13-14% bisexuals 4-5.8% homosexuals and 0.1-1% transgenders and voila 20%
#76 to #74 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
Of course, there's the fact that social pressures often make people hide their sexuality, so it's very likely that the real number is even higher than that.
#65 to #64 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
I should point out, the article I linked actually indicates an even higher percentage, and also states that ten percent is the go-to number.
#60 to #59 - kingkaga (05/18/2014) [-]
For a particular area, or the entire United States population?
#63 to #60 - wheatleygone (05/18/2014) [-]
I'm not sure where the samples may have been done. I did a fair amount of research, just not very recently. That figure I remembered, though. I'd like to think that the percentage would be the same (within certain error bars) virtually everywhere.
#82 to #63 - kingkaga (05/19/2014) [-]
That's not how it works, for instance there's a large population of blacks in southeastern US but they're only <20% of the population, you can have a higher demographic in one area(s) but that can't account for the whole
User avatar #80 to #54 - spunkball (05/18/2014) [-]
Its an FP propaganda post trying to pust the Homo-Lifestyle as normal
#81 to #54 - anon (05/18/2014) [-]
I might be horrible for saying this but I dont care if people are gay, they dont have the ability to make more kids, and they usually die of diseases like STD's and such and I think they might play a key role in helping our over population, before you go crazy I have gay friends who I cherish I'd be sad if they died of disease but on the grand scale of things I only see positives, especially where the people are concerned
User avatar #58 - bonerjam (05/18/2014) [-]
George Takei looks like hes suffering from AIDS related complication. Or maybe hes just old I dunno.
User avatar #66 to #58 - huntergriff ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
he's...pretty damn old, man.
#39 - Gewdaism (05/18/2014) [-]
The avatar episode with george takei kills me every time
#31 - stepsword ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
Can you imagine the religious dilemma if all gay babies were from rape victims (and all rape produced babies turned out gay)? Those extreme Christians would be just so stumped between allowing abortion and condoning gays.
Can you imagine the religious dilemma if all gay babies were from rape victims (and all rape produced babies turned out gay)? Those extreme Christians would be just so stumped between allowing abortion and condoning gays.
#41 to #31 - anon (05/18/2014) [-]
Feels like you just dumped the word "extreme" to avoid ********* towards yourself
User avatar #42 to #41 - elmarcocfc (05/18/2014) [-]
It was the correct thing to do.
User avatar #35 to #31 - xxjmacxx ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
Thank you for saying "extreme christians" and not just "christians"
#8 - thelizardlord (05/17/2014) [-]
That man makes a very very very solid point
#52 - acidtroll (05/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #47 - infinitereaper (05/18/2014) [-]
all the babies actually
User avatar #49 to #47 - chuckbillrow (05/18/2014) [-]
yes but i can only assume that George Takei was speaking at some sort of gay rights thing
#7 - anon (05/17/2014) [-]
Oh my....
#19 - minibeep (05/17/2014) [-]
the japaneese people are so ****** up with radiation so we should have expected this
#18 - spunkball (05/17/2014) [-]
#33 to #18 - clownsormidgets (05/18/2014) [-]
oh you poor fool
#26 to #18 - neoexdeath ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
*******		 Klingons, taking all the prime tail for themselves...
******* Klingons, taking all the prime tail for themselves...
#21 to #18 - juter (05/17/2014) [-]
As if he'd ever go on this degenerate website.
As if he'd ever go on this degenerate website.
User avatar #51 - pinstre (05/18/2014) [-]
I met him once
#45 - anon (05/18/2014) [-]
I saw this dude jerk off another dude on like this radio show thing.
#37 - anon (05/18/2014) [-]
Good lord Takei looks old
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)