None of those are hard words m8 but I see what you're getting at. My sister has a degree in biochemistry or some ******** like that and every day she comes home and tells my parents what she learned. No one understands a god damn thing she's saying but she still drones on and on. I could do the same **** back but I don't because I don't want to sound like a witty cunt and I can make it easier for people to follow along.
The point I was trying to make was that there's no reason to use long phrases to describe something as simple as food I am aware that "Smoked sausage cream of mushroom risotto" is probably a real dish, but it still seems like an overly-complicated name . I just had a retard moment and used "words" instead of "phrases."
People who use unnecessarily large words still piss me off
Also thanks to Hell's Kitchen, many kitchen n00bs are obsessed with making everything into risotto. Plus it super looks like puke, it even has the red chunky bits.
It's rice cooked in some form of stock (like beef stock) usually served with a protein, like rice and beef stock with mushrooms, or rice and fish stick with lobster, delicious. Sometimes you get your main meat on top of it. I had chilean sea bass on risotto, one of the top ten meals I've ever had.
I don't know where you eat like this, but in Italy, risotto is one of the most versatile first course, you can make a risotto with almost everything (and by everything, i mean from seafood to meat to herbs to ******* strawberries).
To make a REAL risotto ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risotto ) you put the raw rice in a pan with a small amount of butter, and you stir it for a LONG time, adding meat or vegetable or fish broth a cup at a time, until if "grows" and becomes softer. Then you can add other ingredients, but you almost always start like that.
Make it while you are cooking your main dish. That way you are there at the stove the whole time anyway. You can intermittently stir it while you cook and prepare other things.
Cook it just like you would cook normal rice, but substitute water for stock. Instead of absorbing water, the rice absorbs something flavorful. You only sir it once to fluff it up with a wooden spoon
Depends on how they use it. You can't deny there are some people insert words that are excessively long or less common in casual conversation in situations not always appropriate, and sometimes they do it for slightly arrogant reasons. This situation wasn't one of them. I think OP was more annoyed by all of the descriptive words needed for the title. But in my opinion they were probably needed, since it looks like a specific cooking post that may have a recipe nearby. I think there are people who get annoyed by long words they dont know too often and should politely ask what they mean or ignore it. I also think there are people who insert long or uncommon words specifically to sound smart to others. It goes both ways.
My girlfriend is actually a culinary arts student and has told me that 'risotto' is called that because the method of making risotto is called 'risole' (don't think I'm spelling that correctly) which means to coat rice in butter. So risotto isn't a pretentious word at all, it's quite literal, actually. The same goes for a lot of terms in cooking -- they're all quite literal if you understand what they mean. In fact, it's faster to use those terms instead of spelling out exactly what each one means.
It is true that you melt butter before adding the uncooked rice to the pan, but it's not where the word comes from.
Risotto comes from the Italian "riso", which means rice.
The word your girlfriend might have been talking about is rissole, which is to do with frying, but it's both French and normally refers to battered food.
My housemate is doing Sports and Injury management, and i had two cans of red bull when i was studying, after a while i said i felt like **** . he told me i was in a "Hypoglycemic dip" with the off chance id ask him wtf it was, i just said straight "just say sugar crash mate, thats what it is, stop using unnecessary words"
he also does it all the time with other stuff, its mildly infuriating
good **** : 👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good **** go౦ԁ **** 👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌 **** right👌👌th 👌 ere👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀👀 👀 👌👌Good ****
There should be an option at the top of the comment section For me it says "Show videos not Gifs" That'll switch it, and if not, This is all I got mang, lo siento
that doesnt look appealing at all and looks like he put too much in one serving imo. i can see corn and maybe some beans and other stuff. ******* stupid.
I don't really think this has anything to do with someone judging someone for naming a dish, but rather that they posted a dish that looks straight like vomit. I'm sure it may taste great, but thats just plated poorly. The dish is fine conceptually. But blue china with a primarily brown dish. No large pieces of mushroom or sausage to show what it is. A risotto lacking a classical creamy appearance. Why post something without trying?