There's a few coming out, but this definitely looks like the best. I love the idea of it being open planned, I was a BIG fan of the last one they did, it was a good mix of Splinter Cell type stealth and run & gun if that floats your boat
YEEEEEEAAAAAH Thats the one! I loved the tits off of that.
Might redownload it actually, I'm short of games. Did you see Hitman/are you into it ? If you didn't, and you are, it looks great, although it looks like a new agent, either that or they remodeled 47, he looks too young I don't like it, but it's a minor gripe, they've gone back to the style of single contracts but more open world, very excited for it.
If it's not your bag then tbh I'd just cherry pick - go straight for Absolution, it's a great game, plus if you're not into Hitman it has a lot of standard features that were not really welcome to the more hardcore assassin, stuff like heightened senses (ie. seeing through walls), and a really flexible difficulty system
i think it means in terms of the cinematography, like i know that most of the trailers we're seeing for games are cgi but the direction of them is really getting quite good
I know right, for me it was as the blood started to pool it seemed a little too gloopy. but I see more blood than most. maybe they want to consult with medical students on the next one in order to achieve the most believable gloopiness?
please someone give me some money i'm so ******* poor.
Oh man, I'm going to trust a single ******* person who says it looks as good as it does on the trailer.
Also the single gameplay(supposed) moments right there doesn't even look as good as it does in the trailer
I thought it was from a movie and was awestruck by the cinematography.
Came down to and found people screeching about pre-rendered trailer.
I also thought pre-rendered trailers were used as an advertisement meant to get you interested and spread word of their product. guess I was wrong too.
See, this is what kinda annoys me about video games. (I myself am an avid gamer) You see trailers like this, and you think "Oh my god, this game is so ******* realistic! Look at those graphics, it's incredible!" Then you buy the game and it's nowhere near as well rendered as the videos, and everyone gets butt hurt about it because developers bent the truth. You had to know that the game wasn't going to be photo-realistic, but everyone is let down (which is mainly the fault of the trailers not the gamers).
Then, on the opposite end of the spectrum, you have video game developers that show you EXACTLY what the game is going to look like (Case in point, fallout 4 trailers) and the gaming community bitches and moans about how "awful the graphics are" compared to trailers like these. But when the game comes out, you are given exactly what was promised, and yet no one seems happy about it. Now obviously not every gamer acts like this, but I still get annoyed with someone brings up an upcoming game and it's always about how "amazing" or " ****** " the graphics are, when 99% of the time it's always good. Not mind blowing, but good.
I was actually EXCITED when Fallout 4 pretty clearly didn't have amazing super intense graphics. To me, that's a sign of a good game.
See, they obviously didn't focus on the graphics. THey put some effort into it, made it look good where it can compete with most average games, but they didn't make them amazing, it isn't in the forefront.
That means that their attention went somewhere else. ...Gameplay, mechanics, story, coding, take your pick. Any of those would be more amazing to put effort into than the graphics.
But I will concede that the faces turning into ketchup and mustard was impressive. Especially for the 80's, before they had computers. Now if we can get a scene like that at some bank headquarters...
Generally anything even remotely close to an alpha phase, the graphics don't change much. Alpha is when it's visible, and controllable but filled with game breaking bugs so you can't fully 'play' it. From that stage the graphics and lighting and textures usually remain the same while the rest of the work is going into ironing out mechanics and building set pieces and making sure everything connects properly.
In my honest opinion mate, if you care more about the graphics of video games than the gameplay you're officially a cunt in my book. Case in point, Mount and Blade: Warband, I play napolionic wars and the graphics are terrible but it is still and incredibly fun game to play, why? because it's the gameplay that bloody counts.
Agreeing with ***** , I'd rather play Ratchet and Clank 3 than some of the new games coming out.
I tried arguing this point when people were being so angry and unreasonable about fallout 4 when the trailer first came out, and now we've seen some gameplay it doesn't even look that bad, people say it looks like a ps2 game, talk about over statement.
I mean here, this is a ******* ps2 game, ratchet and clank 3, fallout 4 looks so much better than that.
I think people are expecting too much from games graphics at the moment, we've hit a wall with graphics and it's expensive to push them further than they are now, for very little gain.
Glad to see people agree, I thought I was taking crazy pills.
honestly, I thought the fallout graphics were GOOD, I mean for ***** sake, the world is HOW big? with no loading screens, SO much customization and so forth. I honestly would rather a huge game that looks like fallout 4, than a beautiful game that is linear like crysis.
There's a lot of little tricks and secrets devs use to keep an "open world" game running like that, Dark Souls is a perfect example by having these tube-like areas you move through where only the area you're in and the adjacent ones are loaded, the rest have their textures drastically reduced or removed from an area as well as mob spawns to save memory.
yeah, I know that and fully accept it. but I don't like people comparing an OPEN world game, to someting like crysis since you can't go exploring in it
I was really into and was hoping for 4 player coop till the end of it. Now it looks like a shooter version of The Crew. Here is to hoping that ubisoft cant **** up a shooter.
>prerendered/CGI trailer drops
"That's not how the real game is gonna look, they're lying to the consumer."
>Fallout 4's in-game trailer drops
"Ew look at those ****** graphics."
Maybe people want graphics to actually be shown as they are, and they want multi-million dollar games to look ever so slightly better than a PS2 game. It's not too much to ask, *******
yeah shame every game trailer that looks amazing in the past few years has proven that it is all pre-rendered gameplay that looks nothing like that on the real thing because "its too hard to make the whole game like that"
You know how freaking hard it is to find something you posted as a Hotdog, I wanted to see if I had any responses. Didn't think of just looking at the screenshot on my desktop where it had the title in it, made it a lot easier