Gay sheep. From humon.deviantart.com/art/Sheep-262786780. I In 10 mm; Prefer oh; hev" WWY-. Rams enjoy ramming each other. I get it god. Being gay is oka
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (117)
[ 117 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
52 comments displayed.
#2 - nightmareschild
Reply +177
(12/03/2013) [-]
Rams enjoy ramming each other. I get it god.
#30 - unncommon ONLINE
Reply +64
(12/03/2013) [-]
God looks bawss as **** in this.
#52 - ggdhindo
Reply +24
(12/03/2013) [-]
RFW
RFW
#53 to #52 - ggdhindo
Reply +38
(12/03/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#81 to #53 - iwishiwasazula
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
gay porn is different...
gay porn is different...
#75 to #53 - aesis
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
I like how there is "MEN" written in the corner, meaning this came directly from some gay porno.
#93 to #75 - destaice
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
The porn is from You need to login to view this link

The actors are Christian Wilde and Jessie Colter. The name of the video is "He Can Do It Better."

The full video can be found here: You need to login to view this link
#54 - inforcersorders
Reply +11
(12/03/2013) [-]
If you were a sheep, would you **** a sheep? DIRTY SHEEP ******.
#58 to #54 - Gewdaism
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
YO THIS ************ AIN'T ONE OF US, HE SAID HE'D **** A SHEEP
Jay & Silent Bob Sheep Fckr
#13 - spooooce
Reply +10
(12/03/2013) [-]
Thought this was going to be a post about home.  EYE  guess not.
Thought this was going to be a post about home. EYE guess not.
#29 to #13 - secretdestroyers
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
**** yes, love Kiwiland!
#105 to #13 - gearshift ONLINE
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
As an Australian, I feel obligated to point and laugh at you.
#116 to #105 - spooooce
Reply 0
(12/04/2013) [-]
You disappoint me.

I expected 'Sheep-Shagger'. Such a shame.
#59 - turtletroll
Reply +8
(12/03/2013) [-]
This is the emblem of my city.

Looks like we are the faggot sheep capital of the world
#61 to #59 - gravdave
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
so you are from preston?
#62 to #61 - turtletroll
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Yeah I live there now but i'm from Manchester originally.
#63 to #62 - gravdave
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Manc master race
#64 to #63 - turtletroll
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
yes m8 manchestah pride
#68 to #59 - anon
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Come to live in France.
The emblem of our country is a cock.
#77 to #59 - toguro ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Hey another Prestonian! Were you there when they switched on the lights?

I wish I still lived in Bolton -_-
#78 to #77 - turtletroll
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Nope. Preston usually do a pretty **** job at things like that. The guild festival is a pretty good example of that
#80 to #78 - toguro ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Oh it was bad, really really bad.

Well actually there was one guy who played the guitar by literally laying it down and hitting the strings with his fingers so that it made percussion noises too. It was actually really really good.

And yeah the guild festival was a travesty as well, but hey - city with the lowest IQ and lowest life expectancy so, what can you do?
#89 to #80 - turtletroll
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Preston is a **** hole though
#83 to #80 - turtletroll
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Oh **** is that true?

I honestly can believe it but the lowest in Britain?
#111 to #83 - toguro ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Either England or the North West - I can't remember which but yeah.
#88 - ijiek
Reply +7
(12/03/2013) [-]
rams ramming rams
#18 - timmity
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
same ratio with humans
#19 to #18 - wliia
Reply +7
(12/03/2013) [-]
I thought the whole "10% of people are gay" was a bit of a myth? True percentage is about 4%.
#39 to #19 - ningyoaijin ONLINE
Reply +2
(12/03/2013) [-]
4% admit to being gay. 6% are still kidding themselves.
#50 to #39 - negette
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Where's your evidence, fagtron?
#57 to #50 - garymotherfingoak
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
r00d
#36 to #19 - tulioandmiguel
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Source? Everywhere I see it it says that about 10% of humans are attracted to the same gender (gays, lesbians, and bisexuals).
#110 to #36 - wliia
Reply -1
(12/03/2013) [-]
www.gallup.com/poll/160517/lgbt-percentage-highest-lowest-north-dakota.aspx

It's for the usa, but I imagine proportions are similar elsewhere. The poll included Gay, Bi, Lesbian, and Transsexual, and 3.5% was the average. Take out those who identify as transexual and its probably lower than that.

A lot of times ratios are just assumed to be 10% when that's a reasonable number, and it just kinda sticks, even if that percentage is completely wrong. Lots of 10% myths that aren't true (ie we use 10% of our brain, 10% of people are gay, etc)
#26 to #19 - timmity
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
i never said gay
#106 - duckmanfj
Reply +4
(12/03/2013) [-]
I think we all know what they're going to be.....

Ramming
#23 - kennyh ONLINE
Reply -4
(12/03/2013) [-]
I love when people say "animals do X so humans can do X"
If you want to **** a dude go **** a dude but don't bring animal behavior into it.
"Your honor animals kill so it is ok that I killed that family"
"hm, you are correct, case dismissed, next we have a woman who ate her baby"
"...animals do it"
#98 to #23 - Sethorein
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Dude... most human behaviours can be observed in animals. Genes are remarkably conservative that way.

However, we are unique in the development of our frontal cortex. That's why we don't get to kill each others families.
#24 to #23 - willindor
Reply +4
(12/03/2013) [-]
It's about people calling something unnatural.
#32 to #24 - honkan
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
I'm not supporting his view, but I'd call eating a baby unnatural too. It's something to do with what's natural for *humans*.
#45 to #32 - mrgreatnamess
Reply -1
(12/03/2013) [-]
And what's natural for humans?

Some would argue that living in cities is unnatural.
I'd disagree and say it's very much human nature.
#47 to #45 - honkan
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Well, human nature is pretty much a contradiction in itself. What's viewed as natural for humans is very much decided by society. I see the fault in my statement, perhaps I should call eating babies inhumane? Can't really think of a fitting and relevant word.
#100 to #47 - lateday
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
I always thought saying "nature" and "humanity" is one big disguised show of ego. Like... Why are humans, of all creatures, the only ones separated from nature? How come a guy killing a deer is unnatural, while a leopard killing a deer (or gazelle wtv) is natural? We are nature. We are part of the whole actions of nature itself. River dams are construction made by beavers, still considered nature. Why are cities any different? If we define natural as "any thing not manmade" then I guess that's fine. For linguistic purposes.
#104 to #100 - honkan
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
I was referring to that definition yeah. But for the rest of the thread I believe we're using the definition of nature as "the basic or inherent features, character, or qualities of something". The separation used in most of the thread was between human nature, and the nature of animals. I guess that's what you're disagreeing with? I can definitely see reasons both to separate the two, and reasons to include humans with animals. But the reasons for the latter are mostly biological and science related.
#48 to #47 - mrgreatnamess
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Amoral would be more fitting, in my opinion, as long as it's understood that morals are also subjective.
#49 to #48 - honkan
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Sounds good.
#37 to #24 - kennyh ONLINE
Reply -1
(12/03/2013) [-]
I'm not saying it is wrong or unnatural. I am just saying the argument that "animals do it so humans should" is a poor argument.
#69 to #37 - Crusader
Reply +1
(12/03/2013) [-]
But that's not the argument at all.

The argument is that homosexuality is man-made, but if it occurs in animals, then it isn't.

No one is claiming that because animals do something that it's OK, no one claims that it's OK to breed with your mother/sister/aunt maybe in Utah no one claims that it's OK to eat your offspring OK, well, maybe in Florida no one claims that it's OK to kill you're brother because he is living too close to you.
#107 to #69 - thegrimgenius
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Floridian here, that's disgusting
We prefer eating our friends, without offspring, who's going to help you?
#72 to #69 - kennyh ONLINE
Reply -1
(12/03/2013) [-]
Right. But people DO claim that. And that is what I say is an incorrect argument.
There ARE people who say "if animals do it, people can, since that is natural.
I'm NOT saying being gay is wrong.
I'm saying that particular argument is wrong.
But whatever. 12 year olds will read half of my argument and thumb me down thinking I am being a bigot when what I am saying is the opposite of what they think I am.
#99 to #72 - lateday
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
I will thumb you down for that last sentence. Just to be clear.
#113 to #99 - kennyh ONLINE
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
And from your avatar it is clear you are also 12. So my point holds.
#114 to #113 - lateday
Reply 0
(12/03/2013) [-]
Oh no. I agree with what you said. It is kinda the appeal to nature fallacy. But that last sentence was really unnecesary and made you seem a little bit too opinionated and jerkish.