fish nipples
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
126 comments displayed.
#83 to #28
-
blackmageewizardt (01/11/2016) [-] Man that´s so ******* fake, anyone knows Ezreal is interested in Taric´s Family gems.
#89 to #83
-
gentlemenmew (01/11/2016) [-] **gentlemenmew used "*roll picture*"**
**gentlemenmew rolled image****gentlemenmew used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**gentlemenmew rolls 33** so outrageous
**gentlemenmew rolled image****gentlemenmew used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**gentlemenmew rolls 33** so outrageous
#11
-
selrahcrox ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
I guess you can say boobs without nipples are just "pointless".
#2
-
celdak (01/10/2016) [-]
Well they're not mammals so they don't need bewbs either...
She's monster, there's nothing preventing her from having them
She's monster, there's nothing preventing her from having them
#115 to #114
-
crazylance (01/11/2016) [-] "Though a unisex race, Floran culture values survival through reproduction and expansion over environmentalism or any perceived bond to Mother Nature."
I am confused. They're unisex, but reproduce. That means there is a Male/Female system going on.
I am confused. They're unisex, but reproduce. That means there is a Male/Female system going on.
#150 to #136
-
blackoutonetwotwo (01/12/2016) [-]
You need to login to view this link
as always, do not go to page 4. I say again.
DO NOT GO TOP PAGE 4.
You have been warrrrneed, travelerrrrr.
as always, do not go to page 4. I say again.
DO NOT GO TOP PAGE 4.
You have been warrrrneed, travelerrrrr.
#151 to #148
-
blackoutonetwotwo (01/12/2016) [-] oops clicked the wrong reply button, I brought da sauce.
#138 to #124
-
mrshrapnel (01/11/2016) [-] Psst. hey achmed, shouldnt we keep the viper for "interrogation"?
#38 to #36
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] If you were an artist yourself, you might be impressed by the attention to anatomic detail.
#40 to #39
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] "I'm not the demographic, so it must be pushed away from convenient access of the general public."
#43 to #41
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] Well sometimes people who are not horny want to look at such images without gifs of pornography burning their eyeball every .05 seconds.
#47 to #44
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] What you call "softcore porn" is arguably non-pornographic nudity. It should have it's own section where people who do not want to see any nudity no matter the circumstance can avoid it, you make a valid point there, but to jumble it with pornography is a bad idea, as pornography is obscene for the sake of being obscene, whereas this is artistic.
Maybe there should be a artistic nudity section.
Maybe there should be a artistic nudity section.
#49 to #47
-
Sunset (01/11/2016) [-] let's not beat around the bush; this post is essentially softcore pornography. there is obviously an "artistic" slant to it, but i can find artistic regular pornography as well. should that mean that that porn, just because it is artistic, is allowed to be posted? i don't believe so, personally. we obviously have differing opinions here, but when it comes to content like this that's only redeemable quality (for you anyways) is that it is artistic, it really has no purpose anyways on this section of the site. there is no attempt at humor whatsoever and it is purely intended to just be looked at and admired / fetishized / gawked at / fapped to.
#50 to #49
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] Well I still think there should be a distinction made when something is nude yet not sexual, even if it is able to be used for gratification.
#52 to #51
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] It (Poorly) attempts at a joke, and isn't any more obscene than most OC and anime posts. I think it should stay.
#21 to #20
-
buddywuggle (01/10/2016) [-] it has no genitals and the breasts without nipples means nothing obscene is shown. It doesn't make the **** quota (Though it wouldn't be wise to show your colleagues.)
#23 to #21
-
bulwark (01/10/2016) [-] I know, I know. But my point is why even post stuff like this? It's borderline softcore porn and with no real joke to it. It's pretty much a waste of bandwidth. Why not post some actual **** in the **** section instead.
It's like these OC comics that have started to sprout up these days, where every single character is constantly semi-nude and every joke is leaning towards something pornographic or sexual. I just don't get the appeal of it, when there is a perfectly fine ACTUAL porn section.
It's like these OC comics that have started to sprout up these days, where every single character is constantly semi-nude and every joke is leaning towards something pornographic or sexual. I just don't get the appeal of it, when there is a perfectly fine ACTUAL porn section.
#27 to #25
-
bulwark (01/11/2016) [-] So why not make an actual comic, without it having to be borderline pornographic?
There is only one way I can describe what I am thinking and to do it, I need the help of a certain funny guy.
His point is exactly the same one I have. Why does it HAVE to be, to use a very popular term nowdays, be lewd? Why not keep it straightly **** in the correct section, or not at all?
It's the same reason I never could stomach those Tardassaaa or how the **** you spell it comics... because they weren't fun. It was just a retarded girl, trying to make herself seem like some sex starved deviant.
There is only one way I can describe what I am thinking and to do it, I need the help of a certain funny guy.
His point is exactly the same one I have. Why does it HAVE to be, to use a very popular term nowdays, be lewd? Why not keep it straightly **** in the correct section, or not at all?
It's the same reason I never could stomach those Tardassaaa or how the **** you spell it comics... because they weren't fun. It was just a retarded girl, trying to make herself seem like some sex starved deviant.
#30 to #27
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] I'm not certain, but I think the OP is not the original artist, so the artist never considered it would be on a funnyjunk post with 69 green thumbs.
#35 to #33
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] True, you make a good point when it comes to FJ as a whole. Especially with OC.
#37 to #35
-
bulwark (01/11/2016) [-] I sure hope so. I know I am not the only one who thinks this is becoming a problem. I mean, I can't tell people what to post, that would be retarded. But if people stopped gaping and drooling over non-funny semi-porn posts, maybe they would go away.
I miss when I first joined FJ and stuff like Inglip was the **** .
I miss when I first joined FJ and stuff like Inglip was the **** .
#8
-
mrmask (01/10/2016) [-] yeah, they don't have noses either, didn't seem to bother the artist though.
#10
-
meatygoodness (01/10/2016) [-] Breasts without nipples are basically just lumps of fat stuck to a chest
#14
-
kinzoi (01/10/2016) [-] Okay, I get it, it's supposed to be funny, I guess, but if the point of getting rid of posts with porn in it is to prevent children from seeing something inappropriate? Is this really any less inappropriate than porn posts if you're being honest with yourself? I hate to be a downer with things, but really, you guys are kidding yourselves.
#22 to #14
-
buddywuggle (01/10/2016) [-] It's only tits. It's only obscene if you have a fetish for that.
#26 to #24
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] If you show no signs of getting gratification from it, depending on cultural background the mom would be more worried about the fact you don't since not many people realize it's a fetish.
#34 to #32
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] Well if you are just browsing and you tap the on the shoulder so you can tell them you think the art is neat, they likely won't be mad at you, as much as, at least if you live in a western country, would wonder why you are not embarrassed to show you mom a drawing of a fish with tits.
#42 to #34
-
kinzoi (01/11/2016) [-] Your example is rather situational in the first place, and knowing my parents, and my friends parents growing up, this wouldn't fly in the slightest. Now think, if this would go with severe punishment back then, and let's say that the world has become less conservative, which it has, do you really still believe that there wouldn't be repercussions from such a an image being viewed?
#45 to #42
-
buddywuggle (01/11/2016) [-] If you were honest about it, a responsible parent might find it to be a good parenting opportunity.
Yes I avoided the main question, I don't understand it. Please rephrase it in simpler terms.
Yes I avoided the main question, I don't understand it. Please rephrase it in simpler terms.
#128 to #14
-
everyziggy (01/11/2016) [-] Whether topless women should be considered pornographic or not has been under debate recently. Breasts produce milk for feeding children and so biologically there is nothing sexual about them. Is it pornographic for a mother to breast feed her infant in public? A hundred years ago a woman exposing her thigh would have been considered inappropriate. I think it's just a matter of time before the ban on women being topless is lifted.
#60
-
thegreatpapyrus ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-] FISH ALSO DON'T HAVE ARMS, LEGS, HANDS, FEET, VOCAL CHORDS, HAIR, AND A STRONG SENSE OF JUSTICE. THEY ALSO AREN'T FRIENDS WITH TWO REALLY NEATO SKELETON BROS, THREE GHOSTS, THE HUMAN, A FLOWER (I GUESS), TWO... WHATEVER THE KING AND HIS CLONE ARE OFFICIALLY... AND IN A ROMANTIC RELATION WITH A NERDY REPTILE ALMOST ALL OF WHICH HAVE ACCESS TO INSANE MAGIC ABILITIES. YET, HERE WE ARE!
#102 to #95
-
thegreatpapyrus ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-] BUT, I REMEMBER TOBY FOX STATING THEIR ACTUAL TITLE ON HIS TWITTER. I KNOW HUMAN CALLS THEM "GOATS" AS SORT OF A NICKNAME, I JUST THOUGHT THERE WAS AN OFFICIAL TITLE.
#104 to #102
-
anon (01/11/2016) [-]
They are, in fact, goats. It mostly plays in with Asgore's satanic theme. King of the underground, castle sits above a lake of fire, wields a trident (pitchfork analogue), his name is an anagram for Sage Or Murderer, and he collects human souls for the purpose of making war on the world above. Satan was referred to as having the cloven hooves of a goat, and is usually associated with goats.
tldr: The Undertale underground-world is Hell and Asgore King Fluffy is Satan, and Satan is goats.
tldr: The Undertale underground-world is Hell and Asgore King Fluffy is Satan, and Satan is goats.
#109
-
galkawhm (01/11/2016) [-] Fish don't have mammaries so undyne wouldn't even have boobs in the first place.
#120 to #109
-
holycrapimacupcake ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-] Peri is slowly replacing Amethyst as my favorite. She's so ******* aodrable sometimes.
#130 to #97
-
bonlino (01/11/2016) [-] see, thats the thing that confuses me. since a mermaid is a mythological creature, we cant study them, we cant analyze them beyond what we see and what whoever is explaining them to be, so they cant be associated with a fish or a human. so would they just be called a hybrid, or would they be associated solely with one or the other?
#140 to #130
-
thechosentroll (01/11/2016) [-] There's actually a field called cryptobiology, which deals with mythological creatures and how their bodies would work if they were real. And there is no logical reason for fish species to develop human-like features. Therefore, it makes sense that mermaids originated from an ancient human subspecies, which started living in the water and developed fish-like features to adapt. Like whales and other sea mammals did.
#142 to #141
-
thechosentroll (01/11/2016) [-] Depends. If they still have the ability to breed with humans, they'd be considered a human sub-species. Like dog breeds are dog sub-species. If not, they'd be their own species.
In the mango, I think they mention that all the monster girls are human sub-species. And it'd kind of make sense, given how they're essentially all trying to **** the MC.
In the mango, I think they mention that all the monster girls are human sub-species. And it'd kind of make sense, given how they're essentially all trying to **** the MC.
#144 to #143
-
thechosentroll (01/11/2016) [-] Yes, she's the least bitchy of the bunch. And I have no idea. The mechanics of how a slime girl would function are beyond me. Just trying to figure out what's giving that adorable little serial rapist her shape and preventing her from turning into a puddle would take forever.
#145 to #144
-
bonlino (01/11/2016) [-] there is a biology... thing about her. the head antennae thing is her, or rather her brain. everything else is completely malleable. not even her eyes are necessary. theyre there for aesthetic effect purely. but i guess, if i were to make sense of it, the brain thing has a psychic power of some sort which keeps the gel she's made from as one. reminds me of Goop from that newer ben 10 show.
#146 to #145
-
thechosentroll (01/11/2016) [-] That still makes no sense from a biological standpoint. There has to be SOME internal structure keeping her together, unless she can individually control every single damn cell in her body.
