Dont divide by zero. .. its almost as dangerous as googling google Or Binging Bing, but no one is going to do that
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - mudkipfucker (10/29/2013) [-]
its almost as dangerous as googling google

Or Binging Bing, but no one is going to do that
#9 to #1 - thisisestonia (10/30/2013) [-]
binging bing sounds so sexy
User avatar #10 to #1 - iamspika (10/30/2013) [-]
i just googled google to google google.
#2 to #1 - kcormahs (10/29/2013) [-]
What about yahooing yahoo   
or asking ask   
 or AOLING AOL
What about yahooing yahoo
or asking ask
or AOLING AOL
User avatar #17 to #2 - iwebby (10/30/2013) [-]
oh look its my retarded twin brother
#11 - luciolemibu **User deleted account** (10/30/2013) [-]
Sauce is first star trek movie from JJ Abrams, the one in 2009.
#14 to #11 - lave (10/30/2013) [-]
"First star trek movie" "2009"   
   
As a trekkie, who has watched all of the star trek shows and movies, sevral dozen times each, I get the urge to find and kill you D:   
   
Star trek: TOS, originally came out in 1966, and soon after came its movie in the 70's so, you should have said   
   
The first star trek in the new series.
"First star trek movie" "2009"

As a trekkie, who has watched all of the star trek shows and movies, sevral dozen times each, I get the urge to find and kill you D:

Star trek: TOS, originally came out in 1966, and soon after came its movie in the 70's so, you should have said

The first star trek in the new series.
#23 to #14 - hargleblarg (10/30/2013) [-]
"Sauce is first star trek movie from JJ Abrams"   
"first star trek movie from JJ Abrams"   
"movie FROM JJ Abrams"
"Sauce is first star trek movie from JJ Abrams"
"first star trek movie from JJ Abrams"
"movie FROM JJ Abrams"
#21 to #14 - blobness (10/30/2013) [-]
And it is exactly that kind of hamfisted reaction, which you belted out without even understanding the comment you were replying to, that prevents people from taking any sort of self-styled "trekkie" seriously.
User avatar #15 to #14 - angrytoilet (10/30/2013) [-]
I think he means JJ Abrams' first star trek movie, not THE first star trek movie.
#22 to #14 - FUUUU (10/30/2013) [-]
You forgot "from JJ Abrams" in the middle there.
#3 - pippysfleas (10/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#12 - hahdumbbirch (10/30/2013) [-]
27÷0=0
#13 - kingoflint (10/30/2013) [-]
I can't believe they destroyed Vulcan. CURSE YOU ABRAMS!!!!!
User avatar #5 - shumdek ONLINE (10/30/2013) [-]
Sauce of this gif?
User avatar #6 to #5 - whatasickname (10/30/2013) [-]
Star Trek movie
User avatar #7 to #6 - shumdek ONLINE (10/30/2013) [-]
Which of them? aren't there several?
User avatar #8 to #7 - whatasickname (10/30/2013) [-]
There are. It's this one, specifically. www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/
User avatar #16 to #8 - iwebby (10/30/2013) [-]
There is*

I'm sorry
User avatar #18 to #16 - whatasickname (10/30/2013) [-]
In context, what I wrote means "there are several."


"there is several" contridicts itself, since is would refer to singular objects, while "there are" addresses plurals. and since there are several, it is plural.
themoreyouknow.jpg
User avatar #19 to #18 - iwebby (10/30/2013) [-]
Ah okay, i see.

i le tip my fedora to you my good sir.

/s
User avatar #20 to #19 - whatasickname (10/30/2013) [-]
its cool.
User avatar #4 - lazengahn (10/30/2013) [-]
I remember my first beer
 Friends (0)