Daniel starts the war. . Daniel starts the war
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (108)
[ 108 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
77 comments displayed.
#3 - andywazowski
Reply +22
(10/23/2013) [-]
Link ?
#58 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
no...frodo and harry potter
#6 to #3 - ruraidhri
Reply +289
(10/24/2013) [-]
What?
#27 to #6 - jamieswhiteshirt
Reply +66
(10/24/2013) [-]
This joke makes no sense. What does a picture of Zelda have to do with this?
#39 to #27 - YorkieCup
Reply +8
(10/24/2013) [-]
It was a joke guise
#63 to #27 - jordanish
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
#51 to #27 - joens
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#86 to #27 - shadowbreech
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
I spent about a minute raging silently at that before I realized you were trolling
Well Done!!!
#46 to #6 - andywazowski
Reply +13
(10/24/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#11 to #6 - whydoniggers
Reply +12
(10/24/2013) [-]
*Heyt?
#15 to #6 - chimi
Reply +4
(10/24/2013) [-]
HEY LISTEN
#60 to #6 - ianmcgunny
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#78 to #60 - deadwillieguy
Reply +2
(10/24/2013) [-]
Man he was just a mess at that roast.
#8 to #6 - HardyUndertook
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
nice
#5 - turkeyslapper ONLINE
Reply +112
(10/24/2013) [-]
#2 - thismightbesparta
Reply +90
(10/23/2013) [-]
Im giving 2:1 odds on the Halfling
#4 to #2 - monkeybrains
Reply +12
(10/23/2013) [-]
Especially if it's a rogue with that sneak attack bonus.
#7 - lean
Reply +86
(10/24/2013) [-]
<---- is best crossover
#83 to #7 - mutantunicorn
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
Dumbledora da explora? just to make it rhyme. i love rhymes
#68 - nim
Reply +40
(10/24/2013) [-]
I find Elijah Wood ridiculously adorable.
I find Elijah Wood ridiculously adorable.
#95 to #68 - spanishninja
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
#100 to #68 - guto
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
me too
#82 to #68 - internetrage
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#101 to #82 - nim
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#70 to #68 - wobblewub
Reply +11
(10/24/2013) [-]
I do too.
I do too.
#71 to #68 - MysticTomatoe
Reply +11
(10/24/2013) [-]
I find Daniel ridiculously Elijah
#9 - mrhaihoang
Reply +25
(10/24/2013) [-]
**mrhaihoang rolled a random image posted in comment #37 at Blowing up **
#73 - shoxx
Reply +20
(10/24/2013) [-]
Well, well, well, fighting again are we? i am very disappointed Harry!
I think you have to rethink your life, and get rid of this bad hobbit!
i´m sorry
#84 to #73 - shadowbreech
Reply +2
(10/24/2013) [-]
don't be
#1 - teranin ONLINE
Reply +19
(10/23/2013) [-]
Totally referencing Stephen's role as the boss from Harvey Birdman with that tweet
#24 to #1 - SergeantPWN
Reply +4
(10/24/2013) [-]
I wish I could give you more than one thumb, you glorious ************. Phil Ken Sebben is my favorite character of all time.
I wish I could give you more than one thumb, you glorious ************. Phil Ken Sebben is my favorite character of all time.
#10 to #1 - shenanidingus ONLINE
Reply +7
(10/24/2013) [-]
Kind of miss that show.
Kind of miss that show.
#13 to #10 - fuckscreennames
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
i love that video so much lol
#26 - yorker
Reply -24
(10/24/2013) [-]
UNPOPULAR OPINION COMING RIGHT UP

Elijah Wood's acting has little to no depth, Daniel Radcliffe is also a poor actor.

The only reason we were able to sit through any of the Harry Potter films was because of the terrific acting on the parts of professors and teachers. The movies would be unbearable if it were not for the talented actors. The talented actors being pretty much everyone who wasn't a student at Hogwarts.

inb4 No he's not-Daniel even admitted that he's a bad actor.
#65 to #26 - revengeforfreeze
Reply -5
(10/24/2013) [-]
srsly dude you watch movies for the acting?

thats like eating popcorn for the kernels

i watch the harry potter movies for the story..
#41 to #26 - shadecrenshaw
Reply -2
(10/24/2013) [-]
Am I ever glad that I'm not some picky cinema snob, I can enjoy sub-par acting without it really bothering me.

#47 to #26 - themisstophat
Reply -2
(10/24/2013) [-]
If he was so bad, why did Broadway want him?
If he was so bad, why did Broadway want him?
#53 to #47 - sabotagesam
Reply +3
(10/24/2013) [-]
because he's famous, you can sell tickets with him. srsly bro, don't be naive.
#106 to #53 - themisstophat
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Did you ever see his shows in the West end theater?
He was brilliant... I'm not talking some silly Disney Broadway show, he stared in a Peter Shaffer play.
I don't know how it runs anywhere else, but you don't give give away a leading role in theater because they're famous, or you'll loose the regulars who enjoy the theater on more than on occasion (which in London, is a lot). It wouldn't be worth it.
#107 to #106 - themisstophat
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
on more than one occasion*
#57 to #47 - anon
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
Perez Hilton was on broadway....
#105 to #57 - themisstophat
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
I have no idea who that is.
#28 to #26 - sexyhimself ONLINE
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
"He admited to being an actor" have you seen al the pretty (and stupid) girls on facebook saying they`re ugly.

I`m not saying taht Daniel is a facebook or anything
#29 to #28 - yorker
Reply -1
(10/24/2013) [-]
Well, no, I ignore dumb bitches. But I don't know why you brought up them being ugly. (Which also happens to be true)
#40 to #29 - haroldsaxon ONLINE
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
He never said they were ugly.
#30 to #29 - sexyhimself ONLINE
Reply -1
(10/24/2013) [-]
I am confuse of this convesation now.
#31 to #30 - yorker
Reply -1
(10/24/2013) [-]
Probably because you brought up a completely unrelated argument and worded it strangely.
#32 to #31 - sexyhimself ONLINE
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
most likely.
#33 to #32 - yorker
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
Drive safely, sexyhimself.

Merry Halloween!
#35 to #33 - sexyhimself ONLINE
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
I`ll keep that in mind
#66 to #26 - mutzaki
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
I kinda have to agree with that. I mean, I don't think either is really a **** actor, but I think they're really average, or even a bit below average for productions that large.
#72 to #26 - inbardo
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
You, sir, have guts,   
   
I'll give you a thumb
You, sir, have guts,

I'll give you a thumb
#74 to #26 - EventHorizon
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
I absolutely agree that Daniel Radcliff is a pretty OK actor, and the professors were absolutely incredible and made some of the movies. Emma watson was pretty convincing, but Rupert Grint played Rohn extremely well.
#75 to #26 - daentraya
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
I dont know about the quality of acting, as i saw hp so long ago, and everything else in LOTR was just so great that noticing and judging everyones acting wasn't really my top priority. But i fail to see why people still thumbs this down, even though you clearly warned them that it was an unpopular opinion
#77 to #75 - deadwillieguy
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
Um isn't that like the whole purpose of thumbs to show that people like his opinion (popular) or don't like it (unpopular).
#79 to #77 - daentraya
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
He already knows it unpopular, and he may have truth to his claim. Sometimes i get the feeling that some hatred is ungrounded and just silly
#76 to #26 - mitchr
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
LOTR has weak character development on purpose.
Evidence:
Tolkien was a notorious perfectionist. He wouldn't have allowed any aspect of his stories to stray from his vision at all. Moreover, Smeagol shows that he could very easily have given all of them strong character development.
He created Lord of the Rings to replace the Celtic lore that was lost in the many invasions of Britain. He was always sad that they had lost their heritage, so he tried to replace it.
Many mythological figures don't have much character development; there are some, but rarely.
Therefore it is my belief that Lord of the Rings has poor character development on purpose to mirror that of Greek, Egyptian, Norse mythologies.
#89 to #76 - pipedt
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
and you know **** gets real when you have weak character development on purpose
and you know **** gets real when you have weak character development on purpose
#90 to #89 - mitchr
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
Tolkien is just that good.
#34 to #26 - tkfourtwoone
Reply +3
(10/24/2013) [-]
^Perfectly true.

Rupert can just make silly faces while Emma Watson... well, she just looks nerdy & intense. Intensely nerdy.
But really, that doesn't require even medium amounts of acting skill.

Seeing McConnagal, Alan Rickman, Gary Oldman (YES PLEASE!), Ralph Fiennes, even the "new" Dumbledore...
Now THAT is acting.

I guess they were cute when they were 9-10-12 years old, but once they hit 16-18, you start to have some standards out of them.
#36 to #26 - xdeathspawnx
Reply +3
(10/24/2013) [-]
I thought that both Daniel radcliffe and Elijah Wood did a very good job at portraying the characters the way the way Tolkien and Rowling intended them to be. I can understand you tinking that Elijah Wood's acting has little depth, but I think that he was just correctly portraying a character who usually expresses little outward emotions.
#45 to #36 - grandogger
Reply +1
(10/24/2013) [-]
hey I thought Elijah wood was good in return of the king
#44 to #26 - tacticalbacon
Reply +8
(10/24/2013) [-]
I respect it
#37 to #26 - murrlogic
Reply +16
(10/24/2013) [-]
Alan Rickman

The greatest ******* person to play Severus Snape
#52 to #37 - sabotagesam
Reply +7
(10/24/2013) [-]
yeah, that doesn't contradict what he said, like, at all, so if you could just not be an ass, that would be great
#67 to #37 - secretary
Reply +3
(10/24/2013) [-]
Also the only person to play Severus Snape
#103 to #37 - yorker
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
******* idiot-I made it clear that the professors were all good actors.
#104 to #103 - murrlogic
Reply -1
(10/24/2013) [-]
>-23 thumbs
#17 - sabotagesam
Reply +13
(10/24/2013) [-]
my bet is on the hobbit. he learned from the best.
#25 to #17 - jayfizzle
Reply -7
(10/24/2013) [-]
Zimmerman would be proud
#54 to #17 - chaossniper
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
exactly my thoughts
any how anybody seen the 3rd movie ?
#22 to #17 - biddo
Reply +2
(10/24/2013) [-]
that movie was much better that i expected
#49 to #17 - harlig
Reply +5
(10/24/2013) [-]
Just sayin.
#62 to #49 - beerterror
Reply 0
(10/24/2013) [-]
oh hell yes