Buckle up Bonehead
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
98 comments displayed.
#10
-
zon (12/11/2015) [-] 
Damn that first one is well written and thoroughly researched just like what my research paper due tomorrow should be like
#20
-
msamnesia (12/11/2015) [-]
As a woman rape is kind of a touchy subject for me, because I was assaulted by my bf while we were still together. i didnt report the rape because we were still a couple and living together and I couldn't afford rent on my own, and I also didn't think they would believe me, and once he had me pinned I didn't struggle because I knew it would hurt me more I found out that marital rape wasn't even considered rape until like the early 90s.
Sadly a lot of cases can be fabricated and hurt the guy accused, but it's also a scary world where people assume a girl is just crying rape, when in fact it could actually be the real thing. It's a tricky situation.
Sadly a lot of cases can be fabricated and hurt the guy accused, but it's also a scary world where people assume a girl is just crying rape, when in fact it could actually be the real thing. It's a tricky situation.
#115 to #49
-
paddypancake (12/11/2015) [-] "Ah yes anon of course you put the whole situation into a totally new light. I actually don't think i was raped anymore, i probably just wanted it. I would never have gotten that one myself if there wasnt this anon on the internet telling me who i like to have sex with"
- not msamnesia
Personally i think its a scary world where people assume either thing without evidence. We will always have a gut feeling that might lead to one side or the other and we will make assumptions but the people who blame either one are scary in general, no matter who of the two involved ones they blame. We have to consider the legal position of course, anything than assuming that there is no rape happening until proven different is neccercary there. Innocent until proven guilty. But especially with all those false rape accusations we should be concerned about our reactions to those hitting the wrong people.
- not msamnesia
Personally i think its a scary world where people assume either thing without evidence. We will always have a gut feeling that might lead to one side or the other and we will make assumptions but the people who blame either one are scary in general, no matter who of the two involved ones they blame. We have to consider the legal position of course, anything than assuming that there is no rape happening until proven different is neccercary there. Innocent until proven guilty. But especially with all those false rape accusations we should be concerned about our reactions to those hitting the wrong people.
#130 to #115
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx (12/11/2015) [-]
Not to sound like an asshole here, but he asked a double check question, he did not say: ¨You probably wanted it anyways you ****** slut!¨, he said ¨Are you sure he didnt misinterpreted it as a roleplay invitation?¨
He was questioning, not assuming. Learn the difference.
He was questioning, not assuming. Learn the difference.
#131 to #130
-
paddypancake (12/11/2015) [-] The block of text is about msamnesias comment. The "quote was about anon"
#125 to #115
-
anon (12/11/2015) [-]
Yeah? Well maybe you shouldn't be a bitch and put out. Put up, shut up, or GTFO. That's how each and every one of my relationships goes, women are completely disposable and I have no problems throwing one to the curb and then bring a new one home a few hours later.
#122 to #49
-
miasaki (12/11/2015) [-]
Did you really just ask someone if they may have enjoyed unwanted intercourse? Like as a legit question for conversation?
I get where you are coming from, some people have their kinks and it may be hard to grasp for others depending on what it is, but to each their own. In all honesty though, asking someone whether or nor they enjoyed unwanted intercourse (regardless of what the other party intended) is a bit of a dumb thing to do.
Granted, there are chemical reactions within the body that may be released or take place leading up to or during sex that may feel somewhat pleasant regardless of the situation (I cant say **** on this, Ive never been raped, to my knowledge) or some primal urge, but were not in the ******* stone age, people can decide and discern **** for themselves for the most part.
I'm not defending nor answering for msamnesia (you can only get your desired answer from them) or anything, its just that the idea is a bit odd and out there.
I get where you are coming from, some people have their kinks and it may be hard to grasp for others depending on what it is, but to each their own. In all honesty though, asking someone whether or nor they enjoyed unwanted intercourse (regardless of what the other party intended) is a bit of a dumb thing to do.
Granted, there are chemical reactions within the body that may be released or take place leading up to or during sex that may feel somewhat pleasant regardless of the situation (I cant say **** on this, Ive never been raped, to my knowledge) or some primal urge, but were not in the ******* stone age, people can decide and discern **** for themselves for the most part.
I'm not defending nor answering for msamnesia (you can only get your desired answer from them) or anything, its just that the idea is a bit odd and out there.
#152 to #122
-
msamnesia (12/11/2015) [-]
it's okay. thank you for standing up for me. i know some people have freaky fetishes like that--and i answered anon's question in case anyone has a freaky girl partner like that. there's a difference between "no" and "tee-hee nooooooo". and sharing my experience hopefully guys wil be able to identify the difference with their own girlfriends. i forgive my ex, but it still hurt me deeply and it was the first time i ever felt truly in danger and powerless. i dont want a guy to misinterpret something and do something he'll deeply regret or hurt the one he cares about.
#150 to #49
-
msamnesia (12/11/2015) [-]
I'm not angry for your question, it was years ago and i've moved on. so i'll answer for you.
yes, i made it very clear. i had just gotten outta the shower and i usually air-dry so it's something i always do. he was coming onto me and i said "not now im not in the mood"
"cmon"
"no"
"you know you want to.'
"hey, im seriously not in the mood, stop."
"you really want me to?"
"yes, im serious, stop."
"you don't feel like you want to"
"its a vagina its called discharge it does that AUTOMATICALLY not because you're ******* touching me. stop!"
"cmon"
"stop it"
------
and after a back and forth it ended up with him immobilizing me and i didn't want him to physically hurt me so i just lied there and waited until he was done. i ended up crying afterwards, and the next few days he realized what he had done because i was acting different and avoiding him. we broke up shortly after that and once our affairs were in order we separated and i found a place i could afford on my own.
yes, i made it very clear. i had just gotten outta the shower and i usually air-dry so it's something i always do. he was coming onto me and i said "not now im not in the mood"
"cmon"
"no"
"you know you want to.'
"hey, im seriously not in the mood, stop."
"you really want me to?"
"yes, im serious, stop."
"you don't feel like you want to"
"its a vagina its called discharge it does that AUTOMATICALLY not because you're ******* touching me. stop!"
"cmon"
"stop it"
------
and after a back and forth it ended up with him immobilizing me and i didn't want him to physically hurt me so i just lied there and waited until he was done. i ended up crying afterwards, and the next few days he realized what he had done because i was acting different and avoiding him. we broke up shortly after that and once our affairs were in order we separated and i found a place i could afford on my own.
#166 to #20
-
neoraed (12/11/2015) [-] im my opinion false rape charges should be harshly punished instead of the slaps on the wrist women tend to get.
that way they would less inclied to cry 'raaaape' at every oportunity wich kinda deminishes the true victims of such because they are basicaly lumped thogeter with those people.
all togheter i belive modern 'femenism' is the one fostering a rape culture, not by comiting it but by trivializing its meaning.
that way they would less inclied to cry 'raaaape' at every oportunity wich kinda deminishes the true victims of such because they are basicaly lumped thogeter with those people.
all togheter i belive modern 'femenism' is the one fostering a rape culture, not by comiting it but by trivializing its meaning.
#167 to #166
-
msamnesia (12/11/2015) [-]
that can be scary too. if they dont find proof of rape--as in my case, because i didn't struggle so there wouldn't be any vaginal tearing or bruises--then i could be severely punished for saying i was raped. thats one of the reasons why i didn't report it, because i honestly didn't think i would be believed. "pff, your BOYFRIEND raped you? yeah, okaaaaaay..."
it's a catch-22. either way someone is gonna get ****** . no pun intended
it's a catch-22. either way someone is gonna get ****** . no pun intended
#128 to #20
-
thesinful ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-] As a male rape victim, I ******* hate everyone who equates things like someone looking at their body to rape. Ya know, **** like "Every woman knows the hopeless, despairing, soul-crushing feeling of someone staring at you from across the room/street."
Also, anyone who lies about being raped, usually either for attention or because they regretted having sex with someone. In those cases, the accuser should have to serve the accused's sentence.
Also, anyone who lies about being raped, usually either for attention or because they regretted having sex with someone. In those cases, the accuser should have to serve the accused's sentence.
#164 to #147
-
thesinful ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-] Remember a few years back when it came out that some woman lied about being raped over a year into the guy's sentence? He wanted to play professional football before she destroyed his dream (thankfully he was given a chance when that came out). She contacted him afterwards, wanting to "let bygones be bygones" and was also upset that she had to pay back the 1.5 million or so she got from suing the school.
#83 to #20
-
nigeltheoutlaw (12/11/2015) [-] I think you may misunderstand where a lot of us are coming from on this issue. I was raped as a child (forced to penetrate by two older girls), and although I didn't report it or even understand what happened to me for a long time, it still ****** me up, as I am sure you understand. When I get mad at the current attitude towards rape it's not because I want people to take the rape of women less seriously, but to take the rape of men as seriously as they do of women. If another man or boy is raped and has the bravery to come forward, they should be taken seriously and have the opportunity to get justice for the crime just like a woman should.
I can't speak for everyone, but I really just want the issue to be approached from an equal viewpoint, rather than diminishing one group's suffering as punishment for that group's past benefits.
I can't speak for everyone, but I really just want the issue to be approached from an equal viewpoint, rather than diminishing one group's suffering as punishment for that group's past benefits.
#108 to #83
-
ericzxvc (12/11/2015) [-] Yes, and this is precisely the problem.
What people don't understand is that the majority of feminists outside the Internet are people who are actually fighting for gender equality. Which means acknowledging both problems, that most men on women rapes are unreported and even more women on men rapes are unreported.
But fighting for one situation doesn't invalidate the other, and when you create two sides fighting each other it just makes it worse for both sides.
The conversation should never go "there is a problem of sexual assault against women in the USA" and the counter to that be "no there's a problem against sexual assault of men in the USA".
An overall greater recognition of sexual assault and both sides working together is the only thing that will create progress, but compilations like this that attack feminists and paint them as straw men by the extremists that don't represent the movement creates a divide between the two. So many people on FJ hear "feminist" and with attack any point they try to make, which alienates women against supporting what they want, which in turn makes them lash out and alienates these men against supporting what women want.
What people don't understand is that the majority of feminists outside the Internet are people who are actually fighting for gender equality. Which means acknowledging both problems, that most men on women rapes are unreported and even more women on men rapes are unreported.
But fighting for one situation doesn't invalidate the other, and when you create two sides fighting each other it just makes it worse for both sides.
The conversation should never go "there is a problem of sexual assault against women in the USA" and the counter to that be "no there's a problem against sexual assault of men in the USA".
An overall greater recognition of sexual assault and both sides working together is the only thing that will create progress, but compilations like this that attack feminists and paint them as straw men by the extremists that don't represent the movement creates a divide between the two. So many people on FJ hear "feminist" and with attack any point they try to make, which alienates women against supporting what they want, which in turn makes them lash out and alienates these men against supporting what women want.
#148 to #83
-
msamnesia (12/11/2015) [-]
i'm sensitive to male struggles as well. there's a lot of unfairness to men, and i know this because i was raised by a single father. my dad took care of me and my brother all on his own, without government help--who wouldn't help him simply because he was a man. which is total ******** because he was working like 3-4 jobs to get by.
there are male rape victims, and beleive it or not there are males who cry rape when it really wasn't. literally, my friend said he was raped, and when i asked him he literally said to me 'welll... like... techincally i cheated on my girlfriend. we were naked and stuff and i was about to put it in her, but then she put it in herself and then i regretted it so it was kinda like rape..."
and i was just like
"are you.. ******* ..SERIOUS."
there's just a lot of injustice all around and the ones who get ****** over most are the innocents.
there are male rape victims, and beleive it or not there are males who cry rape when it really wasn't. literally, my friend said he was raped, and when i asked him he literally said to me 'welll... like... techincally i cheated on my girlfriend. we were naked and stuff and i was about to put it in her, but then she put it in herself and then i regretted it so it was kinda like rape..."
and i was just like
"are you.. ******* ..SERIOUS."
there's just a lot of injustice all around and the ones who get ****** over most are the innocents.
#30 to #24
-
kanekoa (12/11/2015) [-] I have a friend right now who's having his "Fiance" accuse him of rape. They've been in a relationship for over 4 years and he caught her cheating three times they also have two kids . The first two times she's threatened to kill herself if he left her so he didn't dump her.
Third time's the charm because now after he caught her cheating she's doing a lawsuit for domestic abuse, sexual abuse and many other things. Literally everyone who knows him knows that he wouldn't do that.
Also the most recent lie she made up was that he beat her the day after thanksgiving. That was literally impossible because I was with him the whole day and we went drinking at night then I crashed at his place and she was nowhere to be seen all day.
She's also used the newspaper to advertise her accusations on him so he can't even go out in public anymore and we can't go drinking together without him being recognized. Now he just sits at home with an empty look in his eyes and no motivation.
There better be a new law soon saying that when people make false accusations they should be doing the time in jail that the other person would be doing thanks to their lies. News paper companies should also be required to own the **** up to ruining someone's life by publishing any story they can get their hands on. Even if he wins the lawsuit the newspaper's already ****** him.
Yeah I'm pretty salty right now.
Third time's the charm because now after he caught her cheating she's doing a lawsuit for domestic abuse, sexual abuse and many other things. Literally everyone who knows him knows that he wouldn't do that.
Also the most recent lie she made up was that he beat her the day after thanksgiving. That was literally impossible because I was with him the whole day and we went drinking at night then I crashed at his place and she was nowhere to be seen all day.
She's also used the newspaper to advertise her accusations on him so he can't even go out in public anymore and we can't go drinking together without him being recognized. Now he just sits at home with an empty look in his eyes and no motivation.
There better be a new law soon saying that when people make false accusations they should be doing the time in jail that the other person would be doing thanks to their lies. News paper companies should also be required to own the **** up to ruining someone's life by publishing any story they can get their hands on. Even if he wins the lawsuit the newspaper's already ****** him.
Yeah I'm pretty salty right now.
#31 to #30
-
sesshii (12/11/2015) [-]
Have no idea what to say man. That **** is bad.
Would seriously want to see people who are caught falsely accusing others getting sentenced the same jail time of what the accused would have to serve.
Not only would it scare people from tossing accusations around, but it would also serve the real victims too as less resources are used to solve false cases.
But when the damage is done, as in your friend. What can we do? Have a friend who has "given up" on life and everything and it's not a pretty sight. It's like a personal death sentence.
Would seriously want to see people who are caught falsely accusing others getting sentenced the same jail time of what the accused would have to serve.
Not only would it scare people from tossing accusations around, but it would also serve the real victims too as less resources are used to solve false cases.
But when the damage is done, as in your friend. What can we do? Have a friend who has "given up" on life and everything and it's not a pretty sight. It's like a personal death sentence.
#50 to #30
-
cozer (12/11/2015) [-] Totally agree, if a woman falsely accuses a man of rape and is convicted of that there needs to be more than a slap on a wrist and small fine. Even after the men serve jail time the effects still linger, they have more trouble getting a job if at all, nobody trusts them anymore, it's ******* sad. To be honest one of the reasons I'm scared of a relationship is because of false rape charges, not because I'm a dangerous guy or anything, but because I just don't trust people in general after an incident with my ex-best friend. You may think you know someone, hell you can for 10+ years, but **** can change so fast and go down hill so quickly that it just feels like a nightmare sometimes.
#48 to #44
-
kanekoa (12/11/2015) [-] If only it were so easy.
There's many cases of people going to jail even without evidence of "rape" or physical abuse. In this case she either had someone hurt her or hurt herself in order for her story about the domestic abuse to seem believable but other than her word for it there's no evidence of rape.
There's many cases of people going to jail even without evidence of "rape" or physical abuse. In this case she either had someone hurt her or hurt herself in order for her story about the domestic abuse to seem believable but other than her word for it there's no evidence of rape.
#14
-
razerdude (12/11/2015) [-] when someone defend feminism and comes with the age old ''women make less money for the same work a man does''
#103 to #14
-
ericzxvc (12/11/2015) [-] While it might not be as prevalent as some indicate it does exist. Now before I get red thumbed into oblivion, consider this, both sides of this argument attack strawmen.
You are viewing everyone who supports woman's rights as some crazy radical who hates men, but in reality the vast majority are not like that outside the Internet.
Look at the top 500 companies and tell me how many CEOs are women, there is still an issue with women advancing up the corporate ladder in some situations. But acknowledging that isn't some horrible thing that needs drastic action, it will even out with time. I understand that this is an earnings gap, but that's part of the problem.
It's only in recent years that women have begun doing jobs that men do and the stigma has been reduced in industries where women would almost never work before. Obviously if it's just started to change it's going to be a gradual process, it won't be instantaneous.
So why do people try to vehemently deny something that is only natural since progression takes time? I don't agree with people demonizing every man in a high position as if he doesn't deserve it, but I also don't agree with people completely ignoring the fact that yes, it will take time for things to even out.
Because when you have two sides who refuse to see what the other person really means it simply causes strife and harms progress.
You are viewing everyone who supports woman's rights as some crazy radical who hates men, but in reality the vast majority are not like that outside the Internet.
Look at the top 500 companies and tell me how many CEOs are women, there is still an issue with women advancing up the corporate ladder in some situations. But acknowledging that isn't some horrible thing that needs drastic action, it will even out with time. I understand that this is an earnings gap, but that's part of the problem.
It's only in recent years that women have begun doing jobs that men do and the stigma has been reduced in industries where women would almost never work before. Obviously if it's just started to change it's going to be a gradual process, it won't be instantaneous.
So why do people try to vehemently deny something that is only natural since progression takes time? I don't agree with people demonizing every man in a high position as if he doesn't deserve it, but I also don't agree with people completely ignoring the fact that yes, it will take time for things to even out.
Because when you have two sides who refuse to see what the other person really means it simply causes strife and harms progress.
#145 to #103
-
cheatman ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-] You forgot one of the most important facts that actually has a negative impact on a woman getting promoted, and that's pregnancy and motherhood. While there are women who do devote their time solely to get to the top of the corporate ladder, most women want to settle down and have a family, so when that does happen, they have to take time off work, which affects their chances of progressing further up the chain.
It can be case of 'If you want this job, you have to come in on this date to get it' 'Oh sorry I can't, I'm off on maternity leave.''Then there's nothing we can do, you won't be able to get the job.'
And before you say that men can opt to take the maternity leave instead so that the mother can work, while that is true, it is most unlikely because the mother still needs to take time off to BIRTH the child, and can have complications from the birth that might make them ill, forcing them to take more time off. In the end, it just makes more sense for the woman to take the leave and that's what most families opt for and that's ends up affecting the gap.
It can be case of 'If you want this job, you have to come in on this date to get it' 'Oh sorry I can't, I'm off on maternity leave.''Then there's nothing we can do, you won't be able to get the job.'
And before you say that men can opt to take the maternity leave instead so that the mother can work, while that is true, it is most unlikely because the mother still needs to take time off to BIRTH the child, and can have complications from the birth that might make them ill, forcing them to take more time off. In the end, it just makes more sense for the woman to take the leave and that's what most families opt for and that's ends up affecting the gap.
#114 to #103
-
brobathehutt (12/11/2015) [-] Your argument is 100% correct - but you misread #14. He said "make less money for the same work" and they don't, they make the same amount because that's the law. If they don't make as much as the ceo its not the same work because they aren't the ceo. Eventually of course this argument will be dead because as you know the gap is closing fast but for right now it is important to make the distinction which one is being argued, wage gap or earnings gap, always double check before hand.
#3
-
sickreality (12/10/2015) [-] good stuff, but id slow down just a bit or else you might start a mens rights movement and we will be labeled the Menazis...
#22 to #3
-
ilovehitler (12/11/2015) [-] I for one see nothing wrong with being honored with the term 'Nazi'
#4 to #3
-
basaltface (12/10/2015) [-] Who the **** cares at this point anyways? You open your mouth and you are labeled anything from racist to sexist anyways. I get labeled misogynist and worthless piece of **** for having a passion for video games, you get called a ******* rapist for beeing a man in general and having the audacity to speak with a woman and calling ******** on claims she does, speaking out against certain religions and expressing well justified fears about that theme makes you a racist and opressor, to date a dark skinned chick is cultural appropriation and opression. Want child custody as a man? Good ******* luck with that. Got raped? Well you got a penis... means you cant. Welcome to planet earth ************* ... Also Menazi would be the most pleasant thing to be called these days...
#5 to #4
-
sickreality (12/10/2015) [-] i see this upsets you... and im sorry. didnt mean to cause issues, i just feel like me "being white american male" have privilege flowing out of my asshole so i have no complaints about **** right now. people are always going to fight and argue over stupid **** ... you know what i say? **** em... i dont get butt hurt very easily so just **** em...
#170 to #4
-
onerace (12/11/2015) [-] dude so much truth right now. even with the actual fems there's tons of ****** ass ******* who think there better than their sexual equal just cause they bleed 24/7 for one week. i'd be fine with being equal just buy me dinner before you try to **** me or at least some cigs. i hate those who think they deserve more than what's right.
#47
-
anon (12/11/2015) [-] Oh yeah it sucks I got to stay home and play videogames intead of go to school. they got me good!
#73
-
ottofan (12/11/2015) [-] Maybe not popular here, but I am a feminist.
The definition of word "Feminism"
"the ​belief that women should be ​allowed the same ​rights, ​power, and ​opportunities as men and be ​treated in the same way, or the set of ​activities ​intended to ​achieve this ​state"
Definition of feminism from the Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge University Press
The definition of word "Feminism"
"the ​belief that women should be ​allowed the same ​rights, ​power, and ​opportunities as men and be ​treated in the same way, or the set of ​activities ​intended to ​achieve this ​state"
Definition of feminism from the Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge University Press
#78 to #73
-
hideyowives (12/11/2015) [-] too bad definitions arnt really a real thing
just another made up idea humans came up with to make sense of things
if someone pulls a gun on you, the definition of a bullet wont stop it from shooting you
just another made up idea humans came up with to make sense of things
if someone pulls a gun on you, the definition of a bullet wont stop it from shooting you
#84 to #78
-
hideyowives (12/11/2015) [-] also lets be real
we are all america during world war 2
those guys are getting ****** up over there "well at least it isnt us"
like, everyone does evil things, everyone looks out for their own selfish wants first
why give a **** about social rights, if everyone just stopped pretending a individual represents more than just the individual, we wouldnt need laws that let you pull over people for "probable cause" for illegal immigration "well officer what made you think he could be a illigal" and the officer responds with "well he looked the part"
but why focus on social rights, if we cant save a single individual, what is the point of saving the whole? i mean id get it, but at least in america, we are a country who will stay silent about isis when they are carving up africa and other nations, not a single report, but the second we are in some way threatened, you see nothing else
not trying to be a edgy cunt
but why get upset instead of doing the opposite
the world is **** , we all die, every single one of us in some way will die alone and in agony and fear, every single action we take kills lifeforms and things that could grow, ever step you take causes destruction on a catastrophic scale that because of our size we cant comprehend
why not just take out a cigar, take a puff sit in a comfy chair and relax, enjoy our time before we become dirt once again
truth be told its why fundamental satanism (the cool kind where you are nice to people, not the cutting people open , screaming, or you know the idiotic cult system that has nothing to do with satanism at all. besides in name ) kinda of makes me smile, i dont believe or anything but knowing a religion says "dont be a dick, live your life happily, if someone is a dick to you, end their happy life and continue with your own" just seems like everyone would be cool, like the whole thing of towns with no law and tons of guns, no one will want to be a dick, if when they decided to be a dick, everyone who was nice a second ago decided "lets **** up this dick"
think the world would be better, if we accepted the violence death and evil, but used those as wards, taught our kids "you will die, enjoy your time until you do" and maybe those kids wouldnt be special snowflakes wanting the world to be handed to them, if we took the people who couldnt survive from stupidity or they didnt deserve the lives they had, we just take them into the woods and let them get eaten by wolves, or **** , no joke, if by some miracle this world existed, id be willing to gut any who had to be gutted, id do that to myself if it meant making the world a bit better
because the strong didnt **** the world up this bad, it was the weak, the victims who wanted to grow up to be the oppressers, its rape victims who dont consider walking down the ghetto in skimpy clothing in pitch black in a drug filled area, to be a ******* open ******* letter inviting anyone who isnt as nice as you to victimize you, then after the rape say there was nothing the could have done,
people need to look after themselves, nothing else nothing more, when all pretense and posturing and politics are dropped, what more could one attempt than to save one other person?, at a time?, anything else is unintelligent people pretending
man i get lost in these rants, really i do them more to get my own jumbled thoughts out on somewhere than any other point, just felt like i had to explain that diarrhea of the mouth...fingers.....text
we are all america during world war 2
those guys are getting ****** up over there "well at least it isnt us"
like, everyone does evil things, everyone looks out for their own selfish wants first
why give a **** about social rights, if everyone just stopped pretending a individual represents more than just the individual, we wouldnt need laws that let you pull over people for "probable cause" for illegal immigration "well officer what made you think he could be a illigal" and the officer responds with "well he looked the part"
but why focus on social rights, if we cant save a single individual, what is the point of saving the whole? i mean id get it, but at least in america, we are a country who will stay silent about isis when they are carving up africa and other nations, not a single report, but the second we are in some way threatened, you see nothing else
not trying to be a edgy cunt
but why get upset instead of doing the opposite
the world is **** , we all die, every single one of us in some way will die alone and in agony and fear, every single action we take kills lifeforms and things that could grow, ever step you take causes destruction on a catastrophic scale that because of our size we cant comprehend
why not just take out a cigar, take a puff sit in a comfy chair and relax, enjoy our time before we become dirt once again
truth be told its why fundamental satanism (the cool kind where you are nice to people, not the cutting people open , screaming, or you know the idiotic cult system that has nothing to do with satanism at all. besides in name ) kinda of makes me smile, i dont believe or anything but knowing a religion says "dont be a dick, live your life happily, if someone is a dick to you, end their happy life and continue with your own" just seems like everyone would be cool, like the whole thing of towns with no law and tons of guns, no one will want to be a dick, if when they decided to be a dick, everyone who was nice a second ago decided "lets **** up this dick"
think the world would be better, if we accepted the violence death and evil, but used those as wards, taught our kids "you will die, enjoy your time until you do" and maybe those kids wouldnt be special snowflakes wanting the world to be handed to them, if we took the people who couldnt survive from stupidity or they didnt deserve the lives they had, we just take them into the woods and let them get eaten by wolves, or **** , no joke, if by some miracle this world existed, id be willing to gut any who had to be gutted, id do that to myself if it meant making the world a bit better
because the strong didnt **** the world up this bad, it was the weak, the victims who wanted to grow up to be the oppressers, its rape victims who dont consider walking down the ghetto in skimpy clothing in pitch black in a drug filled area, to be a ******* open ******* letter inviting anyone who isnt as nice as you to victimize you, then after the rape say there was nothing the could have done,
people need to look after themselves, nothing else nothing more, when all pretense and posturing and politics are dropped, what more could one attempt than to save one other person?, at a time?, anything else is unintelligent people pretending
man i get lost in these rants, really i do them more to get my own jumbled thoughts out on somewhere than any other point, just felt like i had to explain that diarrhea of the mouth...fingers.....text
#85 to #84
-
hideyowives (12/11/2015) [-] man i love to see myself speak, and ugh my choice of sexy puppet
#35
-
infinitereaper (12/11/2015) [-] For the last ******* time that's literally NOT what a pedophile is,
******* literally, the definition of pedophilia is being sexually attracted to prepubescent humans. Before puberty.
Being sexually attracted to anything that has hit puberty (usually 13 and above) is literally not pedophilia, and by biological standards is literally completely ******* normal because that's when hormones make the body develop and pheromones start getting released and all that ******* **** . and so it was literally for millions of years of human evolution.
liking pubescent teens =/= pedophile
If you don't believe me open up a ******* dicktionary.
******* literally, the definition of pedophilia is being sexually attracted to prepubescent humans. Before puberty.
Being sexually attracted to anything that has hit puberty (usually 13 and above) is literally not pedophilia, and by biological standards is literally completely ******* normal because that's when hormones make the body develop and pheromones start getting released and all that ******* **** . and so it was literally for millions of years of human evolution.
liking pubescent teens =/= pedophile
If you don't believe me open up a ******* dicktionary.
#106
-
kuntz ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-] Feminism - "the ​belief that women should be ​allowed the same ​rights, ​power, and ​opportunities as men and be ​treated in the same way, or the set of ​activities ​intended to ​achieve this ​state"
If a man comes out saying his been raped, he shouldn't be mocked or laughed at. His confession should be treated as intensely as ours.
If i commit the same crime as John, i should serve the same jail time.
i shouldn't be blamed for what i was wearing if i was attacked on the street, just like men aren't " asking for it" when they go out.
This whole movement was to make **** equal and its just a huge disaster now, women are giving us Feminist a bad name, and some men are fighting hard asf against. Society sucks
If a man comes out saying his been raped, he shouldn't be mocked or laughed at. His confession should be treated as intensely as ours.
If i commit the same crime as John, i should serve the same jail time.
i shouldn't be blamed for what i was wearing if i was attacked on the street, just like men aren't " asking for it" when they go out.
This whole movement was to make **** equal and its just a huge disaster now, women are giving us Feminist a bad name, and some men are fighting hard asf against. Society sucks
#117 to #106
-
anon (12/11/2015) [-]
agreed, and I don't think anyone blames a victim for the rape, but i'll feel less bad about a person who decides to jump into a tigers enclosure then the guy who stays behind the safety line if one of them gets mauled. all people mean when they point out what someone wears when they're raped is that we live in a dangerous world, yes we want to change this fact just as much as everyone else but at the end of the day it's like owning a gun, i'd rather be on the safe side and never have to worry than put myself into a bad situation and not have the ability to protect myself.
#104
-
thehistorylover (12/11/2015) [-] **thehistorylover used "*roll picture*"**
**thehistorylover rolled image**I have nothing against old school feminism, really, because it's completely reasonable. Let women vote. Let women have good paying jobs. Let women be drafted into war just like men. I got no problem with that. With enough training, women can kick some just as much ass a men. This new mutation of feminism, though, makes my lip curl in disgust.
**thehistorylover rolled image**I have nothing against old school feminism, really, because it's completely reasonable. Let women vote. Let women have good paying jobs. Let women be drafted into war just like men. I got no problem with that. With enough training, women can kick some just as much ass a men. This new mutation of feminism, though, makes my lip curl in disgust.
#95
-
jaylenthepaintstic (12/11/2015) [-] That first guy had alot of time on his hands to research and type down that whole comment. He even thought of counter arguments and countered them befor she could even post them.
#58
-
skebaba (12/11/2015) [-]
Except the "ladies first" thing was invented during the age of kings. Let the woman go first, then if an assassin, who thinks it's the king, assassinates her, the king can run away and escape. If the assassin doesn't kill her, she will most likely scream, enabling the king to escape from the assassin. It's a pretty practical concept IMO.
#40
-
gigaidan (12/11/2015) [-] Well. Consider the following. The whole notion of "protect women" and "children and ladies first" came from a time where the man was actually the patriarch of the house. He was the provider, and his wife and children were under his care. A man that did not care for women and children was seen as an irresponsible selfish ass, not too different from a woman who did not care for children. It comes from the same side that thinks that: men should be manly (whatever the hell that means), women should be feminine (ditto), your goal in life should be get a job and have a family... in short, pretty old fashioned notions.
It is a very dated social construct, yes. But is one of the things that are slowly changing with time. Let's be patient, guys. Centuries of social conduct are not going to change in a few years...
It is a very dated social construct, yes. But is one of the things that are slowly changing with time. Let's be patient, guys. Centuries of social conduct are not going to change in a few years...
#54 to #6
-
itskennyandjosh ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-] Women always deny **** and wanna hear what they wanna hear, which is why they'll never be better than men, they only get treated better than men when really men will always be better
#53
-
anon (12/11/2015) [-]
All of you that hate feminists hate, and this is important, SJWs that you have seen making comments on the internet. As a feminist, I cannot condone most of the comments/actions that they take under the guise of the feminist movement. Most of them are actually probably closer to misandrists. 'Feminists' that do not support men are not true feminists. A true feminist, in my opinion, has evolved from just purely wanting equal rights between quite men and woman to someone who wants political, social and economic equality for all including race, and gender. The first wave of feminism was introduced because at the time women were not getting paid equally to men within the same field of work and they could not vote to change jurisdiction that would prevent inequality. Their values were consistent with the time and nowadays I think true feminism centres on values that reflect our current society ie issues with transgender equality, equality between races, equality across other countries. There are small issues and there are large issues that feminists seek to improve. Small ones that men may consider futile and pointless but it still counts. For example; the classic if a man sleeps with multiple people he's considered 'cool' or whatever, and if a woman sleeps with multiple people she is considered a 'whore.' Now you may not think this is a big one/related to men but if you analyse it thoroughly there are issues with this trope to both women and men.
1. This reinforces the idea that women are sexually chastised. What are the implications of this? This fear of being a 'whore' teaches us to fear being sexual, maybe even come to despise it. We cannot have sexual experiences that will teach us. Why would men want to restrict a woman's sexual desires when in the end they are the ones that will end up having sex with someone?
2. What about the men that are content with small numbers of sexual partners. You cannot lie that if a woman says she's only ever been with one man/her husband she is celebrated, whereas if a man says he's only ever been with one woman he is most likely looked down upon or made fun of. (ie alpha male type **** /hegemonic masculinity) This is not something that I would want a man to experience either.
(Personally I don't think either should matter, **** whoever/whatever/whomever/how many you want people)
You don't realise it but a lot of issues that feminists want to rectify, are issues that, affect men as well. Issues that may seem small are actually part of bigger concepts. I'm writing this huge essay because some people's knowledge on feminism has been obscured by radical people on the internet and therefore some people have come to hate 'feminism.' And that hurts me because pretty much everyone I know, both men and women, are affected by issues of inequality. It doesn't have to be a large impact but there are still consequences.
1. This reinforces the idea that women are sexually chastised. What are the implications of this? This fear of being a 'whore' teaches us to fear being sexual, maybe even come to despise it. We cannot have sexual experiences that will teach us. Why would men want to restrict a woman's sexual desires when in the end they are the ones that will end up having sex with someone?
2. What about the men that are content with small numbers of sexual partners. You cannot lie that if a woman says she's only ever been with one man/her husband she is celebrated, whereas if a man says he's only ever been with one woman he is most likely looked down upon or made fun of. (ie alpha male type **** /hegemonic masculinity) This is not something that I would want a man to experience either.
(Personally I don't think either should matter, **** whoever/whatever/whomever/how many you want people)
You don't realise it but a lot of issues that feminists want to rectify, are issues that, affect men as well. Issues that may seem small are actually part of bigger concepts. I'm writing this huge essay because some people's knowledge on feminism has been obscured by radical people on the internet and therefore some people have come to hate 'feminism.' And that hurts me because pretty much everyone I know, both men and women, are affected by issues of inequality. It doesn't have to be a large impact but there are still consequences.
#57 to #53
-
kanekoa (12/11/2015) [-] When it comes to the man who sleeps with many woman or the woman who sleeps with many men most people that i know at least look at it like this.
A key that can open many locks is considered a very good key. Men
Now on the other hand
A lock that will open for many keys is a pretty ****** lock. Women
This kind of thinking has been going on for ages and it's not simply going to stop just because people bring it up. Not to mention now there's STD's. The more people you sleep with the higher the chance that you may have gotten an STD somewhere in the mix increases.
Personally I could care less. If you're a nice person overall, don't cheat on your significant other, and aren't spending as much of your spouses money as you can before you divorce them and move to another then you're good in my book. You could sleep with 30 men in one month and i wouldn't care. I probably wouldn't sleep with you because of sexual health reasons but you get the picture.
A key that can open many locks is considered a very good key. Men
Now on the other hand
A lock that will open for many keys is a pretty ****** lock. Women
This kind of thinking has been going on for ages and it's not simply going to stop just because people bring it up. Not to mention now there's STD's. The more people you sleep with the higher the chance that you may have gotten an STD somewhere in the mix increases.
Personally I could care less. If you're a nice person overall, don't cheat on your significant other, and aren't spending as much of your spouses money as you can before you divorce them and move to another then you're good in my book. You could sleep with 30 men in one month and i wouldn't care. I probably wouldn't sleep with you because of sexual health reasons but you get the picture.
#123 to #57
-
metalnettle (12/11/2015) [-] I appreciate you saying that it doesn't matter to you either way, but I just have to say that I absolutely hate that analogy. Objects aren't people. Women aren't locks. Having sex doesn't make you a ****** woman. it's things like this that re-enforce female sexual oppression. Statistically women enjoy and want sex just as much as men, except women are chastised for it and men are praised.
Again this isn't really aimed at you but more that saying/concept.
Again this isn't really aimed at you but more that saying/concept.
