Bill Nye the science buddy. . Man: BILL? whimpering ) EVERYTHING.
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - teranin ONLINE (08/18/2014) [-]
User avatar #8 to #2 - profkitty (08/19/2014) [-]
Anyone know the source on the, I believe WW2, guy cocking the rifle then shooting a german clip? Is it a movie?
User avatar #10 to #2 - frogie (08/19/2014) [-]
If anyone has a youtube link to this video I would be forever grateful.
User avatar #11 to #10 - kanadetenshi (08/19/2014) [-]
Bill Nye the Quickscoping guy Give me that glorious gratefulness.
User avatar #12 to #11 - frogie (08/19/2014) [-]
User avatar #5 to #2 - leadstriker (08/19/2014) [-]
do you know where i can find the original video of bull nye without the editing and stuff?
User avatar #36 to #5 - freakstorm (08/19/2014) [-]
>Bull Nye the Science Cow
User avatar #41 to #36 - leadstriker (08/19/2014) [-]
i dont know what i expected when i googled that
#4 to #2 - breadposter (08/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#1 - firuswolf (08/18/2014) [-]
Other man's fw
#3 - fezzo (08/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#9 - spceinvdr (08/19/2014) [-]
I cackled loudly
#14 - auryn (08/19/2014) [-]
Bitch, do you even E=Mc²?

I don't think he fully understand the implications of mass–energy equivalence.

It makes little sense to say "Everything is matter, except energy" when matter is just a different state of energy.
#16 to #14 - huzibizi has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #17 to #14 - anonymoose (08/19/2014) [-]
Matter is a form of energy. That doesn't mean energy is matter, some is, but as a whole it isn't.
#31 to #14 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
was looking in the comments for this    
Thanks for not disappointing my expectations, random user
was looking in the comments for this

Thanks for not disappointing my expectations, random user
User avatar #35 to #14 - gamagoriira (08/19/2014) [-]
Ice is a form of water, but solids are still not liquids. Being made of the same base, doesn't make them the same.
#65 to #35 - auryn (08/19/2014) [-]
They are not the same, but they are one.

Although technically not wrong, to say "Everything is matter, except energy" is a bit backwards reasoning.
#25 - thebroble (08/19/2014) [-]
Laughed the first time   
Laughed the Second   
and i laughed the 30th
Laughed the first time
Laughed the Second
and i laughed the 30th
User avatar #29 - crispybomb (08/19/2014) [-]
This was the highlight of the school day until they stopped playing this and started playing videos by some dude with a fro and a porno stache.I think he may have been a pedo considering how much he looked at the children in the videos.
#51 - deckbox (08/19/2014) [-]
Sir Isaac Newton vs Bill Nye. Epic Rap Battles of History Season 3. related
#60 to #51 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]

#21 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image** Bill Nye just became a smug **** .
User avatar #6 - satanisrealgod (08/19/2014) [-]
Bill nye never made any sense
User avatar #13 to #6 - adunsaveme (08/19/2014) [-]
Actually he probably made quite a few of them, seems like a high-paying job
#15 to #13 - glayn (08/19/2014) [-]
I see what you where going for there, have a thumb.
User avatar #7 to #6 - Lintutu (08/19/2014) [-]
that's because you're too stupid to understand science on a show that was meant for kids
#32 to #7 - PedoNazi (08/19/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #64 to #7 - satanisrealgod (08/19/2014) [-]
showed me
#57 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
and after the 400th repost of this same thing making front page......
#56 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
It was funny the first 100 times that it was posted here..
User avatar #59 to #56 - cumbersome (08/19/2014) [-]
Ive been here almost every day for like 5 years, and this is the first time ive seen it. **** off
#48 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
E^2 = p^2c^2 + m0^2c^4, bit­ch
User avatar #46 - kevinipples (08/19/2014) [-]
he's not your buddy, guy
#42 - funkmasterjunk (08/19/2014) [-]
TFW you see a repost and it still makes you laugh
TFW you see a repost and it still makes you laugh
User avatar #40 - willindor (08/19/2014) [-]
Anyone having the source?
User avatar #43 to #40 - holycrapimacupcake (08/19/2014) [-]
Bill Nye the Science Guy...BILL BILL BILL BILL!
User avatar #47 to #43 - willindor (08/19/2014) [-]
Yes but does anyone have the actual clip?
User avatar #39 - iliketomop (08/19/2014) [-]
cheeky ************
#30 - BloodyTurds (08/19/2014) [-]
what about Ideas? memes? Concepts? emotions? math? software? Time, gravity ect? All of those are things, yet they are neither energy, nor matter..
User avatar #34 to #30 - mathmanchris (08/19/2014) [-]
All of them have a physical representation (manifestation) in your brain and hence are matter. I know there is a dispute between philosophers whether ideas like mathematics can exist without humans 'doing it' or not. In the end, Nye is right (of course), from a strictly physical point of view everything can be devided into either matter or energy and as Einstein figured out, both can be converted.
#38 to #34 - BloodyTurds (08/19/2014) [-]
just because something requires matter, to manifest does mean it is matter itself.
I would consider it reasonable to say pi has always been 3.14...( in a base 10 system of course), whether or not a sentient being discovered it to be so...

>from a strictly physical point of view
I would agree that everything physical is either matter, or energy....
But I wouldn't classify anything I said as physical..

and the word everything (as implied by the post) is all encompassing (corporeal, ethereal, and abstract)

Sound, and heat both require matter to exist. does this make them matter? no they are still considered energy.

The same should then be said about Ideas...
User avatar #45 to #38 - bobsagget (08/19/2014) [-]
and since we already stated energy is not made up of matter, it is what makes up matter, i don't see your point
#50 to #45 - BloodyTurds (08/19/2014) [-]
my point is the argument made for abstracts, if applied to the aforementioned energy items, would re-classify them as matter..

>>your thoughts are your brains interpretation of the chemicals being digested as they run across the axons in your brain, your thoughts and ideas are actually physical things made of matter.

Mind if we stick to the software analogy? (I feel there is a greater understanding of this field)

A program is saved on a hard disk, stored as 1's and 0's
If that program is compressed into a zip folder, it no-longer has the same binary signature.(some 0's become 1's, and some 1's 0's, and some are no-longer part of the whole) Yet it is still the same program correct?

What if it were deleted completely from the system. then by chance another programmer, coded line for line, a program perfectly matching the binary of the first.
Is it still the same program?

and as stated above, isnt pi always pi, regardless of whether we observe it to be so?
Yes a tree that falls in the forest makes a sound; even if no-one is around to hear it... the molecules still resonate... (
User avatar #52 to #50 - bobsagget (08/19/2014) [-]
pi is only what it is because we made the algorithm that designated those numbers to it. if we never created numbers or decimals then no, pi wouldn't be 3.14159265.... it would just be another part of a circle that we didn't bother thinking about in any way other than round.
#58 to #52 - BloodyTurds (08/19/2014) [-]
so the fact that we discovered it, applies retroactively?

Pi was measured, long before an algorithm was created in attempt to solve it.

3 is considered the same number, whether it is stored on paper, on a computer, or not at all
User avatar #66 to #58 - bobsagget (08/20/2014) [-]
right, but if we had never invented a numbering system, 3 would not exist. sure there would still be 3 of a thing in an area or what have you, but there would be no way to represent that, therefore, it would be meaningless, or mean nothing. you can say an idea exists without being made of matter, but an idea can only exist in the physical mind of someone who is currently thinking about it. therefore even an idea is matter. if no one in the world ever thought about flying, the idea of flight wouldn't exist, capiche?
#67 to #66 - BloodyTurds (08/20/2014) [-]
but the same idea can consist both on paper (matter) or encoded into a light beam soaring through space...
I'm still fairly certain the original quote was referring to the tangible...
And would have accepted a definition of things, excluding abstracts

Also somewhat un-related but where does anti-matter fit in? as energy?
User avatar #68 to #67 - bobsagget (08/20/2014) [-]
anti-matter is matter, the name is a misnomer as it implies it is the opposite, instead of a different flavor of energy. it's like chocolate ice cream vs vanilla icecream, both are still made of milk. as you mentioned about the book, the words still exist as ink on paper, or as a light beam, light is energy, waves are energy. matter is energy.
#70 to #68 - BloodyTurds (08/20/2014) [-]
I recant that first statement, You said that matter is energy, not that energy is matter..
which logical to me
#71 to #70 - BloodyTurds (08/20/2014) [-]
and by first I mean the statement just below this. (because i accidentally replied to you, rather than myself
#69 to #68 - BloodyTurds (08/20/2014) [-]
If energy were matter, why does the quote give exception to it...

I simply believe that concepts transcend time/space. and exist whether or not it is observed.. Can it affect the universe before its observed? No; and because of this
I see no way of proving, or disproving its existence. In a similar fashion that the theory of the existence of a higher plane or god can't be disproven.

As for anti-matter I figured that was the case, just wasn't sure
User avatar #44 to #30 - bobsagget (08/19/2014) [-]
your thoughts are your brains interpretation of the chemicals being digested as they run across the axons in your brain, your thoughts and ideas are actually physcial things made of matter.
User avatar #49 to #30 - darksideofthebeast (08/19/2014) [-]
That is energy though. All of those things are a form of energy.
At least, that's how I would see it.
#53 to #49 - BloodyTurds (08/19/2014) [-]
Unless you are of the belief that math, was created rather than discovered, i fail to see how it is energy at all

Has the circumference of a circle not always been 3.14 times its radius?
It would be safe to assume that this was the case 8 billion years ago as-well?
#55 to #30 - lotengo (08/19/2014) [-]
I dont say this very often, but you are acting very autistic
#61 to #55 - BloodyTurds (08/19/2014) [-]
I guess its just one of those days... but im having fun so eh (this isnt the only 'pointless' conversation i'm having right now, which is mostly why responses are taking so long)
#23 - anon (08/19/2014) [-]
The amount of times i've seen this on the front page is absolutely remarkable.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)