Upload
Login or register
x

Anon on Disney

will never go back to animation
will never go back to the principles outlined by the old men back in their heyday
s style will never return to the classic Mickey and Donald cartoons
tthere will never be a good Disney cartoon ever again
How does this company stay so rich?
304
bbuy Star Wars
mmake a hundred dollars in record time
gee anon I dunno
...
+1372
Views: 37610
Favorited: 45
Submitted: 01/12/2016
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to chokinandtokin Subscribe to 4chan

Comments(98):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 98 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
93 comments displayed.
Reply
+6
User avatar #94 to #2 - jamesten ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
someone please make this:
>gorilla hitler
>saying he's going to kill 6 gorillion jews
Reply
+50
User avatar #67 to #2 - xdiabolicx ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
I like to think you have been waiting months, no, years to use that.
Reply
+2
User avatar #92 to #67 - stupro ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
Or he just googled it?
Reply
0
User avatar #97 to #92 - xdiabolicx ONLINE (21 hours ago) [-]
Which is why I said "I like to think..".
Reply
0
#98 to #97 - stupro ONLINE (21 hours ago) [-]
I also like to think.
Reply
+66
User avatar #12 to #2 - pyrointheface (01/12/2016) [-]
last time i checked thats how much the powerball was worth
Reply
+11
User avatar #13 to #12 - lathyrusvii (01/12/2016) [-]
ikr
Reply
+66
User avatar #30 - angelious ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
disney has released....what 5 or so instant classic movies in the past 5 years???

they literally have something for everybody from age groups of 1 year old to 100 year olds. they have merchandise from movies to comic books to video games. they make money just by existing.


disney is an empire that is never going to fall.
Reply
+1
#58 to #30 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
That makes me wonder what it would be like if Disney ever did fall... That would be weird.
Reply
+8
User avatar #59 to #58 - angelious ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
its in their contracts that they have signed with the likes of pixar that the brand that is "disney" will never fall.


and for disney to actually fall from grace would need something revolutionizing to happen...they have their fingers in too many soups to be disposed off easily.
Reply
+1
#80 to #30 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
Pixar =/= Disney
Reply
+2
User avatar #81 to #80 - angelious ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
collaboration. there is a reason why most disney films say " disney pixar presents"

and as i mentioned below. the deal disney made with pixar specially had a line in it that states (approximately) that "disney as a brand would never vanish from movie industry"
Reply
+3
#63 to #30 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
Didn't people say something like that for the Roman Empire and Soviet Union?
Reply
+3
User avatar #64 to #63 - angelious ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
both of those are not even nearly as big and aloof as disney is. not to mention the thought that goverments of that time could survive forever is a fairytale. specially when it comes down to soviet russia.
Reply
+8
#66 to #64 - ogthegreat (01/12/2016) [-]
Holy **** , mfw Disney is bigger than Sovient Union was. lol Keving looks like he stopped eating a sandwich to gasp.
Reply
+3
#78 to #66 - vegasstoner (01/12/2016) [-]
in coorporate disney, animated movies buy YOU.
Reply
+2
#79 to #78 - ogthegreat (01/12/2016) [-]
When will the madness end?
Reply
+170
#6 - tacobadger ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Reply
-13
User avatar #34 to #6 - dbqpdb ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
I loved that show but it went to **** toward the end of season 2 imo
Reply
+9
User avatar #74 to #34 - neostar ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Season 2 isn't over, idiot.
Reply
+11
User avatar #7 to #6 - blackmorecrest (01/12/2016) [-]
Crying shame the series is ending next month.
Reply
+47
User avatar #8 to #7 - tacobadger ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
But ending with dignity with a satisfying planned ending and a movie, instead of becoming Dog with a Blog level syndication garbage. It was a story with a beginning and and end, so im happy.
Reply
+5
User avatar #9 to #8 - blackmorecrest (01/12/2016) [-]
Very true, I know I'm going to go HAM watching it when it airs (online Cable is expensive and I am poor)
Reply
+5
#53 to #9 - sherlockbatman ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
**sherlockbatman used "*roll picture*"**
**sherlockbatman rolled image**
>paying to watch cartoons online instead of just going to watchcartoononline
do you plan to buy HBO too?
Reply
+2
User avatar #10 to #9 - tacobadger ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Are you caught up? Its crawling to the end and idk why, Alex finished it a while ago and Disney is just dragging it out for no reason
Reply
+1
#17 to #10 - bann (01/12/2016) [-]
I think to milk their money's worth. I felt that the pace of this last season was rushed, despite that the episodes are takin forever to air. I mean I get WHY they're rushed, I just wish they could have had like 2 more episodes to flesh things out.
Reply
+1
User avatar #11 to #10 - blackmorecrest (01/12/2016) [-]
Been caught up since the last episode aired, Thank **** for Kisscartoons! when I say the release date I was PISSED, simply because Disney is cockteasing the fans HARD, still it'll be worth it in the end.
Reply
0
#91 to #10 - idrawfolks ONLINE (23 hours ago) [-]
they have to sell merchandise, no joke
Reply
+2
#51 to #9 - sherlockbatman ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
**sherlockbatman used "*roll picture*"**
**sherlockbatman rolled image**
wtf is HAM?
Reply
+4
User avatar #52 to #51 - tacobadger ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
"Hard as a ************ " He means hes going to be very excited, or watch all of the episodes consecutively
Reply
+8
#16 to #6 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
I hope to god we get another show this good, but chances are slim.
Reply
+17
#22 to #16 - theblackhorntail (01/12/2016) [-]
There's still Rick and Morty. I hope Alex Hirsch and Justin Roiland do a collaboration someday.
Reply
+5
User avatar #41 to #22 - abject (01/12/2016) [-]
Gravity Falls / Rick and Morty - When Portals Collide
Reply
+8
User avatar #40 to #6 - guardianatreyu ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Long ass wait times just for one episode though.
Reply
+5
User avatar #47 to #40 - tacobadger ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Das Maus is a cruel overlord
Reply
+32
#38 to #1 - ugoboom ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Reply
+40
#20 - willindor ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
The 40's had the best cartoons ever
Reply
+3
#26 to #20 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
Both Disney and WB.
Reply
+22
#27 to #26 - willindor ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
You are right indeed
Reply
0
User avatar #56 to #27 - feelythefeel (01/12/2016) [-]
Bavaria or the Rhine?
Reply
+10
#21 to #20 - dragontamers ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
I knew what it was going to be before I hit play.
Reply
+44
#15 - dragontamers ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
GIF
I've always preferred the Loony Tunes over Disney cartoons.
Reply
0
#62 to #15 - gleb (01/12/2016) [-]
Why does everything have to be better or worse?
Reply
+1
#85 to #62 - dragontamers ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
And when exactly did I say Disney cartoons were bad?
Reply
0
#95 to #62 - anon (23 hours ago) [-]
because some things are better then others. That doesn't make either bad.
Reply
+5
User avatar #35 to #15 - mcmanybucks (01/12/2016) [-]
WB had a sense of humor.
Reply
-5
#31 - mcderper (01/12/2016) [-]
Disney Channel is best channel
Reply
0
User avatar #76 to #31 - sketchysketchist ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
I'm sorry, but Disney Channel Original movies are all ***** .
They waste too much time trying to make the next big thing since High School Musical, so they end up with material that can make a disturbing Cringe Comp.

They should just look for people interested in making kids films, and listen to pitches for new original ideas rather than updating old stories with twists that meet this generations fetishes for Jailbait Mouseketeers.
Reply
0
User avatar #88 to #31 - thundergyra ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Jesus ******* Christ. Continuing the ****** tradition of making stories about the ****** kids of previously existing characters, they made it even worse by adding ****** colored haircuts and douchebag older male character as the obvious love interest of the one with the ****** purple hair. It spits in the face of the old movies and I probably don't need any more information to know this is going to be complete garbage that will rehash the thousand-times-rehashed Generic Disney Live Action Show™ wherein a group of highschoolers have a ****** secret to hide, all to a ****** laughtrack. Unless it's a movie, then it'll be accompanied by ****** "deep" emotional background music. The entire company can bomb and die. It disrespects the old films, doesn't bring anything to the table, and generally I think everyone's lives would be better off if they didn't watch it. This is modern television. Canned laughter or paid audiences for **** jokes, awful or nonexistent action sequences typically replaced by garbage romantic subplots, and in general cliches so old they need a ******* LifeAlert.
Reply
+2
User avatar #55 to #31 - feelythefeel (01/12/2016) [-]
God dammit.
Reply
+20
User avatar #46 to #31 - twatter (01/12/2016) [-]
I am... disgusted.
Reply
+15
#43 - ciacheczko (01/12/2016) [-]
The last time I thought decent 2D animations are not going to be made at all, Princess and the Frog came out, so I say we just never say never and hope for the best.
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #43 - qnamanmanga (23 hours ago) [-]
Disney is pepsi. Now We will have only 3d. But- I think this new zootopia look brilliant. I was against 3d. but since "Tanglet" I have changed my mind. They do great job. Because these characters are Good equivalent of cartoon ones.
Reply
0
User avatar #96 to #90 - bemmo (22 hours ago) [-]
That's a real shame about their 2D department, but Disney as a whole is about as far from Pepsi as a human construct is able to get without being shot into space to orbit the sun.
Reply
+5
User avatar #60 to #43 - qnamanmanga (01/12/2016) [-]
But now almost all 2d animators were fired. Even more. Disney also planned replacing all 3d animators with cheaper foreigners
Reply
+8
#61 to #60 - ciacheczko (01/12/2016) [-]
I never asked for this.
Reply
+14
User avatar #14 - redplasticcup (01/12/2016) [-]
Did anyone even find Mickey mouse funny? I didn't, much preferred Bugs Bunny.
Reply
0
User avatar #29 to #14 - angelious ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
read floyd gottfredson mickey mouse comic books. or watch the earlier cartoons.
Reply
0
User avatar #48 to #29 - redplasticcup (01/12/2016) [-]
Even old Mickey Mouse I didn't find funny, most disney cartoons I didn't find funny apart from Pop-eye.
Reply
0
User avatar #49 to #48 - angelious ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
gottfredson is comic book line tho. its don rosa level entertainment.
Reply
+2
#18 to #14 - bann (01/12/2016) [-]
same, but only because he was always on cartoon network and I saw him more.
Reply
+2
User avatar #19 to #14 - Rei ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
1 year olds like Mickey Mouse
Reply
+3
User avatar #39 to #14 - sequel ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Disney has been more on the cute and charming side while Looney Toons are the ones that make me laugh.

And I did prefer comedy over cuteness.
Reply
+28
#33 - bemmo (01/12/2016) [-]
Gee, I wonder indeed.
Reply
+7
#68 to #33 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
> Buy the market for 10-30 years old guy
> Implying my college friends and I were not stocked to watch every Disney animated movie.
Reply
+9
#44 - dannyzapdos ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
A hundred Gorillion dollars huh...
Reply
+1
#25 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
The original comment is right, but it has nothing to do with money. To many media companies make tons of money selling crap. When they use to put a lot of effort into making a quality product. Instead of doing the whole animation with the computer, I want to see more computer aided animation. Where a lot of it is hand drawn, but the computes are used to make the process easier.

On another note. I have not yet seen Star War yet, but I'm going to guess they put in the time and effort to do a quality Job. You don't screw with Star Wars.
Reply
0
#36 to #25 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
It's...well, it's good, but it's not great. It's certainly better than the prequels at the very least but let me put it this way: if you've seen Episode 4, you've seen Episode 7. To be fair, JJ Abrams knew that he couldn't afford to **** up, lest everyone call him Jar Jar Abrams for the rest of his life if he failed, so he decided to play it safe and basically rehashed Episode 4.
Reply
+2
User avatar #42 to #36 - guitarassassin ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Funny thing is that's exactly why a lot of people call him Jar Jar Abrams now.
Reply
+1
#45 to #36 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
I liked the prequels more than VII. Both Dooku and Maul were better villains than Kylo Ren and Maul accomplished that by just not sounding like an angsty brat throwing tantrums the entire movie. Even Little Anny was a better character than desert Katniss and scared black guy.
Reply
0
User avatar #54 to #45 - cisdroidcommander (01/12/2016) [-]
Me too Anon, me too. Oh, dont forget Palpatine, a million times better than Snoke.
Reply
0
#75 to #36 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
All of the twists and what have you are obvious in the moment. Like, you see the scene and the music and it's pretty clear what twist will happen.
Reply
0
User avatar #73 to #36 - daniboyi ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
honestly, this is why I liked episode 7 and don't blame JJ Abrams for re-using the plot from episode 4.
We all know how much Star Wars fans love change and new stuff ("ARHHHHH GREEDO DIDN'T SHOOT FIRST!" ) yet they also get mad, when they don't bring in new stuff.
The Star Wars fan-base, at least the hardcore fanbase, is impossible to please in anyway.
Reply
0
User avatar #28 to #25 - kiaserzerg (01/12/2016) [-]
its a really pretty piece of **** .
Reply
+3
User avatar #50 - xoyv (01/12/2016) [-]
"HUE HUE HOW KAN COMPANE STIL MAEK MONI IF NU PANDUR TU MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?"
Reply
+3
#32 - alpako ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Reply
0
User avatar #65 to #32 - ogthegreat (01/12/2016) [-]
I think they're talking about movies.
Reply
0
#82 to #65 - alpako ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #82 - ogthegreat (01/12/2016) [-]
OP said "There will never be another 2D animated movie again."
Reply
0
#84 to #83 - alpako ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
**alpako used "*roll picture*"**
**alpako rolled image**
oh yeah
Reply
+2
User avatar #70 - xsnowbanex (01/12/2016) [-]
I have when people don't understand change. So what they'll never do the classics again? why not let the classics stay classics? Let them be preserved by their own nostalgic ability. Who says we need more of it? What if they bring back Micky and make it ****** ? Then you'd be mad
Reply
+1
User avatar #87 to #70 - wertologist ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
It's not about remaking them. It's about making movies in the same style. Most Disney movies now are for cheap laughs. Only when they team with Pixar do their movies drift away from cheap laughter. I wish they would make some new ones in the style of the old that don't have forced jokes.
Reply
+1
#86 - dtanobo ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
Maybe it's having Marvel making them billions
or maybe having Frozen make billions
or Cars making billions
or Pixar making them more billions

Disney know what they are doing. They have money coming from left right and centre. They own some of the highest earning properties around. They have a theme park that's flooded with tourists.
Reply
+1
#71 - benadryl ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
That's what we have AdultSwim and **** for nowadays. Let kids watch their CGI'd movies, while us grumpy grandpas enjoy Rick and Morty.
Reply
+1
#57 - astatine (01/12/2016) [-]
Disney Villains "It's Our House Now" Music Video
The likes of House of Mouse along with the cartoon series versions of things like Tarzan, Aladdin, Hercules etc was definitely when Disney hit its peak IMO. Their shows could comfortably do cameos with each other with characters you really cared about and grew up with, the animations were A++ and even when they were kind of samey like Aladdin is to Hercules, they still felt distinctive and unique.

Maybe it's largely nostalgia talking but that was a golden age for TV. There's still some good stuff, but a lot of it's hideously buried under the latest generation of shows with quirky highschoolers that have carbon copies of every personality in Drake & Josh, this time with some new gimmick (the family's got a genie, one of them's a witch, somebody's from the distant future etc,) recycling the same old jokes every episode
Reply
0
#77 - galkawhm ONLINE (01/12/2016) [-]
I'm pretty sure when Gravity Falls finally airs its last episode they'll come up with something new.
Reply
0
User avatar #93 to #77 - sptnfouroneseven (23 hours ago) [-]
February 20th is supposedly the release date. Hype train.
Reply
0
#72 - supersixfourr (01/12/2016) [-]
**supersixfourr used "*roll picture*"**
**supersixfourr rolled image**
This is how I stay rich
12>
[ 98 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)