A proper response to any apple users. Apple = Money x . Ch Van Fleet So .. HDD crash. Can' t boot rm comer. Going to get amid oh Windows 7 disk and rebuild. At  Apple Windows bullshit FUNNYJUNK
x
Click to expand

A proper response to any apple users

Ch Van Fleet
So .. HDD crash. Can' t boot rm comer. Going to get amid oh Windows 7 disk
and rebuild. At least I have the work laptop for now.
David Coles Go apple
about a minute ago . Like
devill Chris Hana That' s like having one bad date with a girl and
saying “I better go gay".
a few seconds ago . Like
arrt
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1861
Views: 56145
Favorited: 98
Submitted: 06/18/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to rexicaan submit to reddit

Comments(309):

[ 309 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - rexicaan (06/18/2014) [-]
I had one more laying in my folder.

(N)SFW
#97 to #1 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
l-o-DICK
User avatar #46 to #1 - themoderguy (06/19/2014) [-]
how is this not flagged
#55 to #46 - neefew (06/19/2014) [-]
I think it's something to do with the black line around all of their penises
User avatar #56 to #55 - lizardnigger (06/19/2014) [-]
still borderline ****
User avatar #64 to #56 - legendaryhero (06/19/2014) [-]
That doesn't make sense.
User avatar #105 to #64 - cedrock (06/19/2014) [-]
Well if you think about it, if you were at work and your boss saw you browsing this, I don't think he would be pleased.
User avatar #138 to #105 - legendaryhero (06/19/2014) [-]
Well, if you are at work you shouldn't be on funnyjunk in the first place.
User avatar #139 to #138 - cedrock (06/19/2014) [-]
Agreed, but that's where the name " **** " was created...
User avatar #157 to #138 - lvlonemeepo (06/19/2014) [-]
my god... how could you be so dingtarded.
User avatar #158 to #157 - legendaryhero (06/19/2014) [-]
love u 2
User avatar #159 to #158 - lvlonemeepo (06/19/2014) [-]
l-l-love you too... oh jeez
User avatar #162 to #159 - legendaryhero (06/19/2014) [-]
Something wrong?
#165 to #162 - lvlonemeepo (06/19/2014) [-]
I don't know what to say!
User avatar #315 to #64 - lizardnigger (06/19/2014) [-]
The picture still falls in to the category of being very near to Not Safe For Work content, thus I stated, in defence, that it was close to the point where it becomes Not Safe For Work because the nudity is only slightly hidden and admin has stated before that covering nudity with black boxes does not make something Safe For Work.
is that enough sense for you?
#103 to #46 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
why are you not flagged
User avatar #170 to #1 - pappathethird (06/19/2014) [-]
i got permabanned for that posting that pic with even more censoring. be careful in the future
User avatar #256 to #170 - rexicaan (06/19/2014) [-]
I probably should, or maybe photoshop on admin's face will grant me eternal North-Korea ramen?
User avatar #5 - jcllcj (06/19/2014) [-]
So would getting a Chromebook be like being with a transsexual.
User avatar #161 to #5 - Kairyuka ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
Chromebook is like being with that hobo you never could actually ascertain the gender of, due to its multiple mutations
#50 to #5 - majordraco (06/19/2014) [-]
No she's more like my mistress, I still love my desktop, but sometimes I need something little lightweight and can last for hours.
User avatar #4 - iceeyboi ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
It's more like dropping an ice cream cone and saying "I better go gay".
#144 - gadgetzan (06/19/2014) [-]
classic
#282 to #144 - fancyfeet (06/19/2014) [-]
"there's nothing you can do about it", but "this giant cock is penetrating your gray matter, and you being to lose control of your motor skills". WTF is this, if I had motor skills in the first place than there is absolutely something I can do about it; seems to me like this guy just wanted a dick in his face. It had noting to do with the operating system he was using.
#128 - teranin ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
I don't think gay people appreciate being compared to something as terrible as Apple products.
#134 to #128 - superiorcheerio (06/19/2014) [-]
No, not really.
No, not really.
#210 to #128 - smokekusheveryday ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
Yea probably not.....
Yea probably not.....
#49 - majordraco (06/19/2014) [-]
So the guy is saying Apple HDD's can't crash?
News to me.
#145 to #49 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
>Buy Mac   
>Take parts out of Mac   
>Put Mac parts in PC   
>Indestructible PC
>Buy Mac
>Take parts out of Mac
>Put Mac parts in PC
>Indestructible PC
User avatar #265 to #145 - timmity (06/19/2014) [-]
a mac is a PC, It is a personal computer
User avatar #283 to #265 - majordraco (06/19/2014) [-]
PC is common vernacular to refer to an IBM clone.
So although you are technically correct, there would be no other distinguishing name to separate Apple component based computers and Non-Apple computers. Since OS is interchangeable.
User avatar #286 to #283 - timmity (06/19/2014) [-]
but most components ARE interchangable, save for a few, and IBM imfrastucture computers came after the original apple, is could be considered an Mac clone, as the Mac was the first to have changable, updatable parts such as RAM.
#293 to #265 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
PC is commonly used as shorthand for Windows PC.

You already know this.

Stop trying to be a smartass.
User avatar #294 to #293 - timmity (06/19/2014) [-]
I did not, you cunt. Kil yourself you assuming cunt
#295 to #294 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
User avatar #2 - cupcakescankill (06/19/2014) [-]
That response doesn't even make sense considering it was a hardware issue.
User avatar #3 to #2 - kilotech (06/19/2014) [-]
everyone knows macs are indestructible and have virus and crash proof software
#10 to #3 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Macbooks are pretty much indestructible. Since they developed the aluminum clam shell design, they are rugged as hell. OSX is given too much hell from the "community" for one reason. Games. That's it. No one actually notes that OSX is Unix. The terminal on OSX is almost the same as any other Unix system. For a plethora of reasons, OSX can do what Windows can't, it's just the things no one really cares about. For Computer Science, A Mac is no different than any other computer. If anyone wants to note any negatives about the Mac besides its price tag, fill free to comment.
User avatar #19 to #10 - citruslord (06/19/2014) [-]
They are pretty rugged, but two laptops with the same hardware, one being a mac and one not, will generally have the same/similar quality hardware. As far as I know, most of the higher end stuff between the two is made in the same factory.
It's kind of tough to compare mac to pc. Mac runs their line alot like a game console, they put together a few distinct setups and perfect those, so they run to the best of their ability. Many PC's will skip on quality in some areas to save, and will iterate much more often instead of perfecting a set of hardware. But a high quality PC can be just as rugged and last just as long as a mac.
From my experience, macbooks especially fall behind since the tiny shell reduces cooling efficiency. My Asus can render/game for hours and hours at a time without going much above room temp. But it is much larger to accommodate the fans. Only other thing other than the absurd price that i can think of right now.
User avatar #25 to #19 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
The only thing that it will have different is thunderbolt and Retina, but thunderbolt is coming rather slowly to normal laptops.
User avatar #28 to #25 - citruslord (06/19/2014) [-]
And retina will eventually come to pc. Honestly I don't see much of a reason to have that high of a resolution, especially on the small screen mac offers. I love my 17 inch screen, and 1080p is really clean even that large.
User avatar #29 to #28 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
They claim it's for photo editing. To me, it sounds like they wanted the "highest resolution" possible for a laptop. Don't get me wrong, its awesome.
User avatar #39 to #29 - citruslord (06/19/2014) [-]
It is awesome, and It would be nice in some instances. I'm an artist and use photoshop for digital painting, and as far as I know, most people who do so professionally use Wacom Cintiqs. So they wouldn't even be using the retina display for it.
User avatar #40 to #39 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Wacom Cintiqs are one of the best Graphic Design tools ever made.
User avatar #48 to #40 - citruslord (06/19/2014) [-]
I know. I want one very badly. But unfortunately they suffer a bit of the same problems macs do, lack of competition. Although apple has carefully crafted their artificial lack of it So the prices ride quite high. RIght now I'm looking at either making one out of a intuos tablet and an lcd screen, or waiting another year or so for the competition to catch up.
#88 to #28 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
Retina is **** compared to the new 4k and 10k resolutions. It's only 2880x1800...
User avatar #91 to #88 - citruslord (06/19/2014) [-]
That's about the highest you can get in a laptop. The highest I could find on newegg for a laptop was 3200x1800, and that was only one. It's still not a common thing with PC.
User avatar #284 to #25 - dumbassvtwo (06/19/2014) [-]
Retina technology Forgot the actual term is just a buzzword that apple copyrighted so that it can only be applied to apple devices to make them seem better.

Lots of other smartphones have the same **** just with a different name they've copyrighted.

Spoiler below is basically a paragraph copied from How To Geek explaining this **** because I'm **** at explaining things.

Look at the specifications list for any device with a screen — especially smartphones — and you’ll find a long list of buzzwords that purport to be specifications. Sony has “TruBlack” and “X-Reality Picture Engine,” Toshiba has “TruBrite,” Nokia has “ClearBlack” and “PureMotion HD+” — the buzzwords go on and on.

It’s misleading marketing to parade these technologies as specifications — “X-Reality Picture Engine, only on Sony devices!” — when they’re trademarked marketing terms that can only apply to a single manufacturer’s products. For example, Apple touts that their devices as the only ones with the “Retina display” — which is true, as Apple has trademarked the term “Retina display” and it can only be used to describe Apple devices. Although other devices have screens with higher pixel-density, they can’t be referred to as Retina displays.
User avatar #290 to #284 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
The display is a gimmick yes. What makes me mad is Thunderbolt. That should be a standard, not exclusive to Apple. I know Thunderbolt is slowly going to PC, but it's too damn slow.
#18 to #10 - alexanderh (06/19/2014) [-]
Well, for one, the platform isn't as open as, say, Linux. For some, that's a major turn-off. I see quite a few places in IT use Linux, and the computer science line at my local university reports a 50 % Linux adoption rate within the first year (including macs switching to a Linux distro).

Also, as far as I know, Mac isn't as strong a platform as most Linux distros for pure programming tasks, and you can get very powerful software for graphic design and movie editing.
And Mac servers don't stand a chance against Linux distro servers. I doubt that you can find anyone who is willing to argue that Macs are better than Linux servers, unless it's for very specific Mac related tasks that only a Mac server can do.


Now, I'm not arguing that Windows is better than Mac for these tasks. For programming, Linux is just better because of how much less stuff is running in the background.
For Graphic Design, they're all pretty much equal. You can't get photoshop for Linux, but you can get programs that are just as powerful, and some of them are even free.
I don't really know about movie editors, but I imagine the OS' are about similar.
Server wise, Linux is the best. The scale of Linux servers are amazing, you can run it on a Raspberry Pi, or you can scale it up to a huge cluster, all without any issues.

By the way, the only reason I have found so far to use a Mac over any other OS is for making apps for the iPhone. The assholes at apple decided that the only way you can make apps for their products is in their OS which you have to buy a Mac for. Which is expensive as all hell.
User avatar #22 to #18 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
The usefulness of the mac is pretty much dead. The only thing that is holding back the PC from its true potential is Microsoft.
#24 to #22 - alexanderh (06/19/2014) [-]
Couldn't agree more, to be honest.
User avatar #27 to #24 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Really. In a work environment. If I had a choice between Windows 8 and OSX Mavericks, I would go with OSX because it doesn't require updates every 24 hours.
#32 to #27 - alexanderh (06/19/2014) [-]
Honestly, if I had the choice between Linux (any), Windows 8.1, Windows 7 or OSX (any), I would choose Linux (ubuntu) for my work PC, and windows 8.1 for my gaming rig. 8.1 fixed a lot of the issues in 8, and I've gotten used to the start screen. It's where I keep all the shortcuts I don't want on my desktop but might still need anyway. Surprisingly useful once you get used to it.
I just don't like the design and the way OSX handles. I find it weird, and since there's cheaper options that work in a more familiar way and are just as powerful, I don't see a reason for me to ever use a mac.

And I haven't noticed excessive updates for windows 8.1.
User avatar #33 to #32 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Linux is indeed the best in all work loads. Personally I am more of the Debian guy. Windows 8.1 is just OK to me. It hasn't wowed me like Windows 7 did.
#110 to #33 - alexanderh (06/19/2014) [-]
Well, 8.1 works fine, but it's not much of a step up compared to 7. And there are some processes that you absolutely have to disable to be able to game, as they will hijack your disk and run it at 100 %. The processes are superfetch which will catalogue your data making it faster to search for it, and BITS which is basically the update service.
Both of them are a huge problem for me. My OS and data disk is a 1TB 7200 RPM HDD, and if either of those is running, I will occasionally lose all control over my computer while they do their thing for 30 minutes or more, and then don't do anything.

People say that Superfetch is fine, but my experience shows otherwise.
User avatar #11 to #10 - MrDeadiron (06/19/2014) [-]
But it's price tag is the biggest issue and why it get's so much flak.
User avatar #12 to #11 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Apple really doesn't actually care about the Mac prices because its revenue is primarily from iPhones. Macs are for professional jobs like Graphic Design, Movie Editors, and Servers. The price really fits the criteria because they know those pros will buy it. Now normal Windows machines are actually getting better at these areas, but the Mac is still supreme. Also, people will say "Why don't they build a PC?". Well Movie Studios and Businesses want something out of the box. It really is a business machine, not just a normal PC.
#30 to #12 - kez (06/19/2014) [-]
As someone whos best friend is a sound engineer and has been on a tour around some of the most prestigous studios in the world located in england, including the studio who did all the sound for the Batman Trilogy...

No one uses a Mac.

Macs are for the wanna be genius'.

All the gear, no idea.
User avatar #31 to #30 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Today yes. 7 years ago. No. Normal PC's back then didn't have the horse power and the software. Today, PC's blow it out of the water.
#35 to #31 - kez (06/19/2014) [-]
I made that up. They use Macs.

Just admit you dont know
User avatar #302 to #35 - homebray (06/19/2014) [-]
Lol'd
User avatar #38 to #35 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
What? That you gave a made up argument that actually has reasoning to get me to admit that I am wrong? Even if it was true, my answer still makes sense. PC's have reached what a Mac can do.
#44 to #38 - kez (06/19/2014) [-]
Just stop pretending you know what you are talking about when you are simply guessing
User avatar #13 to #12 - MrDeadiron (06/19/2014) [-]
You're actually wrong. The price point is higher then normal and most studios keep IT on hand so they buy cheaper computers and download the programs.
My Dad works in IT.
User avatar #14 to #13 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
I know the price is terribly inflated. Apple doesn't care though because diehard fans of the thing keep buying the next machine(most photo studios) . The Mac itself shouldn't be getting flak, the diehard fanbase should be. When I said the price fits the criteria, I meant the price doesn't matter to big business. To the average computer user, it's overrated.
User avatar #15 to #14 - MrDeadiron (06/19/2014) [-]
That's still not true most businesses look for the cheaper option.
User avatar #16 to #15 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Business that have no need for it. Also, small business never go for the mac option. That would be insane. Every single receptionist I have been in were using iMacs. Funny though, they were using Bootcamp. But Photo and Movie Studios are still using Macs, but they are slowly going to the PC because Final Cut Pro X was so different from the past ones, it just pissed them off and they decided to go with Adobe Premier.
User avatar #75 to #16 - cocopopsonfire (06/19/2014) [-]
Managment would never waste money on macs for receptionists unless they were utter plebians.

The business world is all about the price to profit ratio, if a cheaper machine will do something just as good/better then they will sure as hell go for that, the businesses you see with macs everywhere are probably apple stores, apple developers or businesses that clearly dont know how to manage their budget.
User avatar #114 to #75 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Or businesses that make plenty of money for said computers. The businesses in question were Doctor's offices.
User avatar #118 to #114 - cocopopsonfire (06/19/2014) [-]
All the more reason for it to be absolutely retarded, surely that money should go into actual healthcare? and why the **** would anyone have a mac in a doctors office? it provides no additional benefit and is likely incompatible with a lot of medical software

I dont know how you do it in america, but here in the uk, the healthcare system prefers not to spend money on shiny metal turds
User avatar #121 to #118 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
You actually think Doctors spend their money on healthcare? hahaha, no. They spend money on cars and houses.
User avatar #123 to #121 - cocopopsonfire (06/19/2014) [-]
who said the doctors spent personal money on the macs? **** your stupid, please don't discuss business when you have absolutely no idea about it
User avatar #124 to #123 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Do you actually know how a private practice works?
User avatar #133 to #124 - cocopopsonfire (06/19/2014) [-]
Yes it works just like any other private business that relies on a specific type of service. what I'm trying to say is why would management of said practice waste money on a shiny bucket for ******* receptionists(who do **** all work anyway), when it can buy a windows machine and put the same money into its medical equipment, meaning better quality of care which leads to them being able to charge higher for the same service? or hire more staff/expand the business? or even better, pocket the potential savings?

Before you reply, educate yourself, come up with a ******* valid answer or give up because your just digging yourself deeper
User avatar #135 to #133 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
I guess you cannot grasp "disposable income". Doctors can afford 1 Mac in like 4 appointments. And I love how you believe that a high income business is taking a massive hit from buying macs. Dude, it's a doctor's office. They make a **** ton of money.
User avatar #136 to #135 - cocopopsonfire (06/19/2014) [-]
That doesn't mean profit margins can't be increased, what business in their right mind throws away cash for a sub-par product?

And i never said they are taking a hit (your ability to read imaginary words is pretty good i must admit) I'm simply asking WHY?

lemme say that again... WHY? Who in their right mind chooses a mac just because they have money to waste? No business, not even wealthy ones just throws away cash for a label unless they are truly stupid, its the ******* loyalty to game companies all over again.
User avatar #142 to #136 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Are you really Really saying that American doctors give a **** about $3000 worth of Macs? NO. It's like the US Government that pays $50 for Toilet Seats. They don't give a **** .
User avatar #146 to #142 - cocopopsonfire (06/19/2014) [-]
you gotta be ******* ******** me? can you even read? I've asked so many times and you still havn't answered, just stating ********

I asked WHY? i wanna know why if they care so little about money didnt they get decent windows machine that would actually function better in that environment.

your basically telling me that someone qualified to be a doctor would buy a chrome porta potty for stupid money than a proper toilet that washes your ass afterwards thats also cheaper?

I always thought that the stupid american stereotype was ******** , but your converting me.

Also don't expect any replies from me as i'm now leaving work and i don't frequent funnyjunk in my own time

User avatar #147 to #146 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Why? I'll tell you why. Because they can. They like the aesthetic, clean look of a Mac. That is the reason. Because they can.
User avatar #203 to #10 - penileburglar (06/19/2014) [-]
'No different than any other computer'

'Any negative besides its price tag'

...Because being no different than any other computer, yet costing more, isn't enough of an issue?
User avatar #204 to #203 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
It's the biggest negative. As a normal machine, it's fine. Back then, Apple had a monopoly in a ton of areas, so the price was inflated so their profits would skyrocket. Now, it's just too much.
User avatar #205 to #204 - penileburglar (06/19/2014) [-]
That post did not make a lot of sense. 'Back then, it was too expensive. Now, it's just too much.' Back when? Why word it that way if nothing has changed? I have no idea what you're trying to actually convey. All I was saying was that if you're point is 'It's fine, it just costs more for nothing extra,' then why would any further argument against it ever need to be made?
User avatar #209 to #205 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Alright. What I meant to say is, the power macs had back then doesn't have such an impact as it does today. The price for Macs has always been high. Today, PC's can get more powerful hardware for less. Back then, it was not the case. It was either the Mac or a Cray. In short. The price back then was high because they had a monopoly. Now people have a cheaper, even more powerful option, the price has no merit.
#63 to #10 - plwmar (06/19/2014) [-]
Bwahahaha.Games?Seriously?I have a friend with a MAC and had to pay for an OS update otherwise his flash player,graphic editing (for his job) wasn't working AT ALL.He had to either pay 99 euros or get the free update.he decided to get the free update,because basically who the 			****		 would pay for an OS update right?.After that it all went downhill.His libraries were all destroyed,he couldn't get a single program working.NOT.A.SINGLE.ONE.flash player would also be randomly crashing.Hence forcing him to purchase the update after which point everything MAGICALLY was working perfectly.One of the worst scamming companies I have ever seen and yet people keep boasting about apple and mac OS etc.You can't even purchase specific updates or do anything at all with your computer hadware if you reach a certain point where you need better equipment to do your job because specific part upgrades aren't viable.Basically you have to purchase a new one and probably throw the old one at the closet or have it as downloader.
Bwahahaha.Games?Seriously?I have a friend with a MAC and had to pay for an OS update otherwise his flash player,graphic editing (for his job) wasn't working AT ALL.He had to either pay 99 euros or get the free update.he decided to get the free update,because basically who the **** would pay for an OS update right?.After that it all went downhill.His libraries were all destroyed,he couldn't get a single program working.NOT.A.SINGLE.ONE.flash player would also be randomly crashing.Hence forcing him to purchase the update after which point everything MAGICALLY was working perfectly.One of the worst scamming companies I have ever seen and yet people keep boasting about apple and mac OS etc.You can't even purchase specific updates or do anything at all with your computer hadware if you reach a certain point where you need better equipment to do your job because specific part upgrades aren't viable.Basically you have to purchase a new one and probably throw the old one at the closet or have it as downloader.
User avatar #111 to #63 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Don't get me started on Final Cut Pro
User avatar #112 to #111 - RiflemanFunny (06/19/2014) [-]
Or Adobe products
User avatar #171 - mcquiston (06/19/2014) [-]
Personally, i ******* love my PC, but i've found that MAC's are better for stuff like Photoshop, imageready, dreamweaver etc purely from experience.

Source - My College had both, but seemed the PC's couldn't handle the processing as well as the macs, this could be down to them having ****** PC's tbh, but that's just my experience. FYI - my current PC is a beast and would **** over most Macs without even looking down.

User avatar #193 to #171 - dehnoobshow ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
I don't hate Apple users.
Macs are fine. But as long as you don't do "dood why are you using the piece of **** PC? Go apple and destroy your pc you little autistic **** ." I'm okay with you.
#194 to #193 - bestfoxgirl (06/19/2014) [-]
Dood.

Sorry, couldn't help myself

Kind of an inside joke, but I hope some people will get it.
User avatar #305 to #193 - homebray (06/19/2014) [-]
Same for me
theres pros and cons with every machine. my 4 yr old mackbook still runs super fast and has amazing battery. better yet, i got it on discount
User avatar #208 to #193 - canhasdrums (06/19/2014) [-]
I am yet to meet some one who has said that.
#218 to #208 - thiswasnttaken (06/19/2014) [-]
"dood why are you using the piece of **** PC? Go apple and destroy your pc you little autistic **** ."
User avatar #228 to #218 - canhasdrums (06/19/2014) [-]
I retract my previous statement.
#235 to #228 - thiswasnttaken (06/19/2014) [-]
As do I. Now what're ya gonna do? Huh? HUH?
User avatar #175 to #171 - redeadhunter (06/19/2014) [-]
It probably is ****** PCs. The PCs at my college are an absolute disgrace and managed to be worse than my old laptop, which I had to install Linux on just to get decent mileage out of the hardware.
#278 to #171 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
This is very true, I find that most research labs and professors I see are using macs. It could be that they prefer the OS (unix etc...), but I have heard from friends who have done research that Apple's Mac Pro is a very powerful machine and that they used it for various finite element analysis computations.
User avatar #173 to #171 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
I've used photoshop on a mac and a school computer using some core 2 duo with 4gb of ram. I honestly liked the windows version better.
User avatar #176 to #173 - mcquiston (06/19/2014) [-]
Absolutely understandable!
I switched between both for flash design and web design integration, and i swear Apple have purposely made it difficult to use software alongside PC's...
User avatar #178 to #176 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
I wouldn't know. I've only used it on a Mac for a total of 30 minutes. I might be biased though, I've a huge thing against apple.
User avatar #180 to #178 - mcquiston (06/19/2014) [-]
I seriously don't blame you, i could list a lot of things wrong with their hardware, software and general attitude to the industry.
User avatar #186 to #180 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
I honestly don't like what you get for the price. I could get a laptop with the same specs as a Macbook Air for less than half the price.
#189 to #186 - mcquiston (06/19/2014) [-]
And the fact that the components are actually interchangeable.
User avatar #190 to #189 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
Kind of. All you can really change on most laptops is RAM and the HDD
#181 to #171 - rrain (06/19/2014) [-]
what the hell do you think you're doing posting a reasoned yet un-popular opinion around here
#184 to #181 - mcquiston (06/19/2014) [-]
Mfw i hear every reply notification.
#191 - kingofdarkn (06/19/2014) [-]
Well this picture sums up everything
#148 - cabbagemayhem ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
#21 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
This image has expired
Let the butthurt flow with the wrath of the nile





User avatar #37 to #21 - whitie (06/19/2014) [-]
Why Can't We Be Friends- War LYRICS
#84 to #21 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
you didn't blur out your real name.
It would be much cooler if you used 1 keyboard and mouse keyboard-switch-thingy (however you call it)
#257 to #21 - thismustbeseen (06/19/2014) [-]
I could end world hunger with the money it cost to buy that.
#70 to #21 - elricbrostwo **User deleted account** (06/19/2014) [-]
are those 2 imacs?
why not just get one mac and set up a deal monitor display?
Why are you using the ****** default peripherals?
It's not even the fact you're using a mac, it's that you're being a complete retard on top of it
User avatar #115 to #70 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
See comment 113
#90 to #70 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
The hardware is inside the screen, so you can't have two imac screens for the price of an overpriced and underpowered computer + a screen.
User avatar #78 to #70 - rainbowisbestpone ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
Probably Macs do not support multiple monitors since it would actually require some IT skills from user. Why would they add some options since no mac users would be able to do it.
User avatar #117 to #78 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
Shhh. Comment 113
#42 to #21 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
>Has MAC

>uses MIcrosoft Office
#34 to #21 - Ethshar (06/19/2014) [-]
Found the gay guy.
#276 to #21 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
eww you go on funnyjunk you faggot oh oh wait.....
#104 to #21 - hasinvadedyou ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
This explains why you have (0) friends, Joseph.
This explains why you have (0) friends, Joseph.
User avatar #113 to #104 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
OK fine, picture explanation time. I'm not some 50 year old guy, these are my dads computers. One on the right is an old one from 2010. Just bought a new one, and was finishing up transferring files for him and I saw this as a perfect opportunity to make people butthurt.
my names sam
#120 to #113 - hasinvadedyou ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
Hi sam.
Hi sam.
User avatar #122 to #120 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
Stop invading me
#127 to #122 - hasinvadedyou ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
My name is Eric, sam.
My name is Eric, sam.
User avatar #23 to #21 - zomaru (06/19/2014) [-]
Highly inefficient compared to the money you might have spent on it all. But If you aren't a gamer and it works for you then who am I to judge.
#52 to #23 - majordraco (06/19/2014) [-]
You can't judge my facebook machine!
User avatar #74 to #23 - cocoman ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
you might be the only reasonable person on this site.
Everyone acts like a mac is the antichrist.
User avatar #116 to #23 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
See comment 113
User avatar #119 to #23 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
Also the Mac on the left has 16gb ram, a i7 4770 and a GT 780m. On bootcamp it would be perfectly capable of gaming if my dad had any desire to.
User avatar #129 to #119 - linxusthevagabond (06/19/2014) [-]
wow sick laptop gpu m8
User avatar #130 to #129 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
Gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8
User avatar #132 to #130 - linxusthevagabond (06/19/2014) [-]
and it only costed you 3000 dollars.
meanwhile my 1000 pc outperforms it.
User avatar #137 to #132 - istartedthewar (06/19/2014) [-]
Again, it's my dad's computer, he is well aware he could have got more computer for his money. But add in the cost of $1000 to $1500 worth of software and the cost of a 27 inch 1440p IPS display that's high quality, and at that point it wouldn't make that much sense.

PC of equivalent specs with all high quality and high rated parts and monitor pcpartpicker.com/p/LyVgQ7 over $2200 with rebates...
Mac equivalent is $2900

Add in cost of software.....
User avatar #151 to #137 - linxusthevagabond (06/19/2014) [-]
or you could just pirate the software.
#155 to #151 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
ehh if youve got the money you should always support the developers of **** you like
User avatar #156 to #155 - linxusthevagabond (06/19/2014) [-]
yes, but still i don't really like spending 500 dollars on software.
#254 to #156 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
Wow, I don;t like spending $ on things like a car. I guess we both can use yours then? Or let me hire you. If I won't feel like paying you I don't. Good deal! Besides: it costs as much as $500 because of people that "don't like" to pay for it. Besides #2: I worked on mocap for a wordwide known PC shooter game. Got paid less for a day of data cleaning and rebuild than a factory assembly line worker (taking into account that I had to make a few days trip to a studio in another city for training @ my own expense means that I didn't get **** for it). I will never do this again. And in few years they won't do the mocap rebuild and cleaning. In few more years they half ass the mocap altogether (no pro stuntmen, heavy recycling of data). And in a decade people like you will say things like "god look on all this product placement in this game, look how ****** the animation is"...I'm a very poor graphics designer. But I pay for my soft. I don't want to be the guy that makes other people poor.
#220 to #119 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
Sorry, but isn't that an iMac? I'm pretty sure you can just open one of those up and put a GTX 780 in it.
User avatar #229 - minorian ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
He was so ******* quick to screencap his own comment, you can almost feel his excitement.
#198 - huzibizi (06/19/2014) [-]
How did he reply if the status is set to private
How did he reply if the status is set to private
#154 - cantexplain (06/19/2014) [-]
We're still doing that, huh?
We're still doing that, huh?
#92 - alruneia (06/19/2014) [-]
Why would he set the privacy to "Only Me" on the post?
Why would he set the privacy to "Only Me" on the post?
User avatar #108 to #92 - mrfartypants (06/19/2014) [-]
so his post would look funny when he screen shot it and put it on the internet
#166 to #92 - fuckedbyapony (06/19/2014) [-]
Where does it say 'only me'?
User avatar #17 - captinchikin (06/19/2014) [-]
RAID is love, RAID is life.
No really though, I've had both 0 and 1 configurations (for my home PC and file server), and they both help a lot, luckily I haven't had a situation where I've needed 1 yet.
#41 - John Cena (06/19/2014) [-]
Hey. Don't associate us fags with apple. Just cause we appreciate dick doesn't mean we're gonna pay to ride a branded one
User avatar #126 to #41 - toxichospital (06/19/2014) [-]
Damn straig--


Damn gay.
User avatar #81 - emptysuperman (06/19/2014) [-]
Except going gay would be less homo than going Apple.
#168 - pokimone (06/19/2014) [-]
Once you go gay, you never turn away. No, but really though, don't compare us gays to Apple, thats just fukkin insulting. We still know how to use a decent computer, I built Sergei here 7 months ago and he has served me well for my gaming. I'd say going gay is more like going Linux. Its pretty much just as good, some people think its better, some worse, but at the end of the day, all it really is is different.
User avatar #172 to #168 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
I've tried using Linux multiple times. Mostly Xubuntu and Ubuntu. I can never get the video card drivers working right and go back to windows. Also I'm comptia certified in windows so I know it like the back of my hand.
User avatar #174 to #172 - pokimone (06/19/2014) [-]
Like I said, I've been using both for a while, its not really that one is better than other, they're just different. Linux takes a lot of getting used to when you use it so does being gay when you come out of the closet, which only furthers my metaphore but in the end, I find it to be a great OS. It ends up being what you're used to and what you're comfortable with being the favorite.
User avatar #177 to #174 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
I'm probably going to end up sticking with windows for a while. Unless the rumors are true about Windows 9 being always online. I already don't like how Windows 8 makes you sign in with a Microsoft account.
User avatar #179 to #177 - pokimone (06/19/2014) [-]
Oh god, they better not do that to windows. Thats exactly the kind of crap that put the Xbox One under, you'd think they'd learn from their mistakes...
User avatar #183 to #179 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
Well Microsoft has two different departments for Windows and Xbox. Personally I don't even like the Xbox one, though that's probably because I just play all my games on a computer.
User avatar #185 to #183 - pokimone (06/19/2014) [-]
I know its two different sections, but still, there should be some kind of communication. If windows 9 has to always be online, no one is going to want to use it. People are sketchy enough about windows 8 as it is, and I'm still using 7 because I don't like some of the features. Personally though, I've got a Wii U and my PC. Most games that come out on xbone and ps4 go to PC as well, and the few exsclusives I want to play that don't (the last of us, destiny, halo 5, ect ect) I can just go to a friends house and play. But really, I just need my WiiU for nintendo, and my PC for everything else and I'm happy.
User avatar #187 to #185 - zazonion (06/19/2014) [-]
My desktop has Windows 7 on it and the laptop I'm using runs on Windows 8. 8 is pretty much the same as 7 except for the weird start menu, but I have a touch screen so I got used to it pretty fast.
[ 309 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)