9/11. I appreciate you taking the time to view the content I uploaded If you want to, send a friend request my way. I accept them all!.. >thinking it isn't a conspiracy 9/11 I appreciate you taking the time to view content uploaded If want send a friend request my way accept them all! >thinking it isn't conspiracy
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (88)
[ 88 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
63 comments displayed.
#1 - dickticklerluv
Reply +80
(07/20/2014) [-]
>thinking it isn't a conspiracy
>thinking it isn't a conspiracy
#11 to #1 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
Just one more person...
#2 to #1 - ohhh
Reply +12
(07/21/2014) [-]
Found the retard. I know i don't have to say just joking, but some of the people here are not the brightest.
#3 to #2 - dickticklerluv
Reply +15
(07/21/2014) [-]
thinking im serious
thinking im serious

#4 to #3 - ohhh
Reply +4
(07/21/2014) [-]
That's why i said i was just joking...
#5 to #4 - dickticklerluv
Reply +2
(07/21/2014) [-]
thumbing me down as well
#6 to #5 - ohhh
Reply +3
(07/21/2014) [-]
************* be using my picture. Also i can honestly say that was more of a knee jerk reaction.
#7 to #6 - dickticklerluv
Reply +3
(07/21/2014) [-]
ohhh k
#65 to #6 - lamadrama
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
Nah you got orthodox jesus, this is mormon jesus.
#62 to #6 - arreatface
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
> knee jerk reaction   
   
wut ?   
   
 also im french so maybe that is english beyond my skills, i dunno
> knee jerk reaction

wut ?

also im french so maybe that is english beyond my skills, i dunno
#64 to #62 - lecorbi
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
i too am confused
#63 to #62 - ohhh
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Basically i have seen stupidity far worse then his, so out of instinct i just kind of thumbed him down. I don't know when someone is pretending to be stupid anymore man, and the ones that are end up outdone by tumblr. I just don't know anymore man.
#13 - elaxx ONLINE
Reply +7
(07/21/2014) [-]
So FJers, what's your favorite 9/11 conspiracy?
So FJers, what's your favorite 9/11 conspiracy?
#14 to #13 - jaevel ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
The fact that if Al-Qaida hadn't conspired to do it. It ouldn't have gone so smoothely!
#22 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
/pol/ is love, /pol/ is life
#23 to #13 - robinwilliamson
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
One from my very own State Representative, which makes me feel proud *cough*

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) accused President Obama of inviting young immigrants to cross the border alone to recruit future Democratic voters.
thinkprogress.org/immigration/2014/07/08/3457940/gohmert-obama-border-crisis-democrat-voters/
#30 to #13 - ilikeztitz
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
The** Goollddd** one
#39 to #13 - economic
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
**economic rolled image** Kikes
#15 to #13 - tiles
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
The one where tupac faked his death.
#16 to #13 - cactusupthebutt
Reply +7
(07/21/2014) [-]
That, that man is indeed a dragon in disguise. Wake up america
#20 to #13 - thingexplain
Reply +17
(07/21/2014) [-]
Conspiracies are good, but I like to collect anti-conspiracies. Like the fact that people think the government could pull off a massive conspiracy like that without any proof that they did it, but the president of the god-damn united states previous couldn't get a blowjob in his own office without the whole world knowing about it.
#34 to #20 - stardustdragonlord ONLINE
Reply +4
(07/21/2014) [-]
unless he wanted to get caught for publicity
#81 to #20 - splitalterego
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there was a bunch of presidential blow jobs that we don't know about.
#21 to #13 - joaomartins
Reply +40
(07/21/2014) [-]
#27 to #21 - anon
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
Steel beams melted together? Uhhh.. I thought the buildings collapsed, how is this possible?
#29 to #27 - joaomartins
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
It. Was. Jesus.
#10 - DeathKnight
Reply +30
(07/21/2014) [-]
Season 10 Episode 9: Mystery of the Urinal Deuce   
   
 one of my personal favorites of all time
Season 10 Episode 9: Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

one of my personal favorites of all time
#17 to #10 - Mumford
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
I wouldn't trust you, killing your own father, he was the ******* king you dick.
#35 to #17 - ichitoten
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
There are many death knights and Arthas sure as hell wasn't the first. Hell there are 2 types of death knights, he may not even be the same type as Arthas was. You uneducated lil ****.
#43 to #35 - Mumford
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
You must be the most enjoyable person at parties ever, someone has a joke and you go on about your expansive knowledge of World of Warcraft

Autsim...not even once.
#44 to #43 - ichitoten
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Christ, arent you getting prissy. If that was a joke, it was a **** one. Step yo game up niga.
#45 to #44 - Mumford
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
For it to be a joke it would have to be some kind of satirical insight on your life, however I made no joke, I hope you and your autism have a long and lonely life

xxx

P.S. why don't you make another image trying to find Scottish people to ram you in the ass.
#47 to #45 - ichitoten
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
"Someone has a joke" Then you deny it being a joke. Kek
#48 to #47 - Mumford
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Learn2Read please, your being an embarrassment towards 12 year old Scottish kids everywhere.
#49 to #48 - ichitoten
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Oh? Please, explain to my 12 year old brain what you meant.
Correct me if im wrong, but you are now denying it was a joke. So that means you genuinely meant what you said. So you genuinely believe that is Arthas behind that account? C'mon, wheres the sense?
#50 to #49 - Mumford
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
If it was possible for you to read, you'd have noticed me taking the piss out of you by calling you out on being an autist, to which you retorted magically "if that was a joke, it was a **** one"

Sorry if that went over the top of your head, I'll try to speak on your mental level now.
#52 to #50 - ichitoten
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
The joke that was **** was your joke towards Deathknight. I suppose that was too much to expect for you to work out.
#55 to #52 - Mumford
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Well one person liked it, so that's probably more people who actually like you in real life.
#56 to #55 - ichitoten
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Thats it? Thats your defense? Eh. Thats evidence enough that i won this argument to me. Still, congrats on your 1 thumb.
#25 to #10 - shabadaka
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
I like your taste in episodes.
#54 to #10 - werfgh
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
I have raging clue right now
#32 - lightarcanine
Reply +15
(07/21/2014) [-]
Jay Jay did 9/11
Jay Jay did 9/11
#18 - noonesperfect
Reply +6
(07/21/2014) [-]
Oh please, everyone knows that Batman was behind 9/11
Oh please, everyone knows that Batman was behind 9/11
#12 - theladystrangler
Reply +4
(07/21/2014) [-]
It obviously was a conspiracy, its was a conspiracy from Osama dummies
#71 to #12 - raidaltamimi ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
What if Osama WAS the dummy?
#51 - kristovsky
Reply +3
(07/21/2014) [-]
Bitch please we all know it was Russia
Bitch please we all know it was Russia
#42 - teranin ONLINE
Reply +2
(07/21/2014) [-]
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

When people act like people who don't believe the official story behind 9/11 are tinfoilers who think our world is run by lizard men.
#46 to #42 - kanadetenshi
Reply -1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Coming amusingly from a channel that is a well known tinfoiler, climate change denialist, pseudo-scientist and thinking every bad thing is caused by illerminati and big pharma.
#57 to #46 - teranin ONLINE
Reply +2
(07/21/2014) [-]
I disagree with a lot of what he says. Doesn't mean everything is incorrect.     
   
For example, TJ (The Amazing Atheist) holds extreme, nearly totalitarian socialist beliefs that he mentions from time to time.  I disagree with him wholesale on that, but many of his videos I agree with.   
   
Still, the official story on 9/11 is total crap.  Even if you ignore all of his inferences to things like able danger or rumsfeld's budget "mishaps" and other questionable lines of reasoning, 9/11's official story remains about as believable as Noah getting 2 of every animal on earth into a wooden boat.  Y'know, like the guy who couldn't maneuver a single engine cessna for **** but somehow managed to successfully complete an extremely difficult maneuver at sheering speed on a huge plane that military pilots can't replicate on a simulator, or cellphone calls from a plane over 10,000 feet high back in 2001, when that was damn near impossible for our tech at the time, or the fact that building 7 went down due to circumstances that have never brought a building down, ever, in the histoy of mankind, and thousands of architects attest to that.  Nist's model remaining classified when every model constructed by architects in environments with earth physics engines presented with the same set of circumstances that supposedly brought down building 7 never once having been accomplished in the simulation, except in NIST's one.  The fact that the lower, internal supports of both WTC 1 and 2 were capable of holding 4x the entire tower's weight and no heat was anywhere near the vast majority of those supports for 90% of the floors below where the planes hit, but the towers not only collapsed but did so relatively neatly and all at once, nearly at free fall.   
   
I don't like to buy in to whodunit tales, but it's clear **** didn't go down as it is presented.
I disagree with a lot of what he says. Doesn't mean everything is incorrect.

For example, TJ (The Amazing Atheist) holds extreme, nearly totalitarian socialist beliefs that he mentions from time to time. I disagree with him wholesale on that, but many of his videos I agree with.

Still, the official story on 9/11 is total crap. Even if you ignore all of his inferences to things like able danger or rumsfeld's budget "mishaps" and other questionable lines of reasoning, 9/11's official story remains about as believable as Noah getting 2 of every animal on earth into a wooden boat. Y'know, like the guy who couldn't maneuver a single engine cessna for **** but somehow managed to successfully complete an extremely difficult maneuver at sheering speed on a huge plane that military pilots can't replicate on a simulator, or cellphone calls from a plane over 10,000 feet high back in 2001, when that was damn near impossible for our tech at the time, or the fact that building 7 went down due to circumstances that have never brought a building down, ever, in the histoy of mankind, and thousands of architects attest to that. Nist's model remaining classified when every model constructed by architects in environments with earth physics engines presented with the same set of circumstances that supposedly brought down building 7 never once having been accomplished in the simulation, except in NIST's one. The fact that the lower, internal supports of both WTC 1 and 2 were capable of holding 4x the entire tower's weight and no heat was anywhere near the vast majority of those supports for 90% of the floors below where the planes hit, but the towers not only collapsed but did so relatively neatly and all at once, nearly at free fall.

I don't like to buy in to whodunit tales, but it's clear **** didn't go down as it is presented.
#68 to #57 - kanadetenshi
Reply -3
(07/21/2014) [-]
It's amusing that you refer to creationists because you use the exact kind of ******** tactics that they use. Using downright pseudoscience, unreliable unpeer-reviewed claims, PRATT arguments and "u cant xplain taht" reasoning

- All were trained in auto-pilot and navigational systems, and would have only had to plug in GPS coordinates and point the planes in the right direction to hit their targets. The day was clear, the targets were clearer. Experts conclude their skills would have been more than sufficient to finish their missions.

- Marvin Sirbu, professor of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University said on September 14, 2001, that "The fact of the matter is that cell phones can work in almost all phases of a commercial flight." Other industry experts said that it is possible to use cell phones with varying degrees of success during the ascent and descent of commercial airline flights.

- The collapse of WTC 7 is extremely well documented by actual peer-reviewed sources. www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html
#72 to #68 - teranin ONLINE
Reply +2
(07/21/2014) [-]
-Auto-pilot cannot compensate for the wind shear caused by high atmospheric pressure while flying low.  The plane that hit the pentagon was going 500 mph at near sea-level, it was shaking apart as it came in.  You cannot tell the auto-pilot how to make such a maneuver, it can only be done by hand, and based on military pilots attempts, it's hard as ****.   
   
- Cell phone one was my bad.   
   
-You linked an opinion piece that references several conceptual examinations of fire, and of the WTC collapse itself, but does not link to any peer-reviewed experimentation.  It links to references that are presentations and books on individual aspects of WTC 1 and 2 going down.  The entirety of the page you linked is irrelevant to WTC 7, in fact, they never mention it.   
   
-They had a goal going in, to come up with an explanation for what information they had on how WTC 7 could be brought down by the fire, and no other circumstances because none had been proven.  So, in concordance with those groups as you say, they designed a special physics engine and structure for WTC 7 that was choreographed to perfectly fit the story they already had prior to the development of said model.  They then classified how they made the model on trumped up ******** reasons, because they knew extra information on said model would make it useless as an argument.  rememberbuilding7.org/nist-collapse-model/   
   
- You... didn't actually debunk the speed and uniformity of the collapse of WTC 1, 2, or 7 with that statement, you just said the buildings were large.  I also said "nearly" at free-fall.  Had there been nothing beneath them at all, and were it purely gravity, it would have taken just under 10 seconds for each tower to collapse.  It actually took approximately 16 seconds for WTC 1 and 2 to collapse, while 90 floors of supposedly undamaged supports that could hold more than 4 times the total weight of the tower collapsed under the weight of a tiny fraction of the tower, "nearly at free fall"
-Auto-pilot cannot compensate for the wind shear caused by high atmospheric pressure while flying low. The plane that hit the pentagon was going 500 mph at near sea-level, it was shaking apart as it came in. You cannot tell the auto-pilot how to make such a maneuver, it can only be done by hand, and based on military pilots attempts, it's hard as ****.

- Cell phone one was my bad.

-You linked an opinion piece that references several conceptual examinations of fire, and of the WTC collapse itself, but does not link to any peer-reviewed experimentation. It links to references that are presentations and books on individual aspects of WTC 1 and 2 going down. The entirety of the page you linked is irrelevant to WTC 7, in fact, they never mention it.

-They had a goal going in, to come up with an explanation for what information they had on how WTC 7 could be brought down by the fire, and no other circumstances because none had been proven. So, in concordance with those groups as you say, they designed a special physics engine and structure for WTC 7 that was choreographed to perfectly fit the story they already had prior to the development of said model. They then classified how they made the model on trumped up ******** reasons, because they knew extra information on said model would make it useless as an argument. rememberbuilding7.org/nist-collapse-model/

- You... didn't actually debunk the speed and uniformity of the collapse of WTC 1, 2, or 7 with that statement, you just said the buildings were large. I also said "nearly" at free-fall. Had there been nothing beneath them at all, and were it purely gravity, it would have taken just under 10 seconds for each tower to collapse. It actually took approximately 16 seconds for WTC 1 and 2 to collapse, while 90 floors of supposedly undamaged supports that could hold more than 4 times the total weight of the tower collapsed under the weight of a tiny fraction of the tower, "nearly at free fall"
#77 to #72 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
- WW II Japanese Kamikaze pilots, where we have hundreds of examples of pilots who had very little training successfully fly airplanes into large objects (ships) that go 400 MPH. So much for being "hard as ****". And those had very little experience. Some of them had commercial pilots licences which require 200 hrs and had spent "hundreds of hours" in 727 simulators and even had time in 767 simulators. Also regarding speed and wind pressure: www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-the-role-of-aeroelastic-flutter-in-the-events-of-9-11.3359/

- These presentations are backed up by peer-review and solid evidence, in fact one of them is clearly based on the very peer-reviewed book specifically used for fire protection. As for WTC 7 www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html

- You bitch about me for sources with no peer-reviewed references yet the ******** bias propaganda site you presented uses 2 references, one being a ******* youtube video. Talk about trying hard.

- I don't even need to. I just showed that the alternative explanations are ******* impossible which already shows enough about how ******** truthers are. The mechanics of the collapse are really much more simple than conspiracy theorists would like you to believe. The heat expanded the steel in the truss in all directions. As a result they also expanded into the columns. The trusses/floor system, sagged in the middle because the columns were preventing the trusses from expanding in their direction. That led to the bowing of the exterior columns. The rest of your claims about the weight of the floors is unsupported and has zero evidence.
#69 to #68 - kanadetenshi
Reply -3
(07/21/2014) [-]
- Furthermore investigation on WTC 7 was performed by the The investigation, led by Dr S. Shyam Sunder, drew upon in-house technical expertise as well as the knowledge of several outside private institutions, including the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE); the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE); the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC); the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH); and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY) confirmed that there was no conspiracy involved. But hey obviously Mr. Tinfoil hat man is clearly more reliable

- Seriously? You're going to use the free fall fallacy that has been debunked since the first conspiracies rose up? J.L. Hudson’s in Detroit, Michigan, the tallest building ever razed, was 439 ft. (26 stories) WTC 1/2 are 3.2 times bigger than that. So, on 9/11, three buildings were razed with perfect precision. One was 131 ft. taller than the record tower and the other two (minus cell phone antennas) were 929 ft. taller than the record holder. SEEMS LEGIT TO ME!
#33 - hashtronaut
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
this episode was funny, but...that **** WAS an inside job. Just saying.

probably should post this anon, but **** anon.
#58 to #33 - neostar
Reply +2
(07/21/2014) [-]
At least you had the balls to do it logged in
#59 to #58 - hashtronaut
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
Hey, if you're ashamed of your opinion then why is it your opinion...you know? To be honest I used to spend a LOT of time and energy researching all of that **** and tbh it just isn't worth it. I can't do anything about it anyway, so I quit putting energy into that rabbit hole of corruption and such.
#60 to #59 - neostar
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
Honestly at this point I just don't care. I personally don't think it was a conspiracy, but its been 13 years and whats done is done. We're already in the position we're in whether its because muslim extremists lead to it or our own damn government did and there's no changing it.
#61 to #60 - hashtronaut
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
exactly what I mean by it isn't worth investing time and energy into anymore
#36 - skyblueshinx
Reply -4
(07/21/2014) [-]
9/11? What? That wasn't even remotely funny.

Neither was the last post.

This pic fails.
#38 to #36 - duvallwhitey
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
You will never be as great.
#40 to #36 - alphavsomega
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
just... stop
#67 to #36 - oosime
Reply +1
(07/21/2014) [-]
you-dare-to-stand.png
#76 to #67 - skyblueshinx
Reply 0
(07/21/2014) [-]
here you go
here you go