9/11. I appreciate you taking the time to view the content I uploaded If you want to, send a friend request my way. I accept them all!. IT' LL BE ALL OVER AGAIN
x
Click to expand

9/11

9/11. I appreciate you taking the time to view the content I uploaded If you want to, send a friend request my way. I accept them all!. IT' LL BE ALL OVER AGAIN

I appreciate you taking the time to view the content I uploaded
If you want to, send a friend request my way. I accept them all!

IT' LL BE
ALL OVER AGAIN.
WILL YOU SHUT UP
ABOUT ?
KYLE, WHY ARE YOU
SO AFRAID OF THE TRUTH ?
ed P my,
BECAUSE ANYBODY WHO THINKS
WAS A CONSPIRACY
UH REALLY ?
DID YOU KNOW THAT OVER
OF PEOPLE IN AMERICA
THINK THAT
WAS A CONSPIRACY ?
ARE YOU SAYING THAT
OF AMERICANS ARE RETARDS ?
YES, PM SAYING
OF AMERIC ‘ ARE RETARDS,
YEAH, AT LEAST
In My.
LET' S TAKE A TEST SAMPLE:
THERE' S FOUR OF U s,
YOU' RE A RETARD-
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+704
Views: 30835
Favorited: 25
Submitted: 07/20/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to joshlol submit to reddit

Comments(88):

[ 88 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - lightarcanine (07/21/2014) [-]
Jay Jay did 9/11
Jay Jay did 9/11
#10 - DeathKnight (07/21/2014) [-]
Season 10 Episode 9: Mystery of the Urinal Deuce   
   
 one of my personal favorites of all time
Season 10 Episode 9: Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

one of my personal favorites of all time
User avatar #25 to #10 - shabadaka (07/21/2014) [-]
I like your taste in episodes.
User avatar #17 to #10 - Mumford (07/21/2014) [-]
I wouldn't trust you, killing your own father, he was the ******* king you dick.
#35 to #17 - ichitoten (07/21/2014) [-]
There are many death knights and Arthas sure as hell wasn't the first. Hell there are 2 types of death knights, he may not even be the same type as Arthas was. You uneducated lil **** .
User avatar #43 to #35 - Mumford (07/21/2014) [-]
You must be the most enjoyable person at parties ever, someone has a joke and you go on about your expansive knowledge of World of Warcraft

Autsim...not even once.
#44 to #43 - ichitoten (07/21/2014) [-]
Christ, arent you getting prissy. If that was a joke, it was a **** one. Step yo game up niga.
User avatar #45 to #44 - Mumford (07/21/2014) [-]
For it to be a joke it would have to be some kind of satirical insight on your life, however I made no joke, I hope you and your autism have a long and lonely life

xxx

P.S. why don't you make another image trying to find Scottish people to ram you in the ass.
#47 to #45 - ichitoten (07/21/2014) [-]
"Someone has a joke" Then you deny it being a joke. Kek
User avatar #48 to #47 - Mumford (07/21/2014) [-]
Learn2Read please, your being an embarrassment towards 12 year old Scottish kids everywhere.
#49 to #48 - ichitoten (07/21/2014) [-]
Oh? Please, explain to my 12 year old brain what you meant.
Correct me if im wrong, but you are now denying it was a joke. So that means you genuinely meant what you said. So you genuinely believe that is Arthas behind that account? C'mon, wheres the sense?
User avatar #50 to #49 - Mumford (07/21/2014) [-]
If it was possible for you to read, you'd have noticed me taking the piss out of you by calling you out on being an autist, to which you retorted magically "if that was a joke, it was a **** one"

Sorry if that went over the top of your head, I'll try to speak on your mental level now.
#52 to #50 - ichitoten (07/21/2014) [-]
The joke that was **** was your joke towards Deathknight. I suppose that was too much to expect for you to work out.
User avatar #55 to #52 - Mumford (07/21/2014) [-]
Well one person liked it, so that's probably more people who actually like you in real life.
#56 to #55 - ichitoten (07/21/2014) [-]
Thats it? Thats your defense? Eh. Thats evidence enough that i won this argument to me. Still, congrats on your 1 thumb.
#54 to #10 - werfgh (07/21/2014) [-]
I have raging clue right now
#1 - dickticklerluv (07/20/2014) [-]
>thinking it isn't a conspiracy
>thinking it isn't a conspiracy
User avatar #11 to #1 - feelythefeel (07/21/2014) [-]
Just one more person...
User avatar #2 to #1 - ohhh ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
Found the retard. I know i don't have to say just joking, but some of the people here are not the brightest.
#3 to #2 - dickticklerluv (07/21/2014) [-]
thinking im serious
thinking im serious

User avatar #4 to #3 - ohhh ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
That's why i said i was just joking...
#5 to #4 - dickticklerluv (07/21/2014) [-]
thumbing me down as well
User avatar #6 to #5 - ohhh ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
************* be using my picture. Also i can honestly say that was more of a knee jerk reaction.
User avatar #7 to #6 - dickticklerluv (07/21/2014) [-]
ohhh k
User avatar #65 to #6 - lamadrama (07/21/2014) [-]
Nah you got orthodox jesus, this is mormon jesus.
#62 to #6 - arreatface (07/21/2014) [-]
> knee jerk reaction   
   
wut ?   
   
 also im french so maybe that is english beyond my skills, i dunno
> knee jerk reaction

wut ?

also im french so maybe that is english beyond my skills, i dunno
User avatar #64 to #62 - lecorbi (07/21/2014) [-]
i too am confused
User avatar #63 to #62 - ohhh ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
Basically i have seen stupidity far worse then his, so out of instinct i just kind of thumbed him down. I don't know when someone is pretending to be stupid anymore man, and the ones that are end up outdone by tumblr. I just don't know anymore man.
#13 - elaxx (07/21/2014) [-]
So FJers, what's your favorite 9/11 conspiracy?
So FJers, what's your favorite 9/11 conspiracy?
User avatar #14 to #13 - jaevel ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
The fact that if Al-Qaida hadn't conspired to do it. It ouldn't have gone so smoothely!
#22 to #13 - Rascal (07/21/2014) [-]
/pol/ is love, /pol/ is life
User avatar #23 to #13 - robinwilliamson (07/21/2014) [-]
One from my very own State Representative, which makes me feel proud *cough*

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) accused President Obama of inviting young immigrants to cross the border alone to recruit future Democratic voters.
thinkprogress.org/immigration/2014/07/08/3457940/gohmert-obama-border-crisis-democrat-voters/
#30 to #13 - ilikeztitz (07/21/2014) [-]
The** Goollddd** one
#39 to #13 - economic (07/21/2014) [-]
**economic rolled image** Kikes
User avatar #15 to #13 - tiles (07/21/2014) [-]
The one where tupac faked his death.
#16 to #13 - cactusupthebutt (07/21/2014) [-]
That, that man is indeed a dragon in disguise. Wake up america
User avatar #20 to #13 - thingexplain (07/21/2014) [-]
Conspiracies are good, but I like to collect anti-conspiracies. Like the fact that people think the government could pull off a massive conspiracy like that without any proof that they did it, but the president of the god-damn united states previous couldn't get a blowjob in his own office without the whole world knowing about it.
User avatar #34 to #20 - stardustdragonlord ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
unless he wanted to get caught for publicity
#81 to #20 - splitalterego (07/21/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure there was a bunch of presidential blow jobs that we don't know about.
#27 to #21 - Rascal (07/21/2014) [-]
Steel beams melted together? Uhhh.. I thought the buildings collapsed, how is this possible?
User avatar #29 to #27 - joaomartins (07/21/2014) [-]
It. Was. Jesus.
#18 - noonesperfect ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
Oh please, everyone knows that Batman was behind 9/11
Oh please, everyone knows that Batman was behind 9/11
User avatar #12 - theladystrangler (07/21/2014) [-]
It obviously was a conspiracy, its was a conspiracy from Osama dummies
#71 to #12 - raidaltamimi (07/21/2014) [-]
What if Osama WAS the dummy?
#70 - Rascal (07/21/2014) [-]
Anyone who seriously thinks that 9/11 was a conspiracy is a ******* idiot. Stop being a paranoid nutcase. DUH GUBERNMENT isn't after you. The world isn't trying to get you. Calm the **** down.
#73 to #70 - freshpound (07/21/2014) [-]
If they could explain the collapse of building seven and the source of all the molten steel I might be more inclined to believe them. You're just gullible if you don't question these things.
User avatar #78 to #73 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
Fun fact: They have, countless of times, for years.
User avatar #79 to #78 - freshpound (07/21/2014) [-]
I'm not American so I don't hear these things. Can you tell me how they explain temperatures comparable to that of a blast furnace?
User avatar #80 to #79 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
There is no documented evidence of the presence of actually-melted steel at ground zero. The molten material noted in the 911 Commission report was "slag", not a molten metal. Most of the reports of "molten steel" found at ground zero were merely references to obviously red-hot solid steel. Even if they actually found "molten" metal, aluminum (which the planes were made out of) melts well under the temperature of jet fuel (pure aluminum melts at 660C, jet fuel burns around 980C going up to 2,200C. In addition, the mix of jet fuel, plastics, rugs, curtains etc. may burn hot enough to melt aluminum. (This can be demonstrated by placing an empty aluminum soda can on top of an ordinary campfire.)
#83 to #80 - freshpound (07/21/2014) [-]
Ey? There's a picture here of a melted girder found at the site. How do you explain that? What about those balls of iron that formed. And allegedly some temperature records where done in the weeks proceeding, some as high as 20'000 degrees. So long as these things are not explained I cannot help but be skeptical.
User avatar #85 to #83 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
That picture nor the source it come from was about pools of molten steel, this is about the remarkable erosion, and yes, melt droplets at the microscopic level as a result of the formation of eutectic mixtures.

www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
User avatar #88 to #85 - freshpound (07/21/2014) [-]
I don't understand. Did steel melt or not? Melting a droplet still requires the same heat. I have no idea what a eutectic mixture is and I'm not willing to invest so much time reading that pdf.
If still did melt I don't see how.
User avatar #82 to #80 - freshpound (07/21/2014) [-]
So how did the molten metal get underneath WTC7? And what caused WTC7 to fall if not fires melting the steel.
#51 - kristovsky (07/21/2014) [-]
Bitch please we all know it was Russia
Bitch please we all know it was Russia
#42 - teranin ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

When people act like people who don't believe the official story behind 9/11 are tinfoilers who think our world is run by lizard men.
User avatar #46 to #42 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
Coming amusingly from a channel that is a well known tinfoiler, climate change denialist, pseudo-scientist and thinking every bad thing is caused by illerminati and big pharma.
#57 to #46 - teranin ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
I disagree with a lot of what he says. Doesn't mean everything is incorrect.     
   
For example, TJ (The Amazing Atheist) holds extreme, nearly totalitarian socialist beliefs that he mentions from time to time.  I disagree with him wholesale on that, but many of his videos I agree with.   
   
Still, the official story on 9/11 is total crap.  Even if you ignore all of his inferences to things like able danger or rumsfeld's budget "mishaps" and other questionable lines of reasoning, 9/11's official story remains about as believable as Noah getting 2 of every animal on earth into a wooden boat.  Y'know, like the guy who couldn't maneuver a single engine cessna for 			****		 but somehow managed to successfully complete an extremely difficult maneuver at sheering speed on a huge plane that military pilots can't replicate on a simulator, or cellphone calls from a plane over 10,000 feet high back in 2001, when that was damn near impossible for our tech at the time, or the fact that building 7 went down due to circumstances that have never brought a building down, ever, in the histoy of mankind, and thousands of architects attest to that.  Nist's model remaining classified when every model constructed by architects in environments with earth physics engines presented with the same set of circumstances that supposedly brought down building 7 never once having been accomplished in the simulation, except in NIST's one.  The fact that the lower, internal supports of both WTC 1 and 2 were capable of holding 4x the entire tower's weight and no heat was anywhere near the vast majority of those supports for 90% of the floors below where the planes hit, but the towers not only collapsed but did so relatively neatly and all at once, nearly at free fall.   
   
I don't like to buy in to whodunit tales, but it's clear 			****		 didn't go down as it is presented.
I disagree with a lot of what he says. Doesn't mean everything is incorrect.

For example, TJ (The Amazing Atheist) holds extreme, nearly totalitarian socialist beliefs that he mentions from time to time. I disagree with him wholesale on that, but many of his videos I agree with.

Still, the official story on 9/11 is total crap. Even if you ignore all of his inferences to things like able danger or rumsfeld's budget "mishaps" and other questionable lines of reasoning, 9/11's official story remains about as believable as Noah getting 2 of every animal on earth into a wooden boat. Y'know, like the guy who couldn't maneuver a single engine cessna for **** but somehow managed to successfully complete an extremely difficult maneuver at sheering speed on a huge plane that military pilots can't replicate on a simulator, or cellphone calls from a plane over 10,000 feet high back in 2001, when that was damn near impossible for our tech at the time, or the fact that building 7 went down due to circumstances that have never brought a building down, ever, in the histoy of mankind, and thousands of architects attest to that. Nist's model remaining classified when every model constructed by architects in environments with earth physics engines presented with the same set of circumstances that supposedly brought down building 7 never once having been accomplished in the simulation, except in NIST's one. The fact that the lower, internal supports of both WTC 1 and 2 were capable of holding 4x the entire tower's weight and no heat was anywhere near the vast majority of those supports for 90% of the floors below where the planes hit, but the towers not only collapsed but did so relatively neatly and all at once, nearly at free fall.

I don't like to buy in to whodunit tales, but it's clear **** didn't go down as it is presented.
User avatar #68 to #57 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
It's amusing that you refer to creationists because you use the exact kind of ******** tactics that they use. Using downright pseudoscience, unreliable unpeer-reviewed claims, PRATT arguments and "u cant xplain taht" reasoning

- All were trained in auto-pilot and navigational systems, and would have only had to plug in GPS coordinates and point the planes in the right direction to hit their targets. The day was clear, the targets were clearer. Experts conclude their skills would have been more than sufficient to finish their missions.

- Marvin Sirbu, professor of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University said on September 14, 2001, that "The fact of the matter is that cell phones can work in almost all phases of a commercial flight." Other industry experts said that it is possible to use cell phones with varying degrees of success during the ascent and descent of commercial airline flights.

- The collapse of WTC 7 is extremely well documented by actual peer-reviewed sources. www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html
#72 to #68 - teranin ONLINE (07/21/2014) [-]
-Auto-pilot cannot compensate for the wind shear caused by high atmospheric pressure while flying low.  The plane that hit the pentagon was going 500 mph at near sea-level, it was shaking apart as it came in.  You cannot tell the auto-pilot how to make such a maneuver, it can only be done by hand, and based on military pilots attempts, it's hard as 			****		.   
   
- Cell phone one was my bad.   
   
-You linked an opinion piece that references several conceptual examinations of fire, and of the WTC collapse itself, but does not link to any peer-reviewed experimentation.  It links to references that are presentations and books on individual aspects of WTC 1 and 2 going down.  The entirety of the page you linked is irrelevant to WTC 7, in fact, they never mention it.   
   
-They had a goal going in, to come up with an explanation for what information they had on how WTC 7 could be brought down by the fire, and no other circumstances because none had been proven.  So, in concordance with those groups as you say, they designed a special physics engine and structure for WTC 7 that was choreographed to perfectly fit the story they already had prior to the development of said model.  They then classified how they made the model on trumped up 			********		 reasons, because they knew extra information on said model would make it useless as an argument.  rememberbuilding7.org/nist-collapse-model/   
   
- You... didn't actually debunk the speed and uniformity of the collapse of WTC 1, 2, or 7 with that statement, you just said the buildings were large.  I also said "nearly" at free-fall.  Had there been nothing beneath them at all, and were it purely gravity, it would have taken just under 10 seconds for each tower to collapse.  It actually took approximately 16 seconds for WTC 1 and 2 to collapse, while 90 floors of supposedly undamaged supports that could hold more than 4 times the total weight of the tower collapsed under the weight of a tiny fraction of the tower, "nearly at free fall"
-Auto-pilot cannot compensate for the wind shear caused by high atmospheric pressure while flying low. The plane that hit the pentagon was going 500 mph at near sea-level, it was shaking apart as it came in. You cannot tell the auto-pilot how to make such a maneuver, it can only be done by hand, and based on military pilots attempts, it's hard as **** .

- Cell phone one was my bad.

-You linked an opinion piece that references several conceptual examinations of fire, and of the WTC collapse itself, but does not link to any peer-reviewed experimentation. It links to references that are presentations and books on individual aspects of WTC 1 and 2 going down. The entirety of the page you linked is irrelevant to WTC 7, in fact, they never mention it.

-They had a goal going in, to come up with an explanation for what information they had on how WTC 7 could be brought down by the fire, and no other circumstances because none had been proven. So, in concordance with those groups as you say, they designed a special physics engine and structure for WTC 7 that was choreographed to perfectly fit the story they already had prior to the development of said model. They then classified how they made the model on trumped up ******** reasons, because they knew extra information on said model would make it useless as an argument. rememberbuilding7.org/nist-collapse-model/

- You... didn't actually debunk the speed and uniformity of the collapse of WTC 1, 2, or 7 with that statement, you just said the buildings were large. I also said "nearly" at free-fall. Had there been nothing beneath them at all, and were it purely gravity, it would have taken just under 10 seconds for each tower to collapse. It actually took approximately 16 seconds for WTC 1 and 2 to collapse, while 90 floors of supposedly undamaged supports that could hold more than 4 times the total weight of the tower collapsed under the weight of a tiny fraction of the tower, "nearly at free fall"
User avatar #77 to #72 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
- WW II Japanese Kamikaze pilots, where we have hundreds of examples of pilots who had very little training successfully fly airplanes into large objects (ships) that go 400 MPH. So much for being "hard as **** ". And those had very little experience. Some of them had commercial pilots licences which require 200 hrs and had spent "hundreds of hours" in 727 simulators and even had time in 767 simulators. Also regarding speed and wind pressure: www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-the-role-of-aeroelastic-flutter-in-the-events-of-9-11.3359/

- These presentations are backed up by peer-review and solid evidence, in fact one of them is clearly based on the very peer-reviewed book specifically used for fire protection. As for WTC 7 www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html

- You bitch about me for sources with no peer-reviewed references yet the ******** bias propaganda site you presented uses 2 references, one being a ******* youtube video. Talk about trying hard.

- I don't even need to. I just showed that the alternative explanations are ******* impossible which already shows enough about how ******** truthers are. The mechanics of the collapse are really much more simple than conspiracy theorists would like you to believe. The heat expanded the steel in the truss in all directions. As a result they also expanded into the columns. The trusses/floor system, sagged in the middle because the columns were preventing the trusses from expanding in their direction. That led to the bowing of the exterior columns. The rest of your claims about the weight of the floors is unsupported and has zero evidence.
User avatar #69 to #68 - kanadetenshi (07/21/2014) [-]
- Furthermore investigation on WTC 7 was performed by the The investigation, led by Dr S. Shyam Sunder, drew upon in-house technical expertise as well as the knowledge of several outside private institutions, including the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE); the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE); the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC); the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH); and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY) confirmed that there was no conspiracy involved. But hey obviously Mr. Tinfoil hat man is clearly more reliable

- Seriously? You're going to use the free fall fallacy that has been debunked since the first conspiracies rose up? J.L. Hudson’s in Detroit, Michigan, the tallest building ever razed, was 439 ft. (26 stories) WTC 1/2 are 3.2 times bigger than that. So, on 9/11, three buildings were razed with perfect precision. One was 131 ft. taller than the record tower and the other two (minus cell phone antennas) were 929 ft. taller than the record holder. SEEMS LEGIT TO ME!
#75 - somefatguyone (07/21/2014) [-]
snap snap snap snap snap
..................................snap
...........................snap
....................snap
.............snap
......snap
snap snap snap snap snap
User avatar #66 - azyzil (07/21/2014) [-]
Don't belif on everything you see on the Internet
#41 - Rascal (07/21/2014) [-]
>Front Page post about pepsi and Budweiser pulling all products out of a store because Ahmed laughed at 9/11
>Front Page post about 9/11 not being real
>FJ Logic
>Kills self
User avatar #33 - hashtronaut (07/21/2014) [-]
this episode was funny, but...that **** WAS an inside job. Just saying.

probably should post this anon, but **** anon.
#58 to #33 - neostar (07/21/2014) [-]
At least you had the balls to do it logged in
User avatar #59 to #58 - hashtronaut (07/21/2014) [-]
Hey, if you're ashamed of your opinion then why is it your opinion...you know? To be honest I used to spend a LOT of time and energy researching all of that **** and tbh it just isn't worth it. I can't do anything about it anyway, so I quit putting energy into that rabbit hole of corruption and such.
#60 to #59 - neostar (07/21/2014) [-]
Honestly at this point I just don't care. I personally don't think it was a conspiracy, but its been 13 years and whats done is done. We're already in the position we're in whether its because muslim extremists lead to it or our own damn government did and there's no changing it.
User avatar #61 to #60 - hashtronaut (07/21/2014) [-]
exactly what I mean by it isn't worth investing time and energy into anymore
#9 - selfdenyingbeggar (07/21/2014) [-]
False Flag attack if there ever was one.
User avatar #37 - konradkurze (07/21/2014) [-]
kinda sad seeing some people shut off logic and reason and just shout stuff in support of the government regardless of how dodgy bastard politicians are
User avatar #36 - skyblueshinx (07/21/2014) [-]
9/11? What? That wasn't even remotely funny.

Neither was the last post.

This pic fails.
User avatar #38 to #36 - duvallwhitey (07/21/2014) [-]
You will never be as great.
User avatar #40 to #36 - alphavsomega (07/21/2014) [-]
just... stop
User avatar #67 to #36 - oosime (07/21/2014) [-]
you-dare-to-stand.png
#76 to #67 - skyblueshinx (07/21/2014) [-]
here you go
here you go
User avatar #87 - woodlandcritters (07/21/2014) [-]
"the boy in the red poof ball hat"
#31 - thankmrskeltal (07/21/2014) [-]
**thankmrskeltal rolled image**
#28 - thewitchking (07/21/2014) [-]
**thewitchking rolls 712**
#53 to #28 - Rascal (07/21/2014) [-]
OH MY GOD! Add 2 to 7 = 9. Make two 1s and that's 11.... 9 11!!!!!
#26 - Rascal (07/21/2014) [-]
Idiotic Americans, Israel is your master.
[ 88 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)