-. . WHY WWII] ANYOING BABE out miimii finalist THINGS van" can no IS WORRY mm WHAT nannies mm was WITH ms I] } l(
x
Click to expand

Comments(128):

[ 128 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#7 - melkevegen ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
#3 - casualbench (06/11/2014) [-]
**casualbench rolled image**
#59 to #3 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
nice roll bro
#69 to #3 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
will you stop your endless rolling now, Adele?
#6 to #3 - doomedalive (06/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #10 - luncheonlad ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
Don't be hatin' on those queers y'faggit
User avatar #17 to #10 - whereisaname (06/11/2014) [-]
Don't be hatin' on those blacks ya' ****** .
User avatar #18 to #17 - luncheonlad ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
I aint racist. I love *******
User avatar #8 - willindor ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
Do homophobics think more about gay sex than gay people do?
#11 to #8 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
No. We get bombarded with information and opinions of gays each day, from news to parades.

And most people with a brain, the only group that actually show any interrest in these campaigns, have never been against homosexuality.
So they are getting annoyed, and are actively seeking to ignore the debate as a whole.


I just feel it's disgusting as **** , that my hometown gets 24/7 traffic problems and gets to smell like urine and **** for an entire weak each year, because someone is proud of their defect. I mean, what the **** ?

(I say defect, because speaking from our species perspective, homosexuality won't get new generations. Therefore, from a biological PoV, it's a defect).
-8
#12 to #11 - wliia has deleted their comment [-]
#13 to #12 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
I don't even know what you are reffering to, i'm talking about the situation from my homeland, Denmark.
-7
#14 to #13 - wliia has deleted their comment [-]
#33 to #14 - facepalmftw (06/11/2014) [-]
Mammals don't lay eggs, because they have developed the ability to nurture their young, thus improving survival rates. Comparing the reproductive cycle of humans to that of fish is like comparing apples to roast beef.

In all but the very highest brain-use species, sex is used purely for reproduction. Many species mate for life, many die after mating. Humans are one of the select few species that has advanced to find pleasure in sex. Thus, we have sex in different positions, environments, and with different partners. Homosexuality does not advance the species. Stick two gay guys (or two lesbians) in a room and tell them to make a baby. They can't. It just doesn't work that way.

Also, the claim that gay couples are good for children because they present more caretakers is totally backwards. Human children develop more fully when they are presented with a variety of social perspectives. This is why "it takes a whole village" to raise a child, and this fact trickles down to even the demeanor of the parents. The mother and the father each have very distinct roles in a child's life. Children that grow up without one of these two show patterned social problems. A child without the nurturing guidance of a mother will grow up with significantly less social and personal compassion. A child without a father's heavy hand in discipline and in work ethic will grow up to be more timid towards society.

We as a species have advanced purposefully for centuries. An it is scientifically proven that homosexuality is not a genetic advancement, nor a psychological superiority. It is like music, or games: An aspect of our being and society developed purely for pleasure and interest. This doesn't make homosexuals any less human that the rest of us, but it doesn't validate homosexuality to the equal footing of heterosexual actions with the intent to create and foster life.
-2
#41 to #33 - wliia has deleted their comment [-]
#43 to #41 - facepalmftw (06/12/2014) [-]
>"Saying that mammals and fish are different is a stupid comparison because mammals and fish are different"
You claimed that, if sex was biologically about reproduction, human females would lay eggs like fish.

>"You saying it takes a village to raise a child is totally backwards, cause it takes a village to raise a child"
You claimed that gay couples are better for raising children because 2 guys raising a child is better than a guy and a girl. I'm saying that you're wrong, that it takes a variety of influences to properly raise a child.

You're point is that homosexuality is valid because sex isn't just about making babies, and same-sex couple do a better job of raising kids than opposite-sex couples. I'm saying that you're technically right on the first claim, and as such gay porn is no better or worse than straight porn. But claiming that gay couples should be allowed to have kids is crap. They don't make them, they don't raise them better, and it's simply not the natural order of things.
0
#47 to #43 - wliia has deleted their comment [-]
#48 to #47 - facepalmftw (06/12/2014) [-]
Like I said before, almost all animals use sex purely for reproduction. Mammals have developed nurturing their young and live birth because it increases individual survival rates. That's why birds take care of their babies. That's why Giraffes give birth to live young. I've never seen or heard of birds ******* for pleasure.

I didn't say there are only ever two people raising a child. I said, quite specifically, there are many more. What I said was that there needs to be a variety of influences, and this necessity reached down even to the parents. What I said was that children who are raised by a family that all thinks and acts similarly (i.e. two parents of the same sex) are socially inferior to those with a healthy experience of a variety of personalities. What I said is that in a family, the mother has a specific purpose and the father has a specific purpose. When you start to mess with these, you start to mess with the child's early learning.
User avatar #50 to #48 - wliia (06/12/2014) [-]
I don't get why you're arguing with me then. That was exactly my point. You're arguing with me because I'm trying to explain to shadow that sometimes having less children is more advantageous as it allows for the parents to better nurture their young.

You're arguing something completely unrelated. In our past, homosexual couples were generally there to aid in nurturing young. If you have 1 straight couple and 1 gay couple, then that's essentially 4 adults caring for ~ 4 children. If you have 2 straight couples that's 4 adults caring for ~8 children. Having gay couples in a small tribe does for the tribe the same thing as a mother producing less than a fish does. It provides more care for the children.

If you really want to argue about whether gay couples should be allowed to adopt that's fine. You're just not making your point clear when you're putting that argument in when its an argument about evolution. I have a question for you though, do you think that every single gay male is super macho masculine? Does every lesbian refuse to wear anything but a dress, has long hair, and is super effeminate? If that's true, you have a point, but the thing is, people are varried. A child can very easily end up with a gay couple as parents that have very different parrenting styles, or a straight couple that parents in much the same way.
#52 to #50 - facepalmftw (06/12/2014) [-]
I'm arguing with you because you're making ridiculous statements. You're claiming that if people were supposed to use sex to reproduce, we'd lay eggs. That is a totally ridiculous comment. We DO use sex to reproduce, and we DON'T lay eggs, and there are plenty of other animals that are the same way. Your fish comment made absolutely no contribution to that conversation.

YOU are arguing that no gay couples try to raise children and all straight ones do. What makes gay people any better at helping friends raise kids that straight people? Seriously? Honestly? Again, no constructive words from you.

Finally, I don't care about personal values anywhere near as much as I care about innate behavioral traits. No, no two people are the same. Yes, gay couples act differently. But fathers inherently act a certain way with respect to their kids. And mothers act an inherently different way. Go ask 100 dads what they would do to protect their daughter. I can guarantee their responses will be very close to the same. Go as 100 moms what they would do if their little boy skinned his knee on the playground. I guarantee they will say nearly the same thing. There are inherent behavioral traits in each sex. A father isn't going to be any more or less protective of his daughter just because he takes it up the ass. THAT is why it is so important to have a MOTHER and a FATHER in a nuclear family.
User avatar #53 to #52 - wliia (06/12/2014) [-]
No, you're the one that's saying the sole evolutionary goal is to produce as many offspring as possible, and because gay people don't produce offspring, gay people don't exist. Well here's some facts for you:

A) Gay people exist.
B) There's more to evolution that producing as many offspring as possible.

We don't lay eggs like fish because of fact B. Gay people exist because, when we lived in smaller tribes (here's a fun fact for you: we didn't always have these big cities and mcdonalds to provide food for you) they increased the ratio of adults to children in a tribe.

No, YOU are saying that gay couples remove the ability of straight couples to have children. Facts are: There are an overabundance of children without parents. Gay people and Straight people both want to raise children.

Let's set aside whether its better to have 1 mom and 1 dad, or 2 parents of the same gender. Actually, I'll just say you're right. Can you answer me this: Is it better to have no parents or 2 parents of the same gender? Because there are kids growing up without parents, and denying gay couples the ability to adopt will just increase the number of those kids.
#76 to #53 - facepalmftw (06/12/2014) [-]
Where did I claim that gay people don't exist? Quote me, please.

>Gay people exist because, when we lived in smaller tribes... they increased the ratio of adults to children in a tribe.
So you're saying that homosexuality is a social evolution to AVOID having children? Isn't that claim entirely counter to your argument here?

>YOU are saying that gay couples remove the ability of straight couples to have children.
Again, show me where I made that claim.

On the topic of having gay parents vs. having no parents I'll agree with you. However, 1) There is a difference between growing up without parents and growing up in the foster system. 2) There is no evidence to support the claim that denying gay couples the ability to adopt will actually INCREASE the number or kids entering the foster system.
User avatar #78 to #76 - wliia (06/12/2014) [-]
1. I'm intentionally misconstruing your words the same way you're doing with mine.
"Gay couples aid in nurturing the young"
"WOW WTF You arguing that no gay couples try to raise children totally wrong"
If you're not going to even attempt to take what I'm saying seriously, then don't expect anything better in return.

2. No it's not? My entire argument this whole time has been:
A) Having less children can be evolutionary advantageous (ie, mammals don't lay thousands of eggs) to help nurture children.
B) Gay couples don't have children, so that means more adults care for less children.

I'm not sure what you thought I was arguing.

3. I dunno how you can say that. It's not really a matter of evidence, it's just logic:
The more people you deny adopting kids, the more kids that will not get adopted.
#80 to #78 - facepalmftw (06/12/2014) [-]
I was taking everything you said seriously... up until now. If you're going to mock me, then I see no point in trying to help you understand what I'm saying.


Ah, I'll give it one last shot: Homosexuality is inherently unnatural and presents absolutely no benefit to society. It is a psychological evolution of a species that has evolved to the point where sex is pleasurable. I don't give a flying **** where you put your cock, but I refuse to accept the claim that gay couples make as good or better parents than hetero couples.
User avatar #97 to #80 - wliia (06/12/2014) [-]
Okay. That's debatable, but I'll even accept it for now. I still don't see any reason gay couples shouldn't be allowed to adopt if they're still better than a kid growing up without parents in an orphanage.

Again, my point was that homosexuality inherently increases the ratio of parents to children, allowing for better nourishment, meaning it is a very viable evolutionary advantage, and shows why it does occur naturally (and hence why it occurs in ~10% of people).
#112 to #97 - facepalmftw (06/12/2014) [-]
Not having kids in general increases the ratio of adults to children. And yet, when I put it THAT way, it sounds like such a DISadvantage.
User avatar #124 to #112 - wliia (06/13/2014) [-]
It's all a matter of checks and balanced. Taking the issue to either extreme is disadvantageous for a species. Homosexuality is an evolutionary check for that 1 direction. Taking it to the other end is also gunna end with bad results.
#100 to #97 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
I got to say, your side of the argument is riddled with fallacies of relevance.
#16 to #14 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
Also, don't insult others on a whim, you deranged lawn mower.
#15 to #14 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
1. The 2-4 children pr family is wrong. Nowadays, most white families don't even get 2 children. Go back 4 centuries, and the average was much higher.

I've actually read the gay uncly hypothesis, iii just didn't recall it by name, tho i re-read it again.
Keep in mind, that it's a hypothesis, not a theory.
-4
#19 to #15 - wliia has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #19 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
1. You started out with directly insulting me, based on what you THINK to know i've read.
Which is the logic of a deranged lawn mower.

2. I just called it defect. And i stand by it, seeing as even if the UG hypothesis holds true, it's useless in most, if not all societies today. Maybe except Indien and China(Free population control).

3. I never meant to insult anyone, i even made a ******* whole parenthesed sentence, specifically to point out that i was not intending to insult.

4. Your being egdy and butthurt at the same time. Please stahp it.
#24 to #22 - anon (06/11/2014) [-]
>getting mad cause you know you're wrong

get off the internet kid. ask your parents permission next time your try to be edgy.
#25 to #24 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
I'm defending my argument, which is the entire idea of a debate.

You on the other hand, is just annoying.
User avatar #56 to #22 - jaybear (06/12/2014) [-]
platypuses and echidnas lay eggs and they are mammals, dolphins are incredibly intelligent mammals and they have sex for pleasure, and homosexuality has been observed in about 1,500 different species and over 500 of these cases has been documented, the bat being the gayest of the animal/mammals species.
#23 to #14 - anon (06/11/2014) [-]
You should read the selfish gene by richard dawkins. Then maybe you won't make such idiotic comments.
#26 to #12 - kanyesfishsticks (06/11/2014) [-]
That's an unproven hypothesis, its just as likely that homosexuality is a birth defect. I know the words "birth defect" have a negative connotation, but I don't mean it a negative way.
User avatar #125 to #11 - interrest (06/14/2014) [-]
interest*
#126 to #125 - shadowgandalf ONLINE (06/14/2014) [-]
You ************ ...
You must get a few PM's a day
User avatar #127 to #126 - interrest (06/14/2014) [-]
nope, people dont write it wrong that often
User avatar #92 to #11 - steelcrasher (06/12/2014) [-]
Don't forget to mention all the progay progapanda in shows and games. I mean it's hard to stay neutral when stories of the games/shows you love are being massacred for the sake of being politically correct.
-3
#38 to #11 - skittlesinexcess has deleted their comment [-]
#34 - phantasmalcat (06/11/2014) [-]
That actually makes a lot of sense though
User avatar #64 to #34 - pootismang (06/12/2014) [-]
Found the redneck.
#35 - evebishop (06/11/2014) [-]
A gay friend of mine once pointed out that some straight men are probably uneasy around gay guys because they don't like the idea of someone looking at them the way they look at women.....I've always found this to be a little funny
A gay friend of mine once pointed out that some straight men are probably uneasy around gay guys because they don't like the idea of someone looking at them the way they look at women.....I've always found this to be a little funny
#75 to #35 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
what is that .gif from?
User avatar #77 to #75 - stringfingerable (06/12/2014) [-]
A show called Wakfu.
0
#108 to #35 - aldothenazi has deleted their comment [-]
#51 to #35 - soczy (06/12/2014) [-]
You deserve more thumbs for this comment.
You deserve more thumbs for this comment.
User avatar #90 to #35 - notstill (06/12/2014) [-]
You sound like a passive aggressive feminist.
#73 to #35 - emptysuperman ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
So then those homophobes probably don't think of women too well. That might explain why homophobia and sexism go hand and hand most of the time.
So then those homophobes probably don't think of women too well. That might explain why homophobia and sexism go hand and hand most of the time.
#98 to #73 - swagbot (06/12/2014) [-]
Wow....

TMI alert... but the moment you said that, I thought about my Dad... then other examples of homophobic-but-otherwise-bearish men that i know... and realized you're completely right!

Awesome observation... can't believe I never saw that before... faving.
#86 to #73 - joemoearigato (06/12/2014) [-]
That's a hot gif...
#49 to #35 - xcoreyx (06/12/2014) [-]
I'd find it very flattering if a gay guy was checking me out
#106 to #49 - akigon ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
I once wnt to a gay bar with my lesbian friends. It was weird... and I kinda liked being wanted. Whether it was a man or woman did not matter
User avatar #121 to #106 - evebishop (06/13/2014) [-]
I like going to gay clubs with my friends, I don't have to worry about any guys hitting on me (not that I get that much anyways) and it's kind of cool being able to chat with any random guy.
#36 - aurumuru (06/11/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#67 - CaptainKill (06/12/2014) [-]
This meme sure has changed a lot since it first came out. Sort of like those "This changes everything" pictures being used for just the dad acting weird.
#4 - anon (06/11/2014) [-]
all the gay men aren't faggots and not every faggot is gay
and not every black guy is a ****** But most of them are
#5 to #4 - anon (06/11/2014) [-]
Never ******* happy are you
#40 - kouzan (06/11/2014) [-]
**kouzan rolled image** That's actually not that bad for advice.
#82 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
Sounds like OP is ok with guys raping his girlfriend
#66 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
i often ask a gay guy what i should wear when shopping for clothes, they know their ****
User avatar #87 to #66 - demandsgayversion (06/12/2014) [-]
You're gonna go get new clothes anyway, so it doesn't really matter what you wear.
User avatar #96 - alfjnn (06/12/2014) [-]
I'm a 19 year old Greek-American IT dude in New York City (Who just happens to like dudes)

It's not who I am, it's something that I happen to be.
I don't look or act the part.

At the same time, I understand the sentiment against homosexuals. While I think it's unreasonable, all mankind are entitled to their opinion, be it tolerance or or hatred, and I accept others for believing what they do, and thinking what they do.

Because this is America, god damn it. What I do with my dick is my business, and you're all entitled to hate me for it.
User avatar #107 to #96 - aceshot ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
Well I care what you do with your dick. you should stick it in me
User avatar #113 to #107 - alfjnn (06/12/2014) [-]
Get to know me better, baby.
User avatar #116 to #113 - aceshot ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
Is that all? That's the best part.
User avatar #117 to #116 - alfjnn (06/12/2014) [-]
Friended.
4lyfe.
#99 to #96 - swagbot (06/12/2014) [-]
Holding hateful thoughts is fine.

Acting upon them in aggression is, IMO, unacceptable.

Nonaggression Principle FTW. (And also - funny, that: a philosophy that does not condone violence as a primary motivator actually makes for the manliest men.)
User avatar #114 to #99 - alfjnn (06/12/2014) [-]
Well yeah.
Not giving a **** about other people's opinions is manly as **** .
User avatar #9 - zeroqp ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
I get that it's a joke, but it depicts the very reason homosexuality is controversial: it focuses on the sexual acts. That's why many people are disturbed and disgusted by it. They forget that what really defines who we are attracted to are our feelings. Gay people fall in love just like straight people do. Think about the way you get butterflies in your stomach, the way you notice the little things about your crush, the scent, and how time slows down when you think about said person...

gay people are just that, people, and there's no reason they wouldn't feel what any other person can feel.

I'm not gay, but I don't believe in categorizing people like that either. I concider myself straight because I think I could only truly love the opposite gender, but I would love to have sex with the same gender.
User avatar #21 to #9 - MudkipTomislav (06/11/2014) [-]
Yeah, straight as **** .
#29 to #9 - anon (06/11/2014) [-]
faget
#32 to #9 - facepalmftw (06/11/2014) [-]
>I'm not gay
>but I would love to have sex with the same gender

Sounds like someone is scared of being gay.
0
#45 to #9 - GShock has deleted their comment [-]
#46 to #9 - GShock (06/12/2014) [-]
That means you're bi, dude. Here's a free shirt.
0
#89 to #9 - demandsgayversion has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #105 to #9 - renespar (06/12/2014) [-]
okay, I'll put this nicer than others who replied to this will, you're not straight, you're bisexual if you think that latter part, but based on what you said before that, you're Hetero-romantic, or you only have romantic feelings for the opposite gender, while for those of your own gender you'd just want to **** , also a 1 on the Kinsey scale if you prefer
User avatar #57 - deadadventurer (06/12/2014) [-]
I don't care which sexuality you have. Go **** a monkey for all I care.

I don't like gay people because they always check me out and some don't understand a mean glare and actually try to make moves on me.
User avatar #63 to #57 - TheFixer (06/12/2014) [-]
that and the gays flaunt it more publicly and its accepted yet when I flaunt my heterosexuality im told to keep it in the bedroom.
User avatar #94 to #63 - somethingpants (06/12/2014) [-]
I found this weird because in the area I live it's the exact opposite.
Then I remembered I live in Texas. Public displays of non-hetero affection are cause for stoning or crucifixion.
#111 to #94 - partyboomer (06/12/2014) [-]
**partyboomer rolled image** Wish I lived there.
#109 to #63 - partyboomer (06/12/2014) [-]
**partyboomer rolled image**
One of the reasons I've become homophobic over the last few years.
User avatar #119 to #109 - TheFixer (06/12/2014) [-]
it hasn't made me homophobic its just made me not give a **** about their claims to equality
0
#122 to #119 - TheFixer has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #120 to #119 - partyboomer (06/13/2014) [-]
I hate gays.
User avatar #123 to #120 - TheFixer (06/13/2014) [-]
well to each his own.
#81 to #57 - chewiewhatawookie (06/12/2014) [-]
So, you don't care about pedophilia?
#84 to #81 - partyboomer (06/12/2014) [-]
As long as it's not gay.
#110 to #85 - partyboomer (06/12/2014) [-]
You know you want some.
You know you want some.
User avatar #95 to #57 - alfjnn (06/12/2014) [-]
No one checks you out, bro.

Your insecurity is showing.
User avatar #128 to #95 - deadadventurer (06/16/2014) [-]
I just came back from a festival and on that festival a homo made a move on me.
#28 - imungo (06/11/2014) [-]
I care because I don't want them coming for my dick.
#102 to #28 - alphagex (06/12/2014) [-]
Shhhhhhhh Is all Oger now.
#118 to #28 - imungo (06/12/2014) [-]
Damn look at all the fags smh
#91 to #28 - stealingbikes (06/12/2014) [-]
Wouldn't be your dick they're after, Sally
User avatar #101 to #28 - spartankillerbro (06/12/2014) [-]
They're gay, not rapist's.... Faggot
User avatar #39 to #28 - byobgraffpro ONLINE (06/11/2014) [-]
a simple 'no' can solve that problem
#61 to #28 - drtrousersnake ONLINE (06/12/2014) [-]
like you would be the dude in the relationship
like you would be the dude in the relationship
#42 to #28 - professorbob (06/12/2014) [-]
>implying we would want your dick in the first place
#55 to #42 - brokenhalf (06/12/2014) [-]
i read that in a sassy gay voice, and i have no idea why.
i read that in a sassy gay voice, and i have no idea why.
#58 to #55 - professorbob (06/12/2014) [-]
I know a guy that talks like that, although living in the Bible Belt I can't help but feel sorry for him. He can't open his mouth without somebody screaming "GAAAYYYYYY" at the top of their lungs, not even trying to be subtle in the slightest.
I know a guy that talks like that, although living in the Bible Belt I can't help but feel sorry for him. He can't open his mouth without somebody screaming "GAAAYYYYYY" at the top of their lungs, not even trying to be subtle in the slightest.
#60 to #58 - brokenhalf (06/12/2014) [-]
poor chap. must be pretty tough for him.
poor chap. must be pretty tough for him.
#62 to #60 - professorbob (06/12/2014) [-]
He's actually not a bad guy, and everybody knows that the people who insult him are faggots, anyway. I just hope his family is a little bit more understanding than mine.

<---- pic related, it's what will happen when I finally come out to my family

Sorry if I've been rambling, I don't usually get the chance to talk about this kind of thing.
User avatar #65 to #62 - brokenhalf (06/12/2014) [-]
people that have a problem with something like that are usually much worse then the people that they confront.

And good luck with coming out.

And a third note. you've definitely not been rambling. i've talked to quite a few people about this kind of subject. and if you need to talk again about it just message me. And i am straight and will probably never change that, but i have absolutely no problem with it. and on another note, my best friend in this world is gay, and just came out a few months back. i've never been prouder of him before that point.
#68 to #65 - professorbob (06/12/2014) [-]
Thanks man, that means a lot. I've never really had someone to talk to about what goes on in my life and what I think, so it's nice to meet somebody who actually cares for once.
Thanks man, that means a lot. I've never really had someone to talk to about what goes on in my life and what I think, so it's nice to meet somebody who actually cares for once.
#70 to #68 - brokenhalf (06/12/2014) [-]
Hey no problem man. Everyone should have at least one person that they can talk to, even if it is a stranger on the internet. the one thing i like about funnyjunk is that even though theres a lot of trolls, and assholes, the community (usually) will help people with their real life problems.
Hey no problem man. Everyone should have at least one person that they can talk to, even if it is a stranger on the internet. the one thing i like about funnyjunk is that even though theres a lot of trolls, and assholes, the community (usually) will help people with their real life problems.
#71 to #70 - professorbob (06/12/2014) [-]
Yeah, that's what I really like about our little slice of the internet. Anyway, thanks again.   
   
Also, have Hitler dancing with a cat, because internet.
Yeah, that's what I really like about our little slice of the internet. Anyway, thanks again.

Also, have Hitler dancing with a cat, because internet.
#72 to #71 - brokenhalf (06/12/2014) [-]
no problem mate. also this. also because internet
no problem mate. also this. also because internet
User avatar #104 to #42 - tehlulzbringer (06/12/2014) [-]
then why are gay guys all over me all the time
#115 to #104 - professorbob (06/12/2014) [-]
Because you are fabulous, obviously.
Because you are fabulous, obviously.
#44 to #28 - xredstar (06/12/2014) [-]
Those gay thoughts must haunt you pretty hard bro
Those gay thoughts must haunt you pretty hard bro
#30 to #28 - notjewelry (06/11/2014) [-]
Here's something
If girls don't want you, Guys sure as hell don't
You're a faggot
#31 to #28 - anon (06/11/2014) [-]
Gays don't like small dicks either.
#54 to #31 - anon (06/12/2014) [-]
....There's a kink for everything ....
#103 - baitdoesnttalkback (06/12/2014) [-]
this meme was used wrong. nothing is offensive in the seoond part
#93 - ztwenyeight (06/12/2014) [-]
**ztwenyeight rolled image** what i do with my dick
[ 128 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)